On 12/04/2013 12:10 PM, Brendan Jones wrote:
>
> This is just a pain. Can someone explain to me why this is good?
>
Good or not, this is not the right question to ask.
* Is this necessarry, and are the benefits worth the pains? *
This change is Sofa King stupid. Why couldn't we have just enabl
On 12/05/2013 07:38 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> As I see it, GCC's -Wformat-security is too unreliable to be used in
> production. It certainly diagnoses valid security leaks in some cases,
> but all it does in other cases is to enforce stylishness to work outs
> GCC's limitations. I.e. in these ca
On 12/05/2013 09:41 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> For the current stage (filing bugs for known failures), it does not make
> much of a difference how the data is obtained about future build
> failures. Filing bugs seems reasonable for tracking purposes.
>
The FESCO ticket is about enabling -Werror=
On 12/05/2013 11:38 AM, Michael scherer wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 08:25:54PM -0600, mrnuke wrote:
>>
>> This change is Sofa King stupid. Why couldn't we have just enabled the
>> warning without turning it into an error, THEN let packagers work with
>> u
