Re: Integrity protection of fetches

2010-08-06 Thread i . grok
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 04:34:19AM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: > On Fri, 6 Aug 2010, Mike McGrath wrote: > > On Fri, 6 Aug 2010, Till Maas wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 04:32:36PM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: > > > > We also use SSHFP records for those of you that want to enable > > > > VerifyH

Re: Integrity protection of fetches

2010-08-06 Thread i . grok
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 12:54:23PM +0200, Till Maas wrote: > On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 04:31:00AM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: > > On Fri, 6 Aug 2010, Till Maas wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 04:32:36PM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: > > > > We also use SSHFP records for those of you that want to ena

Re: Linker weirdness: "could not read symbols: Invalid operation"

2010-03-15 Thread i . grok
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 05:27:55PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 15:48 -0700, John Reiser wrote: > > > "could not read symbols: Invalid operation" > > > > Could "Invalid operation" be an error message that corresponds to > > an error from a system call? Apply 'strace' to t

Re: RemoveSETUID feature (Was: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo meeting (2010-10-26) NEW TIME!)

2010-12-21 Thread i . grok
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 10:37:44PM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote devel: > Colin Walters píše v Út 21. 12. 2010 v 11:47 -0500: > > "But they still have uid 0, which typical system installation allows > > root to do things. For example, /bin/sh is 0755 and /bin is also 0755 > > perms. A disarmed root p