Hi everyone,
I'm not in the packager group yet and looking for a Sponsor to completed the
onboarding process.
Afterwards I want to become the maintainer of the orphaned packages
php-aws-sdk3 [1], php-ralouphie-getallheaders [2] and php-guzzlehttp-guzzle6
[3].
My main motivation is to keep the
> On 04/24/2024 4:21 PM CEST Remi Collet wrote:
>
> I can probably help for PHP reviews
Thank you, appreciated!
> Notice:
>
> - php-ralouphie-getallheaders: this is a compat layer providing a
> missing function in PHP < 7.3 for php-fpm users
>
> Please check you really still need it ;)
Goo
gt;
> Fehler: nothing provides libtonezone.so.2.0()(64bit) needed by
> asterisk-dahdi-13.9.1-1.fc25.1.x86_64
>
>
> I have build dahdi-tools from the fc24 src and it works!
>
>
> --
>
>
> Dominik Kucher
>
> _
you can download my dahdi-tools as a tar.gz file
https://dk-software.org/RPMS/dahdi-tools.tar.gz
--
Dominik Kucher
t: +43 720 511 941
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi!
Works VMware with Linux 4.10 out of the box?
--
Dominik Kucher
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
p://207.244.97.131/%D9%84%D9%82%D8%B7%D8%A9%20%D8%B4%D8%A7%D8%B4%D8%A9%20%D9%85%D9%86%202017-02-27%2001-52-02.png
>
>
>
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@list
maybe the problem of my
mod_ssl build?
i use the httpd-2.4.25-3.fc25.src.rpm file
This is my .rpmrc file:
[builduser@buildsrv]: cat /home/builduser/.rpmrc
optflags: x86_64 %{__global_cflags} -m64 -march=core2 -mtune=core2
--
Dominik Kucher
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
Am 2017-04-10 um 23:44 schrieb Andrew Lutomirski:
>
>
> On Apr 10, 2017 2:28 PM, "Dominik Kucher" <mailto:d.kuc...@dk-software.org>> wrote:
>
> when i rebuild the src.rpm with my .rpmrc file i became the error
> "illegal instruction", when i
Hi!
No longer maintains pure-ftpd? 1.0.46 is released on Apr. 24 2017
--
Dominik Kucher
A-2130 Mistelbach, Ebendorferstraße 7/2/3
p: +43 (0) 720 511 941
f: +43 (0) 1 34242 289967
m: +43 (0) 676 57 68 677
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
os.
>
> ср, 12 июл. 2017 г. в 9:11, Petr Pisar <mailto:ppi...@redhat.com>>:
>
> On 2017-07-11, Vascom <mailto:vasc...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > Dominik, are you try communicate with it's maintainers?
> >
> Surely they know abou
bug report -> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470184
Dominik Kucher schrieb am 2017-07-12 um 15:26:
> Vascom schrieb am 2017-07-12 um 10:21:
>> I am builded
>> it https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=20472651
>> You can try this build an
i have build it about a month
it runs on my fedora 25 without problems
the bug numbers are not valid
--
[root@srv-dksoft:]# rpm -qa | grep pure-ftpd
pure-ftpd-1.0.46-6.fc25
On Thursday, 12 January 2017 at 12:56, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 12.01.2017 um 12:44 schrieb Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski:
> > > Yes, we're just changing the default, if you drop a 99-local.conf file in
> > > /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d with the following content
On Thursday, 12 January 2017 at 13:38, Dominik Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Thursday, 12 January 2017 at 12:56, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > Am 12.01.2017 um 12:44 schrieb Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski:
> > > > Yes, we're just changing the default, if you d
ls
kalzium
molsketch
xdrawchem
Run-time dependencies:
avogadro2
chemtool
molsketch
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPM Fusion http://rpmfusion.org
There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and
oppression to develop psychic muscles.
-- from &
are, they might
take up to ten times longer (and in some cases even more)
to finish than normal.
We're planning to enable more armhfp chroots later on based
the performance of the first two.
[1]: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/wiki/Feature-forcearch
o opt into gating!
Thanks,
-Dominik
[0] https://github.com/dcantrell/rpminspect
On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 9:59 PM Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> So what I've been reading from the rawhide gating mailthread,
> creating the gating rules unfortunately is somewhat convoluted /
&g
Hello.
Today, we have released a new version of Copr.
Main highlights from the release was the addition
of discussion panels in Copr projects and speed
optimization of front page.
For more information, see:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-4aca9d983d
Dominik
/vh2nxwdaicgpw2hv
Thanks for letting us know your preference.
Dominik
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code
confusing.
Thank you,
Dominik
Background: Gnome-shell does not allow to customize locale settings
beyond choosing one locale setting globally (ui language, currency,
first day of week,...).
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
Hi,
Thanks for your answer! As we speak, I have solved my problem (see
below). That aside, I think that there is a serious issue with Gnome's
handling of locales:
On Mon, 2018-11-12 at 19:45 +0100, Rafal Luzynski wrote:
> 9.11.2018 14:39 Dominik Grafenhofer wrote:
> > Hi all,
&g
On Tuesday, 11 October 2022 at 11:18, Luna Jernberg wrote:
> On 10/11/22, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > Hi!
> > It seems that s390x builds in koji are not progressing. At the time of
> > writing, I can see ~150 s390x buildArch tasks in "free"
Hey everyone,
I met a few people already on Events, during the Job or by contributing
to Pagure, Uyuni and some other projects. But I didn't properly
introduced myself on the Fedora devel list, so here we go.
My nickname for most accounts, including FAS, is wombelix, you can also
call me Dom. I l
Hi everyone,
I'm looking for help with my review request [1] for php-psr-http-client [2] as
part of the process to un-retire [3] the package.
It's a dependency of my work to update php-guzzlehttp-guzzle [4] to v7.x [5].
Which is required to keep php-aws-sdk3 [6] alive and up-to-date.
Thanks in
On 5/3/24 8:00 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> So, help would definitely be welcome fixing the matrix/irc issues in the
> code, and then we could look at mass updating it.
>
I briefly looked into it, can be an easy fix. I put a comment into the
open issue for matrix support in fedocal:
https://pagure
> On 05/13/2024 12:29 PM CEST Remi Collet wrote:
>
> As I said, because of bundled libraries
>
OK, I work on packaging the AWS C libs right now that would otherwise bundled.
So that problem should be solved / solvable in a couple of weeks.
I would then like to give php-awscrt a try based on you
> On 05/08/2024 10:38 PM CEST Tom Hughes via devel
> wrote:
>
>
> On 08/05/2024 21:36, Kenneth Goldman wrote:
>
> > Is it possible for a .spec file to clone a github.com repo rather than
> > download a tarball? Can someone link to a working example?
>
> No, but github can give you a tar bal
> On 05/21/2024 5:54 PM CEST Tom Hughes via devel
> wrote:
>
> The automatic tar ball URLs on github just do a git archive and are
> separate to uploaded release artifacts. Just use a URL like:
>
>https://github.com/OWNER/PROJECT/archive/REVISION/NAME.tar.gz
>
> where tag can be any tag or
Hi everyone,
it's been a while and because of increasing requests and important security
fixes we release pagure version 5.14.1 today!
The release is build based on version 5.13.3 with 59 backports:
- 13 features, 34 fixes, 4 security fixes and 8 improvements of the
documentation.
Checkout th
> On 05/24/2024 5:03 PM CEST Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 2024-05-24 at 16:55 +0200, Dominik Wombacher wrote:
> > [4] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pagure
>
> good news and thanks, I want to test in my local machine, to do that I
> need the package upda
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/wxmacmolplt/settings#usersgroups-tab
Users & Groups
Below is the list of users having commit rights to this repo.
rathann (main admin)
swt2c (commit)
scitech_sig (admin)
Let me know if you have any trouble with rebuilding.
Regards,
Dom
es Paket ist:
kernel-core-4.13.0-0.rc1.git1.1.fc27.i686
GPG-Schlüssel sind eingerichtet als:
file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-26-i386
--
Dominik Kucher
A-2130 Mistelbach, Ebendorferstraße 7/2/3
p: +43 (0) 720 511 941
f: +43 (0) 1 34242 289967
m: +43 (0) 676 57 68 677
signature.asc
in
production soon, in a matter of weeks. Until then, it's still fairly
straight forward to test a package locally.
I invite you to take a look at the material and reach out to us on IRC
(contact info on the linked page, #fedora-ci on freenode or via mailing
list) with questions.
Thank you
On Tuesday, 08 June 2021 at 21:23, Jiri Kucera wrote:
> Hi Dominik,
>
> from paraview source rpm is produced paraview-devel which is a dependency
> of libeml-devel and libmatroska-devel:
>
> [root@fedora ~]# dnf --enablerepo '*-source' repoquery --whatrequires
>
Hi everyone,
I announced this already to the current
Co-Maintainers (Cloud SIG) a week ago
but didn't get a response.
Open up the audience for awareness and
in case someone is interested to take
over some packages.
Packages in scope:
rpms/aws-c-auth
rpms/aws-c-compression
rpms/aws-c-event-s
Hi everyone,
as announced a week ago [1], I orphaned the following packages today:
rpms/aws-c-auth
rpms/aws-c-compression
rpms/aws-c-event-stream
rpms/aws-checksums
rpms/aws-c-http
rpms/aws-c-io
rpms/aws-c-mqtt
rpms/aws-c-s3
rpms/aws-c-sdkutils
rpms/ec2-instance-connect
rpms/s2n-tls
Dom
(FAS: wo
On Thursday, 21 January 2010 at 18:21, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> We have an existing bug where if you're in single-user mode, and
> SELinux is active, various commands don't print to the console.
> The root of this is the single-user shell isn't running in the
> right SELinux context, as there's not
On Thursday, 12 August 2010 at 04:19, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
[...]
> I happened to have a full list of all former xulchris owned packages around:
>
[...]
> cksfv -- Utility to manipulate SFV files
Taken.
Regards,
R.
--
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion
a short e-mail announcing
the ABI breakage.
Best regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu
"Faith manages."
-- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"
--
deve
Hi Matthias,
On Thursday, 19 August 2010 at 16:39, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 16:24 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > Dear GNOME maintainers,
> > I would appreciate it if you announced changes that cause broken
> > dependencie
On Thursday, 19 August 2010 at 18:26, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 17:18 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > On Thursday, 19 August 2010 at 16:39, Matthias Clasen wrote:
[...]
> > > Again, I'm sorry. Maybe it makes you feel better to
those libs?
>
> e.g. media/libvpx media/libvorbis modules/libimg/png
I'd say the question should be not "if", but "when". Otherwise it's
a violation of the packaging guidelines.
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http
- we cannot have two packages
providing a library with the same name doing different things. libotf and
openmpi
need to sort it out between themselves.
We had issues with packages providing the same binaries, but I think this is
the first time I see it with a library.
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedor
er-version subpackages conditional via macros
and build only the one that has been updated.
Example: we have unison-2.9-1 package which produces
unison-2.9-1
unison28-2.8-2
unison21-2.1-5
We want to update unison28, so the next build of unison-2.9-2 produces only:
unison28-2.8.1-1
What do you th
On Thursday, 25 February 2010 at 22:29, Thomas Spura wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I never saw this anywhere before, so I'd like to ask here first, before
> doing so ;)
>
> Is it allowed to create a file ~/.mpd.conf, when building in koji and
> deleting afterwards?
>
> I need to write down a password in
On Saturday, 27 February 2010 at 16:44, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Feb 2010, Mike McGrath wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 27 Feb 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> >
> > > Chris Adams wrote:
> > > > IMHO you're developing the wrong distro. It is statements like yours
> > > > that contribute to the "Fedora is
On Sunday, 28 February 2010 at 11:44, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 01:23:21AM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> wrote:
> > Speaking as someone who is still on F11, I want the latest software
> > as long as it doesn't break anything, bec
On Monday, 01 March 2010 at 23:34, Doug Ledford wrote:
[...]
> One could argue that the current bodhi karma system is simply too
> simplistic for real use cases.
There's nothing to argue. It's rather obvious. :)
> Maybe instead of just +1 -1, there should be:
>
> Fixes my problem
> Works for me
On Saturday, 06 March 2010 at 18:49, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 06.03.2010, 18:17 +0100 schrieb Michał Piotrowski:
[...]
> > Because I don't understand the
> > criteria for Fedora package update.
> >
> > Why I can install KDE 4.4 in F11 and I can't install latest gnome?
>
> Becaus
On Monday, 08 March 2010 at 22:59, Matthew Garrett wrote:
[...]
> Proposal
>
>
> The ability for maintainers to flag an update directly into the updates
> repository will be disabled. Before being added to updates, the package
> must receive a net karma of +3 in Bodhi.
-1 to this. I've
ct.
Agreed. However, we should ask ourselves if it's better to have a package
in our distribution even if it doesn't fit ideally with the rest or not
to have it at all?
I prefer the latter. Someone might step up as co-maintainer and help.
Starting from scratch is usually more difficult.
On Wednesday, 10 March 2010 at 17:34, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 04:38:53PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> wrote:
[...]
> > Agreed. However, we should ask ourselves if it's better to have a package
> > in our distribution even if it
On Wednesday, 17 March 2010 at 10:54, Dawid Gajownik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after changing job and place of living I have no more time to maintain
> kadu, sorry. That's the main reason why I have decided to orphan this
> package.
I have a potential maintainer for this package, but he's not sponsored
On Thursday, 18 March 2010 at 00:15, Julian Sikorski wrote:
[...]
> I was thinking about taking this, but since I'm primarily a
> Gnome/empathy user I guess I'm not the most optimal choice. On the other
> hand, I could update kadu to the latest version in the meantime. This
> would mean updating li
On Thursday, 18 March 2010 at 00:32, Julian Sikorski wrote:
[...]
> I'll try to get it done tomorrow, last time I looked the kadu spec
> looked very convoluted.
The person who wants to take over maintainership has submitted an updated
package here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=57329
On Thursday, 18 March 2010 at 20:33, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> W dniu 18.03.2010 10:45, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski pisze:
> > On Thursday, 18 March 2010 at 00:32, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> > [...]
> >> I'll try to get it done tomorrow, last time I looked th
57 Package(s)
Upgrade 1 Package(s)
Total download size: 14 M
Is this ok [y/N]: N
Exiting on user Command
Complete!
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu
"Faith manages."
-- Del
user giving away LVM-formatted USB drives.
I'd think NTFS would be much more common, if only for its ability
to store files larger than 4GB.
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu
"Faith manag
ate or create derivative works based upon the Software. You shall not
> reverse engineer, decompile, disassemble, or otherwise attempt to discover
> the source code of the Software. [...]
Not enforceable in many countries.
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wik
.
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu
"Faith manages."
-- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
h
Hi,
On Monday, 13 December 2010 at 23:23, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's been quite a while since I've used the big red lizard and
> unfortunately, I've lost my password. No problems. Hit the reset button.
>
> As expected, it comes up with that it's sent a token to my email address,
> but no
nnart?) please explain this extremely bright idea of hard-coding
what should be admin-configurable?
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu
"Faith manages."
-- Delenn to Le
ultiple real packages and will work as long as at least
one of them is installed.
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu
"Faith manages."
-- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confess
e
the firmwares acceptable for Fedora and the plugins acceptable for
RPMFusion.
I have a preliminary spec file for the aforementioned bits, by the way.
I really don't like having files floating around the file system outside
RPM control.
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora http://fedoraprojec
when the last JBIG patent expires. If HP still
> doesn't want to free the plugin code then, we could at least ship a Free
> replacement if somebody makes one.
Do you mean foo2* packages from RPMFusion? :)
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
R
On Thursday, 17 March 2011 at 07:48, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > Do you mean foo2* packages from RPMFusion? :)
>
> I mean a drop-in replacement for the hplip-plugin based on the foo2* code,
> or even just on jbigkit, depend
On Tuesday, 06 July 2010 at 11:53, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 10:13:40AM +0800, Chen Lei wrote:
> > 2010/6/18 Chen Lei :
[...]
> > Can we orphan his packages now? I'd like to take scons, I don't think
> > waiting more time will be helpful.
>
> According to:
> https://admin
Hi all.
I'm orphaning GNU Gadu (gg2). I no longer use it (pidgin replaces it
quite well), upstream is dead and the project website domain has been
taken over. If someone is interested, feel free to pick it up. Otherwise
it should probably be dropped before F-14.
There are some crasher bugs report
Hello!
On Monday, 20 July 2015 at 07:58, Beat Küng wrote:
[...]
> I've been a Fedora user for a while now, and I'm looking forward to be
> part of the Fedora project and contribute to it!
Welcome! It seems that many follow this path.
We're looking forward to your contributio
27;t use it and I have no contact with anyone who
does anymore. Feel free to pick it up.
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu
"Faith manages."
-- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confess
ng packages,
so taking it.
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org
"Faith manages."
-- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://
BUILDROOT/mozilla-noscript-2.6.9.33-1.fc24.x86_64/usr/share/mozilla/extensions/{ec8030f7-c20a-464f-9b0e-13a3a9e97384}/{73a6fe31-595d-460b-a920-fcc0f8843232}
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org
"Faith manages."
-- De
useful sending patches to the devel list than sending
them directly to package maintainer or attaching to bugzilla.
I wouldn't expect a patch for one of my packages to be sent here and
I believe most other packagers wouldn't either.
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora http://fedoraproje
27; token
> class FilesDragDropHandler: public QObject {
>^
>
> That seems to be another missing header (as with rhbz1234405) not a
> Boost problem.
This is fixed upstream. I've updated to 8.2.0 for f23+.
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fed
should be understandable that it takes time to review and adapt the package
to the Fedora Packaging Guidelines. The other hasn't seen a new comment
for only a week, so I really don't understand why Marcin threw the towel
already.
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora http://fedoraproject
there any reason why Fedora packager would
> need to modify the original extension?
Yes. Bundled JavaScript libraries are one example. Fedora-specific
preferences would be another.
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org
"Faith
g with cases of bundling as they're
brought to our attention. I believe there are enough cases that are not
straightforward to decide to warrant analyzing them closely and voting.
As you've probably noticed, not everyone on the FPC has exactly the same
stance on bundling, though we all
o attempts to package something that bundles the same code.
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251198
[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251281
[3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251289
[4] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248730
[5] https
On Monday, 14 September 2015 at 21:35, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 02:38:55PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> wrote:
> > New bundling exception could be granted automatically in cases where:
> > * the bundled code is not packaged in Fedo
iB
>
> These are needed on UEFI systems
> shim-signed is 633KiB
> grub2-efi is 837KiB
>
> So, I'm not sure where 70MB is coming from.
[...]
Matt was talking about 70MB on disk (installed size), not rpm package size.
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/
: opencl-driver
Another approach could be to create a meta package (named
opencl-drivers, for example - similar to xorg-x11-drivers) which would
depend on all vendor-specific implementations.
I guess the second approach is more fool-proof. Comments?
Regards,
Dominik
[1]
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/c
On Thursday, 24 September 2015 at 14:44, Fabian Deutsch wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> wrote:
> > Dear maintainers,
> > I've just enabled OpenCL support in the gromacs package[1] and would
> > like to
l open CVE) in luatex (and probably
in many more packages) is a good example of why this is a bad idea.
The current FPC bundling exception process should be preserved,
otherwise we're effectively removing all motivation to work with
upstreams on unbundling.
> === Strongly Recommended ===
&g
Hi,
On Thursday, 01 October 2015 at 00:04, Christian Dersch wrote:
> I've taken yasm.
I'd like to co-maintain. It's essential for mplayer and ffmpeg over at
RPMFusion. Request for commit access submitted.
Regards,
--
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.o
7; and 'Deny all' buttons.
>
> So feel free to visit: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acl/pending/ and
> take action.
Wonderful! I wasn't even aware that people were waiting for my
approvals. All done now.
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/
mat, so
> hopefully some of these will magically be fixed in the future.
Fixed chemtool just now, it turns out I was using the wrong icon
(a PNG icon is shipped in the tarball, too).
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer h
t.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121425
As usual, co-maintainers are welcome.
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu
"Faith manages."
-- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations&quo
ve some time
to keep contributing to Fedora.
> So, I'm orphaning the following packages:
>
[...]
> gromacs
Taken, co-maintainers welcome.
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org
"Faith manages."
-- Del
On Sunday, 20 July 2014 at 22:47, Björn Persson wrote:
> Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> >I intend to unretire lazygal, a static web gallery generator, which was
> >retired as of F15.
>
> Thank you for working on this. I was planning to unretire Lazyga
area of packaging interest/expertise:
Reason(s) for willing to join the FPC:
Thanks in advance,
Dominik
--
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org
"Faith manages."
-- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions a
On Thursday, 16 October 2014 at 16:47, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-10-16 at 14:40 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We seem to have a number of broken dependencies in F21 that have gone
> > unfixed for a quite some time. Not sure what's up with them; the
> > maintainers are s
Hello, Piotr.
On Saturday, 18 October 2014 at 00:40, Piotr Popieluch wrote:
> My name is Piotr Popieluch and live in the Hague in the Netherlands. I
> work as a Unix sysadmin with focus on monitoring. I manage rhel boxes
> professionally and use Fedora on my laptop. Because of this I want to
> giv
On Friday, 27 February 2015 at 11:51, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> Do we need to tell upstream about these patches?
Yes, it's part of maintainer responsibilities.
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org
"
Hi,
On Sunday, 01 March 2015 at 15:45, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Audacious 3.6 has been released.
>
> This is another chance for interested people to join and help deciding how
> to proceed with the Fedora packages. I'm still looking for co-maintainers,
> too, especially some who have an opinion
On Monday, 09 March 2015 at 16:06, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
> 06.03.2015 19:34, Kevin Fenzi пишет:
> > On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 11:31:45 -0500
> > Rich Mattes wrote:
> >
> >> There's no planned f22 rebuild for gcc5, as f22 defaults to
> >> -D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0. These issues are cropping up in f23.
>
Hi, Marcin.
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 04:53, Marcin Haba wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am going to try join to Fedora packagers.
Welcome to the Fedora Community!
> I created and I develop Baculum tool. It is web interface to Bacula
> Community services. In RedHat Bugzilla I added Package Review ticke
On Monday, 30 March 2015 at 11:08, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 30 March 2015 at 07:57, Till Maas wrote:
> > - provides hibernation support via "systemctl hibernate", which is
> > also what pm-hibernate does (why do we have two tools for the same
> > core task?)
>
> pm-hibernate sho
s "libpugixml.so.1.0()(64bit)"
[...]
> mkvtoolnix-0:7.7.0-1.fc21.x86_64
> mkvtoolnix-gui-0:7.7.0-1.fc21.x86_64
[...]
mkvtoolnix is mine, feel free to request commit ACL for rebuilds.
This is a new addition to mkvtoolnix dependencies, because I haven't
noticed it was bundled before.
I
several
useful groups off the top of my head.
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org
"Faith manages."
-- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.f
Konsole output
> libproj.so.9()(64bit)
>
> but how can the "()(64bit)" part be specified?
Something like:
%if 0%{?__isa_bits} == 64
%global req_suf ()(64bit)
%else
%global req_suf %{nil}
%endif
and then:
Requires: libproj.so.%{proj_somaj}%{req_suf}
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora h
1 - 100 of 952 matches
Mail list logo
