On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 2:06 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 02.08.10 23:50, pbrobin...@gmail.com (pbrobin...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> > So, I guess what I want to say is: I will return full-time to PA not so
>> > far away. And I have a queue of patches in my ch
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 08:32:07PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
>> Rawhide (dist-f14) now has python 2.7
>
> I have a machine which run rawhide since F11 times. Recently upgrade to
> python2.7 failed because of "rhpl" package. rhpl was removed
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> Orphan: nas
>> gstreamer-plugins-bad-free requires nas-devel = 1.9.1-6.fc12
>> gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-extras requires libaudio.so.2
>> speech-dispatcher requires libaudio.so.2
>> speech-dispatcher
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 2:04 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 10:46 +, Petr Pisar wrote:
>
>> PulseAudio is interresting project, but it's absolutely unusable on old
>> slow hardware. Last time I checked it out on Pentium TSC (no MMX)
>> running at 200 MHz, it consumed 20 % of
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Petr Pisar (ppi...@redhat.com) said:
>> > I suggest that these be just built without NAS support. NAS is basically an
>> > older competitor to PulseAudio with fewer features (it focuses on network
>> > transparency, which is just one of the
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 10:56 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
>> While the XO-1 is a comparitatively relative higher HW spec (433 mhz
>> from memory, so not massive but still double) it might be a worthwhile
>> canditdate as there's quite a few of
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Matthias Runge
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> currently I'm looking for a review for two of my packages:
> lockfile-progs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601115
> is a dependency of
> logcheck: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
>
> liblockfil
Hi All,
I know its been discussed in the past but there's been reasons not to
drop a default MTA but now that cronie (the last actual dependency)
has support for logging to system logs is there any reason to include
an MTA by default for F-14?
Peter
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraprojec
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> I know its been discussed in the past but there's been reasons not to
>> drop a default MTA but now that cronie (the last actual dependency)
>> has support for logging to syste
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 20:10 +0200, drago01 wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> > pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
>> >
>> >> I know its been discussed in the past but there's
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On 08/23/2010 02:21 PM, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 20:10 +0200, drago01 wrote:
>>>> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Re
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
> my desktop runs on software mirror raid below an lvm. not for
> performance but for data recovery reasons. mdmonitor does mail
> notification. will this be fixed? how about logwatch, it is really
> useful to have to get an overview what happen
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 08/23/2010 08:15 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
>> On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 20:10 +0200, drago01 wrote:
>>> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
>>>> pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>
>&
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 03:43:36PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
>> The problem with delivering this to a user's mailbox via an MTA is that
>> in the typical case it doesn't result in the user noticing anything
>> until they've logged in as roo
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 10:09 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:58:50AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>> > Why are you complaining? If your package needs an MTA - put in a Requires!
>>
>> If we follow the general stat
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:58:50AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>> Why are you complaining? If your package needs an MTA - put in a Requires!
>
> If we follow the general state of things: "if a package might need
> something, toss it in
>> > > My previous objection was based on the precedent it sets. I don't want a
>> > > "Desktop" distribution in Fedora. I want a server-usable distribution.
>> > > Sure, it's just a dep and one can go install an MTA. But today it's
>> > > killing the MTA, tomorrow it's removing something else that
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 05:43:49PM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
>
>> that seems like a bit of odd logic. The logs are emitted to syslog with
>> the same thought in mind - that someone will read them - but that is
>> also not necessarily true.
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:34 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 17:54 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
>> On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 22:52 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 05:43:49PM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
>> >
>> > > that seems like a bit of odd logic. The logs are em
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 9:22 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway
wrote:
> On 08/24/2010 03:53 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> On Tue, 24.08.10 14:59, Matthew Miller (mat...@mattdm.org) wrote:
>>
>>> The service command has a syntax like this:
>>>
>>> service servicename action
>>>
>>> where as systemctl has
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:36 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 07:23 +0100, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:34 AM, Jon Masters
>> wrote:
>
>> > I have an MTA installed because I expect to get emailed logs, and root@
>> >
I've orphaned the following packages if anyone wants to pick them up.
They are primarily dead upstream but some might still use them.
libmatchbox
matchbox-window-manager
twitter-glib
Regards,
Peter
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listin
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 08/30/2010 06:07 PM, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
>> I've orphaned the following packages if anyone wants to pick them up.
>> They are primarily dead upst
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
> Heads up to Clutter consumers - I'm updating it in f15 to the 1.3
> (master) branch. I've tested GNOME Shell and quadrapassel, feel free
> to CC me for other fallout.
This will break meego.
Peter
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedorapr
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 8:04 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 19:57 +0100, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
>> > Heads up to Clutter consumers - I'm updating it in f15 to the 1.3
>> > (master)
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:57 PM, pbrobin...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
>>> Heads up to Clutter consumers - I'm updating it in f15 to the 1.3
>>> (master) b
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
> 2010/8/31 pbrobin...@gmail.com :
>> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:57 PM, pbrobin...@gmail.com
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:52 PM,
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 14:52 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
>> Heads up to Clutter consumers - I'm updating it in f15 to the 1.3
>> (master) branch. I've tested GNOME Shell and quadrapassel, feel free
>> to CC me for other fallout.
>
> Hey,
>
> Doe
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Martin Sourada wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 12:20 +, Rawhide Report wrote:
>
>> entangle-0.1.0-7.fc14.x86_64 requires libmozjs.so()(64bit)
>> ethos-0.2.2-7.fc15.i686 requires libmozjs.so
>> ethos-0.2.2-7.fc15.x86_64 requires libmozjs.so()(64
Hi All,
Anyone want to do package review swapsies?
meego-panel-datetime https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624204
Peter
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 02:02:05PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> On 09/06/2010 08:24 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:
>> > paraview-3.8.0-4.fc14 (build/make) orion,pertusus
>>
>> Sorry [Errno 28] No space left on device
>>
>> Looks like a check for th
Hi All,
How do the bodhi 7 days timeframes for updates work? My understanding
is that an update is required to be in updates for 7 days. I have an
update that according to bodhi was submitted as an update on the 29th
Aug at 18:13. It was pushed to updates-testing at 19:42 the following
day (Aug 30
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 12:25:29AM +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
>> Quote from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_acceptance_criteria:
>>
>> All other updates must either:
>> · reach the criteria laid out in the previous sect
Hi All,
Does anyone know if the new Broadcom drivers are in a state where they
would be in the Fedora 14 kernel? I've seen the release but i've not
seen any comment as to the state of them other than they already
support mac80211. These are quite a common device and I think it would
be nice to see
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:13 PM, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:31:44PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
>> On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 00:40 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> > IIRC they require a firmware blob that has a license that we cannot
>> > distribute
>> > unlike say the Intel
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 09/15/2010 12:49 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:04:04PM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
>>> Which OEMs care enough about Linux support to use a more expensive part?
>> Seriously. I will go buy their stuff right now.
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 09/14/2010 08:33 PM, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the update. That's what I suspected as it seems to be the
>> norm for vendor code dumps.
>
> It is nevertheless a massive step fo
Subject says it all.
Cheers,
Peter
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I wonder about the maintainer ship of epiphany. The ownership of it is
gecko-maint but in none of the current versions of fedora is epiphany
gecko based and of the 18 other maintainers not a single person is on
the bugzilla watch ACL. There's a bug that was introduced at some
point in the F-13 time
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
>
> There is an ongoing outage at this time in PHX2. The exact start time is
> not yet known and the ETA to be fixed is not yet known.
>
> To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Shakthi Kannan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have two new packages for review:
>
> teal:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612384
>
> ghc-feldspar-language:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612076
>
> Anyone interested in review swap?
I'm happy to tak
Hi Chen,
As I'm the MeeGo maintainer let me outline my thoughts and reasoning
behind my MeeGo strategy.
> I intend to review two meego-related packages[1][2], but I'm confused
> with which package name will be more appropiate.
> [1]https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=610794
> [2]https://b
Hi Chen,
As I'm the MeeGo maintainer let me outline my thoughts and reasoning
behind my MeeGo strategy.
> I intend to review two meego-related packages[1][2], but I'm confused
> with which package name will be more appropiate.
> [1]https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=610794
> [2]https://b
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Chen Lei wrote:
> 2010/7/9 pbrobin...@gmail.com :
>> Hi Chen,
>>
>> As I'm the MeeGo maintainer let me outline my thoughts and reasoning
>> behind my MeeGo strategy.
>>
>>> I intend to review two meego-related packages
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim
wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Chen Lei wrote:
>> 2010/7/10 pbrobin...@gmail.com :
>>> Yes, but most of the Netbook side of things are from Moblin. Also if
>>> you look at a lot of the clutter/mx and o
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 9:29 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> Hello Fedora!
> ==
>
> Okay. Here's the list of packages that I think might be affected by
> this. Reminder: You need to check these packages and fix any which need
> fixing, then email me and let me know which ones you checked/fi
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 23:28 +0200, Andreas Tunek wrote:
>> 2010/7/7 Andreas Tunek :
>> > On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 16:24 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 13:59 +0100, pbrobin...@gmail.com
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Mamoru Tasaka
wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones wrote, at 07/22/2010 03:45 PM +9:00:
>> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:54:32AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>>> right now a glibc build is going on that has --enablekernel=2.6.32
>>>
>>> from Jakub
>>>
>>> Bumping that from 2.6
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 11:08 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jul 2010, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
>
>> On 07/27/2010 10:53 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Are we skipping Firefox 4 for Fedora 14? Beta 2 has been released
>> > recently and I am wondering if we can go with it if it
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 07/23/2010 11:54 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> The conversion will take a couple days, which means our normal short
>> outage for branching will be a bit extended. I wish there was anothe
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 03:04:46PM +0200, Florent Le Coz wrote:
>> On 28/07/2010 14:52, Mike McGrath wrote:
>> > In my opinion including software that even upstream says is not ready is
>> > for a distribution that's "lost their way". We
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 07/23/2010 11:54 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> The conversion will take a couple days, which means our normal short
>> outage for branching will be a bit extended. I wish there was anothe
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 07/29/2010 07:14 AM, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>>
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 07/29/2010 11:48 AM, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Completely ignore OLPC* they are historical and are no longer used.
>
> I see active build targets in
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 4:55 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> This evening we opened up dist-git for business. Dist-git is our git
> based replacement for dist-cvs, the source control system we were using
> for our package specs, patches, and source f
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Chen Lei wrote:
> 2010/7/30 Remi Collet :
>> Le 30/07/2010 01:07, Jesse Keating a écrit :
>>
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Using_Fedora_GIT
>>>
>>> We just might finish up before the 48 hour window is up!
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for that great work !
>>
>> Just upda
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> Great news!
>
> Few questions still remains unanswered for me:
>
> * Should I use git now?
> * May I still use cvs?
> * If I'll add some changes right now using git/cvs will they be
> available in cvs/git respectively?
> * I just noticed th
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> In an effort to try to reduce and eliminate Wordpress's reliance on
> bundled PHP libraries, I've produced some test builds. If someone
> familiar with administering Wordpress and Wordpress-mu could test to
> make sure the changes don't break a
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 8/2/10 9:52 AM, Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
>> People have had this complaint since PA was forced on to the Fedora users.
>
>
> Language such as this is not being excellent to each other.
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Aug 2010, Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
>
>>
>> - "Carl G." wrote:
>> > Well, i'm happy to be a bug triager so
>> > you can get "real work" done. /s
>> >
>> > Let me know if you need some help to
>> > make the stats looks pretty.
>>
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Mon, 02.08.10 23:09, pbrobin...@gmail.com (pbrobin...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2 Aug 2010, Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
&g
61 matches
Mail list logo
