Review swap: parcimonie.sh

Hi all, I'm looking for a review for parcimonie.sh [1]. parcimonie.sh refreshes individual keys in your GnuPG keyring at randomized intervals. Each key is refreshed over a unique, single-use Tor circuit. The package is rather simple, as it only consists of a single bash script and a parameterize

Re: bodhi 2 now live

Why can I push to testing for updates submitted by other people, and where the update is already stable? [1] Also, it seems like I can revoke other people's updates. At least I could press the 'Revoke' button and I received a confirmation notification. Also, instead of the Revoke button, there is n

Re: bodhi 2 now live

On 08/21/2015 08:34 AM, Till Hofmann wrote: > Also, it seems like I can revoke other people's updates. At least I > could press the 'Revoke' button and I received a confirmation > notification. Also, instead of the Revoke button, there is now a "Push > to Testin

Re: bodhi 2 now live

On 08/21/2015 09:00 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > Anywas, this time bodhi offered me a "push to testing" and "push to > stable" (!) button (Note: "push to stable") > > I used "pushed to testing" to re-push it. > I just tested "push to stable" on an unpushed update: Despite the name, it pushes

Review swap: dex-autostart

Hi all, I'm looking for a review swap for dex-autostart: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243061 dex-autostart is a program to generate and execute DesktopEntry files. Among others, this can be used for auto-starting applications in alternative DEs/WMs such as i3wm. An informal revie

Re: F21: fedora-easy-karma / bodhi / updates testing / kf5-baloo

On 08/29/2015 06:32 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2015-08-28 at 16:27 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > >> bodhi2 at https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/ is unusable for testers >> because the search field seeks for users, no idea how to get to the >> current firefox build for give karama as ex

Review or review swap for libkindrv

Hi everyone, I've created a package for libkindrv which needs reviewing: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210004 The package is a small library/driver package, so the review will probably be rather simple. I'd appreciate a review and I'm also willing to do a review swap. Thanks, T

Review Swap: orocos-kdl

Hi everyone, I'm looking for a reviewer for orocos-kdl: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076517 I'll be happy to review a package in return. Thanks, Till -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct

Re: [HEADS UP] F33 Boost 1.73.0 rebuilds starting in a side tag

On 6/2/20 5:24 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > ### C++ includes > > Several packages failed to build because they couldn't find C++ > Standard Library algorithms: > freeopcua: error: 'for_each' is not a member of 'std' I don't see a changelog entry (or a commit), did you only update the changelo

Re: [HEADS UP] F33 Boost 1.73.0 rebuilds starting in a side tag

On 6/3/20 1:01 PM, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 12:46 PM Jonathan Wakely > mailto:jwak...@fedoraproject.org>> wrote: > > On 03/06/20 12:35 +0200, Till Hofmann wrote: > > > > > >On 6/2/20 5:24 PM, Jonatha

Re: [HEADS UP] F33 Boost 1.73.0 rebuilds starting in a side tag

On 6/3/20 4:50 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 03/06/20 13:36 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: >> On 03. 06. 20 13:32, Till Hofmann wrote: >>> Yes, that's what I meant. I'm not going to test patches by submitting >>> builds over and over again, that's not

soname bump: librealsense

Hi all, I'm updating librealsense to 2.35.2 in Rawhide. The only dependency is fawkes, which is currently FTBFS because gazebo fails to install. Kind regards, Till ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to d

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Fedora-Retired-Packages

On 6/16/20 1:16 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 16. 06. 20 v 0:37 James Cassell napsal(a): >> Please not using mechanism. Make it easy to opt out, or better yet opt-in. > > On package level, there is likely no other way. DNF team will have no > time/resources to implement this on DNF level. > I

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Fedora-Retired-Packages

On 6/16/20 9:56 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Also, I wonder what is wrong with "dnf autoremove", which is supposed to > remove unused leaf packages, which were not explicitly installed? On my system, it removed grub2-efi and made the system unbootable. So I'm not sure running this as part of the sys

Re: Fedora Packager Dashboard available for testing

On 6/23/20 6:28 PM, Josef Skladanka wrote: > Hi, > > We'd like to announce public testing of the Packager Dashboard - a new > service for Fedora package maintainers aiming to provide all relevant > data: FTBFS/FTI status (from both Bugzilla, Koschei and health check), > orphan warnings, bugzilla

Re: libdc1394: Unannounced soname bump?

On 7/27/20 2:28 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > I just got a BZ on OpenImageIO due to inability to install the -devel > package, > > Upon inspection it looks like the soname was bumped but a rebuild of > OIIO was not performed. > > libdc1394-2.2.2-14.fc32 -> libdc1394-2.2.6-1.fc33 > > libdc1394.so.2

Self Introduction: Till Hofmann

Hey everyone, my name is Till Hofmann and I'm a student working for the Knowledge Based Systems Group ( http://kbsg.rwth-aachen.de/ ) at RWTH Aachen University in Germany. Since we are packaging the robotics software framework Fawkes ( http://fawkesrobotics.org/ ) for Fedora, I joined the pr

review swap: openrave

Hi all, I'm looking for someone to review openrave - Open Robotics Automation Virtual Environment: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338339 Description: OpenRAVE is targeted for real-world autonomous robot applications, and includes a seamless integration of 3-D simulation, visualizati

Re: Review swaps

On 06/01/2016 09:49 PM, Jerry James wrote: > I've got a handful of packages awaiting review, and am willing to swap > for reviews with others. Take your pick: > - gap-pkg-gbnp: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1340513 Taken. Can you please review btrfs-sxbackup: https://bugzilla.redh

Re: Too fast karma on Bodhi updates

On 07/11/2016 05:11 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > Regarding the comment regarding karma left 40 seconds after the package > was pushed... it could > be that the person earlier had downloaded the package directly from > koji, because they did not > want to wait DAYS for the package to be pushed to the

review swap: openrave

Hi all, I'm looking for a review for openrave: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338339 There's already been some work on the package (original request is from 2011) and Igor has already done a partial review (thank you!) so I don't think there is a lot of work to do anymore. I'd be g

Re: Orphaned packages seeking new point of contact

On 07/29/2016 07:21 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > I have orphaned the following packages / branches and they need a new point of > contact to stay in the Fedora or EPEL Collections: > > gprolog (epel7) > gprolog (f23) > gprolog (f24) > gprolog (f25) > gprolog (master) I've taken gprolog. @Roberto

need help with gcc segfault on i686

Hi all, gprolog has been FTBFS for a while due to a segfault on i686, see this build [1] for an example. I followed advice on [2] to add some debugging flags, not sure if they really help though without access to dumped files. The segfault occurs while compiling this file [3]. Do you have any gen

Re: need help with gcc segfault on i686

On 08/12/2016 11:43 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 08/12/2016 11:36 AM, Till Hofmann wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> gprolog has been FTBFS for a while due to a segfault on i686, see this >> build [1] for an example. I followed advice on [2] to add some debugging >> fl

Re: rpmbuild for cmake project error :: Found 'build_dir' in installed files

On 09/06/2016 01:35 PM, Adrian Sevcenco wrote: > Hi! I have a head scratching problem with a project (clhep) that i try to > package. > It is cmake based and the spec file can be seen here: > https://github.com/adriansev/SPECS/blob/master/clhep.spec > > the error that i get is : > Found '/home/ad

Re: rpmlint: wrong-script-interpreter

On 02/06/2017 04:39 AM, Pranav Kant wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Michael Catanzaro > wrote: > > Dude it looks like you have a tracking pixel in your mail: > > http://405n.mj.am/oo/AEUAHWjyTGwAAC8AAAMA > AAQ

Re: unheeded ACL requests

On 02/12/2017 04:05 AM, Globe Trotter wrote: > Hello, > > For a long time (almost 2 years), dilo (and a number of packages) have > not been updated. So, I decided to request commit privileges. But the > request has sat unheeded for the last several months. Unfortunately, > this is not true only fo

Re: Retiring yap (Prolog interpreter)

On 23.02.2017 17:18, Petr Pisar wrote: > I'm deeply sorry I will have to retire yap package because: > > It crashes on i686 after updating GCC to 7 > . > Last stable version is 7 years old (we have it in Fedora). > Last development version is 4

Taking orphaned package ctemplate

Hi all, I'm taking the ctemplate package. The package was unretired about a year ago but it was never built after unretirement. After I filed a ticket about the missing builds [1], the package was orphaned without further comments. The package is still functional and (somewhat) maintained upstrea

How to use COPR + Tito + dist-git?

Hi all, I'm playing around with Tito and COPR following [1,2]. It works great so far, but I'm still having problems with loading the sources to a lookaside cache. I've found a blog post that uses git-annex [3], but the COPR builders do not have git-annex installed. According to another blog post [

Re: How to use COPR + Tito + dist-git?

On 28.03.2017 14:23, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 28.3.2017 v 10:40 Till Hofmann napsal(a): >> I'm playing around with Tito and COPR following [1,2]. It works great so >> far, but I'm still having problems with loading the sources to a >> lookaside cache. I've f

Re: orphaning all my packages

Hi Dominik, On 04/25/2016 11:03 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > [...] >> rpms/tinyxml -- A simple, small, C++ XML parser ( master f24 f23 f22 epel7 ) > > Co-maintainers welcome, as usual. > I'd like to co-maintain tinyxml. I've requested commit access. Thanks, Till -- devel mail

review swap: orocos-bfl

Hi all, I'm looking for a review swap for orocos-bfl - A framework for inference in Dynamic Bayesian Networks. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1233240 The package has already been informally reviewed and it should be fairly straight-forward to finish the review. I'm happy to do a rev

dnf error during upgrade that changes a directory into a symlink

tadir}/%{name}/testfile %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/%{name}/dir/subdir %files %{_datadir}/* %changelog * Mon Dec 19 2016 Till Hofmann - Initial package Name: symlinktest Version:1 Release:2%{?dist} Summary:Test to move symplinks License:WTFPL URL:ht

Re: dnf error during upgrade that changes a directory into a symlink

On 20.12.2016 13:20, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 20/12/16 12:15, Till Hofmann wrote: > >> I have a package that contains a subdirectory which is changed to a >> symlink in the next release. When I upgrade, I get the following error: >> >> Error: Transaction che

Re: dnf error during upgrade that changes a directory into a symlink

On 20.12.2016 13:25, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 7:20 AM, Tom Hughes wrote: >> On 20/12/16 12:15, Till Hofmann wrote: >> >>> I have a package that contains a subdirectory which is changed to a >>> symlink in the next release. When I u

intention to unretire log4cxx

Hi all, I intend to unretire log4cxx, which was retired because it was orphaned for too long. Among others, log4cxx is used by the Robot Operating System ROS [1] and thus is quite important for robotics applications in Fedora. I've updated the spec file to build with GCC6, moved the documentation

Re: Request for review swap

On 18.01.2017 13:09, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > Hello, all: > > I have one review request for a package for LXDE: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409243 lxhotkey > > Review swap is appreciated. I'll take it. Can you please review librealsense: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?

Re: Updated review trackers pages

On 4/7/20 9:21 AM, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > we have updated the script which provides the cached review trackers > pages at https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/ (thanks to > cverna for the assistance). It looks like 1821497 [1] is displayed incorrectly (currently at the bottom

Review swap: freeopcua

Hi all, I'm looking for a review for freeopuca, a C++ OPC-UA library: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824467 The package should be rather easy to review. I'm willing to do a review in return. Kind regards, Till ___ devel mailing list -- de

Re: i3 new SIG

Hi Eduard, On 5/15/20 12:21 AM, Eduard Lucena wrote: > > As others have already mentioned in the thread: we should look into > joining forces with the sway SIG (which I am also a member of). > > > It's not a bad idea, but TBH, I still want to stay away from Wayland. > > While a lot

Re: CGAL soname "bump" in rawhide

On 10/13/19 4:39 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote: Hello, I'm building a new package, graph-tools. The scratch build fails on rawhide with: ``` annobin-cc1 -m64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -Wno-register -fopenmp -O3 -fvisibility=default -fvisib

Re: undefined symbol from OpenColorIO prevents Blender from running

per: $ c++filt _ZN4YAML6detail9node_data12empty_scalarB5cxx11E YAML::detail::node_data::empty_scalar[abi:cxx11] So the problem is really with YAML. It looks like Till Hofmann built yaml-cpp 0.6.3 for Fedora 30 and 31 (I only built it for Rawhide) and did not rebuild OCIO. Yes I did. There was no soname bump and the abidiff warn

Re: undefined symbol from OpenColorIO prevents Blender from running

On 11/20/19 1:32 PM, Till Hofmann wrote: On 11/20/19 4:49 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 9:27 PM Luya Tshimbalanga mailto:l...@fedoraproject.org>> wrote:     Some users reported Blender which I maintain failed to start due to     this issue:     blender: symbol

Re: Vim and spec template

On 7/18/19 1:44 PM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to ask as Vim co-maintainer, do you find useful for Vim to do: > > - when you open new file with .spec suffix, Vim will get you basic spec > file structure? > > Recently I found out someone can find it as bad behavior > https:

Re: Vim and spec template

On 7/18/19 6:44 PM, Steven A. Falco wrote: > On 7/18/19 10:28 AM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: >> >> On 7/18/19 4:10 PM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: >>> Hello, Zdenek Dohnal. >>> >>> Thu, 18 Jul 2019 15:51:33 +0200 you wrote: >>> Even the new .spec files, which do not have to be RPM spec files?

Re: Vim and spec template

On 7/19/19 11:33 AM, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 at 05:09, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: >> >> >> On 7/18/19 9:47 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: "ZD" == Zdenek Dohnal writes: >>> ZD> Hi all, I would like to ask as Vim co-maintainer, do you find useful >>> ZD> for Vim

Re: friday roundup of failing images in rawhide

On 7/20/19 3:16 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > 6. Fedora Robotics lab: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=36353237 > > fawkes broken deps: > > Problem 1: conflicting requests > - nothing provides fawkes-plugin-clips-webview needed by > fawkes-1.2.0-6.fc31.x86_64 > - nothing pr

Cannot build with mock for rawhide on Fedora 30

Hi all, I'm facing an issue with the package signatures on Fedora when trying to build in rawhide chroot: $ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --shell [...] Public key for zstd-1.4.2-1.fc31.x86_64.rpm is not installed. Failing package is: zstd-1.4.2-1.fc31.x86_64 GPG Keys are configured as: file:///us

mongo-cxx-driver 3.4.0 is available (was: RH Account of package maintainer disabled)

On 7/10/19 8:01 AM, Petr Kubat wrote: > Hi Till, > > On 7/10/19 7:39 AM, Till Hofmann wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I'm trying to contact the maintainer (Marek Skalický) of >> mongo-cxx-driver, which has a pending update: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sho

Re: Upcoming change for adopting orphaned packages and anitya integration

On 9/13/19 12:32 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > ## Anitya integration > > Currently if you want to tweak the setting for the anitya integration, you > need > to open a pull-request on the fedora-scm-requests project at > https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/ > That git repo is pretty b

Problem with F30 module packages that are built in F32 buildroot (?)

Hi all, We have an odd issue with a module build of sway for F30: It looks like the module was actually built with a F32 buildroot. BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754167 Here's the build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1376355 The modulemd file contain

Automation ignores FTBFS guidelines

Hi all, So I've just been notified that tolua++ has been retired, which is a dependency of one of my packages (fawkes). BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1736911 This would have been fine (as no action has been taken), if the automation had actually followed the FTBFS guideline

Re: Automation ignores FTBFS guidelines

On 9/22/19 3:01 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: But I do have something to say about the specific example used. tolua++ being retired is not a problem for fawkes, as fawkes depends on compat-tolua++, which is maintained by me and has NOT been retired. Thanks for pointing this out! I assumed com

Re: Automation ignores FTBFS guidelines

On 9/22/19 3:40 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 22. 09. 19 14:37, Till Hofmann wrote: Hi all, So I've just been notified that tolua++ has been retired, which is a dependency of one of my packages (fawkes). BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1736911 I've closed this bug

Re: Automation ignores FTBFS guidelines

On 9/22/19 4:08 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 22. 09. 19 16:01, Till Hofmann wrote: So the guidelines allow package retirement without any announcement on devel. That's certainly unexpected, at least to me. I also don't think this is a good idea, because maintainers of packages that

Re: Problem with F30 module packages that are built in F32 buildroot (?)

On 9/23/19 1:42 PM, Petr Pisar wrote: On 2019-09-22, Till Hofmann wrote: We have an odd issue with a module build of sway for F30: It looks like the module was actually built with a F32 buildroot. BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754167 Here's the build:

Re: Proxies for Copr repositories

On 2/4/20 10:03 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Hi, > I just enabled the content delivery network (CDN) for Copr repositories. > It is provided by CloudFront from AWS. And it is provided for free by Amazon > to Fedora. > [...] > > If you experience any problem with CDN, please let me know. > Firs

Re: Proxies for Copr repositories

On 2/4/20 2:58 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 04. 02. 20 v 13:18 Till Hofmann napsal(a): >> Does COPR itself also use the CDN for builds? I usually build dependency > > Yes. Since today. > >> chains, and since this morning, I see a lot of build failures due to a &g

Re: Packaging of github cli?

On 2/14/20 7:36 PM, Joe Doss wrote: > On 2/14/20 10:23 AM, Joe Doss wrote: >> On 2/14/20 9:56 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: >>> Anyone working on packaging github's CLI? >>> >>> https://github.com/cli/cli  >>> >>> I've never packaged a GO application before... >> >> I have a spec I am working on right

Re: Disabling Fedora 29 chroots in Copr

On 2/18/20 12:15 PM, Jakub Kadlcik wrote: > I would like to ask you, can anyone with non Red Hat email confirm, > that they get the notifications? The subject is > >> [Copr] upcoming deletion of outdated chroots in your projects > I received the notification. I have a posteo.de email. Kind re

Re: mock build failures for f32/33

Hi Richard, On 2/18/20 3:44 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > I am unable to build packages using mock for either f32 or f33 which is > very problematic. Afaik you need mock from updates-testing for the new config/keys. Kind regards, Till ___ devel mailing lis

Re: Unannounced SONAME bump: librealsense

Hi Fabio, On 3/6/20 9:13 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > Hi everybody, > > librealsense (maintainers in CC) bumped the SONAME of its shipped > library with the latest update, and (at least some) dependent packages > have not been rebuilt (including fawkes, maintainers in CC). Thanks for the reminde

Re: Packages looking for new (co)maintainers

Hi Peter, On 3/8/20 12:04 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > A list of packages that I still have an interest in but would > appreciate a co-maintainer: > dotconf > festival-freebsoft-utils > speech-dispatcher > flite > csound I can help out with flite, although I can't promise I'll put a lot of time in

Re: ONGOING PROBLEM: Buildsystem degradation

On 12/21/18 4:03 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > There is currently a problem with the networking of various systems in > our Phoenix data-center which houses most of our build systems. The > problem has knocked off most of our x86_64 build systems and several > of our aarch64/arm systems. Buil

Re: ONGOING PROBLEM: Buildsystem degradation

On 12/23/18 7:20 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 12/23/18 3:37 AM, Till Hofmann wrote: >> >> >> On 12/21/18 4:03 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >>> There is currently a problem with the networking of various systems in >>> our Phoenix data-center whic

Re: ONGOING PROBLEM: Buildsystem degradation

On 1/4/19 6:38 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 12/24/18 4:24 AM, Till Hofmann wrote: > >> OK, I was actually wondering exactly that, I remembered that COPR is >> maintained/run by someone else. But on the Fedora Infrastructure Status >> page [1], there is also a COPR

Re: Self-Introduction: Michael Zhang

On 1/20/19 2:27 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Also, please attach your spec file and srpm to the bug. Don't use url > obfuscators and don't use external hosting (people want to see where > the links go without following them, and we want those files to be > available infinitely, and e

sway SIG

Hi all, there's been a rising number of people interested in sway, the i3-compatible Wayland compositor. At the same time, with the recent sway 1.0 release, the packaging work is also increasing, as more and more components are split into separate projects. For this reason, we thought about creat

Re: sway SIG

On 3/18/19 4:22 PM, Till Hofmann wrote: > There's been ongoing discussions on BZ [1] with some people showing > interest in a SIG. The main purpose of this email is to see who else > would be interested in contributing to sway. If we can find enough > people, I'd con

Should I always create a dedicated stream branch for my module?

Hi all, I'm currently working on a module for sway. We basically just want to have a stream that always contains the latest version of sway (including all its dependencies), the same version that is also in rawhide (this stream should be named 'rolling' if I understand the guidelines correctly). I

Nonresponsive maintainer: bioinfornatics

Hi all, I'm trying to reach bioinfornatics. According to fedora_active_user, their last login was on 2019-03-27. Open tickets: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1700141 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1674976 Does anyone know how to reach bioinfornatics? Kind regards, Till

RH Account of package maintainer disabled

Hi all, I'm trying to contact the maintainer (Marek Skalický) of mongo-cxx-driver, which has a pending update: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1723810 However, if I try to select "Need additional information", I get an error: You can't ask Marek Skalický because that account is disa

Re: SONAME bump for armadillo

b On 08/18/2018 01:58 AM, José Abílio Matos wrote: > On Friday, 17 August 2018 16.53.37 WEST José Abílio Matos wrote: >> reveals that the only packages that require armadillo are: >> * gdal >> * mlpack >> * mmseq > > OK, after following the prescribed procedure for rawhide I had only a problem

Re: Yet another gargantuan mathematical software update

On 10/7/18 2:17 AM, Jerry James wrote: > Hi folks, > > It's about time for another "update the world" moment for some of the > mathematical software we have in Fedora. I'm going to try to clear > away a big chunk of my backlogged package work with this update, so it > will be even bigger than u

Re: Yet another gargantuan mathematical software update

On 10/12/18 9:14 PM, Jerry James wrote: > On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 7:33 AM Till Hofmann > wrote: >> FYI: gazebo is currently FTBFS because player is FTBFS. I looked into >> player and fixed two smaller issues [1], but it's still FTBFS [2]. It >> looks like it'

@fedoraproject.org email in Bugzilla

Hi all, I've been using my @fedoraproject.org email alias in Bugzilla for a while. I regularly get those complaining emails that I should fix my account, specifically it says: > If you recently changed the email address associated with your > Fedora account in the Fedora Account System, it is now

Re: @fedoraproject.org email in Bugzilla

On 10/24/18 1:54 PM, Christopher wrote: > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018, 06:19 Till Hofmann <mailto:thofm...@fedoraproject.org>> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I've been using my @fedoraproject.org <http://fedoraproject.org> > email alias in Bugzilla fo

Re: bottlenecks that case my machine to freeze

On 10/25/18 4:47 PM, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: > On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 6:50 AM, Nicolas Mailhot > wrote: >> I get the same thing without any special load. System would work fine >> for hours and then input would start bugging. >> >> It translates into floods of keystrokes, or eaten keystroke

Re: Issues with Google Chrome, PyCharm, Steam and other third-party repos in Fedora 29 prereleases

On 10/25/18 4:02 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > It was discovered[1] a short while ago that, due to a packaging > mistake in the fedora-workstation-repos package, upgrades from Fedora > 28->Fedora 29 would replace the /etc/yum.repos.d/*.repo files provided > from that package with their default c

Re: [HEADS UP] Latest protobuf is coming into Rawhide

On 11/23/18 12:55 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > I've built it and dependent packages in side tag and it's going to be > merged back soon. > > Only 4 problematic packages: > * gazebo (not related to protobuf, FTBFS for long time) > /builddir/build/BUILD/gazebo-8.3.0/gazebo/msgs/generator/GazeboGener

libdc1394 soname bump

Hi all, I have updated libdc1394 to 2.2.7, which bumps the soname to libdc1394.so.26. I created the side tag f39-build-side-68587 and built the updated libdc1394 in the side tag. If my query was correct, the following packages need to be rebuilt: ffmpeg libdc1394 mrpt opencv player vxl You c

Re: libdc1394 soname bump

Hi all, On 6/5/23 23:13, Till Hofmann wrote: Hi all, I have updated libdc1394 to 2.2.7, which bumps the soname to libdc1394.so.26. I created the side tag f39-build-side-68587 and built the updated libdc1394 in the side tag. If my query was correct, the following packages need to be rebuilt

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 39 Python 3.12 rebuilds to start in a side tag this week

On 6/16/23 09:47, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 16. 06. 23 9:41, Bastien Nocera wrote: Scolding people that haven't seen your original message for limitations in the build system isn't nice. Apologies for not being nice enough. However, we need to notify the folks who do that and ask them to stop,

How to build two flavors of the same package?

Hi all, Someone (rightfully) suggested that we should build glfw twice, once with wayland support and once without: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2152319 Is there any best practice how to build the same package in two different flavors, in this case cmake-based? I vaguely rememb

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in August

Hi, On 6/28/23 09:43, Miro Hrončok wrote: If you see a package that was built, please let me know. If you see a package that should be exempted from the process, please let me know and we can work together to get a FESCo approval for that. If you see a package that can be rebuilt, please do

Review swaps for 3 nagios plugins

Hi all, I'm looking for reviews or review swaps for 3 nagios plugins: python-nagios-plugins-check_systemd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2082886 nagios-plugins-check_ssl_cert https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131602 nagios-plugins-check_newest_file_age https://bugzilla.

Re: Wiki search?

On 12/10/2017 02:21 PM, Radka Janekova wrote: > Hi, > > is it just me or there is no way to search the new wiki? Could we pretty > please have easily accessible search bar, or have a search button under > the obvious "Navigation" drop down? Anything would do the trick really... > Should be bac

Re: Firefox "shield"

On 12/17/2017 01:11 AM, Benjamin Kreuter wrote: > Sorry if this was discussed already, but it looks like Firefox 57 on > Fedora 26 (and I assume 27 but have not checked) in the Fedora repo has > "extension.shield-recipe-client.enabled = true". > > 1) Is there a reason this is not turned off by

package conflict with source package but not with binary package

Hi all, I'm preparing Bear [1] as a Fedora package. Unfortunately, the package name bear is already taken by the bear engine [2], so I'm considering the best way to resolve this. Ubuntu [3], Debian [4], Arch (AUR) [5], and Mint [6] all package the compilation database (i.e., the package I'm workin

Re: provenpackager request: Re: [HEADS UP] opencv 3.3.1 is going to rawhide

On 01/09/2018 05:53 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Packages remaining to rebuild: > digikam > fawkes > kf5-libkface > nomacs > player > simon > > Provenpackager request for: > Do fedpkg build in fawkes master [3] > [3] > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fawkes/commits/master > That won't help

non-responsive maintainer: radford

Hi all, I'm trying to contact Jim Radford (radford) per non-responsive maintainer policy [1]. I contacted Jim several times on bz#1505463 [2] and also sent a private e-mail to his email account shown in FAS. If you know how to get in touch with Jim, please let me know. Kind regards, Till [1] h

Re: package conflict with source package but not with binary package

On 12/30/2017 09:44 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > Hi, Till. > > On Saturday, 30 December 2017 at 17:27, Till Hofmann wrote: > [...] >> So, I'm wondering: >> 1. Can I add "Provides: bear = %{version}-%{release}", as bear does not &g

Exclude paths for elfdeps dependency generator

Hi all, I have a question regarding the the RPM dependency generator scripts. I'm working on packaging the ROS stack [1,2] and I'm currently dealing with the dependency generation. My goal is to wrap all Provides and Requires for sonames because ROS does not use proper sonames (and therefore they

Re: Lazarus vs. FPC updates

On 02/26/2018 12:53 PM, Artur Iwicki wrote: > Is there a way I can automatically do something like "BuildRequires: fpc > (whatever version); Requires: fpc = version-used-during-build", or would I > have to control this manually? You can define an RPM macro for the version in fpc, e.g., by addi

Re: Exclude paths for elfdeps dependency generator

On 02/20/2018 05:33 PM, Till Hofmann wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a question regarding the the RPM dependency generator scripts. > I'm working on packaging the ROS stack [1,2] and I'm currently dealing > with the dependency generation. My goal is to wrap all Provides a

Re: News in opencv package

On 03/02/2018 12:24 PM, Josef Ridky wrote: > Hi folks, > > I would like to inform you, that new version of opencv package (3.4.1) will > be available in rawhide and Fedora 28. > All packages, that requires opencv should be rebuild. > It would be nice if the announcement would have been made a

Re: News in opencv package

On 03/02/2018 08:31 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Fri, 2018-03-02 at 10:55 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On Fri, 2018-03-02 at 18:39 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: >>> >>> player will fail due a glibc problem >> >> Can you elaborate? You've tried a build and it blew up? >> >> I am starting to get

Re: Fedora 28 Change Checkpoint: 100% Code Complete Deadline & Beta Freeze

On 03/08/2018 03:54 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > I wrote: >> Fedora: >>> Beta and Final freezes are in effect from 00:00 UTC of the freeze day. >> >> KDE: >>> All deadlines are due 23:59 UTC, but if you need a few more hours, notify >>> someone from the release team. > > PS: The deadlines I encount

Re: fawkes

Hi Kevin, On 10/9/20 9:19 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Hey folks. > > The fawkes package FTBFS and is not installable in F33/rawhide. > This breaks the robotics spin compose, and since it's the _last_ failing > thing in f33 composes, I'd love to fix it. :) > > We don't have a listed post of cont

  1   2   >