centos epel xfce bluetooth broken

Hello Guys, bluetooth is broken. I installed all xfce4 package and xfe-bluetooth did not installed (dependency). The package can be straight forward compiled from fedora. http://centos.cms4all.org/repo/7/other/SRPMS/xfce-bluetooth-0-0.5.20150130git.el7.centos.src.rpm on my private server. Sin

Fedora 25 backport dnf pretransaction done in dnf-1.1.10 & dnf-plugins-extras (example snapper.yp)

r.py b/plugins/snapper.py index d0443b0..877be38 100644 --- a/plugins/snapper.py +++ b/plugins/snapper.py @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ # creates snapshots via 'snapper'. # # Copyright (C) 2014 Igor Gnatenko +# Copyright (C) 2017 Andreas Benzler # # This copyrighted material is made available to anyo

Does anyone know how to contact igjurisk?

Hello, according to the policy for non-responsive package maintainers: Does anyone know how to contact igjurisk (Igor Jurišković)? I have been trying to do so for the past 2 weeks. (see #552351) Thanks a lot, Andreas -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https

Contacting igjurisk ... ?

Hello, according to the policy for non-responsive package maintainers: Does anyone know how to contact igjurisk (Igor Jurišković)? I have been trying to do so for the past 2 weeks. (see #552351) Thanks a lot, Andreas -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https

Mumble's package owner is non-responsive, I wish to take over the package

least one FESco member. Cheers, Andreas Bug 552351 - Non-responsive package maintainer of Mumble https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552351 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: '/usr/bin/[' (was RE: FC12: Hidden files in /usr/bin/*)

and > without > escaping, while [ can't: [[ is a builtin, but [ isn't. Well, [ is a builtin too, but [[ is a keyword recognised by the parser, thus it can use special parsing rules. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC

Re: '/usr/bin/[' (was RE: FC12: Hidden files in /usr/bin/*)

"Bryn M. Reeves" writes: > [ may be a built in but then again (as its presence > in /usr/bin implies) it may not be :). Like any other command. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E "

Re: '/usr/bin/[' (was RE: FC12: Hidden files in /usr/bin/*)

"Bryn M. Reeves" writes: > On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 17:44 +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote: >> "Bryn M. Reeves" writes: >> >> > [ may be a built in but then again (as its presence >> > in /usr/bin implies) it may not be :). >> >> Lik

Re: RCS keywords rewritten in dist-git conversion?

Jesse Keating writes: > I suspect parsecvs got confused by the contents of the file having RCS > keywords. parsecvs's handling of expansion overrides is broken. http://repo.or.cz/w/parsecvs/schwab.git/commitdiff/5751a0b42436f90e5a36208967c74e3fdbb12970 Andreas. -- Andreas

Re: Python 2.7 status: python2.7 is in dist-f14

seth vidal writes: > I think I had suggested it, multiple times, and each time fesco had a > problem with it. > > maybe even the package was named package-swift > > http://skvidal.fedorapeople.org/misc/package-swift.spec You can also use package-cleanup --orphans. Andreas.

Re: git branch help?

"Richard W.M. Jones" writes: > I didn't know git could do this, but it sounds useful for other > (non-fedpkg) things. Can you explain how, or where to start looking? Look for git-new-workdir, it is in the contrib directory of the git sources. Andreas. -- Andreas Schw

Re: [HEADS-UP] adding missing systemd links in rawhide/F14 upgrades

Jesse Keating writes: > When an F14 build goes stable through bodhi, it'll be inherited into > rawhide. Unless there is already a release of the package tagged dist-f15, IIUC. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C

Re: [HEADS-UP] adding missing systemd links in rawhide/F14 upgrades

Jesse Keating writes: > Yes, that is correct. An already built version on f15 will always be > "newer" than anything coming up from f14. Which is exactly the situation with systemd. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84

Re: Where can I find the list of all Fedora Git repos?

he erlang >> package (also broken, unfortunately) " > > Oops, sorry, I didn't notice that. Maybe I should have had a look at the > wiki page first. :) Except that both are working fine. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 38

Re: Where can I find the list of all Fedora Git repos?

Matt McCutchen writes: > On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 10:59 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: >> Martin Gieseking writes: >> >> > Am 12.08.2010 10:32, schrieb Jaroslav Reznik: >> >> But as you can see on [1]: "http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/ BROKEN >>

Re: Checkout entire release with git

bug.cgi?id=1330 has a much nicer > solution than the shell script wrapper. Add "ControlMaster auto" to .ssh/config and do $ ssh -f -N pkgs.fedoraproject.org Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E

Re: drop default MTA for Fedora 15

it, but… >> >>> What about "ed"? >> >> … it's time we drop such legacy junk! > > What you offend as "legacy junk" is mandated by POSIX: POSIX mandates a lot of legacy junk. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com GPG Key fingerprint

Re: stuck on git (again)

Till Maas writes: > git config --add push.default tracking push.default can only have one value, so --add does not make sense. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E "And now for something completely d

Re: stuck on git (again)

Neal Becker writes: > $ fedpkg push > Everything up-to-date > $ fedpkg build > Could not initiate build: There are unpushed changes in your repo > > Clue? $ git status Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 2

Re: stuck on git (again)

verted to use matching branch names!) Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E "And now for something completely different." -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.o

Re: Putting cross compilers into Fedora

cc_s against glibc, etc. For a freestanding implementation (ie. for building the kernel) all you need is binutils, gcc and libgcc.a for the target (no shared libgcc). Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E "And

Re: fedpkg prep

Matt McCutchen writes: > I propose that fedpkg should consider a --dist option, a "branch" > file, and the name of the current git branch in that order. Or make it a branch config (eg. git config branch.$branch.dist f14). Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com GPG

Re: Putting cross compilers into Fedora

your linker with a sysroot then it will take care of absolute paths in linker scripts. > Nothing really hard but needs to be done. The only real problem are absolute symbolic links which need to be changed to be relative (to the sysroot). Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com GPG

Re: git usage question

hes in the spec file too. glibc takes a slightly different approach. The fedora-specific changes are maintained in a branch. When I prepare a new fedora build I merge master into the fedora branch, run "make srpm" to build an srpm that contains the fedora changes in a single patch, and &

Re: yet another git problem

Neal Becker writes: > Let's try: > > $rm -rf igraph Btw., you can undo a failed merge with "git reset --merge". Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E "And now for something com

Re: docbook and glibc breakage [STILL BREAKING EVERYTHING]

Kevin Kofler writes: > POSIXLY_CORRECT has a lot of other effects which will break tons of > packages, e.g. it disables all bash extensions! Not all of them, only those that conflict with POSIX (which still leaves a lot room for extensions). Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.c

Re: More mono/koji problems

919799/utilities/V3_chap02.html#tag_18_08_02>: The exit status of a command that terminated because it received a signal shall be reported as greater than 128. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 98

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo meeting (2010-10-26) NEW TIME!

lorized ls seems to already recognize them. Setuid binaries are > gray text on a red background, while binaries with capabilities set are > black text on a red background. >From coreutils/src/ls.c: /* Note has_capability() adds around 30% runtime to `ls --color` */ Andreas. -- Andre

Re: Unable to push to git this morning

Matthew Booth writes: > [mbo...@t500 virt-v2v (f14)]$ git push origin f14 $ git push origin f14:f14/master (It was a very bad idea to name the local branches differently than the remote branches.) Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D F

Looking for review of synce-connector

-connector into fedora will help in completing [2] and clean up the stack of old implementations we have today which are not supported/maintained anymore by upstream. It should be an easy review. If you want to swap reviews ping me via mail. Best Regards, Andreas [1] - https://bugzilla.redhat.com

Re: Are their guidelines for packaging translated man pages?

}/uk/man1/foo.1* in this case. - Andreas -- BrandAss Andreas Bierfert, M.Sc. | phone: +49 6897 1721738 | GPG: C58CF1CB andreas.bierf...@lowlatency.de | fax: +49 6897 1722828 | signed/encrypted http://lowlatency.de | cell: +49 170 9665206 | mail preferred signature.asc Descrip

libetpan soname bump

maintain). rpmfusions cairo-dock-plug-ins package is also affected. Regards, Andreas -- BrandAss Andreas Bierfert, M.Sc. | phone: +49 6897 1721738 | GPG: C58CF1CB andreas.bierf...@lowlatency.de | fax: +49 6897 1722828 | signed/encrypted http://lowlatency.de | cell: +49 170 9665206

Re: 2011-07-29 - F16 Alpha blocker bug review #3 - recap

evaluate if new information >    surfaces  (jlaska, 17:48:14) What is the workaround for this bug? None is given in bugzilla. /Andreas Tunek -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: 2011-07-29 - F16 Alpha blocker bug review #3 - recap

2011/8/2 Adam Williamson : > On Sun, 2011-07-31 at 11:40 +0200, Andreas Tunek wrote: >> 2011/7/29 James Laska : >> >> > >> > * http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711489  (jlaska, 17:42:29) >> >  * atl1c: transmit queue timeout (ASUS 522)

Screen brightness settings, are there any commands?

regarding that bug. /Andreas -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [PATCH] macros: Globally add --disable-silent-rules to configure

Tom Lane writes: > What happens in packages using a (possibly old) autoconf script that > doesn't recognize --disable-silent-rules? Autoconf-generated configure scripts generally ignore unknown --enable and --with options (newer versions give a warning). Andreas. -- Andreas

Re: 2011-07-29 - F16 Alpha blocker bug review #3 - recap

2011/8/2 Andreas Tunek : > 2011/8/2 Adam Williamson : >> On Sun, 2011-07-31 at 11:40 +0200, Andreas Tunek wrote: >>> 2011/7/29 James Laska : >>> >>> > >>> > * http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711489  (jlaska, 17:42:29) >>> >

Re: To Require or not to Require?

ecutables in external packages. > But executables shipped with the library package (in subpackages) may > strictly need the very latest library. There is no difference between "external" packages and subpackages: they both will need the new symbol some day. Andreas. -- Andreas S

Re: To Require or not to Require?

in the build system's buildroot. I don't understand. How is the contents of the buildroot relevant to "yum install foo"? Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E "And now for something complete

Re: To Require or not to Require?

e package of "foo-libs", and this -libs package has > added symbols needed by programs in package "foo", an older release > of "foo-libs" would not suffice. On the contrary, all programs > linked with an older foo library will continue to work. How is that diff

Re: To Require or not to Require?

Michael Schwendt writes: > On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 16:13:48 +0200, AS (Andreas) wrote: > >> > No external package can build with new features of the new "foo-libs" >> > package >> > prior to making that package available in the buildroot. >> >>

Re: To Require or not to Require?

Michael Schwendt writes: > So, where are we now? yum install bar doesn't update foo-libs automagically. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E "And now for something completely different." --

Re: To Require or not to Require?

Michael Schwendt writes: > So, what is safer? Neither fixes the missing symbol. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E "And now for something completely different." -- devel maili

Re: To Require or not to Require?

Michael Schwendt writes: > There is no missing symbol. Of course there is. See <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/152427>. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E "And now

Re: To Require or not to Require?

Michael Schwendt writes: > The separate "bar" package still is entirely irrelevant It kills your entire argument. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E "And now for something completely dif

Re: To Require or not to Require?

Michael Schwendt writes: > libfoo update would need to come first. How? Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E "And now for something completely different." -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedo

Re: To Require or not to Require?

Your whole argument is just void. There is not a single difference between "external" packages and (sub-)packages. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E "And now for something completely differ

Re: To Require or not to Require?

uot; package is always working. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E "And now for something completely different." -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Best practice for extracting information from a makefile

Richard Shaw writes: > I was hoping something like "make -p ..." would work but it doesn't > evaluated the variables, which seems useless since if I just wanted > the raw output 'cat' would work. $ make -f Makefile -f - <<<'echo-foo:; @echo $(f

Re: Notice of intent: patching glibc

Please wait until I am finished working on it. This is not a bug that can be easily reproduced. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E "And now for something completely different." -- devel mailing

Re: Notice of intent: patching glibc

Adam Williamson writes: > On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 08:50 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: >> Please wait until I am finished working on it. This is not a bug that >> can be easily reproduced. > > The Arch report claims a fully reliable reproducer: > > https://bugs.archlinu

Re: Notice of intent: patching glibc

Zoltan Boszormenyi writes: > The "I can 100%..." is not the first sentence of the comment > but it's all in there. I'm taking about the redhat bug. How do I get to know about all this if nobody tells me? Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com GPG Key fingerp

Re: Notice of intent: patching glibc

--reject-with > icmp-admin-prohibited > # wget http://google.com/ > --2011-06-08 12:13:58-- http://google.com/ > Resolving google.com... zsh: segmentation fault (core dumped)" I'm unable to reproduce that. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com GPG Key fingerprint = D4

Re: Notice of intent: patching glibc

bug report, so that it can be found. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E "And now for something completely different." -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Notice of intent: patching glibc

formation by the person who added the duplicate. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E "And now for something completely different." -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fed

Fedora 16 feels slow

info is appreciated! /Andreas -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Non-responsive Maintainer: Andreas Osowski (th0br0)

Hello all, sorry for this small hassle, I was planning to answer Peter's last e-mail tomorrow as I was unable to do so today. @Peter: The update is the first thing on my todo list for tomorrow together with a rebuild of mumble for F16 & rawhide. - Andreas On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at

Abrt does not work in F16

Hi Fedora! Currently, the abrt reporting program does not seem to work for me, when I try to submit to bugzilla I get Essential file 'duphash' is missing, can't continue.. (exited with 1) Is this a known problem or is there anything wrong on my part? /Andreas -- devel mai

Re: Abrt does not work in F16

On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 22:12 +0200, Jiri Moskovcak wrote: > On 09/15/2011 09:29 PM, Andreas Tunek wrote: > > Hi Fedora! > > > > Currently, the abrt reporting program does not seem to work for me, when > > I try to submit to bugzilla I get > > > > Essential fi

Re: Why EDID is not trustworthy for DPI

Thanks for writing this up! It was good info. On Oct 4, 2011 7:55 PM, "Adam Jackson" wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 11:46 -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > > > Grovelling around in the F15 xorg-server sources and reviewing the Xorg > > log file on my F15 box, I see, with _modern hardware_ at lea

Re: unsure for wich component file bugreport

Reindl Harald writes: > [harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ ssh root@centos.vmware.local > ssh: Could not resolve hostname centos.vmware.local: Name or service not known .local is reserved for MDNS. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC

Re: f15 libchamplain bump

in-0.9.1-1.fc15 > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libchamplain-0.10.0-1.fc15 For claws this also means some patching because of API changes... - Andreas -- BrandAss Andreas Bierfert, M.Sc. | phone: +49 6897 1721738 | GPG: C58CF1CB andreas.bierf...@lowlatency.de | fax: +49 6897 17228

Re: Ext4 + barriers=1 + ssd + power loss while commiting to a git repo = broken repo?

Michał Piotrowski writes: > After turning system on I noticed that repo is totally broken. How do you define "totally broken"? Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E "And now for something co

Re: Ext4 + barriers=1 + ssd + power loss while commiting to a git repo = broken repo?

Michał Piotrowski writes: > Also git log says > fatal: bad default revision 'HEAD' Looks like the only issue is that .git/refs/heads/master has been lost. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 9

Re: Ext4 + barriers=1 + ssd + power loss while commiting to a git repo = broken repo?

Michał Piotrowski writes: > But I don't have this file in the repo that I restored from the backup. You do, in .git/packed-refs. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E "And now for something complet

Re: Ext4 + barriers=1 + ssd + power loss while commiting to a git repo = broken repo?

Michał Piotrowski writes: > But the question remains - should enabled barriers protect against > such data loss/breakage? Or I just had a big bad luck? It could also be a bug in git, perhaps it needs to take more care to create the ref file atomically. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwa

Re: Ext4 + barriers=1 + ssd + power loss while commiting to a git repo = broken repo?

Michał Piotrowski writes: > W dniu 14 kwietnia 2011 11:04 użytkownik Andreas Schwab > napisał: >> Michał Piotrowski writes: >> >>> But the question remains - should enabled barriers protect against >>> such data loss/breakage? Or I just had a big bad luck?

Re: f15 libchamplain bump

On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 17:53 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > Is there a releng ticket for the koji buildroot override? Any news on this? - Andreas -- BrandAss Andreas Bierfert, M.Sc. | phone: +49 6897 1721738 | GPG: C58CF1CB andreas.bierf...@lowlatency.de | fax: +49 6897 1722828 | sig

Re: f15 libchamplain bump

libchamplain and the other rebuilds can be added to it as well. - Andreas -- BrandAss Andreas Bierfert, M.Sc. | phone: +49 6897 1721738 | GPG: C58CF1CB andreas.bierf...@lowlatency.de | fax: +49 6897 1722828 | signed/encrypted http://lowlatency.de | cell: +49 170 9665206 | mail pr

Re: AutoQA: distro congestion?

ut also as proposed upgrade. It should then impose a constraint that the upgrade for f can only be pushed to stable if f is pushed to stable at the same time (or obviously independently before). Seeing a failed upgradepath test comment at least gives me the wrong feeling on what is going on. - Andre

Workaround for bug 702953?

into this issue more and more. Best regards Andreas Tunek -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Workaround for bug 702953?

2011/5/14 Andreas Tunek : > Hi > > I am running into bug 702953 > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702953), which > essentially is that the computer becomes very, most probably due to a > bad GPU driver. Is there any way to work around this problem? > > If I

Re: execve()ing non-existent command returns EPERM instead of ENOENT in Koji

Petr Pisar writes: > Reviewer of my package found the package does pass tests in Koji > (dist-f16). I found the reason: > > A test executes non-existent command and expects ENOENT. That's a bug in the test. EACCES is a valid error if a PATH element is inaccessible. Andr

Re: Highlighting totem-upnp issue and possible koji problem?

knows what's going on =) > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA Community Monkey > IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org > http://www.happyassassin.net > Aha, so that is why nothing happened when I tried to install the upnp plugin! No need to file bug now I g

Re: Laptop CPU overheating in Fedora, temperature +30 celsius higher than in Windows

2011/6/12 José Matos : > On Sunday 12 June 2011 18:26:25 Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: >> > What is the graphics card? >> > >> > >> >> It's ATI radeon RV635. Do you have the same graphics card? > > I think so (but I think that are mixing the references :-) ): > > # lspci | grep ATI > 01:00.0 VGA compatibl

Re: Fedora 14 and "Sandy Bridge" graphics

like that to. But that takes a lot of resources that are much better spent elsewhere, like fixing reported bugs! (Please fedora devs, fix my bugs :) ) /Andreas Tunek -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: conclusion: F15 / systemd / user-experience

If you want to run F14 you should buy hw that supports F14 (or hw that F14 supports, whichever you want to put it). /Andreas Tunek -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Heads up: impending IPv6 Test Day

e2\\\]/ http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd";> Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E "And now for something completely different." -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org h

Re: F15: ugly behavior of "df"

;# mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt/B There is a big difference between "mount --bind /mnt/A/B /mnt/B" and "mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt/B". Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E "And now

Re: 32bit vs 64bit - 32bit can't handle 2100 in strtotime?

Michał Piotrowski writes: > I would like to note that I am aware of that 32 bit systems will not > work after 2038. But does that mean that they can not do simple date > conversion? If they use the system time_t, then no. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com GPG Key fi

Re: About package review and mismatching md5sums

P J P writes: > But as it turns out, it seems, if you create a tarball from the *very same* > sources on two different machines, they don't match. As in the md5sum for the > two tarball differs. Make sure to disable the gzip timestamp. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redh

Re: About package review and mismatching md5sums

P J P writes: > - Original Message - >> From: Andreas Schwab >> Make sure to disable the gzip timestamp. > > >   ...how do you do that? $ gzip --help -n, --no-name do not save or restore the original name and time stamp Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, s

nss_db

glibc now includes libnss_db again, so the nss_db package is no longer needed from f16 onward. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E "And now for something completely different." -- devel mailing

Re: vsftpd in the news

t help if the tarball is already defective when uploaded. The checksum is basically only used to identify the blob in the cache, at most to detect cache corruptions. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E "And n

Re: glibc 2.14-4 eats my data (Re: F15 ext3, eCryptfs + samba = data corruption (Re: F15 "Error mounting eCryptfs: [-5] Input/output error" on different disks))

Use valgrind. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E "And now for something completely different." -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: systemd: Is it wrong?

Matthew Garrett writes: > These scripts don't sanitise input beforehand. What happens if I'm > logged in as root, change IFS and then do /etc/init.d/nfs restart? Nothing, because the shell always sets IFS to the default on startup. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@re

Re: help for fixing Fedora rawhide FTBFS

unknown' not recognized > checking build system type... Invalid configuration > `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu': machine `x86_64-unknown' not recognized The included config.sub is older than 10 years. Try running autoreconf. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com GPG Key finge

Re: help for fixing Fedora rawhide FTBFS

Zoltan Kota writes: > So, you recommend to add the above lines (or something similar) to the > spec file? I'd recommend to update to recode-3.7-beta2. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E &

Re: Example of karma not being functional [Was:POSTUN scriptlet failure in rpm package cyrus-sasl]

Adam Williamson writes: > The point is: this update *does* work. The error message is non-fatal. > The software works. So what they claim is correct. What you claim is > also correct. If the user/group saslauth is not needed by cyrus-sasl, why has it been added in the first place?

F16 on refit, does it work?

On my iMac using refit I have triplebooted MacOS, Windows 7 and F15. Yesterday I tried to upgrade (with preupgrade) to F16. In the end of that updgrade process (when all rpm files have been installed and cleaned up) process anaconda crashed leaving me with and unbootable Linux partition. (I could n

How can we make F17 be able to boot on Macs (with or without reFit)

st days"? Or is something else needed? /Andreas -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: How can we make F17 be able to boot on Macs (with or without reFit)

2011/12/2 Adam Williamson : > On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 12:08 +0100, Andreas Tunek wrote: >> As you all might know, it is currently impossible to boot the default >> install of F16 on Macs. > > I'm not entirely sure that's correct. We had several reports of > suc

Re: How can we make F17 be able to boot on Macs (with or without reFit)

f you have one of the Macs we can't do EFI boot on, the > situation is indeed 'you must install via BIOS emulation and use 'nogpt' > parameter', it seems. > -- Yes, and the question becomes, can we make this easier in F17? /Andreas > Adam Williamson

Re: How can we make F17 be able to boot on Macs (with or without reFit)

2011/12/6 Adam Williamson : > On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 12:08 +0100, Andreas Tunek wrote: >> As you all might know, it is currently impossible to boot the default >> install of F16 on Macs. It does not seem to matter if you use boot >> loaders such as reFit and Bootcamp or remove

Re: Fedora 17’s unified filesystem (/usr-move)

i386 enabled=1 metadata_expire=1d gpgcheck=0 Regards, Andreas -- Andreas Bierfert signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: How can we make F17 be able to boot on Macs (with or without reFit)

Has there been any more tests getting F17 to boot on macs, with or without refit? I would love to test, but if macs are not any target hardware for fedora it would be pretty pointless. /Andreas On Dec 27, 2011 4:09 AM, "Chris Murphy" wrote: > > On Dec 26, 2011, at 5:55 PM, Todd

Re: How can we make F17 be able to boot on Macs (with or without reFit)

Den 28 februari 2012 18:22 skrev Matthew Garrett : > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 05:57:38PM +0100, Andreas Tunek wrote: >> Has there been any more tests getting F17 to boot on macs, with or without >> refit? I would love to test, but if macs are not any target hardware for >> fedo

Re: How can we make F17 be able to boot on Macs (with or without reFit)

Thanks for all your testing! It certainly seems like Fedora has quite a way to go before it is possible to install on "clean" macs. Have you done any testing using refit, or is this all with vanilla apple efi? On Mar 13, 2012 10:06 AM, "Chris Murphy" wrote: > > On Feb 28, 2012, at 12:53 PM, M

Re: What are differences between real and rpmbuild's environment?

Michal Hlavinka writes: > So it seems rpmbuild has a bug and breaks sigpipe somehow... Perhaps it leaves it ignored? You can check with /proc/$$/status. $ (trap '' SIGPIPE; bash x.sh) early termination not causing broken Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com GPG Ke

Re: debugging build hang in koji ?

Caolán McNamara writes: > time taken was 0.004 seconds > zip warning: help.jar not found or empty > adding: com.sun.PresenterScreen-linux_x86_64/presenter.xhp (deflated 81%) > > and nothing else. Perhaps some ENOSPC condition? Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@red

  1   2   3   4   >