On 02/22/14 16:14, chnin...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> +/opt/csw/sbin/amd64
> +/opt/csw/sbin/i486
> +/opt/csw/sbin/pentium
Shouldn't this have been pentium_pro? (just an innocent question.)
--
Juraj Lutter
c directory.
Yep, lib/$(projname) or libexec/$(projname) would be more appropriate.
--
Juraj Lutter
___
devel mailing list
devel@lists.opencsw.org
https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 10/19/2012 03:42 PM, cgrze...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> +OBSOLTED_PKGS_CSWpy-dbus = CSWdbuspython
Small typo.
--
Juraj Lutter
___
devel mailing list
devel@lists.opencsw.org
https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
virtinst +=
> file-with-bad-content|/usr/share|root/opt/csw/lib/python/site-packages/virtinst/CapabilitiesParser.py
Please use REINPLACE to modify /usr/share -> /opt/csw/share in order to
avoid this override :-)
--
Juraj Lutter
___
devel mailing list
devel@lists.opencsw.org
https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 09/21/2012 12:53 PM, cgrze...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> +PACKAGING_PLATFORMS = Solaris10-sparc Solaris10-i386
This should be ``solaris10-'' with lowercase ``s'', afaik.
--
Juraj Lutter
___
devel mailing list
devel@
omq/trunk: Initial commit of zeromq build recipe
I know 0mq authors in person, I can probably report any issues to them.
--
Juraj Lutter
___
devel mailing list
devel@lists.opencsw.org
https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
= -m32 -xarch=sparc
> ARCHFLAGS_GCC3_sparcv8plus = -mcpu=v8 -mv8plus
> - ARCHFLAGS_GCC4_sparcv8plus = -mcpu=v8 -mv8plus
> + ARCHFLAGS_GCC4_sparcv8plus = -mcpu=v9
>MEMORYMODEL_sparcv8plus = 32
And when I am at it, I've also changed mcpu to proper "v9
Wouldn't it be better to use:
#ifndef _PATH_DEVULL
#define _PATH_DEVNULL "/dev/null"
#endif /* _PATH_DEVNULL */
rather than #ifndef __sun? In that case the patch can be accepted by
upstream as it seems less platform-dependent.
--
Juraj Lutter
___
devel mailing list
devel@lists.opencsw.org
https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
