etimes stated
> as "license in, license out", but that most do not make this explicit.
> The DCO explicitly states that the contribution itself is granted to
> the project under the same license that the project uses.
Just adding a link to the talk:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3O
arder. Especially with back
porting all the fixes to the then LTS. And besides that I guess most
people who want an LTS outside of the IoT world, would go for CentOS
anyway. So may let's see if we can bring CentOS and RHEL towards IoT
instead of bringing CentOS and RHEL to Fedora. I hope/guess
ime to get a new maintainer. And the people who
are maybe interested in being this new maintainer: The people who need
the package.
Maybe I'm a bit to easy with taking packages away from unresponsive
maintainers, but I think this would be a quite easy way to take care of
those things.
--
Signed
Sheo
kay with CPU usage (but keep in mind it may take an hour to
decompress) and depending on the upstream, either use mobile data for
networking or when you're lucky some WiFi/Bluetooth/… thing.
Means:
CPU usage: Getting worse here, doesn't hurt too much
Memory usage
version is supported for about 13 months. Is
> it likely to receive security fixes for not-the-latest Nextcloud
> version?
>
According to their web page[1] they support the last two versions of
Nextcloud. So with ~1 release per year and Fedora with 13 month of
support, we are covered here.
the timeout to 1 second sounds fine.
--
Signed
Sheogorath
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of
name of Fedora executed by the
Gitlab team, will end up in GitLab-foss i.e. open source?
And what really makes me wonder in the whole process: According to
various mails from the CPE the deal that will come out, like features,
price, … is not yet figured out. Not even the plan what GitLab version
C
DoT doesn't bring so much more privacy, but it
provides integrity to DNS that unencrypted DNS even with DNSSec is
lagging as an attack can always opt to not answer for a specific domain
name.
And whenever or not applications of the system should implement it, is
probably decided by how fast the s
On Thu, 2019-11-07 at 21:25 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote:
> Le jeudi 07 novembre 2019 à 18:32 +0100, Sheogorath via devel a écrit
> :
> > The talk is right on many points, but I think it dismisses the most
> > essential point DoH does right: DNS is a decision of th
5202217/https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/networking/2010/09/08/network-location-awareness-nla-and-how-it-relates-to-windows-firewall-profiles/
There is quite some documentation about how Windows
determines/determined when it was connected to a different network
(being it by wire or WiFi). Even when
testing in background. Then we head over
there, open the notebook and of course need some kind of
presentation/picture/data we stored on the cloud storage provider of our
trust. We connect to the public/unknown WiFi and *boom* suddenly we have
unexpected open ports on a public network we d
nter your FAS credentials. This
> means while accessing Pagure, participating in discussions in
> discussion.fedoraproject.org, and also while using Bodhi, Koji, and
> all.
>
Just out of curiosity, is this done by a patch or with a separate package?
--
Signed
Sheogorath
OpenPGP: https:/
ent hanging
and what's the origin of hanging? Is it that the kernel starts to swap
and therefore eats up all CPU time or is it the programs in foreground
that suddenly all try to get their piece of memory back that forces
kswapd onto the CPU?
My guess would be the latter, but I'm sure the g
13 matches
Mail list logo
