Re: It’s time to transform the Fedora devel list into something new

o participation, this is my second post, so I haven't been taking part of conversation very actively. Switching to Discourse would not make me post more (unless there is magically more topics which I could participate in). Regards, Tomi Lähteenmäki _

Self Introduction: Tomi Lähteenmäki

Hi all, My name is Tomi Lähteenmäki and I have recently got my first package review request [1] reviewed. I got my first touch to Linux on vocational school and since then I have been an user for a bit over decade now. For past two years I have been running Fedora both at work and personal

Re: Fedora Mass Rebuild 41 has completed

On ma, heinä 22 2024 at 12.43.30 -07:00:00, Kevin Fenzi wrote: The mass rebuild was done in a side tag (f41-rebuild) and moved over to f41. Failures can be seen I saw "chatty" has failed to build [1] for s390x due test failur

Re: Fedora Mass Rebuild 41 has completed

re in chatty's tests [1] which actually turned out to be issue in evolution-data-server. -Tomi [1] <https://gitlab.gnome.org/World/Chatty/-/issues/835#note_2086408> On ti, heinä 30 2024 at 11.40.55 +02:00:00, Michael J Gruber wrote: Am Mo., 29. Juli 2024 um 20:11 Uhr schrieb

Re: `Unix-domain socket path "..." is too long (maximum 107 bytes)` can we change that?

"Hijacking" this thread I stumbled up on this also some months ago in one of my packages when I was doing builds locally with "mock". The tests were failing so I had to create a patch [1] to make sure the Unix-socket is created in a path which does not exceed the limit. I'm not sure what would

Non-responsive maintainer check for lkundrak

Hi, I'm trying to reach the maintainer of phosh [1] and phoc [2]. Allan has tried to reach out for him without success [3] so I created bug [4] for this non-responsive maintainer check. If someone knows how to contact him, please let me know. Best Regards, Tomi Lähteenmäki [1] &

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for lkundrak

On ti, huhti 30 2024 at 14.07.47 +02:00:00, Miroslav Suchý wrote: plus work related email (added to cc) Thank you! I was able to get a reply in Mastodon. -Tomi -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproj

Review request for gmobile

Hi, I sent a review request for gmobile [1] a bit over two weeks ago. The gmobile is written in C and it is dependency of phosh and phoc and upcoming phrog package. If someone would have time to review the request it would be great. -Tomi [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228158

Re: Updating libportal to v0.9.1 in F41

On Fri, Apr 11 2025 at 09:41:50 +02:00:00, Jan Grulich wrote: I submitted the update to F41. I checked the changelog and didn't see any breaking changes. I assume it was bumped to 0.9.0 for the reason there is a Notifications v2 portal. Alright and thank you! Regards, Tomi -- _

Re: CMake 4.0 and other change proposals

On ke, huhti 16 2025 at 15.05.26 +02:00:00, Cristian Le via devel wrote: Recently I have opened a few CMake related change proposals [1-3], which were recently announced. I have run the mass-prebuild related to those changes, and gathered the list of affected packages. There are suggested mig

Updating libportal to v0.9.1 in F41

ps gnome-network-displays gnome-photos gnome-todo input-leap libportal-devel libportal-gtk3 libportal-gtk3-devel libportal-gtk4 libportal-gtk4-devel libportal-qt5 libportal-qt5-devel libportal-qt6 libportal-qt6-devel nautilus ptyxis setzer shotwell totem and all built successfully so at least buildi

Re: Updating libportal to v0.9.1 in F41

doned and he didn't know why, so we were not sure is it safe to do the update. Can you submit the update or should the maintainer (added to CC) do it? Regards, Tomi Lähteenmäki -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubs

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired next week

On 2025-01-23 10:30, Miro Hrončok wrote: marker atim I wish I would have noticed this; started un-retirement process, review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2362370 -Tomi -- ___ devel mailing list -

Re: heads-up: evolution-data-server's libcamel soname version bump in rawhide

On Fri, Jun 27 2025 at 11:21:22 +02:00:00, Milan Crha wrote: * chatty, elementary-calendar and pidgin-chime only need rebuild in the side tag Chatty is now taken care of. Regards, Tomi -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org T

Re: heads-up: evolution-data-server's libcamel soname version bump in rawhide

Jul 31, 2025 09:18:19 Milan Crha : > P.S.: if this feels like a deja vu, then you are right, (almost) the > same mail went for the 3.57.1 ;) Just like a deja vu :) > I covered most of the packages, the last missing are chatty and > pidgin-chime. Please build them into the side tag when you've ti