perhaps even
become
active contributors.
People **will** bitch about being able to read the password as they type
it. "Any
Press
is Good Press" is a bromide that Fedora shouldn't test.
- Pete Travis
- Fedora Docs Project Leader
- 'randomuser' on freenode
- immane
; > make decisions and if you don't like it "too bad".
> >
> > Even if that is true, what is your point?
>
> That you are replying to a 4 days old email on a thread that is no
> longer active?
FOUR DAYS is "no longer active" for you? Seriously?
You want
base for marketing materials like
release announcements and talking points. These interesting changes might
miss marketing attention and press interest they would otherwise have
benefited from.
The public at large reads the Release Notes (albeit often secondhand) and
accepts them as the representation of the package maintainers' work. The
docs writers can create a better product with developer help, and we're
asking for input on how to make that process work.
--Pete
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
someone there splitting
texlive into 2500 subpackages and then 100 angry contributors
reverting it. What are they going to do in their "open" model then?
-- Pete
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
t checkout $sourcebranch --
relative/path/to/file"
to pull $file from $sourcebranch to $targetbranch. Globbing with * works,
too. I have no idea if this is the best approach, but it works for my
purposes.
--Pete
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
ll or
rpm without repo? The users that need help with security the most are the
users that will follow the inline instructions by rote, without searching
the repositories.
--Pete
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
applications and
other packages, ie back end dependencies, system libraries, texlive
packages? What role do maintainers have in making this distinction, and by
what process?
Where does the additional user facing metadata live? How can maintainers
provide it for their packages, an
picked it up so it doesn't get retired at least. Pete--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
uses cairo for
> drawing ( master f24 f23 f22 )
> rpms/pygoocanvas -- GooCanvas python bindings ( master f24 f23 f22 )
I picked these 4 up, co-maintainers welcome.
Pete
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
review request?
> >
> > A review swap is welcome.
> >
> > Regards,
> > --
> > José Abílio
> > --
>
>
>
> --
> -Igor Gnatenko
> --
Hey Jose, I saw your other mail about this but procrastinated responding.
Thanks for resurrecting t
trying to get rid of openstack-swift,
and it's failing.
I guess I'd be okay with an explanation why it's not allowed and why
I have to leave a stub RPM with the same name as the spec/SRPM. But it
would be the best if someone has an example that I can steal.
-- Pete
--
devel mai
created.
Thanks a lot, I was able to update the spec.
-- Pete
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
packaged files found. But this case is
different, as above.
Does anyone have any guesses about what's going on?
Thanks in advance,
-- Pete
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
can't deal with this binary.
-- Pete
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Welcome, also come see us in #lad #opensourcemusicians on freenode irc
On Sep 7, 2016 2:58 AM, "Giovanni" wrote:
> Welcome :)
>
> --
> 010 Giovanni [dacav] Simoni
> 001
> 111
> OpenPGP key: 93FC 2A6A 43A4 AAC2 0D8E 5411 2F99 ABB6 BA14 DF9E
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedorapro
and rote verification of a checklist, and the
list does often address /etc/shells. IMO disruption of those expectations
does warrant a Change proposal.
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=53963#c0
> [2]
https://lists.fedoraprojec
documentation?
--Pete
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
ents above. Presenting
this as a playground for inexperienced users negates the benefit of
curation and compounds the very problems I think it should solve. Not that
the functionality shouldn't be there, of course, but the presentation
should stress quality over extensibility.
--Pete
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
s to insert itself between
OpenStack and OpenVSwitch (or actually anything that implements OpenFlow).
What's the purpose of adding the layer, and how is it different from
what Quantum is doing now? There has to be some kind of specific benefit.
-- Pete
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedorap
#x27;t react to network usage
> dynamically.
Thanks a lot, that explains it.
-- Pete
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
27;nothing, we just
have to accept what they ship' then there isn't much to say. If there is
room for a feedback loop, what would it look like?
--Pete
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
ving a new version shouldn't
break existing deployments unless they are served out of /usr/share/, and
that doesn't seem sane. The update would then be available, not imposed.
--Pete
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Feb 9, 2013 3:47 AM, "Aaron Gray" wrote:
>
> On 7 February 2013 16:41, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
wrote:
>>
>> On 02/07/2013 04:23 PM, Aaron Gray wrote:
>>>
>>> Can someone who knows firewalld please do a HOWTO to on setting up a
secondary DHCP with DNS and HTTPS access for PXEBOOTing of Fedora18
On Feb 14, 2013 12:03 PM, "Pete Travis" wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 9, 2013 3:47 AM, "Aaron Gray" wrote:
> >
> > On 7 February 2013 16:41, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
wrote:
> >>
> >> On 02/07/2013 04:23 PM, Aaron Gray wrote:
> >&g
On Feb 15, 2013 6:39 AM, "Aaron Gray" wrote:
>
> Pete,
>
> Yeah that's the easy bits, they need details too. The bit I have yet to
find out how to do is to forward HTTPS and DNS ports between the
primary internet network and the secondary DHCP BOOTP network on
192.168
On Feb 15, 2013 5:34 AM, "Adam Williamson" wrote:
>
> On 08/02/13 01:36 PM, Pete Travis wrote:
.
>>
>> I haven't poked at mediawiki in a while, so please correct me if I'm
>> wrong, but isn't it fairly self contained? I recall copying the content
c19.x86_64
openstack-keystone-2013.1-0.2.g2.fc19.noarch
Weird thing is, I'm not trying to migrate anything anywhere.
Just launching a new Keystone with "keystone-manage db_sync".
Does it work for anyone else?
Thanks,
-- Pete
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https:
the use cases where it doesn't work, what about dropping a bootloader
config spoke into anaconda, or revealing the appropriate features in
kickstart options? Perhaps probing to test for dual boot to determine if a
brief timeout should be the default?
--Pete
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
cts.org is getting a new backend, and possibly new
presentation if I, or someone, can work up some CSS for the Fedora publican
brand. We've discussed shipping guide rpms in the user repositories, and
even gnome-shell search integration after that. We've casually discussed
posting smalle
On Mar 13, 2013 1:55 PM, "Rahul Sundaram" wrote:
>
> On 03/13/2013 02:52 PM, Pete Travis wrote:
>>
>> .
>>
>> Guides are getting updated too, of course. More writers make for better
docs, so if you want that for our users, please help write docs instead of
gt;> programs).
>
> Here you go
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Documentation_Security_Beat
>
> Rahul
>
> --
That is an excellent explanation, thanks Rahul!
--Pete
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
ngo14
>
>
> --
> Kalev
>
> --
transifex-client is probably seeing a lot more use ( at least on my desk :)
It still seems openly active at
https://github.com/transifex/transifex-client . I doubt they will change
that - it's mostly just pycurl talking to an API, no secret s
Taking this one; I used it just recently and don't want to be surprised if
I need it again.
--Pete
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
7;t be so bad
to get things rolling with a comaintainer that does have that experience.
Bonus, its one more thing to check off my "We can't use Linux because"
list.
What do you say, Ed? If I get the package review done, will you help with
bugs and maintenance?
--Pete
--
devel m
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Suchakra <mailto:sucha...@fedoraproject.org>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > What do you say, Ed? If I get the package review done, will you
> help with
> > bugs and maintenance?
> >
> > --Pete
>
>
ge for the maintainers involved. Please reply here with
any concerns about this process that might not have occurred to me.
[0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126521
[1] https://immanetize.fedorapeople.org/python-dateutil.requires
- --
- -- Pete Travis
- Fedora Docs Proj
Where can we
follow along with that effort? Starting with, say, how I might change
`nikola runserver` or `django-admin runserver` to ask for the port, and
ending with the resulting UI that asks me for approval?
If we want actual progress, it doesn't happen because of controversial
compromi
On Dec 9, 2014 11:33 AM, "Chuck Anderson" wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 11:16:54AM -0700, Pete Travis wrote:
> > But seriously, there's an implication in this thread that there will be
> > work happening to give stuff a path to ask for an open port. Where
On Dec 9, 2014 12:06 PM, "Chuck Anderson" wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 11:52:01AM -0700, Pete Travis wrote:
> > On Dec 9, 2014 11:33 AM, "Chuck Anderson" wrote:
> > I should have said "ask firewalld for a port to be opened" - sorry
lopment environment. I recall dev servers being cited as use cases as
well. If the only problem you have with the firewall config is the way it
is described in the RNs, I'm tempted to change it just to end the stop
energy put into what *could be* a productive discussion.
--Pete
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Dec 9, 2014 12:38 PM, "Chuck Anderson" wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 12:09:23PM -0700, Pete Travis wrote:
> > On Dec 9, 2014 12:06 PM, "Chuck Anderson" wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 11:52:01AM -0700, Pete Travis wrote:
> &
On Dec 9, 2014 12:55 PM, "Reindl Harald" wrote:
>
>
> Am 09.12.2014 um 20:51 schrieb Pete Travis:
>
>> Hmm... a whitelist of things that are allowed to ask for firewall
>> accommodation doesn't help me develop new applications at all. And
>> you&#
On Dec 9, 2014 1:31 PM, "Reindl Harald" wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 09.12.2014 um 21:25 schrieb Pete Travis:
>
>> Lets say I do have an understanding of network basics, just for the sake
>> of argument. I share my application with you. The application is
>>
heir
grabbed-off-the-shelf tools break more easily and sooner, while mine
operate reliably through hard use. The experience is just more pleasant,
the user more productive, the quality of the end product noticeably better.
An OS is also a tool. You don't have to be a professional developer t
media, blog posts, etc.
Can you work in similar signal for end users? Besides the online content,
I think even an integrated warning from within the GNOME session would be
cool. I could show you a dozen examples from ask.fp.o where users
encounter a "404, your repo has gone away&qu
On Jan 7, 2015 7:23 AM, "drago01" wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Pete Travis wrote:
> >
> > On Jan 7, 2015 6:00 AM, "Richard Hughes" wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm planning to delete
> >> https://copr.fedoraproject.org/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/08/2014 09:47 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 09:10:59AM -0700, Pete Travis wrote:
>> On Dec 8, 2014 8:51 AM, "Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek"
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On
ly? Or what? Why is everyone so
fixated on Unbound?
-- Pete
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 11:22:57 +0100
Marcel Oliver wrote:
> Are these considered bugs that I should file against the package? Is
> there a policy that applies?
I think you should file. I had in the past made maintainers of gvim
(vim-X11) and evince take action to fix this.
-- Pete
--
re, have answered inane questions from me at
one time or another :P Sometimes more process and more guides can help,
and sometimes you just need to bounce your understanding of the subject
off someone to clear up misconceptions and gain a little confidence.
That part isn't broken, but may
l enough to be usable, and cleanly fall
back? That's probably a big ask, though; presumably this can be set one
way or another by the user?
--Pete
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
ent to produce an lxqt spin, or is this simply a publicity
change for the existing packages? What's new here?
--Pete
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
r could break?
I understand these are relatively ignorant questions, but if the aim is to
provide a path for someone to maintain older JDKs it seems better to offer
them guidelines and best practices instead of "you'd better be competent
enough to figure it out". They might not thi
d it 4 times in the
past 12 years while restricted it to "kernel.sysrq = 20" long before the
systemd change
>
> it's such a bad idea to *not* optimize out-of-the box for security
>
> the ones which don't care can disable it, most won't care, nor have a
need nor
project.org/pkgdb/packager/sundaram/
>
> Rahul
>
>
I'll take python-dateutil15, and see it through to retirement once the
last of the dependencies are gone.
I see you've already retired askbot - any sign from upstream that
they'll support a newer django within a reasonable
On Feb 26, 2015 9:01 AM, "Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek"
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 08:51:46AM -0700, Pete Travis wrote:
> > The only time I've needed sysrq reboots in recent memory was while
running
> > rawhide and knowingly venturing into uncharted territ
jiben). My intention is to keep maintaining the webkitgtk3 package until
bijiben gets ported to something else.
I took ownership in pkgdb, but it appears to be still blocked in koji. Does
anyone know how I can get it unblocked?
Pete
14.03.2017, 19:29, "Michael Catanzaro" :
> On Mon, 20
... I've never done that before, any pointers to how I can make
that happen?
--
kind regards,
David Sommerseth
File a PR or issue at https://pagure.io/release-notes and I'll follow up on
it. An issue would be best at the moment, there's a bit of prep work to do
for the F26 branch.
-- Pete
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
-DINTEL_SSSE3 -msse4.1 -DINTEL_SSE41 -msse4.2 -DINTEL_SSE42 -mavx -DINTEL_AVX
-DARCH_64 -c erasurecode.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/liberasurecode_la-erasurecode.o
So, what now? I have no clue where to start fixing this.
Thanks in advance for any suggestions,
-- Pete
_
On Mon, 22 May 2017 23:00:14 -0600
Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> As much as I can tell, there's nothing custom in CFLAGS in Makefile.am,
> everything is inherited from RPM somehow. Here's how the actual line
> looks like in Koji logs:
Hate to reply to myself, but I'm an idiot
f liberasurecode, the library itself is by definition
is a switcher shim. Those that want performance specify the fastest Galois
Field implementation and liberasurecode then uses -ldl. The fastsest
known module for Intel CPUs is their in-house ISA-L library.
-- Pete
bodhi.client.bindings
instead.
DeprecationWarning)
All the packages are up to date... or so I think (fedpkg-1.28-1.fc25.noarch,
python-fedora-0.9.0-3.fc25.noarch). Is there something I need to steal from
Rawhide or what?
-- Pete
___
devel mailing list -- devel
s as much an
introduction to the community as a verification that someone understands
the guidelines. It was valuable to me as a new packager in this context,
and there is a lot of potential for the process to foster a sense of
collaboration and community.
--Pete
--
devel mailing list
dev
ject using
Fedora/fedorahosted resources. For this discussion, citing, oh, the cobbler
mailing list would be just as effective.
--Pete
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
e tooling out
there to enable a mirror with only your required packages; if not, you can
create a wrapper script for it. Something like --excludes=$("yum list all"
- "yum list installed") might do. [not actual code]
--Pete
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
line.
>
> Tim
>
>
> --
Hmm... It sounds like yumex would be much more discoverable if it included
an appdata file :)
--Pete
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
m using it
as a disposable rawhide playground now.
If anyone really wants to hack out support for this I'd be happy to ship it
to them.
--Pete
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
gt; less) "foolproof"?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Tim
>
Enough people have asked this sort of question that Chris Roberts and I
started hacking on a Guide to address it. Suggestions, criticisms, or
contributions are equally welcome.
[1] https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/docs/multiboot
[1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/docs/2013-November/015317.html
[2] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/docs/2013-November/015337.html
- --
- -- Pete Travis
- Fedora Docs Project Leader
- 'randomuser' on freenode
- immanet...@fedoraproject.org
-BEGIN PGP
bird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAlLhd8QACgkQeiVVYja6o6N1WgCgqGU51RjTv4/uizYPOV5HSBhE
> WFkAoLAl4Twg3iHIBgEx1O5++juLlaXH
> =rNyt
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
> --
Is there something inherent to COPRs that solves the problem of duplicate
paths, ie /usr/bin/m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, I'd like to swap reviews with someone for a font I've packaged up[1] .
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050805
- --
- -- Pete Travis
- Fedora Docs Project Leader
- 'randomuser' on freenode
- immanet.
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
> http://www.happyassassin.net
>
>
I've done it, and it was indeed an angry and detailed process, so I decided
it probably wasn't something I wanted to advise people to do.
--Pete
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
N is released, ie:
"You filed this bug against Fedora 19, and Fedora 20 has recently been
released. A new Fedora release includes a version update for many
packages, and your issue may have been resolved. Please consider checking
to see if your issue persists in Fedora 20 and updating thi
new address. Will follow up if
> > > I get a response.
> >
> > Laura says she has no time to work on Fedora packaging. The packages
> > can be orphaned. I'll see if I can get our new documentation manager
> > to pick them up.
>
> ok. Note that t
> docs and marketing teams directly.
>
> josh
> --
FWIW, to get attention for a new package in the release notes process, you
can simply set the review ticket's fedora_requires_release_notes flag to ?.
--Pete
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
ts for some time, and would definitely be interested
in the results from a SIG, thanks Miro! Probably not much time to
contribute beyond documentation I'm already doing, but that could be
improved with some guidance.
--Pete
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
20.03.2016, 10:49, "Igor Gnatenko" :I'm updating libgit2 stack to 0.24.0 in rawhide. Can you do it in F24 as well, please? Thanks--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
This might also be interesting for Docs people.
--Pete
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
doing a
lot more manual work when updating foobar because upstream's declared
requirements simply are not useful in a distribution packaging context.
-- Pete
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
boot this way. It would be more
important for RHEL users than Fedora users, I assume.
--Pete
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, 21 Dec 2016 00:18:47 +0100
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> I've attached the list of failed packages (failed.txt). You can search
python-ceilometerclient
python-keystoneclient
python-manilaclient
python-swiftclient
These are victims of python-oslo-sphinx, needs a new release:
https://bugzilla.r
Hi,I am in the process of updating icu from 65.1 to 67.1 in rawhide. This comes with a soname bump, but as usual, I'm including a compat package providing the old soname to not break the world while the rebuilds are in progress, so no rawhide breakage is expected. I'll work on the rebuilds over the
ile
> on.
Well said. I have also stayed quiet for much the same reasons, but I support
what Kevin and Miro and others are saying.
It's definitely just not 4 noisy individuals. I'd even go as far as saying that
most of the community here agrees with what they are saying.
Pete
__
he weekend.
Have a good weekend!
Pete
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List
s and containers and special-purpose machines.
>
> I would support this change if there were plausible scenarios where the
> password is unset by mistake. But the only case cited so far is the puppet
> mistake where the admins scripted 'passwd -d root' and then forgot a
Go vote now before the vote closes! Otherwise you'll miss this crucial chance
to choose whether Fedora should support modularity or not.
https://elections.fedoraproject.org/
Pete
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubs
I'll submit mesa to stable after you've
submitted llvm so they end up going out at the same time.
Thanks,
Pete
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
F
Hi everybody,
I'm orphaning the percona-xtrabackup package. It's fallen behind the
upstream and doesn't build in F32. I no longer need the package for work
(the Trove OpenStack project) and don't have the time to maintain it any
longer.
\Pete
--
Pete MacKinnon
Principal S
For months!? This is the first email I get from you. Just for the record, I am
around, but have 0 interest in EPEL 8 as of the moment.
Pete
21.03.2020, 08:41, "Neal Gompa" :
> Hello all,
>
> I've been trying to get in touch with Pete Walter for a few months now
Sure, I've bumped the access level and please go ahead. Thanks for asking
nicely (instead of demanding like Neal Gompa did ...).
Pete
21.03.2020, 15:20, "Pierre-Yves Chibon" :
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 10:02:18AM +, Pete Walter wrote:
>> For months!? This is the fi
21.03.2020, 10:15, "Neal Gompa" :
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 6:02 AM Pete Walter wrote:
>> For months!? This is the first email I get from you. Just for the record, I
>> am around, but have 0 interest in EPEL 8 as of the moment.
>
> In that case, I'd be happy
ake an argument that it is different there because gtk
has longer lifetime than libmodulemd, but it still makes sense to do things
right if we can and not make packages unnecessarily conflict. It's just good
design that way.
Pete
___
devel mailing
11.12.2018, 10:29, "Fabio Valentini" :
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 11:05 AM Pete Walter wrote:
>> Huh, better to conflict? That's just not true. Conflicting packages are a
>> major hurdle that we should try to avoid if at all possible. If it's still
>&g
continue using the compat package.
Thanks,
Pete
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Gu
thing to modules/flatpak, but that fails again
with the familiar missing buildrequires error:
$ fedpkg module-build
Submitting the module build...
Could not execute module_build: The build failed with:
None of the base module (platform or bootstrap) streams in the buildrequires
section cou
01.02.2019, 04:06, "Owen Taylor" :
> Thanks for trying it out, and sorry that you are having problems!
Thanks Owen! That was super helpful. Got it to build now and submitted the
update to bodhi:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-FLATPAK-2019-a92
02.02.2019, 15:54, "Rex Dieter" :
> Rolling back is still probably the "right thing to do(tm)"
Completely agree. Thanks for fixing it, Caolán!
Pete
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe se
There seems to be an issue with moving builds over. Everything seems to be stuck in f30-pending and not getting tagged with f30. I'm also concerned that once the signing queue starts moving, it's going to tag older packages over the new builds that have happened in the mean time. Pete
Looking at the build log, it seems to be checking for 'libpcre = 8.41', but the
build root has 8.43-RC1 which causes the build to error out.
Pete
12.02.2019, 20:43, "jt" :
> Hi All,
>
> I am looking at the FTBFS for hyperscan[0] and need some assistance.
> Fr
12.02.2019, 21:16, "jt" :
> On Tue, 2019-02-12 at 16:13 -0500, jt wrote:
>> On Tue, 2019-02-12 at 21:06 +, Pete Walter wrote:
>> > Looking at the build log, it seems to be checking for 'libpcre =
>> > 8.41', but the build root has 8.4
101 - 200 of 234 matches
Mail list logo
