portions of the ABI unless you need to.
If they also have different API, I strongly recommend yelling at upstream.
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
-BEGIN PGP
e trick you might consider doing is adding in a --cache-file
argument to the call to %configure in your makefiles. This will store a
copy of the configure results on-disk in a location of your choosing.
Builds after the initial creation of this file will refer to it for
answers and will run
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/18/2010 10:05 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
> On 01/18/2010 03:49 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 01/18/2010 09:38 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
>>> hi,
>
t; Cheers!
You probably want to cross-post this to v...@lists.fedoraproject.org
That might be a more focused discussion list.
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/ven
;
>
> I downloaded
> http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/desktop/desktop-x86_64-20100810.15.iso
> - it is too large to fit on the CD.
>
> Regards,
> Michal
That's very common with the pre-releases. They usually need to be on a DVD.
- --
Stephen Gallagher
R
s installed. Also, once this package is installed, you will have to log
out and back in for it to take effect.
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
--
nch and then do:
git rebase origin/f13/master
This will apply any patches atop the branch point of your branch, then
attempt to apply your branch's patches atop those (stopping if there are
merge conflicts that need to be resolved)
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering v
robably wanted it (if they're hitting the same issue).
It would then be up to the individual spins whether they want this in
their default package set or not.
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http
to push the update to all
branches simultaneously.
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using
checkout that aren't
committed and pushed to the master.
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Commen
ld be much easier if I could just yum install them.
>
> Any thoughts on whether it would be worthwhile?
>
> David
I can't see why it wouldn't be. There's even a precedent for it:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Windows_cross_compiler
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHC
Regards,
> Michal
Well, the version of Mozilla Firefox in Fedora 14 should support WebM,
so try this: http://www.youtube.com/html5
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vend
t; How do I do this with LDFLAGS. I'm trying to pass --build-id using
>
> export LDFLAGS="$LDFLAGS --build-id"
>
> It's about the only way I can get mono to build currently!
>
> TTFN
>
> Paul
Try
export LDFLAGS="$LDFLAGS -Wl,--build-id"
ree years or more old (32-bit)
Option 2) New, non-netbook hardware (64-bit)
Option 3) Small text link leading to complete download list, including
spins like KDE and XFCE
Or just have the download page provide a link to "List all download
options" or "Ask me some questions about
is a problem with Fedora's support to my graphics card.
>
> Hope someone can help to fix it in future releases...
>
I tested my Intel GMA X3100 card today with the Test Day LiveCD. All
tests passed.
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year after year.
a
new package in Fedora. Once that's reviewed and included in the
packageset, you should raise the question of default inclusion with FESCo.
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/v
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/11/2010 08:30 AM, Matej Cepl wrote:
> Stephen Gallagher, Mon, 11 Oct 2010 08:20:08 -0400:
>> Being that it's a different upstream project now, you need to create a
>> new package in Fedora. Once that's reviewed and incl
amespace
> /tmp breaks it. sssd can not create kerberos tickets in my /tmp and
> gssd can not find my kerberos tickets in /tmp. I believe the solution
> to both is to move the tickets to be managed by sssd and leave /tmp to
> users.
>
> BTW, X has solved this problem a couple of year
ce?
>
It's as good a place as any. What is your concern?
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Co
llation to accomplish this)
* Well, it also added a SWAP partition.
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 18:50 +0200, Jos Vos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Should configs files of a package be patched to have settings that
> make it work more or less out of the box (as far as possible, some
> setting like DB access etc. just can't be filled in in advance)?
>
> I came across a package that d
(Sent on behalf of jima, the former owner)
The dnsmasq package in Fedora has now been orphaned. This package is in
need of a new maintainer and should not be allowed to lapse, as it is a
critical component of the virtualization features.
It is used by libvirt to manage DNS/dhcp for client VMs hos
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 15:43 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:13:48PM -0700, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
> >> Neither bodhi nor mash appears to consider systemd to be in the critical
> >> path. Why is this? Is that
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-08-29)
===
Meeting started by sgallagh at 17:00:05 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-08-29/fesco.2011-08-29-17.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
-
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libtalloc-2.0.6-1.fc15
This CRITPATH package has been in update-testing for 20 days without any
karma. The same package went to stable in F16 a week ago with karma
automatism.
If you use Samba, SSSD, openchange, certmonger, evolution-mapi or
notmuch, please
On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 18:31 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Stephen Gallagher
> wrote:
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libtalloc-2.0.6-1.fc15
> >
> > This CRITPATH package has been in update-testing for 20 days without
> any
On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 12:20 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 07:43 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libtalloc-2.0.6-1.fc15
> >
> > This CRITPATH package has been in update-testing for 20 days without any
> &
On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 13:24 -0400, Tom Callaway wrote:
> In trying to clean up the broken dependencies report, I intend to revive
> three retired packages:
>
> lwp:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745216
I had a few spare minutes today, so I reviewed and approved this one.
signatu
On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 09:27 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> NOTE (just for Jon :): This is for RPM Fusion but the question is a
> technical one.
>
> I'm looking at packaging zfs for Fedora (via RPM Fusion) and it has a
> single source package but contains two spec files. One for the
> utilities (zfs{
Please review the critical path update=20
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-14614
We're right up against the last minute to get these fixes in to ensure
that all of these features work properly from the install DVD. We very
desperately need testers (including one proventester, du
On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 10:48 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
> On 10/26/2011 10:45 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > I forgot to add that it's probably a good idea to recompile any
> > package that was compiled against the -13 glibc package.
> >
> > Strictly speaking, any package that uses a func
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting today at 17:00UTC (1:00pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic #667 - Request to fix CRITPATH update proce
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-10-31)
===
Meeting started by sgallagh at 17:00:21 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-10-31/fesco.2011-10-31-17.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
-
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 08:31 +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 09:31 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > On 11/02/2011 07:54 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > > Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > >> * #683 - Zif as default PackageKit backend for desktop users -
> &
On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 10:21 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:48:40 + (UTC)
> Petr Pisar wrote:
>
> > On 2011-06-10, Luke Macken wrote:
> > > * Buildroot Override Management
> > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bodhi/BuildRootOverrides
> > Excuse me for my low knowl
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 10:54 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> > I decided to try to help the cause of Bayesian statistics and the open
> > source effort of the OpenBUGS group (http://www.openbugs.info/w/) by
> > making some packages. In case you are not a statistically-inclined
> > person, it is worth kn
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 18:58 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 06/15/2011 06:25 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > * Open Floor (nirik, 18:07:26)
> >* ACTION: sgallagh will collect base / core packages that need
> > conversion to systemd and we will try and get those done by alpha.
> >
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 21:56 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> As I say let's put the goal a bit higher and aim atleast for all those
> service on the livecd
>
> > > Any other goals/plans the sysvtosystemd features owners should be aware
> > > of?
> > >
> > > Stephen care to give us a head
On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 10:34 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Due to the requirement for contributors to sign the FPCA by Thursday of last
> week, certain package owners who haven't yet signed will be removed from the
> packager group soon. When that happens, the packages that they own will be
> orp
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 19:17 -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
> Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64
> using rawhide from 2011-06-16
>
> Good hunting!
>
> Full logs at http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/
> sgallagh: pysvn
I've opened a bug upstream. The %check unit test
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 17:30UTC (1:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic #563 suggested policy: all daemons must
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-06-27)
===
Meeting started by sgallagh at 17:01:05 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-06-27/fesco.2011-06-27-17.01.log.html
.
Meeting summary
-
On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 23:55 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> I am using Linux every day, but for a long time I did not use X. Some
> people just needs shell magic :)
The primary reason to use X is to have multiple shell prompts on the
screen at the same time, isn't it? :)
signature.asc
Descript
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 01:07 +0200, Maciej Małecki wrote:
> Hello everyone!
>
> As it is my first mail to this list, let me briefly introduce myself:
> I am Maciej Małecki, software developer based in Poznań, Poland. I've
> been using Fedora since F11 (and I love it).
>
> The point is: is there a
F-12]$
>
> Not my fault I hope...
>
> Is there some infrastructure list where this stuff should go or is devel OK?
infrastruct...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
> Linus Walleij
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in val
hreshold for the automatic push to
> happen.
>
> Regards
> Till
>
> [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Easy_Karma
Given the obvious utility of this script, can we get it added to the
fedora-packager package? It doesn't make a lot of sense to have
developers downloa
e} to 1 following a new %{version} bump.
Simo, thank you for pushing a fix. It's available in updates-testing
now. Karma appreciated.
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/pro
C and
> recently revived for fun and to support DIASER.
>
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/dspaceinvadors/
>
> Where do I start?
>
> TIA - Damian
>
Follow the package review process for Fedora described here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process
Welcome to F
On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 20:28 +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> On the today's FESCo meeting we discussed the request to move forward
> the conversion of the sysvinit scripts to systemd units in Fedora 17.
>
> The packages which ship sysvinit script but do not ship systemd unit
> according to the Fedora p
On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 12:52 -0600, Dan Williams wrote:
> It certainly has a different soname, so yeah, we can have a -compat
> package. But that would still mean a ton of stuff busted for rebuilds
> while packages get fixed up. A few upstream packages already work with
> libnl2, and the delta bet
On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 10:47 +0100, Adam Tkac wrote:
> Hello,
>
> today I tried to upload new bind tarball via `fedpkg new-sources`
> command but it failed with
> "pycurl.error: (60, 'Peer certificate cannot be authenticated with given
> CA certificates')" error.
>
> I though there is problem with
On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 13:58 +0100, Ola Thoresen wrote:
> On 15. nov. 2011 13:03, Ola Thoresen wrote:
>
> > I have successfully set up pure-ftpd with LDAP-auth directly, instead of
> > relying og sssd, and that works fine.
> > Except users do not have access to folders woth "rwx"-permissions for a
On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 15:19 +0100, Ola Thoresen wrote:
> On 15. nov. 2011 14:44, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> >
> > It should be working with *just* PAMAuthentication. Can you check to see
> > if /var/log/secure is showing any errors during login?
> >
> > Also
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2012-12-12)
===
Meeting started by sgallagh at 18:01:16 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-12-12/fesco.2011-12-12-18.01.log.html
.
Meeting summary
-
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 13:16 -0700, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Stephen Gallagher
> wrote:
> > * #715 Provenpackager education/status/brainstorming (sgallagh,
> > 18:43:02)
>
> There was some discussion a while back about preventing certain
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 22:26 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On 12/12/2011 10:16 PM, Ken Dreyer wrote:
>
> > There was some discussion a while back about preventing certain
> > extensions from being uploaded to the lookaside cache. Could ".patch"
> > be added to that list?
>
> Please don't do that.
On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 14:06 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 01:22:06PM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > To some extent I agree with both sgallagh's sentiment and the logical
> > conclusion you're drawing. However, I think the lookaside cache is
> > a necessary optimization
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 09:47 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> Hi,
> just a note that the upcoming release of evolution-data-server 3.3.3
> contains soname version bumps for libcamel and libedatacal, as of today.
> The release is planned for the next week.
>
> I'll rebuild broken deps packages the n
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 02:21 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> While that makes some sense, it was not my point. My point was that even if
> the package has NO maintainer, as long as it works, it's still better than
> no package at all!
Not true. A package that appears to work, has people using it, bu
On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 22:30 +0530, Arun SAG wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found this interesting http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2012/q1/200 . I
> am not able to reproduce this on my laptop. Any one able to reproduce
> it?
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2012-0064
signature.asc
Description:
On Sat, 2012-01-07 at 10:03 +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> W dniu 28.11.2011 17:52, Julian Sikorski pisze:
> > W dniu 28.11.2011 17:32, Bill Nottingham pisze:
> >> Julian Sikorski (beleg...@gmail.com) said:
> >>> Dear Fedorians,
> >>>
> >>> goffice-0.9.0 was released recently, along with new gnum
For the record, I am referencing
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow#CLOSED
Currently, the official bug lifecycle includes the following phrase:
"The resolution UPSTREAM can be used by maintainers to denote a bug that
they expect to be fixed by upstream development and natur
On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 15:30 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-01-14 at 19:12 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > Keeping packages around with no maintainers or people handling their
> > > bugs is poor for everyone.
> >
> > Why? If I, as a user, really need a certain
On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 09:17 +0100, Matej Cepl wrote:
> On 20.1.2012 00:31, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > Currently, the official bug lifecycle includes the following phrase:
> > "The resolution UPSTREAM can be used by maintainers to denote a bug that
> > they expe
On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 09:30 +, Tim Waugh wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 08:39 +0100, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
> > I use closed/upstream, when I already fixed it in upstream. This bug
> > should be closed with number of release, where it is fixed or with the
> > link to the commit. I wouldn't
On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 08:04 -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 09:30 +, Tim Waugh wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 08:39 +0100, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
> > > > I use closed/upstream, when I already fixed it in upstream. This
> > > > bug
> >
On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 10:11 -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
> Hopefully this is being addressed:
>
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTA0NTA
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2012-0064
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mai
On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 11:24 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Stephen Gallagher (sgall...@redhat.com) said:
> > Essentially, when closing this bug as UPSTREAM, we are communicating to
> > our users "This will get fixed. Probably. And it will get pulled into
> > Fedora e
On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 08:16 +0100, David Tardon wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 06:31:44PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > For the record, I am referencing
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow#CLOSED
> >
> > Currently, the official
On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 08:27 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Since feature freeze is tomorrow, I'd like to see us finish all of them
Just to clarify, in case anyone just had a heart-attack, tomorrow is the
Feature Submission Deadline, *not* the Feature Freeze.
According to http://fedoraproject.org/wik
On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 06:11 -0500, Jared K. Smith wrote:
> 2012/2/6 Michał Piotrowski :
> > I noticed that F17 is based on the latest stable glibc realease.
> > Previously development Fedora version was based on development glibc.
> > Was there a change of some Fedora glibc policy? If it is no
> >
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting today at 18:00UTC (1:00pm EST) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic #799 Issues with maintainer responsiveness
On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 12:44 -0500, Omair Majid wrote:
> On 02/13/2012 12:35 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
> > meeting today at 18:00UTC (1:00pm EST) in #fedora-meeting on
> > irc.freenode.net.
> >
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2012-02-13)
===
Meeting started by sgallagh at 18:00:33 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-02-13/fesco.2012-02-13-18.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
-
On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 17:17 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 02/17/2012 05:09 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> >
> > Sure, as time permits and when such can be done without harming user
> > experience.
>
> Why bother only with unit files? Users never touch those the ones in
> /lib/syst
you have any questions feel free to contact any of the people in CC.
--
Stephen Gallagher * Red Hat, Inc * Massachusetts
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 12:59 -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 23 February 2012 12:28, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > Dear fellow developers,
> >
> > with the upcoming Fedora 18 release (currently Rawhide) we are going to
> > change the place where krb5 credenti
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 14:07 -0700, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Stephen Gallagher
> wrote:
> > If you have any questions feel free to contact any of the people in CC.
>
> Thanks for this heads' up. I maintain a package that hardcod
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 23:58 +, David Howells wrote:
> Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> > with the upcoming Fedora 18 release (currently Rawhide) we are going to
> > change the place where krb5 credential cache files are saved by default.
> >
> > The new default for
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 14:28 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Dear fellow developers,
>
> with the upcoming Fedora 18 release (currently Rawhide) we are going to
> change the place where krb5 credential cache files are saved by default.
>
> The new default for credential cache
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 08:07 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi wrote on 27.02.2012 04:21:
> >
> > #topic #810 Clarify our position on forks .fesco 810
>
> It's just a statement that is asked for in the ticket, but nevertheless:
> Shouldn't issues like this be discussed on this list fir
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 15:18 +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 08:14:13AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> > Personally, my stance on this is that, provided that the forks are
> > properly renamed such that they will not conflict with other forks of
>
On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 10:03 +0100, Jos Vos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a possibility to see Django 1.4 in F17?
>
> Django 1.4 RC1 came out yesterday, the final release is expected within a
> month from now. AFAICS there are no real incomapatibilities, see:
>
> https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/de
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 13:01 +0100, Brendan Jones wrote:
> On 03/12/2012 03:46 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > I checked in a tarball for egoboo that turned out to have a non-free
> > (noncommercial restriction) font file in it. The tarball has only
> > been used for local builds (no scratch-builds).
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 10:07 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> There will be a "GNOME Shell and Extensions" Test Day on Thursday!
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2012-03-15_Gnome_Shell_and_Extensions
>
> Here's an introduction from Vitezslav Humpa, who's in charge of this
> event from QA per
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 19:36 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 11:07 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> >
> > I know this should most likely be directed at upstream Gnome, but would
> > it be possible to redesign extensions.gnome.org so that it's.
So
by the time you next ran an update, you continued on rawhide.
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11
maintainer of this package, as it is
a broken dependency in EPEL 6 for one of the packages I maintain
(ReviewBoard).
I am also willing to assume comaintainership in Fedora.
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software ven
s here are very important, so as mentioned above, I don't want to
leave it to a future Fedora. (Which furthermore wouldn't necessarily
help if users have puppet-managed configurations that they'd try to port
forward).
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value ye
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/10/2011 08:37 AM, Mat Booth wrote:
> On 10 January 2011 13:02, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> As a caveat, this is a project that always requires at least som
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/10/2011 09:02 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 08:02 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
>> As a caveat, this is a project that always requires at least some manual
>> intervention on upgrade, as individual sit
hed.
>
> Isn't it the same amount of time as Fedora, that is, one week?
>
> Thanks.
No, EPEL 5 has a two-week minimum time in testing.
Also, EPEL questions are probably better directed at the EPEL mailing lists.
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value y
libkrb5.so.3
sssd-1.5.0-2.fc15.i686 requires libkrb5.so.3(krb5_3_MIT)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
Do I need to rebuild against the latest krb5 library?
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software ve
n
rawhide yesterday because I pushed a new version of libldb that
apparently broke ABI without an SO bump. I have subsequently reverted
this change. Please downgrade to libldb-0.9.10-25.fc15 and SSSD will
work again.
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year after year.
R
ebody help me?
Looks like you're not linking in BOARD::GetLayerColor(int) and
BOARD::GetLayerName(int) const correctly. You should figure out what
library or object file provides those and make sure they're listed in
the linking step.
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Deliv
first, it could be returning
an error that's preventing it from trying /etc/passwd.
If "files" is listed first, then Matt is right, and it's either a
permissions problem on /etc/passwd or /etc/nsswitch.conf, or a bug in glibc.
The fact that it only happens after hibernate is what
r changes to the package to drive it closer to being stable.
On the other hand, I do wonder why it's not currently in
updates-testing, since I'm certain I clicked "push to testing" on the
24th, but it's still marked as "Pending". Trying again.
--
Stephen Galla
ge doesn't have a higher
name-value-release, so there's no need to upgrade to it.
If you're really concerned about having the fc13 package, you can do a
'yum reinstall ' and it will exchange it in place with the fc13
version.
--
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
D
>
Feature Request: ability to add other libraries to the system for tracking.
--
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Can someone explain to me why a package whose update comment lists
"added patch that fixes insufficient environment sanitization issue
(CVE-2010-1646)" is not marked as a security bug?
--
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in v
1 - 100 of 1701 matches
Mail list logo
