It seems that the original topic was a bit forgotten in favor of the forum vs.
ML vs. TJC (which is a good and intersting topic but no matter what tool we use
we will have to go back to the main question).
Just to try to steer the boat back on the original journey this the question
that David
Hi all
I am pleasantly surprised at the volume of traffic resulting from a
thread that I innocently kicked of that the weekend. Thanks for the
active and balanced discussion.
I probably won't be able to take an active part in the IRC meeting this
afternoon, as it is during the Swiss working
I've managed to isolate the problem. If I use the qmake.cmd which is the
default (proposed) command file for build/clean then warnings and errors
have the same icon and cannot double click on the icon so that the IDE can
take me directly to problematic line.
This happens in all cases and all templ
Hello!
I want to record VGA quality video with low bitrate, but i'm stuck at
using gst presets, just don't know how to change it.
I cloned almost everything from jolla-camera application:
https://github.com/CODeRUS/mitakuuluu2/blob/master/client/qml/Capture.qml
https://github.com/CODeRUS/mitak
Hi!
Thanks to everyone who've responded on
http://piratepad.net/SailfishOSSMeetings
Here's the invitation/reminder for tomorrow's meeting:
Date: 27 May 2014
Time: 15:00 UTC, for your local time: http://bit.ly/1pbJprh (note
different time from past couple of meetings)
Duration 90 minutes
Cha
Hi all,
I think Norman is bang on with the fragmentation issue. To address this I
propose a possible solution. Why not convert this mailing list to a 'virtual'
one; By that I mean move all discussion to a devel section on TJC and have the
mailing list be another frontend or interface if you l
Thanks for the lengthy discussion. Don't forget that the topic will also be
discussed tomorrow during the weekly sailfish OS meeting
(http://piratepad.net/SailfishOSSMeetings)
Please come and discuss on actions to be taken :)
Cheers,
Lucien
- Mail original -
De: "Thomas Tanghus"
À: "S
Hi everybody,
So, current situation is:
ML: official, could use, in dare times ;-), some moderation
TJC: official, nedd some improvements, but nobody can deny the success of Q&A sites (see Stackoverflow) as a dev
On Monday 26 May 2014 10:18 Luca Donaggio wrote:
> +1 for keeping this ML and (eventually) improving TJC.
>
> Personally, TJC currently suffers of one big drawback, which is not even
> technical: it is perceived more as a generic issue-reporting /
> feature-requesting tool than anything else.
> De
Thanks to all for the inputs! :)
On Mon, 26 May 2014 14:17:40 +0200
Martin Windolph wrote:
> Hi,
>
> my way was the opposite. I had an app for Windows and then went for Android.
> As Sailfish OS came out, I ported it to Sailfish OS. The porting afford to
> Sailfish OS was a lot higher than fo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I agree on these opinions too. So +1.
Cheers,
Leif-Jöran
Den 2014-05-26 10:18, Luca Donaggio skrev:
> +1 for keeping this ML and (eventually) improving TJC.
>
> Personally, TJC currently suffers of one big drawback, which is not even
> technical: it
Hi,
my way was the opposite. I had an app for Windows and then went for Android. As
Sailfish OS came out, I ported it to Sailfish OS. The porting afford to
Sailfish OS was a lot higher than for Android. So you are fine when using basic
QtQuick 2.0 there without any Silica (I use separate pro fi
yes qt5 for android is stable, no idea about ios, sorry. and QtQuick 2.x
modules are same for all platforms.
26.05.2014 18:07, mikete...@gmail.com пишет:
Hi in short time I'm going to 'port' my pure QML application to android and ios.
Currently I import QtQuick 2.0 and QtQuick.LocalStorage 2.0
Hi in short time I'm going to 'port' my pure QML application to android and ios.
Currently I import QtQuick 2.0 and QtQuick.LocalStorage 2.0
(and Sailfish.Silica 1.0)
I use LocalStorage and XMLHttpRequest, I try to keep it simple, I'm using only
Rectangle, Row, Text, TextInput, MouseArea, few an
On Monday 26 May 2014 11:23:34 Kimmo Lindholm wrote:
> Testing TJC with development issues;
>
> https://together.jolla.com/question/43768/dialogconnect-function-loses-its-p
> arent/
>
+1 to idea to try it there.
the good part is that once app-development etc. appeared one can subscribe to
it a
So, current situation is:
ML: official, could use, in dare times ;-), some moderation
TJC: official, nedd some improvements, but nobody can deny the success of
Q&A sites (see Stackoverflow) as a developer helping tool
TMO: unofficial, suits all the needs of forum estimators.
For official advice
Testing TJC with development issues;
https://together.jolla.com/question/43768/dialogconnect-function-loses-its-parent/
-kimmo
-Original Message-
From: devel-boun...@lists.sailfishos.org
[mailto:devel-boun...@lists.sailfishos.org] On Behalf Of Denis Zalevskiy
Sent: 26. toukokuuta 2014
On Monday 26 May 2014 11:03:14 sfietkonstan...@free.fr wrote:
> I went active on TMO while developing for SFOS.
> It's not even a habit but more about easiness to use.
>
> Forum have a clear hiearchy (better than TJC), and a thread system (like in
> ML). It's focused on discussion (unlike TJC), an
Hi,
I can't reproduce this in Windows XP either. I installer Win XP Pro SP3
(32 bit) and the warnings and errors show up just fine and warnings can
be filtered away.
Also I don't get the word "warning:" in front of the warning messages as
you can see in the picture I included in the previous
I went active on TMO while developing for SFOS.
It's not even a habit but more about easiness to use.
Forum have a clear hiearchy (better than TJC), and a thread system (like in
ML). It's focused on discussion (unlike TJC), and provides some useful tools
(edit, formatting, thanks button; better
On Monday 26 May 2014 10:18:00 Luca Donaggio wrote:
> +1 for keeping this ML and (eventually) improving TJC.
>
> Personally, TJC currently suffers of one big drawback, which is not even
> technical: it is perceived more as a generic issue-reporting /
> feature-requesting tool than anything else.
On Monday 26 May 2014 10:52:43 Andrea Bernabei wrote:
> I agree, sections and subsections are important, random tags can't take
> their role imho :/
>
> An alternative could be to force people to use only a LIMITED number of
> tags decided by Jolla?
>
> in that way we'd only have tags which basic
On Monday 26 May 2014 10:49:51 sfietkonstan...@free.fr wrote:
> +1
> TMO is often the forum of choice for many developers (me included), to
maybe because you are using TMO for a long time and have a habbit to use it ?
Also because many people who develop and developed for mobile linux also has
t
I agree, sections and subsections are important, random tags can't take
their role imho :/
An alternative could be to force people to use only a LIMITED number of
tags decided by Jolla?
in that way we'd only have tags which basically act as sections.
That means losing tags as we know it, and try
Without sections and subsection it is only ocean of mess. Mess of tags not
helped. :(
Kaacz
Mon May 26 2014 09:50:11 GMT+0200 (CEST), Stefano Mosconi napsal:
> On 26/05/14 10:21, Ruediger Gad wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > just to add a bit of my opinion as well.
> >
> > Just a mailing list is imho not e
+1
TMO is often the forum of choice for many developers (me included), to
communicate with users.
TJC could have taken this role, but the flat hiearchy, and the focus on QA, it
don't fit that much for a discussion (especially between users and devs).
- Mail original -
De: "Ruediger Gad"
On Monday 26 May 2014 10:07:04 Erlend Böe wrote:
> Hi Stefano
>
> first make Wifi actually work, then invest time in building a better Stack
> overflow/Forum.
> As it is, I stopped using my Jolla as my main phone. This was mainly due to
> not being able to connect to wifi at work, and having to
+1 for keeping this ML and (eventually) improving TJC.
Personally, TJC currently suffers of one big drawback, which is not even
technical: it is perceived more as a generic issue-reporting /
feature-requesting tool than anything else.
Developer related questions have always been reported on this M
On 05/26/2014 09:50 AM, Stefano Mosconi wrote:
> ...
>
> Should we invest our time into making a better together.jolla.com rather
> than a different platform (this is not rhetorical)?
Thanks for you answer, both Norbert and you. :)
Indeed, the time overhead to manage multiple platforms as well as
Hi,
personally, I like the structure of pages like stackoverflow and TJC a lot more
than usual forums, because of it's flat structure organized by tags. I don't
know if the usage of TJC for developer question irritates some users to much or
if the mixture can be even good so that a few wishes a
Hi Stefano
first make Wifi actually work, then invest time in building a better Stack
overflow/Forum.
As it is, I stopped using my Jolla as my main phone. This was mainly due to not
being able to connect to wifi at work, and having to reboot every 5 days.
Regards
Erlend
PS: Taking time to actu
To take TJC in use, atleast we need to agree a specific tag to be used;
(atm seems that there are few in use: app-development, development, silica,
qml, ...)
And then subscribe that tag, you got them all in your mail.
-kimmo
-Original Message-
From: devel-boun...@lists.sailfishos.org
[
You don't need to follow the forum...there are subscriptions, which you can
also enable by default on all threads, if you want a ML-like "send me an
email with the content of every new post"
2014-05-26 9:53 GMT+02:00 Norbert Wenzel :
> On 05/26/2014 09:21 AM, Ruediger Gad wrote:
> > Why not let
On 05/26/2014 09:21 AM, Ruediger Gad wrote:
> Why not let the users make the decision?
> I.e., we have a mailing list and a Q&A site already, just the forum is
> missing.
> So, if there were a forum as well, it would show over time how the usage
> and the user counts of the different infrastructure
On 26/05/14 10:21, Ruediger Gad wrote:
Hi,
just to add a bit of my opinion as well.
Just a mailing list is imho not enough.
Personally, I like a forum.
Even though, due to its nature(?), it might attract more OT discussion.
However, such OT discussion can be canalized by proper categorization,
Hi,
just to add a bit of my opinion as well.
Just a mailing list is imho not enough.
Personally, I like a forum.
Even though, due to its nature(?), it might attract more OT discussion.
However, such OT discussion can be canalized by proper categorization,
e.g., OT sections etc.
Canalizing discus
36 matches
Mail list logo
