On 2025-04-23 09:38, Peter Krempa wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 16:33:03 +0100, Shalini Chellathurai Saroja
wrote:
Let us introduce the xml and reply files for QEMU 10.0.0 on s390x.
Notable changes:
- new s390-ccw-virtio-10.0 machine type
- old machine types (2.4 - 2.8) dropped
- n
On 4/29/25 12:57 PM, Pierrick Bouvier wrote:
On 4/29/25 2:35 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
If a distro wants to name a binary 'qemu-kvm' it can drop the
-target option and hard-wire its target_info() to a distro-specific
TargetInfo implementation, or &target_info_x86_64_system.
Having upd
On 4/29/25 10:40 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 29/04/2025 21.48, Pierrick Bouvier wrote:
...
I'm not keen to have a default target set, but it's a personal opinion based
on fear of "implicit smart choice hurts", so I'll be happy to change my mind
with a good argument for it.
No default target, ple
On 4/29/25 2:35 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
If a distro wants to name a binary 'qemu-kvm' it can drop the
-target option and hard-wire its target_info() to a distro-specific
TargetInfo implementation, or &target_info_x86_64_system.
Having updated my Debian stable to next stable (trixie)
On 4/29/25 2:20 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 29/04/2025 10.23, Markus Armbruster wrote:
...
I don't wish to derail this thread, but we've been dancing around the
question of how to best fix the target for some time. I think we should
talk about it for real.
Sure, and no problem about that, that
On 4/29/25 1:37 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 09:43:24AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Pierrick Bouvier writes:
After looking at the introspection code, I don't see any major blocker.
We need to keep some of existing "if", as they are based on config-host,
and should
On 4/29/25 12:43 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Pierrick Bouvier writes:
On 4/25/25 11:21 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Trouble is some uses of the second kind are in QAPI conditionals. I can
see three options:
(1) Drop these conditionals.
(2) Replace them by run-time checks.
(3) Have target
I have just tagged v11.3.0-rc2 in the repository and pushed signed
tarballs to https://download.libvirt.org/
Please give the release candidate some testing and in case you find a
serious issue which should have a fix in the upcoming release, feel
free to reply to this thread to make sure the issue
On 29/04/2025 15.15, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
We remove versioned machine types on a fixed schedule. This allows us
to auto-generate a paragraph in the removed-features.rst document that
always has accurate version info.
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé
---
docs/about/removed-features.rst |
On 4/30/25 12:16, Thomas Huth via Devel wrote:
On 29/04/2025 15.15, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
We remove versioned machine types on a fixed schedule. This allows us
to auto-generate a paragraph in the removed-features.rst document that
always has accurate version info.
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. B
10 matches
Mail list logo
