RE: Where are we going? (Not a rant)

2012-12-09 Thread dave . gibbons2
> The thread was already screwed. > > Yes, I know about it. This will be a problem of the past soon enough. > > Dan You make it sound like you don't usually top post, but in other threads you also top post: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-December/174781.html May I remind

Re: Where are we going? (Not a rant)

2012-12-09 Thread dave . gibbons2
On 09/12/2012 at 11:35 AM, "Dan Mashal" wrote: > >Sorry if I came off as impolite. It's a bit late here. It's not >like I love >top posting and getting on people's nerves. > >Anyways, please continue making assumptions about who I really am >instead >of looking at my townhall, questionnaire or

RE: Where are we going? (Not a rant)

2012-12-10 Thread dave . gibbons2
On 09/12/2012 at 10:03 PM, "Dan Mashal" wrote: > >MATE IS growing. And MATE developers are starting to contribute to >Gnome. :) > >Dan In the absence of any good reasons *not* to vote for any of the other candidates, and in the face of at least one reason not to vote for you, I'm happy you ca

RE: Where are we going? (Not a rant)

2012-12-10 Thread dave . gibbons2
On 10/12/2012 at 9:42 AM, "Dan Mashal" wrote: > >Classy. I wasn't going for classy ;) I was hoping to make an impact. But obviously falling on deaf ears. If anybody else is reading this car-crash thread, thank you for not voting for Dan Mashal. This lad is clearly not material for our board. C