Koji only uses yum to make the chroot's we have it on the list of things to add
to koji supporting using dnf to install the chroot.
Dennis
On May 14, 2015 4:09:08 AM CDT, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
>For your information:
>
>Yesterday gdb package introduced "Remommends: d
Additionally everything is installable provides the minimal offering and has
anaconda's defaults rather than servers.
Dennis
On June 15, 2016 4:31:03 PM CDT, Chris Murphy wrote:
>Actually this is better:
>
>https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ser...@lists.fedoraproje
Sometimes a maintainer doesn't want to approve ACLs for "reasons" but doesn't
want to reject the request for various reasons including the requestor
re-request of denied requests.
Dennis
On August 5, 2016 3:34:58 PM GMT+02:00, Helio Chissini de Castro
wrote:
>I hav
pecial, minimalist,
>boot target. So if the system boots normally before the update or
>upgrade, it should boot and assemble fine for the offline update. It
>could fail following a successful upgrade however - if there's some
>new previously undiscovered bug.
Fedup has not existe
itting is because you have to always rebuild the srpm for
the target arch, rpm processes the spec and sets the macros in the srpm at srpm
creation time. Which can be wrong when you go to do anything on the srpm. Koji
rebuilds the srpm on every arch to ensure deps for that arch are correct,
x27;ll
>cancel and look
>at it when I have time. Koji possibly has an untold number of zombie
>processes that
>need cleanup.
There is some builds that were restarted. Some all the processes went to sleep,
others the test suite has caused zombies, koji will reap them when the tasks
have
Spec files are licensed under mit license the same as fedora as a whole.
Dennis
On 2 June 2017 3:07:15 pm GMT-05:00, Matthew Miller
wrote:
>On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 09:42:48PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>> (Note: pagure can and will enforce the FPCA for dist-git)
>
>I know
There is also groups in fas for alternate architectures. On top of CVS admin
and proven packager, that all some how have to be tied into the ACLS. Proven
packager give you access to everything except for the Mozilla packages and the
others give access to everything.
Dennis
On 2 June 2017 2
fault private comments in
or off for different products.
Dennis
On 25 October 2016 7:29:25 am GMT-05:00, Kevin Kofler
wrote:
>Jakub Filak wrote:
>> I will repeat my argument again - users are allowed to do it when
>filling
>> a private bug manually.
>
>M
I hope you really mean f25 final validation :)
Dennis
On 30 October 2016 5:44:41 pm GMT-05:00, Adam Williamson
wrote:
>Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting tomorrow. I don't have
>any topics lined up, and we are mostly focused on Fedora 24 Final
>release val
You have to find the existing buildroot override in bodhi and change it's
expiry date.
Dennis
On 13 November 2016 8:27:27 am GMT-06:00, Michael Schwendt
wrote:
>Hello!
>
>I'd like to build F25 audacious-plugins with mpg123, but can't because:
>
>1) There is no
Without filesystem capabilities, many things will not work. Ping as a user for
instance. Lots of setuid binaries switched to using filesystem capabilities
rather than setuid and require it to work. RPM failing is the right thing to do.
Dennis
On 29 November 2016 8:04:07 am AEST, "J.
I would think that they are now allowed as they should work out of the box.
Maybe we need legal to clarify, then update the guidelines.
Dennis
On 11 December 2016 11:26:38 am GMT+01:00, Till Maas
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Since Fedora now ships a MP3 decoder, does the Code vs Content sectio
failed build? Or I must run it manually?
>
> I see the same with my "maradns". GIT shows version bump in spec,
>but there is no build in Koji.
Please submit the build in this case. If the srpm for instance failed to create
there is no task in koji. I do not know why it was not s
There is no debug repos for the buildroot repos.
Dennis
On 31 July 2017 6:45:24 am GMT-05:00, Florian Weimer wrote:
>Is there are debuginfo repository matching the contents of the
>f27-build
>buildroot repository?
>
>This would be extremely helpful for verifying the presence
Looking at https://ring.cx/en/about/technical the requirement of ffmpeg and
patented codecs is likely why it's not in fedora and would be difficult to add.
Just needs someone to figure it out and do the work.
Dennis
On 1 August 2017 12:47:12 pm GMT-05:00, Jos Vos wrote:
>Hi,
>
>
accounts in pkgdb, and compare them to the active valid certs, and
> any discrepancies where the account owns packages, we can tag those for
> needing attention.
there is an index file we can use to see if a user renewed there cert or not.
Dennis
signature.asc
Description: This is
gt; p.s.s More information on these deadlines and freezes:
> >--Feature Submission: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Policy
> >--Spins: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Spins_Process
> >--Feature Freeze: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Feature_Freeze_Policy
>
> One
source file, for instance), this could break.
>
> Are there other reasons than I see for doing #2?
>
> -Toshio
snort builds 9 times for different options.
it uses approach number 2
Dennis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
kernel acl
> has committed anything afaik).
>
> The git tree commit went unnoticed because the commitdiff hook isn't
> wired up yet.
>
> Dave
I would be the only one not explicitly on the list that has commited. but all
of my commits have been sparc specifc ones.
koji to apply the git tags after
> a successful build, but its not yet
been implemented. For the time
> being, I plan to simply add annotated tags
myself after each
> successful build of packages I own.
Koji will never
interact directly with git. the plan is to have something watching f
e", "fedora 15", "--define", "fedora
> >
1", "-q", "--qf", "%{VERSION} ", "--specfile",
> >
"/home/petr/fedora/nas/nas.spec"],...)
> >
> > You can check it with this
simple spec file:
> >
> > %if 0%{?fedora} > 8
> >echo TRUE %{?fedora}
>
> %else
> >echo FALSE %{?fedora}
> > %endif
> >
> > -- Petr
> >
The
latest build in koji does the right thing. I need to push it out as an
update
Dennis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
ule, file_basename, file_hash):
>
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pyfedpkg/__init__.py", line 580, in
>
file_exists curl.perform()
> pycurl.error: (60, 'Peer certificate cannot be
authenticated with known CA
> certificates')
>
> PS: I'm just download
he "there is too much STUFF
in fedora" bit.
Parsing of the metadata isn't strictly necessary as you could simply let
the packagers declare their packages as apps. Beeing able to do this
automatically is a nice bonus though.
Regards,
Dennis
--
devel mailing list
deve
ed builds as long as we keep the build. that build
however was not built in koji. it was built in plague and imported into koji.
we never had build logs available for it.
Dennis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.
ast feature freeze. It can
not target F-14 but can be looked at for F-15
Dennis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
and my sysetm to never
fully come up.
With no outcome other than to stick with upstart for now its not all
wonderful and peachy. it has been the case forever that if your using ldap
for auth you need to have network start before dbus that has always been the
answer but you broke that from happening.
Dennis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
The Fedora 14 "Laughlin" Alpha release is available! This release offers a
preview of some of the best free and open source technology currently under
development. Catch a glimpse of the future:
http://fedoraproject.org/get-prerelease
== What is the Alpha release? ==
The Alpha release contains
ut this is only because all new mainboards I bought still supported
> PCI, so I can still use it.
>
> Regards
> Till
Ive not brought one in years, I jsut use whatever is onboard. I have no need
to but something highend for my needs.
Dennis
signature.asc
Description
ople who don't run NetworkManager?
>
> For the longest time, NM only worked predictably for logged-in users,
> which made "network" service a requirement for servers with static IPs
> and such.
>
> Jeff
There are still use cases that NetworkManager doesnt
=/sbin/upstart to your boot line will get you booting using
upstart.
Dennis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Koji
used to keep the file lists in the database, but that did not scale well
and caused imports to take too long.
Separate static repos that contain all package versions should be
feasible and would have the most utility.
Cheers
-- Dennis
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
rts. I've not had to do
> this before, so am I missing something and if I include it, will it then
> fail to build on koji?
>
> TTFN
>
> Paul
Mono has had alot of issues building on x86_64 recently. it would be great if
you worked with upstream to track down and resolve the 6
On Wednesday, September 15, 2010 03:56:39 pm Paul F. Johnson wrote:
> Hi Dennis,
>
> > Mono has had alot of issues building on x86_64 recently. it would be
> > great if you worked with upstream to track down and resolve the 64 bit
> > issues.
> >
> >From what
/dbus-glib updates be
> pushed for F-14 as well? Some packages like Vala have newer versions out
> that we cannot update to without this.
This is an issue with the buildroot causing builds to fail. ill take a
look at it.
Dennis
pgp4wywTcqTke.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
Mark your calendars, and get ready to break out and have some fun: Fedora 14
will launch in early November. Fedora is the leading-edge, community-
developed, free and open source operating system that continues to deliver
innovative features to users worldwide, with a new release every six months
s ?
>
> Chitlesh
did you recently get a new cert? if so you may need to update nss. if your
using rhel6 you should use fedora or convert the cert to a format nss
understands
(openssl x509 -in ~/.fedora.cert -text; echo; openssl rsa -in ~/.fedora.cert)
> fedora.cert.new
Dennis
and then save the
standard/global/default rules in /etc/sysconfig/iptables and the service
rules it filterd out into /etc/sysconfig/iptables.d/. When loading
the whole thing is executed in reverse.
Once workable semantics are found for such a management layer the second
step could be to move th
s
> a precondition for this.
Notice how the last clause misses "using the same name"? You are perfectly
free to distribute modified versions as long as you don't call them
Firefox. That's what the Iceweasel people decided to do.
So all freedoms are intact.
Regards,
Dennis
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
et of rules you want to
support for the subsystems.
Thomas Woerners idea looks like the best approach to this. I was aiming for
a more iterative approach using scripts instead of a daemon but if Thomas
has fleshed this out already and some code working then more power to him :)
Regards,
Dennis
-
; Thomas
"fedora-cert -v" will verify if the cert is valid or not.
when you need a new cert the recommended way to get it it to use fedora-
packager-setup or fedora-cert.
you dont upload a ssl cert to fas. and there is no waiting for it to be valid.
Dennis
signature.as
trigger warning
bells.
So yes someone if they had access to by AES key could duplicate my key but i
would know quickly.
It sounds like you do not fully understand how the yubikeys work. either that
or i dont understand the attack you are describing?
Dennis
signature.asc
Description: Thi
On Friday, October 08, 2010 09:15:08 am Farkas Levente wrote:
> On 10/08/2010 03:53 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > On Thursday, October 07, 2010 04:25:45 am Thomas Spura wrote:
> >> On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 11:19:21 +0200
> >>
> >> Farkas Levente wrote:
> >>
e installed? There was a nss build that
> could not handle the certs offered by FAS.
the nss issue only effects uploads to the lookaside cache. koji itself uses
pyopenssl and have no such issues
Dennis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--
devel mailing list
dev
i was able to build today i'm not again (and there was not any
> kind of package in the last few weeks:-).
Rhel6's curl doesnt support fas certs.
but openssl does since it makes them.
does
koji list-tasks --mine
work?
Dennis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
u cannot make two distinct target audiences happy with one workflow
especially if one of those groups requires a limitation of choice.
Regards,
Dennis
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 10/12/2010 02:52 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 10/12/2010 02:16 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>> On 10/12/2010 10:28 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>> Striving for usability and pleasantness for the untechnical users
>>>>
On 10/12/2010 02:57 PM, Jean-Francois Saucier wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
> wrote:
>> On 10/12/2010 10:28 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>> Striving for usability and pleasantness for the untechnical user
On 10/12/2010 04:20 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 02:16:49PM +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>> The only way to accomplish this without actually removing the features is
>> to have two anaconda modes one for easy desktop installation and one full
>>
On 10/12/2010 05:13 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 08:06:59AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 10/12/10 7:20 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 02:16:49PM +0200, D
this usually kills any progress because
not only do they not come to an agreement initially but even if they do any
future changes now have to be agreed upon by both sides.
This sort of tight coupling is exactly what should be avoided if you want
to make both groups of users happy.
Regards,
Dennis
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 10/14/2010 06:32 PM, Lars Seipel wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 October 2010 15:56:02 Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>> Now we are really talking semantics. The point is that users should not be
>> confronted with choices they don't really need to make or they don't
>>
On 10/14/2010 07:05 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 10/12/2010 03:56 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>> On 10/12/2010 02:52 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>> On 10/12/2010 02:16 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>>>> On 10/12/2010 10:28 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>>&
Future (Oxf13, 17:18:45)
* Oxf13 (Jesse Keating) to step down as Fedora Release Engineering
lead for a years time to work on internal Red Hat source migration
(Oxf13, 17:23:17)
* dgilmore (Dennis Gilmore) to take over as Release Engineering Lead
(Oxf13, 17:23:37)
* Transition to happe
Interesting move: http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/551
Has anyone looked into bringing Wayland to Fedora? If not this might be the
right time getting involved in the discussion.
http://wayland.freedesktop.org/
Regards,
Dennis
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Wayland it would just not be part of the core.
On the net I read that Ubuntu wants to "ditch X" in favor of Wayland but
that's not what I read in Marks post. As I understand it the plan is to
introduce Wayland but not get rid of X for years to come. Sounds like a
reasonable p
y anymore" I think this is bogus. Nowadays virtually all
application aren't X application but gtk/qt applications and the toolkits
tend to support different backends. So you will be able to use your apps as
long as the toolkits support X and I think that's going to be a long time
unless Wayland is dramatically successfull.
Regards,
Dennis
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 11/06/2010 07:39 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 05:28:08PM +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>> First I think you should probably head over to the Wayland mailing list and
>> get involved there. That's something I also recommend to Richard be
Hey all,
Sometimes there is a bit to much noise in #fedora-admin so i created #fedora-
releng for releng discussion and as a place to come and get real time support
for release engineering related issues.
So please drop by and say gday
Dennis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
nd we do have that rule, I could have sworn that it
had only been built that day and not made it into rawhide. if i had realised
that it had made it to rawhide i would have bumped the epoch on the old build
to ensure that updating was correctly handled.
Dennis
signature.asc
Description: This is
an outage and rename all of the epel
branches from el4 ->epel-4 el5->epel5 el6->epel6 git to make it a bit clearer.
Dennis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
On Wednesday, August 03, 2011 02:14:55 AM Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 09:40 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > Hey all, this is a heads up that with the branching of f16 we have
> > dropped dist- from the tags and targets in koji.
> >
> > the target th
my boot EBS volume to another instance and changing the
> kernel back to kernel-2.6.38.8-35.fc15.x86_64 allowed my instance to boot
> normally.
>
> [/quote]
>
> Anyone can tell me more after reading the console log?
>
> TIA
>
> --Marek
looks like selinux is w
The Fedora 16 "Verne" Alpha release is available! This release offers a
preview of some of the best free and open source technology currently
under development. Catch a glimpse of the future:
http://fedoraproject.org/get-prerelease
== What is the Alpha release? ==
The Alpha release contains al
Minutes:http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-
meeting/2011-09-16/releng.2011-09-16-20.05.html
Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-
meeting/2011-09-16/releng.2011-09-16-20.05.txt
Log:http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-
meeting/2011-09-16/releng.2011-0
Mark your calendars, and get ready to go exploring: The release of
Fedora 16, codenamed "Verne," is scheduled for release in early
November. Fedora is the leading edge, free and open source operating
system that continues to bring everyone fresh, innovative features
with each release, delighting us
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
on Monday October 24 we will be doing the last push to stable, after
that the only things that will get pushed to stable before GA will be
things that have been accepted as release blockers.
Thanks
Release Engineering
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATU
w available except EC2 images, which will be
> uploaded fairly soon (see
> https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4967#comment:8 ).
ec2 images are up and publicly available final will be pushed to all
zones, the rc images however are only available in the us-east-1 region.
32 bit: ami-fddf
articularly those mentioned in the first
> paragraph, please let us know their availability so we can set up a
> meeting? thanks.
Let me know when ill be there
Dennis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Ive not used snort in ages and not really had time to maintain it. im going to
orphan it in pkgdb if no one picks it up in a week ill retire it
it needs a bit of work as its an odd beast
> snort
Dennis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--
devel mailing l
27;
>
> which I'm not sure about --- perhaps it was expecting mysql to export
> such a function? We tightened up the exports list some time ago, so
> I'd have expected such a problem to be caught already. Did pure-ftpd
> get through the F15 mass rebuild successfully?
y usable.
I'm not sure how to detect if the Input Method is working but I've been
using the nightly builds for some time now in /opt/firefox and things look
perfectly fine here.
Regards,
Dennis
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
/firefox and run it from there. To get
rid of it just delete the directory and you're done. So why RPMs are
generally preferable in this particular case the manual approach is quite
manageable.
Regards,
Dennis
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi All a heads up that change freeze for the Fedora 15 Beta is Tuesday April
5th. after this point only accepted blocker bugs will be pulled in. Please
limit your changes to try and avoid unintended breakages.
thanks
Dennis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
one that meets the
release criteria, it then becomes the alpha release.
for beta we do a series of RC composes until we get one that meets the release
criteria, it then becomes the beta release.
for GA we do a series of RC composes until we get one that meets the release
criteria, it then
On Friday, April 08, 2011 01:11:18 PM Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Dennis Gilmore said:
> > Chris its the teminology we have always used.
> > each phase has a series of release candidates.
>
> I thought they were called "test composes" or TC, not RC.
the
The clock is ticking. The days are counting down. The release of
Fedora 15, codenamed "Lovelock," is scheduled for release in late
May. Fedora is the leading edge, free and open source operating
system that continues to deliver innovative features to users
worldwide, with a new release every si
systemd. ive
seen cases where the yum updated box wouldnt boot. and you cant go back to
the older kernel to poke at things.
Dennis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi All,
A heads up that change freeze for the Fedora 15 is Monday May 9th. after this
point only accepted blocker bugs will be pulled in. Please limit your changes
to try and avoid unintended breakages.
thanks
Dennis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
well IIRC -- they are noarch and can be built anywhere,
> but we wanted to %check them using wine which only runs on i386.
>
> Rich.
make it archeful with a noarch subpackage that has the noarch bits. if you do
it ExclusiveArch for the base arch you want it built on it would work as you
want
Dennis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
C4 after all? It's quite surprising to see 4 updates pushed
> to Branched after the mail declaring the release gold.
>
> Kevin Kofler
They were in RC3 but did not have the karma to get pushed to stable when i
pushed the builds we included for blockers.
Dennis
signature.a
5 and a box that gets newly installed with F16).
>
> -Toshio
Im with Toshio here there is potential pitfalls with many legacy systems.
there is also great potential that system ids from newer systems will clash
with legacy ids in ldap and nis setups, we really should make it a feature
t sure what is the right way
> - F16 Feature/Release Notes/ ? We can also annouce the 200 limit for
> reserved IDs. ;)
another issue that i thought of was existing ldap/nis systems that allocate
regular users in the 500-1000 range when installing or upgrading if they use
policies that probit system accounts from logging in will have users unable to
login.
Dennis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
n centralized ID are
> also available via NIS/LDAP.
new installs in places with legacy systems cand and likely will be effected
with the result in cases being that users can not log into systems any longer.
Dennis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wednesday, June 01, 2011 12:48:36 PM David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 18:53 +0200, Phil Knirsch wrote:
> > We have tested them on a Power7 box as well as on an older Apple G5, but
> > your mileage may vary. Especially on Power5 and Power6 the problem still
> > exists that the unifi
ambassadors to produce and
distribute at events.
Dennis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
ther servers that work totally for us. if we are getting rid
of it we should also look as using something else for the torrents we provide.
A nice thing to have is something that we can use with ipv6 and ipv4, the
server that torrent.fp.o is on has both
Dennis
signature.asc
Descriptio
he first time and that offers the user a short introduction
to the basic principles of the desktop.
Easy discoverability and good usability may sometimes go hand in hand but
also at times are mutual exclusive. Having a short introductory "pamphlet"
would help the user understand the basics without resorting to awkward
tool-tips or pop-ups to nudge the user in the right direction.
Regards,
Dennis
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
eadline itself but the fact that you cannot coerce
volunteers into action and that's what you are trying to suggest.
Regards,
Dennis
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I don't know that it's a hard requirement, but I think every group needs
to have at least one default or mandatory package. Otherwise, "yum
groupinstall" will have no effect.
-- Dennis
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 11:46 -0800, Kevin Wright wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> I was won
build the liveCD?
Regards,
Dennis
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530784
and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553059
[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564519
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma
#x27;, 'SSL3_WRITE_BYTES', 'ssl handshake
> failure')]
> make: *** [build] Error 1
>
> My cert is fine as I can commit to cvs.
cvs and koji auth are two seperate things. the certificate you are using is
revoked because you got a new one at some time. if you dont
ge.
The rawhide repo is targeted for fedora 14. unless you want fedora 14 content
then install and enable it. if you only want to track Fedora 13 then your
repos are setup correctly
Dennis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
l say again here sorry i should not have
said anything it was not appropriate for me to do so
Dennis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
ssh as many times as I want.
This needs to be followed by:
-A INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 22 -j DROP
That way as long as you stay within the limiting conditions you get
ACCEPTed by the first rule but if you make more ssh attempts the limit rule
no longer applies and you get DROPed instead.
Regards,
Dennis
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Minutes:http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-
meeting/2010-03-26/fedora-releng.2010-03-26-17.36.html
Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-
meeting/2010-03-26/fedora-releng.2010-03-26-17.36.txt
Log:http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-
meeting/2010-0
Minutes:http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-
meeting/2010-04-09/fedora-releng.2010-04-09-17.03.html
Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-
meeting/2010-04-09/fedora-releng.2010-04-09-17.03.txt
Log:http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-
Minutes:http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-
meeting/2010-04-16/fedora-releng.2010-04-16-17.05.html
Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-
meeting/2010-04-16/fedora-releng.2010-04-16-17.05.txt
Log:http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-
meeting/2010-04-16/
fixed? That is the only thing
that keeps me on F11 right now. When running the F13 LiveCD I cannot play a
360p Youtube video without it dropping frames due to high CPU usage but on
F11 things work fine an CPU usage is significantly lower.
Regards,
Dennis
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedo
On 04/30/2010 05:24 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 13:56 +0200, Dennis J. wrote:
>> On 04/29/2010 05:24 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 04:15 +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
>>>> As far as I understand, both Nouveau and the Intel gra
1 - 100 of 1693 matches
Mail list logo
