Excerpts from Maciej Bliziński's message of Wed Aug 03 04:36:31 -0400 2011:
> I like the early detection of the issue. You could consider it a
> build recipe check, as opposed to a binary package check.
Fail fast is good, but doing the check in GAR removes the opportunity
to intentionally have t
2011/8/3 Ben Walton :
> I wonder if checkpkg isn't a better place for this check though?
> Separating package building from package verification makes sense to
> me.
I like the early detection of the issue. You could consider it a
build recipe check, as opposed to a binary package check.
Neverth
Excerpts from Maciej Blizinski's message of Mon Aug 01 12:15:57 -0400 2011:
> Works around ticket #56.
>
> http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gar/ticket/56
>
> Previous attempt at fixing it:
> http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gar/changeset/11424
If we're shelling out, why not offload the whole thi
Works around ticket #56.
http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gar/ticket/56
Previous attempt at fixing it:
http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gar/changeset/11424
---
gar/v2/gar.pkg.mk |9 -
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gar/v2/gar.pkg.mk b/gar/v2/gar.pkg.mk
