Hi,
I'm looking for some info on systemd and how filesystems are mounted in
Fedora. I've started looking into converting the gfs2-utils package to
the new init system and run into things which are not documented (so far
as I can tell).
Currently there are two init scripts in gfs2-utils, one is ca
Hi,
On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 14:54 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
> On 10/04/2011 02:39 PM, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm looking for some info on systemd and how filesystems are mounted in
> > Fedora. I've started looking into converting the gfs2-uti
Hi,
On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 00:01 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Tue, 04.10.11 14:39, Steven Whitehouse (swhit...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> Heya,
> >
> > I'm looking for some info on systemd and how filesystems are mounted in
> > Fedora.
Hi,
On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 09:18 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 10/05/2011 08:55 AM, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> > Ok, excellent, so there is really just one issue to try and resolve in
> > that case I think, which is the ordering of mounts vs. gfs_con
Hi,
Currently Fedora doesn't automatically mount debugfs at boot time. So I
thought that it might be worth asking whether this should be the case?
One alternative would be to only mount it when a package was installed
that requires debugfs. The issue there is that there are potentially, at
least,
Hi,
On 03/10/14 07:42, Juan Orti Alcaine wrote:
El 2014-10-03 05:31, Andre Robatino escribió:
openSUSE 13.2, scheduled for release in November, will have btrfs as the
default filesystem. What are the chances that F22 will follow suit,
assuming
openSUSE has no major problems with it?
https://
Hi,
On 27/06/2020 11:00, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Josef Bacik:
As for your ENOSPC issue, I've made improvements on that area. I
see this in production as well, I have monitoring in place to deal
with the machine before it gets to this point. That being said if
you run the box out of metadata
Hi,
On 29/06/2020 23:57, Markus Larsson wrote:
On Mon, 2020-06-29 at 18:51 -0400, James Cassell wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020, at 6:43 PM, Markus S. wrote:
Why not Stratis?
Stratis cannot be used to build the root filesystem. (It's been
answered elsewhere in the thread.)
Are we sure?
https://g
Hi,
On 30/06/2020 13:58, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 5:42 AM Steven Whitehouse wrote:
Hi,
On 29/06/2020 23:57, Markus Larsson wrote:
On Mon, 2020-06-29 at 18:51 -0400, James Cassell wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020, at 6:43 PM, Markus S. wrote:
Why not Stratis?
Stratis cannot be
Hi,
On 29/06/2020 19:54, Igor Raits wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Mon, 2020-06-29 at 12:26 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 09:59:52AM -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
We cannot include ZFS in Fedora for legal reasons. Additionally,
ZFS is not
re
Hi,
On 01/07/2020 07:54, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 03:15:23PM -0400, Solomon Peachy wrote:
So yes, I think an explicit "let's all test btrfs (as anaconda
configures it) before we make it default" period is warranted.
Perhaps one can argue that Fedora has alread
Hi,
On 01/07/2020 12:09, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 11:28:10AM +0100, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
Hi,
On 01/07/2020 07:54, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 03:15:23PM -0400, Solomon Peachy wrote:
So yes, I think an explicit "let&
Hi,
On 03/07/2020 14:18, Colin Walters wrote:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020, at 11:53 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
It would be great if we could fairly reliably boot with a read-only
root file system,
Eh, just mount a tmpfs for /var, and an overlayfs for /etc (backed by a tmpfs).
That's what
Hi,
I've had some reports recently that appeared to suggest that in F17,
GFS2 was no longer being supported by the kernel. Having investigated
this, it appears that the root cause is that the gfs2.ko module has been
moved to a package called kernel-modules-extra (although the kernel RPM
still cont
Hi,
On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 10:55 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:52:19AM +0100, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've had some reports recently that appeared to suggest that in F17,
> > GFS2 was no longer being supported by
Hi,
On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 07:19 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 6:03 AM, Steven Whitehouse
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 10:55 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:52:19AM +0100, S
Hi,
I've opened bug #811547 for this issue,
Steve.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi,
On 29/04/14 22:41, Josh Boyer wrote:
Hi All,
As part of the F21 "Modular Kernel Packaging for Cloud" Feature[1],
I've committed and pushed the kernel packaging split up into
kernel-core and kernel-drivers subpackages. For those of you running
rawhide, this really shouldn't be a major impac
Hi,
I wonder if one way to deal with the network configuration issue is to
try and help different configuration systems work with each other,
rather than to try and create one system which does everything. Last
time I looked into this there were various things which could be done to
allow peaceful
Hi,
On 28/01/18 07:48, Terry Barnaby wrote:
When doing a tar -xzf ... of a big source tar on an NFSv4 file system
the time taken is huge. I am seeing an overall data rate of about 1
MByte per second across the network interface. If I copy a single
large file I see a network data rate of about
On 04/08/17 16:23, Fernando Nasser wrote:
On 2017-08-04 11:12 AM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
The release notes for RHEL 7.4 announce that RedHat gave up on btrfs:
Is it only RHEL?
Yes, it is only RHEL. It does not have any effect on Fedora, that is
entirely independent,
Steve.
___
Hi,
On 14/11/17 19:20, Laura Abbott wrote:
The kernel has seen an uptick in testing from fuzzers lately. This
has been great for the kernel as its exposed a number of bugs. See
https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.com/2017/05/exploiting-linux-kernel-via-packet.html
as an example. Part of this
Hi,
On 28/04/18 14:55, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 11:09 AM, Daniel Walsh wrote:
We are adding some features to container projects for User Namespace support
that can take advantage of XFS Reflink. I have talked to some of the XFS
Reflink kernel engineers in Red Hat and the
Hi,
On 16/03/2021 16:51, John Reiser wrote:
On 3/16/21, David Howells wrote:
John Reiser wrote:
See the manual page "man 2 getdents".
Um, which bit? I don't see anything obvious to that end.
On that manual page:
=
The system call getdents() reads several linux_dirent structures from
Hi,
On 28/04/2021 16:27, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 11:27 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Is there any preference for fuse3 over fuse2? I moved a package over
to fuse3 yesterday[1]. The API[2] seems a bit cleaner, but it's no
big deal. However it's not really feasible to support
25 matches
Mail list logo
