At the moment I am unable to build qbittorrent and torium (springlobby
as well) at Koji due to broken deps.
I have emailed Peter and requested commit rights for the devel branch
but received no response.
Would it be possible for a proven packager to rebuild rb_libtorrent
against the latest boost ve
Thank you for bumping and rebuilding it.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=151914
On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 18:55 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 January 2010, Leigh Scott wrote:
> > At the moment I am unable to build qbittorrent and torium (springlobby
&g
On Thu, 2010-01-21 at 12:21 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> However, this changes behavior that has existed since the dawn
> of time in Red Hat/Fedora systems; with this change, single-user
> mode would now require the root password.
> Comments?
>
I'm totally opposed to this change.
--
devel
I had the same issue, it's due to the F12 xorg-x11-drv-nouveau version
being higher than the rawhide version.
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 16:24 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
> Over the weekend I tried this via yum and the upgrade/install part went
> fine. But once I rebooted, the gui wouldn't work. Me
-25 at 22:32 +, Leigh Scott wrote:
> > I had the same issue, it's due to the F12 xorg-x11-drv-nouveau version
> > being higher than the rawhide version.
>
> Soo, if one was to do the process again, cept use the F12 version
> instead (the nouveau driver) (xorg too?), it
I suppose you could install it just before upgrading ( you might need
--nodeps ) , doing so would break X so avoid rebooting before the
upgrade.
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 16:55 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 22:50 +0000, Leigh Scott wrote:
> > You need to manually fetc
Better still, if using yum to upgrade, install it after it's completed
(before reboot)
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 16:55 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 22:50 +0000, Leigh Scott wrote:
> > You need to manually fetch the f13 package from koji and install it
>
I believe the avant-window-navigator bugs could be reduced by bumping
the version to 3.2.1
https://launchpad.net/awn/0.2/0.3.2.1
I have also applied for commit rights for avant-window-navigator.
On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 19:22 +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sindre Bjørdal seems to be non respons
I'm getting this error when trying to update
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/lib64/gstreamer-0.10/libgstmpegdemux.so from install of
gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-0.10.17-3.fc13.x86_64 conflicts with file
from package gstreamer-plugins-flumpegdemux-0.10.15-8.fc13.x86_64
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at
I would refuse to allow two accounts.
On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 09:05 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> According to yesterday's reply, the person really wants to create a second
> account. Whatever the full plan may be, so far it only creates confusion.
>
> --
> Michael Schwendt
> Fedora releas
I will take avant-window-navigator but I haven't got the time to go
through all the bugs reported against it.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/bugs/avant-window-navigator?
Is there any chance a bug zapper could help ?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://ad
IMO ABRT isn't that useful as a lot of the reports don't include steps
to reproduce (I just close the bugs after a month if they don't respond
to the "needinfo" request).
I believe ABRT shouldn't file a bug report unless it is filled in
properly.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.or
On Sat, 2010-02-06 at 13:32 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> And, IIRC, Jiri has already agreed and said this will be implemented, so
> why bring it up again?
> --
> Adam Williamson
> Fedora QA Community Monkey
> IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
> http://www.happyassassi
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 17:37 -0500, Roland Grunberg wrote:
> This is just an update to let maintainers know that the changes to
> LD outlined here :
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ChangeInImplicitDSOLinking
>
> will be in fedora rawhide pretty soon.
>
> The details behind what this f
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 15:48 +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> but then user might well enter description consisting of
> "I dont care" (or worse).
>
> --
> vda
>
>
That would ease my conscience when I closed the bug report :-)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.f
avant-window-navigator doesn't have broken deps, this error occurred
because the F12 package had a higher release version.
Perhaps yum should deal with this better i.e take dist tag into account
On Sun, 2010-02-21 at 02:15 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
>
> > * short (1-3 words)
Have about
The dog's bollocks
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Dog%27s%20Bollocks
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 08:20 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> The maintainers should coordinate, and one of them should bundle both packages
> into a single bodhi update. It's the only way to guarantee they get pushed at
> the same time.
>
> josh
They would need commit rights for both packages.
--
Last time I looked at the admin logs for Fedoraforum i.e who's voted ,
there was at least 15 votes from Fedora project members.
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 18:12 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
> Adam, if you can't realise that the users most likely to haunt a support forum
> are the people most like
> Hello.
>
> As you might already know, we have recently merged in the Python 3.9 side
> tag,
> despite several builds have not succeeded. We always aim for some compromise
> between having the side tag open for too long and having too many failures.
>
> The packages, when not rebuilt, are not
> On 31. 05. 20 12:49, Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> Note that python-setproctitle already failed to built with Python 3.8 and the
> "fix" was to comment out the tests:
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-setproctitle/c/d6d9620c3c4fa076...
>
> Hence, i
> On 31. 05. 20 17:09, Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> That's up to the maintainer. Seems reasonable to me.
Thanks, patch forwarded to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1792059
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Can you assign me as main-admin please?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List
> I use Cinnamon as the main DE on one of my machines, and the package
> doesn't look like something that requires a lot of maintenance, so I'll take
> it.
Please don't do that, cinnamon-themes is a dead package
https://github.com/linuxmint/cinnamon-themes
mint-themes provides cinnamon-themes
> I noticed that kmod-wireguard is being updated on F31, even after WireGuard
> became a part
> of Linux kernel since 5.6.0. Shouldn't kernel>5.6.0 obsolete kmod-wireguard?
> Is it
> kept and updated because it was originally installed via @commandline?
>
> We had a discussion about not removing
We did attempt to obsolete it in f32
https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/free/rpmfusion-free-obsolete-packages.git/log/?h=f32
TBH I don't really like the idea much, removing peoples VPN isn't cool and
leaves them exposed.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@li
> From what I understood of the thread it's purely removing the akmod
> and the new kernels have the module so how does it break their VPNs?
If you remove akmod-wireguard it will also remove the wireguard package which
will cause the VPN to stop functioning.
Wireguard/wireguard-tools is required
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UseNanoByDefault
> In contrast, Nano offers the kind of graphical text editing experience
> that people are used to, and therefore doesn't require specialist
> knowledge to use. It is already installed across most Fedora Editions
> and Spins. This proposal
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 9:14 AM Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> If it's set as a default across the distribution there's nothing
> stopping the cinnamon spin changing it for them.
>
> One thing that's required of all spin maintainers, and everyone else,
> is to
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 10:44:22AM -0000, Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> Tone doesn't translate well to email. I assume you meant this with a joking,
> friendly tone -- but "grubby" is still negative (merriam-webster says
> "worthy of contempt"). It's easy
You don't have to solve it!
The issue is qt5-qtwebkit needs rebuilding against new gsteamer1-1.17.1
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https:
> ah ok, i will wait for a new qt5-qtwebkit version.
> Thanks
> Martin
It looks like they addressed with this build
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1526223
* Mon Jun 22 2020 Wim Taymans - 1.17.1-2
- Enable debug again
I tagged gstreamer1-1.17.1-1.fc33 into overrides for r
Has UEFI support improved in the last 2 - 3 years?
My last experience with it was so poor on a multi-boot system I switched to
legacy and haven't bothered trying it since.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an ema
> On Monday, July 27, 2020 1:10:36 PM MST Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> I'll update emacs-php-mode and submit a new spec, and look at taking
> zoneminder.
zoneminder was retired and dropped from f26, it's provided by rpmfusion now.
http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=501
___
> Wait, nevermind. It’s kmod, got them confused:
>
>
> rpm-ostree install kmod-nvidia xorg-x11-drv-nvidia
You need to use the nodebug kernel
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RawhideKernelNodebug
> rpm-ostree(akmod-nvidia.post)[16484]: FATAL: modpost: GPL-incompatible
> module nvidia-drm.ko uses
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 11:57 PM Ty Young You can use regular kmod packages with Fedora Silverblue (rpm-ostree
> install kmod-nvidia). You can also use regular Fedora Workstation and
> have akmods work perfectly.
>
We don't supply compiled kmod packages at rpmfusion, using akmod-nvidia is the
> Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> Since when? Why? Where was this discussed?
It will 4 years in July.
https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/nonfree/nvidia-kmod.git/commit/?id=52cadb0401a80d4c95563880f154d45506f18b9e
I believe there may have been a brief discussion between kwizart and me on IRC.
> On 3/29/20 2:29 PM, Daniel Smith wrote:
>
>
> OK, so why aren't they installing?
Works fine here on normal fedora
$ inxi -GCS
System:
Host: leigh Kernel: 5.6.0-0.rc7.git1.2.fc33.x86_64 x86_64 bits: 64
Desktop: Cinnamon 4.4.8 Distro: Fedora release 33 (Rawhide)
CPU:
Topology: 8-Core mo
> Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> But how do akmods solve that? What will happen with the akmod if the kernel
> breaks the build is that the akmod will fail to build on the user's machine!
> How does that resolve the issue? IMHO, it makes it worse!
>
> Kevin Kofler
I can guarantee akmod-nvidia
Aren't external kernel modules banned by fedora packaging rules?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/proj
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 4:45 PM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> I don't know enough about RPMFusion packaging. I use RPMFusion, but
> haven't looked into the contribution process. In particular, I wonder
> if their modules are signed by a key that's already trusted in Fedora.
> My guess is not, and then it'
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 12:00 PM Miro Hrončok
>
> Taken. Will start builds that fix this later today.
>
> -Ian
You could try
https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/free/audacity-freeworld.git/tree/Fix-gcc-10-compile-issue.patch
___
devel mailing list -- de
> On Tue, 2020-04-07 at 20:55 -0400, Paul Dufresne via devel wrote:
> you could discuss it on their mailing lists etc.
There is no need to do that as rpmfusion has already been updated to 440.82
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
If there any plan to fix them?
https://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/screenshots/Screenshot%20from%202020-04-17%2013-32-22.png
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.or
> Hi Leigh,
>
>
> Do you think you could please use nicer language? There's no need to
> use words like that to describe other people's work in the community.
That was the nicest term I could use to describe it!
>
> I personally quite like the 90s retro look.
>
> >
> https://leigh123linux.fed
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020, at 4:02 PM, Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> Hi Leigh,
>
> Elections for alternative wallpapers are currently open:
> https://apps.fedoraproject.org/nuancier/elections/
> Please vote for ones that you like.
>
> The submission phase for Fedora 32 has u
> Well then please don't express your opinion then and keep it to yourself.
It's a free country with free speech.
If you don't like it don't read it!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@list
+1
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.or
> nemo-extensions jcpunk leigh123linux
nemo-extensions has Py_Initialize / Py_Finalize in the nemo-python sub-package
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora
Shame on Redhat for using an untested feature
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671683
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https:/
> Hello,
>
> Dav1d 0.5.0 was published today and brings a SONAME bump from libdav1d.so.
> 2.0.0 to libdav1d.so.3.0.0.
> I will be updating it next week on F31/32, consumers of these libraries
> (ffmpeg, xine-lib, vlc) will need to rebuild their packages.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Robert-André
I'm
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 05:49:15PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> Except sadly, it doesn't build:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=38248022
>
> ...
> * Running build
> *
> Fatal Python error: PyQt5.QtCore: Unable to embed qt.conf
> /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.vEjk0u: line 31: 9198
Seems the f30 build wasn't tagged
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1390409
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://d
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 08:38:57AM -0000, Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> Thanks! I tagged it into f30-updates-candidate and submitted a bodhi update:
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-a4aa28b798.
> Please give it karma so it can go to stable quickly.
>
> Zbysz
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 12:44 AM, John M. Harris Jr
>
> As previously mentioned in this thread, we already approved Steam for
> F28.
>
>
> This was also previously addressed earlier in this thread, where I
> quoted the relevant portion of the policy in full. Please consider
> previous rep
> On Tuesday, October 15, 2019 8:59:18 PM MST Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> I am not a troll, and I definitely am listening. I read the third party
> software guidelines very carefully, on both the FESCo page, and the
> Workstation Group's page.
Sorry for mislabeling you :-)
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 09:01:31PM -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> Yes; Leigh, let's please refrain from name calling. I often disagree with
> John, but I don't think he's acting in bad faith here (or in Fedora in
> general).
Did I manage to earn another misconduct badge for that? ;-)
_
> On Fri, 2019-10-18 at 07:50 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> I mean, in the end it would be self-defeating, because the high chance
> that it would introduce more problems would just mean we'd need to
> freeze again for longer.
>
So you get a working ISO for release then break it by releasing un
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 01:38:03PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> We're in final freeze now. Any progress?
>
> Zbyszek
I poked mokutil with a couple of upstream fixes, now it fails only on i686.
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=38515227
_
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 07:45:03AM -0000, Leigh Scott wrote:
>
>
> mokutil.c:1977:16: error: comparison of integer expressions of different
> signedness:
> 'unsigned int' and 'int' [-Werror=sign-compare]
> 1977 | if (sa
On 29/10/2019 15:24, Miro Hrončok wrote:
leigh123linux
xed
(BuildRequires: python2-gobject-base → PY2)
Check your script as it returned a bogus result, xed has
BuildRequires: python3-gobject-base
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedor
Rpmfusion can't ship blender due to our non-replacement policy, fedora should
consider dropping their crippled package.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Cod
See https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/870
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/
So a few package need to adapt, they should have listed all the required
#includes in their source files already IMO
> So you mean to say that this has to be "fixed" in each individual
> package, from fedora f32 forward?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@
Why report it here?
I think rpmfusion mirrormanager is missing the source repos.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraprojec
> On 11/10/19 7:44 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
>
> Everyone answering so far has missed the important point. He explicitly
> disabled that repo, but using the "--source" option re-enabled it. I
> would suggest that you file a bug report for that.
I noticed that but only care about the rpmfusion is
I wouldn't review this as it isn't correct to use prebuilt code, you will need
to build from source.
Source0:
https://github.com/mozilla/geckodriver/releases/download/v0.26.0/geckodriver-v0.26.0-linux64.tar.gz
___
devel mailing list -- devel@list
> Please don't revive ancient, unmaintained, security-critical libraries
> for use with proprietary software not distributed by Fedora
Old gstreamer is used by a couple of ancient apps in fedora (banshee) and
isn't installed by default so I fail to see how you class it as
'security-critical
It seems none of my overrides are in the buildroot despite bodhi showing them
as active.
The new interface doesn't work properly, I can't expire them and reactivate.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
I used bodhi cli to expire and reactivate, at least something still works
unlike the new interface :-)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
ht
I have taken sassc but will welcome anyone else willing to help co-maintain
this train wreck.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://do
Hi,
Can someone check these specfiles before I submit review requests please?
I have zero experience with packaging rubygem packaes.
https://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/SPECS/rubygem-hrx.spec
https://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/SPECS/rubygem-linked-list.spec
Best regards
Leigh
___
Thanks, I didn't know about gem2rpm.
Reviews submitted (needed for sassc tests).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1779403
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1779404
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscri
Thank you for the examples and hints
> 2. Adding %check section, as Jaroslav said.
> Note that we do not use "bundler" ("bundle" command) and
> "rake"
> command in RPM *.spec file.
>
I have removed bundler and rake from linked-list, the test doesn't seem to run
anything
+ pushd ./usr/share/gem
> For linked-list,
> And you see the temp_dir rubygem dep is used for only
> spec/archive_spec.rb context "::load" and "#write!".
>
> ```
> $ grep -r temp_dir spec/
> ```
>
> spec/archive_spec.rb
>
> ```
Thanks that fixes the %check
> context "::load" do
> ...
> end
>
> context "#write!"
Can someone from releng please fix this issue please?
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/20219
koji isn't aware
BuildError: package rubygem-linked-list not in list for tag
f32-updates-candidate
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=39430986
__
Ticket also filed
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9081
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-o
I will take it.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fed
> Hi,
>
> I tried the following:
>
> $ kinit mufti11(a)FEDORAPROJECT.ORG
> rm -rf wdune
> fedpkg clone wdune
> cd wdune
> $ fedpkg import ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/wdune-1.654-3.fc32.src.rpm > /dev/null
>
> $ git commit -sm "Initial import (#1658153)"
> error: gpg failed to sign the data
> fatal: failed
> $ fedpkg build --target f31
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=39903543
>
> Result
>
> BuildError: package wdune not in list for tag f31-updates-candidate
>
>
> What has to be done, to bring wdune to fedora 31 ?
>
Try reading
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/l
> Hi,
>
> | fedpkg request-branch --repo wdune f31
> | fedpkg request-branch --repo wdune f30
>
> $ fedpkg request-branch --repo wdune f31
> Could not execute request_branch: Missing a Pagure token. Refer to
> "fedpkg request-repo -h" to set atoken in your user configuration.
>
> I created a new
> == Upgrade/compatibility impact ==
> Fedora installations on systems with CPUs which are not able to
> execute AVX2 instructions will not be able to upgrade.
>
Time for me to switch to LinuxMint as I'm not going to be forced into hardware
updates I can't afford.
__
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1669913
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672861
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672862
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672863
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684936
>
> so long
> MUFTI
I wouldn
Maybe package the newer version 0.20.1 http://www.gnu.org/software/gettext/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org
There is no f31 repo yet
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/ so perhaps
mirror-manager is redirecting f31 to rawhide.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedora
> There is no f31 repo yet
> https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/ so
> perhaps mirror-manager is redirecting f31 to rawhide.
It is mirror manager doing the redirection to rawhide.
https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=fedora-$releasever&arch=$basearch
> On 8/19/19 3:31 PM, David Jeremias Vásquez Sicay wrote:
> Please stand by.
Is the beta freeze going to be delayed because of this?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject
> Hi Jacob,
> Iam the packager of the given package(fctxpd).
>
> And in pkgs.fedoraproject.org I don't find an option to add ssh key as we
> have in pagure.io .
You have to add the ssh key to your FAS account.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/
___
> On 9/9/19 12:47 PM, vvs vvs wrote:
>
>
> Having read the thread, you seem to miss the point that's been
> repeatedly made: the packages occasionally fail to build, and someone
> has to fix them. That act, fixing packages when they don't build is the
> "support" that someone has to provide.
> We need to drop 32-bit packages, except needed to run Steam and Wine32.
Why should I bother helping to keep steam alive?, perhaps the gamers should
allocate some of their gaming time to keeping i686 alive.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedor
Shouldn't you be using system waf instead of the ancient bundled version?, try
the waf-python3 package instead.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Con
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 8:33 PM Ty Young Fedora and other distributions have been working on rootless Xorg
> since 2013. We've had it in place since at least 2015. This change was
> made way back in Fedora 24.
>
Do you mean 'Support non-root X'? if so some DM's still don't support it.
https:/
> I'll just cut to the chase.
> Rawhide with Nvidia drivers because of debug kernel. There is a lack of
> software compared to other Linux distros like Ubuntu or Arch(no
> Vivaldi!?!?). Fedora developers tend to be hostile towards proprietary
> software. etc.
I guess debugging symbols are an
rpmfusion dropped support for gstreamer when it was retired,
Banshee is not going to be a nice experience for users if there are no codecs
to play stuff.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...
> Why we should drop such useful app just because it doesn't work on Cinnamon?
> It works
> on GNOME without ffpmeg and rpm fusion repo, see screenshot [1].
Please prevent your useless app from displaying in cinnamon menu, I'm sure
Mate, XFCE and LXDE would also like it removed from their menus
> Also this whole issue is more suitable for regular bug report, not for such
> drama in
> mailing list and salt.
You started the drama by picking on cinnamon!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dev
> * Leigh Scott [02/01/2020 02:34] :
>
> This is not being excellent to each other. Please consider respecting the
> project policy when you are posting to a Fedora mailing list.
>
> Emmanuel
Perhaps he shouldn't have singled out cinnamon when it equally applies to all
> On 1/2/20 9:18 AM, Artem Tim wrote:
> There are a number of screen recording alternatives that are
> simpler
> than OBS Studio, including vokoscreen, Kazam, Simplescreenrecorder etc,
> The main problem is that most depend on FFMPEG. FFMPEG has a license
> that is compatible with the main Fedor
> But what about users which actually have ffmpeg installed? Do you think
> they don't deserve having peek in menu?
>
> On Fri, Jan 3, 2020, 04:02 John M. Harris Jr wrote:
NO, it's not required on cinnamon, users can use the screenshot+ Record desktop
applet instead.
___
Why ignore the reviewer and use bundled vcglib? you were asked not to do that.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658153
You did the vcglib review and never built it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677989
I have removed the useless unpacked source files, don't abuse fedor
1 - 100 of 361 matches
Mail list logo
