Jorge Gallegos wrote, at 08/14/2011 09:22 AM +9:00:
> Hi,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for uwsgi server in this ticket
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682704 however I am trying
> to fix the rpath issues I commented there because otherwise i think it
> simply won't pass. I am faced
Luya Tshimbalanga wrote, at 08/24/2011 09:45 AM +9:00:
> Attempting to build rpm version of gimp 2.7.3 ended with failure from
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3297263
>
> For some reasons, I am puzzled about gimp-remote not built with this version
> while it did with 2.7.2. Can
Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote, at 09/05/2011 03:59 AM +9:00:
> Hello.
>
> I have couple of bugs with FBFS similar to [1]. At first glance it is trivial
> - php-config doesn't found [2].
>
> But what interesting, it still there as was in Fedora 15:
> [pasha@vbox temp]$ repoquery --whatpr
Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote, at 09/06/2011 07:00 PM +9:00:
> 05.09.2011 19:17, TASAKA Mamoru wrote:
>> First:
>> * php-devel is not installed when trying to package srpm from spec and
>> sources. This is
>> what koji (build server) always does. i.e. koji
Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote, at 09/07/2011 04:14 PM +9:00:
> 06.09.2011 18:47, TASAKA Mamoru wrote:
>> Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote, at 09/06/2011 07:00 PM +9:00:
>>> 05.09.2011 19:17, TASAKA Mamoru wrote:
>> 2. The line 28
>>>>
>>
Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote, at 09/11/2011 01:01 AM +9:00:
> Now I change it on:
> %if %( php -r "echo (version_compare(PHP_VERSION, '5.3.0', '>=') ? 1 : 0);"
> &>/dev/null || echo 0 )
> but on make srpm got error:
> error: /home/pasha/SOFT/git/php-pecl-runkit/master/php-pecl-runkit.
Iain Arnell wrote, at 10/22/2011 09:30 PM +9:00:
> Is anyone able to fix koji rawhide buildroot?
>
> DEBUG util.py:247: Error: Package: kernel-3.1.0-0.rc10.git1.1.fc17.i686
> (build)
> DEBUG util.py:247: Requires: grubby>= 8.3-1
> DEBUG util.py:247: Installing: grubby-8.2-
Tomasz Torcz wrote, at 04/09/2011 07:57 PM +9:00:
> On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 05:32:04AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Will Woods wrote:
>>> In fact, there's plenty of approvers available, but you're not engaging
>>> with them. They might not know how to test libtiff, or what needs
>>> testing, so ot
Hello, all:
Now rawhide buildtree sees rubygems 1.8.5. The license changed from
(Ruby or GPL+) to (Ruby or MIT).
If you see any issues with new rubygems please feel free to report them,
thank you.
Regards,
Mamoru
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject
Reindl Harald wrote, at 06/22/2011 02:56 AM +9:00:
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds
>
> is there any way to get this filtered only for F15 or whatever is used?
>
Click "Build Targets" and choose build targets.
For example latest builds for dist-f15-updates-candidate tag are seen on:
ht
Bill Nottingham wrote, at 07/13/2011 06:10 AM +9:00:
> Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
> It's that time again for Fedora 16.
>
> New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have
> failed to build since before Fedora 14.
>
> The following packag
Jussi Lehtola wrote, at 12/12/2011 03:46 AM +9:00:
> Hi,
>
> Recently, a collaboration has picked up the pieces and started
> maintaining a new fork of ARPACK [2].
>
AFAIK forking or renaming will always require new review request.
e.g.
fork; util-linux -> util-linux-ng
https://bugzilla.redhat.co
Darryl L. Pierce wrote, at 12/21/2011 11:23 PM +9:00:
I have a package [1] I'd like to get through the review process, and am
willing to trade reviews with someone else with a Ruby package to get
reviewed.
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=752089
If you would review my review re
Paul Wouters wrote, at 06/17/2012 09:46 AM +9:00:
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 06/15/2012 05:03 AM, Jens Petersen wrote:
yum install rpm-build should install an rpmbuild version that works
as expected for fedora. Currently, it does not because it is missing the
dependancy on r
Bill Nottingham wrote, at 08/01/2012 02:11 AM +9:00:
Before we branch for Fedora 18, as is custom, we will block currently
orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 16.
The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If
you have a need for one of thes
Fedora Rawhide Report wrote, at 08/25/2012 09:34 PM +9:00:
Compose started at Sat Aug 25 08:15:10 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[OpenSceneGraph]
OpenSceneGraph-examples-gtk-3.0.1-12.fc18.x86_64 requires
libpangox-1.0.so.0()(64
Hi, Parag:
Parag N(पराग़) wrote, at 08/26/2012 03:41 PM +9:00:
Hi Mamoru,
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 7:31 PM, TASAKA Mamoru
wrote:
Fedora Rawhide Report wrote, at 08/25/2012 09:34 PM +9:00:
Compose started at Sat Aug 25 08:15:10 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
Ilyes Gouta wrote, at 09/01/2012 11:06 PM +9:00:
Hi,
I'm getting the following errors, when attempting to build llvm-3.1
(from f18) on my Fedora 17 setup.
In file included from
/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.0/../../../../include/c++/4.7.0/iterator:63:
In file included from
/usr/bi
Hello, mate-screensaver maintainer:
leigh123linux wrote, at 10/23/2012 04:13 PM +9:00:
commit e8b3798a18387d3e05675f40c4ee5998e94d0dfd
Author: leigh123linux
Date: Tue Oct 23 08:13:31 2012 +0100
Initial import
.gitignore|1 +
mate-screensaver.spec | 131 +
19 matches
Mail list logo
