On Tue, 1 Apr 2025 at 14:22, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 10:55:28AM +0200, Alessandro wrote:
> > We attempted multiple ways to clean up dynamic files; however, we must
> > preserve user overrides, which requires keeping the file
> > /etc/apparmor.d/libvirt/libvirt-uuid
> >
On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 08:12:11AM -0700, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 03:24:10PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 07:15:46AM -0700, Andrea Bolognani via Devel wrote:
> > > More importantly, I'm not convinced that you can just start deleting
> > > th
We attempted multiple ways to clean up dynamic files; however, we must
preserve user overrides, which requires keeping the file
/etc/apparmor.d/libvirt/libvirt-uuid
This commit proposes to move user overrides into
/etc/apparmor.d/libvirt/libvirt-uuid.local and include it, if present,
unconditional
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 14:36:50 +0100, Michal Prívozník wrote:
> On 2/20/25 23:26, Ján Tomko wrote:
> > Similarly to `desc` and `net-desc`, return an empty string if
> > there is no metadata to be returned.
> >
> > https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-27172
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ján Tomko
> >
>> tmp = g_strdup_printf(" #include %s\n",
>> ifexists, ctl->uuid);
>> +tmp_local = g_strdup_printf(" #include
>> %s\n", ifexists, ctl->uuid);
>> +new_tmp = g_strconcat(tmp, tmp_local, NULL);
>> +g_free(tmp);
>> +tmp = g_steal_point
On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 05:12:35AM +0200, Ján Tomko via Devel wrote:
See patch 3/7 (7/3 for Americans) for the reasoning
Ján Tomko (7):
Add a copy of the Sandwich license
remote: do not generate the qemu protocol header
Deprecate the QEMU driver
meson: remove all references to QEMU
Remove s
The 11.2.0 release of both libvirt and libvirt-python is tagged and
signed tarballs are available at
https://download.libvirt.org/
https://download.libvirt.org/python/
Thanks everybody who helped with this release by sending patches,
reviewing, testing, or providing feedback. Your work is
From: Ján Tomko
Signed-off-by: Ján Tomko
---
NEWS.rst | 64 +++-
1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/NEWS.rst b/NEWS.rst
index 03efead80f..9a8611ccb0 100644
--- a/NEWS.rst
+++ b/NEWS.rst
@@ -8,7 +8,23 @@ the changes
On a Friday in 2025, Peter Krempa via Devel wrote:
From: Peter Krempa
Use a 'switch' statement instead of a bunch of if statements to do
validation and selection what to parse.
Remove the pre-clearing of the struct as we always alocate cleared
allocate
memory for it and we can reorder assi
From: Daniel P. Berrangé
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé
---
NEWS.rst | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/NEWS.rst b/NEWS.rst
index 0cb11313cd..d359bc5a32 100644
--- a/NEWS.rst
+++ b/NEWS.rst
@@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ v11.3.0 (unreleased)
* **Removed features**
+ * Support for
On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 10:55:28AM +0200, Alessandro wrote:
> We attempted multiple ways to clean up dynamic files; however, we must
> preserve user overrides, which requires keeping the file
> /etc/apparmor.d/libvirt/libvirt-uuid
>
> This commit proposes to move user overrides into
> /etc/apparmor
Alexander Shursha wrote:
> The current virpci code uses the Linux-specific sysfs subsystem, which makes
> it impossible to use on other Unix-like systems. The libpciaccess library
> provides a cross-platform API for accessing the PCI bus. Employ it to make
> the code portable.
>
> This makes li
On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 03:24:10PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 07:15:46AM -0700, Andrea Bolognani via Devel wrote:
> > More importantly, I'm not convinced that you can just start deleting
> > that file unconditionally. Since, as you note, it's explicitly
> > documente
On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 18:57:30 +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> For change, pause, resume, complete, dismiss and finalize actions
> corresponding job- and block-job commands are almost equal. The
> difference is in find_block_job_locked() vs find_job_locked()
> functions. What's diffe
Alexander Shursha wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Shursha
> ---
> src/bhyve/bhyve_parse_command.c | 60 +++
> .../bhyveargv2xml-passthru.args | 7 +++
> .../bhyveargv2xml-passthru.xml| 22 +++
> tests/bhyveargv2xmltest.c
Alexander Shursha wrote:
> It is used to pass a PCI device from the host to a bhyve guest
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Shursha
> ---
> src/bhyve/bhyve_command.c | 24
> .../bhyvexml2argv-passthru.args | 9 ++
> .../bhyvexml2argv-passthru
>-Original Message-
>From: Jim Fehlig
>Subject: Re: [PATCH rfcv4 06/13] qemu: Add command line and validation for TDX
>type
>
>On 5/24/24 00:21, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
>> QEMU will provides 'tdx-guest' object which is used to launch encrypted
>> VMs on Intel platform using TDX feature.
>>
On a Friday in 2025, Peter Krempa via Devel wrote:
See 6/8 for justification.
Peter Krempa (8):
virDomainStorageNetworkParseHost: Remove unpopulated 'transport'
variable
virDomainStorageNetworkParseHost: Refactor cleanup
conf: Introduce VIR_STORAGE_NET_HOST_TRANS_FD
virStorageNetHostDefCl
On a Tuesday in 2025, Daniel P. Berrangé via Devel wrote:
From: Daniel P. Berrangé
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé
---
NEWS.rst | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/NEWS.rst b/NEWS.rst
index 0cb11313cd..d359bc5a32 100644
--- a/NEWS.rst
+++ b/NEWS.rst
@@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ v11.3.0
On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 07:30:02PM +0200, Alessandro wrote:
> We attempted multiple ways to clean up dynamic files; however, we must
> preserve user overrides, which requires keeping the file
> /etc/apparmor.d/libvirt/libvirt-uuid
>
> This commit proposes to move user overrides into
> /etc/apparmo
On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 04:00:42PM +0200, Alessandro wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Apr 2025 at 14:22, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 10:55:28AM +0200, Alessandro wrote:
> > > We attempted multiple ways to clean up dynamic files; however, we must
> > > preserve user overrides, which requi
On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 07:15:46AM -0700, Andrea Bolognani via Devel wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 04:00:42PM +0200, Alessandro wrote:
> > On Tue, 1 Apr 2025 at 14:22, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 10:55:28AM +0200, Alessandro wrote:
> > > > We attempted multiple ways to
For change, pause, resume, complete, dismiss and finalize actions
corresponding job- and block-job commands are almost equal. The
difference is in find_block_job_locked() vs find_job_locked()
functions. What's different?
1. find_block_job_locked() do check, is found job a block-job. This OK
whe
23 matches
Mail list logo
