Greetings,
I am very aware this is not the place for user questions. This is also where
the likelihood of an answer /at all/ are the highest. So, please bear with me;
at the bottom[fn:1] are all the other places where I tried to find hints
before posting here.
The issue is that I upgraded my c
> Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 13:00:13 +0200
> From: Petr Pisar
> Subject: Re: Transitioning scripts relying on libcgroup-tools to the
> cgroup’s unified hierarchy (v2)
>
[…]
> cgcreate tool comes from libcgroup-tools-0:0.42.2-1.fc32 package that comes
> from libcgroup project sources, and libcgroup
> On 12/05/2020 14:13, Petr Pisar wrote:
> ...
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 12:47:51PM +, virgo wrote:
> >> I recommend you to ask the question about v2 support on Fedora Bugzilla
> >> for=
> >>
> >> the
> >>
> >&g
> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 12:47:51PM +0000, virgo wrote:
> ...
>
> > I recommend you to ask the question about v2 support on Fedora
>
> Bugzilla for=
>
> > the
> >
> > libcgroup package
> > <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi
> On Di, 12.05.20 14:21, Fedora Development ML
> (devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org) wrote:
>
> ...
>
> cgroupsv2 is built around a single-writer scheme. That means any
> section of the tree shall only have a singler writer, i.e. one
> subsystem 'owning' it. On systemd systems the root of the tree
> > On 12/05/2020 15:06, virgo wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > Let’s say I want to compile `pandoc` with modifications of my own and
> >
> > many non-
> >
> > default compiler options. At the same time, on the same machine, I still
> >
> From: Samuel Sieb
> […]
> Please fix your email client. Every reply you send starts a new thread.
I saw that, my apologies.
> Are you actually using the Pandora email client? It's still being =
> developed? Unfortunately, it appears to not create any of the proper =
> headers.
No, I am not u
> From: Samuel Sieb
> […]
> Are you actually using the Pandora email client? It's still being =
> developed? Unfortunately, it appears to not create any of the proper =
> headers.
No, I am not using that.
The thing is, any post at lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/… has a clickable
“⤣ Reply” U
Greetings,
The LLVM project has been providing a C++ ABI for a while [1]. A naive user
like I'm would presume Fedora easily ships with that, as the saying goes:
“Fedora is a developer-friendly distro.” Unfortunately, that isn't the case for
this instance and if one is using clang++, they have t
> I'm not sure if I follow. Supporting multiple C++ ABIs would make
> things more complicated for developers because they now have to figure
> out which ABI their project needs and if all the libraries they want to
>> Alas, clang++ now needs to link against the GCC ABI to successfully compile.
> what actual problem is caused by that?
Please read instead “Alas, clang++ currently needs to link against the GCC ABI
to successfully compile.”
The problem is that one might want to use libstdc++ (GCC) and libc++ (L
> I'll take on the review,
Thank you so much for stepping in, this is mostly appreciated.
> but you really should consider becoming
> involved in Fedora as a packager, as any packager can review another
> packagers packages proposed for inclusion into Fedora.
I am a slow learner, but there is some
> So what? Why is that a problem?
> Does the libc++abi have better performance for exception handling?
> Smaller footprint for RTTI?
> More new features, such as C++17's std::uncaight_exceptions()?
> Just because there's a different low-level C++ runtime library
> available doesn't mean that using
[…]
This is getting out of hand, so I logged straight into the web client.
> Ok, I understand what's happening. Your email client doesn't recognize
> the in-reply-to option from the url.
Exactly; I will enquire and send a bug report.
> Why are replying from there instead of using your email cli
Greetings,
The sole purpose of this thread is to bring attention to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646930
Unreliable time on the system is a daily annoyance that will be easily fixed by
aligning the Fedora version with the upstream's. Could someone ping the package
maintainer? Al
Thanks to everybody for the quick response. As you'll see in the ticket thread,
the maintainer is now handling the update.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora
Here is a proof-of-concept one-liner (split up a bit for readability purposes):
```fish
#!/usr/bin/fish
function get_dependent_pkgs
dnf -q repoquery --repo=koji --qf='%{sourcerpm}' --whatrequires $argv[1]
end
function parse_names
get_dependent_pkgs | rev | cut -d/ -f1 | cut -d- -f3- | re
17 matches
Mail list logo
