On Wed, 9 Jul 2014, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 08:29:41PM -0400, Scott Talbert wrote:
Hi all,
Suds [1], a Python Library for using SOAP web services (Fedora
package: python-suds), has been unmaintained for about 3 years or
so. There is a relatively active fork
Hi,
Anyone up for a review swap? I've got a relatively simple package:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152804
It just has a single C file. :-)
Thanks,
Scott
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of C
On Sun, 31 May 2015, Momcilo Medic wrote:
Now, the situation here is a bit tricky as the package is not (quite)
orphaned (and I would like it to stay that way) so I cannot adopt it;
and its owner doesn't want to maintain it anymore, so I cannot co
-maintain. To make it even worse, even if he wan
On Fri, 29 May 2020, Jun Aruga wrote:
I opened the issue ticket for systemtap.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1841558
I suspect this is probably because of the Python 3.9 rebuild being merged
back into rawhide. See the [HEADS UP] thread...
__
Whatever you did with the koji web interface, +1000! It is crazy fast now!
Thanks
Scott
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fed
On Wed, 17 Jun 2020, Dan Horák wrote:
"J. Scheurich" wrote:
Hi,
I updated white_dune with creating a source.rpm,
$ fedpkg clone wdune
$ fedpkg import source.rpm
$ fedpkg commit
$ fedpkg push
$ fedpkg build
but i get the following problem
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID
On Tue, 30 Jun 2020, Christopher wrote:
I know Fedora doesn't directly support Amazon Linux, but I was
wondering if the package maintainer for rpmconf on EPEL was aware that
the latest version doesn't work on Amazon Linux 2, which recently
updated to python-3.7, whereas rpmconf has a direct depe
On Wed, 29 Jul 2020, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
libnbd failed in the mass rebuild. I kicked off a second build by
hand, and it failed in the exact same way:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=48118058
DEBUG util.py:623: Downloading Packages:
DEBUG util.py:621: Error: Error d
Hi all,
Suds [1], a Python Library for using SOAP web services (Fedora package:
python-suds), has been unmaintained for about 3 years or so. There is a
relatively active fork, suds-jurko [2], that has, among other things,
Python 3 support. Thus, I would like to package suds-jurko for Fedora.
On Mon, 23 Nov 2015, David Timms wrote:
Hi any GTk3 or WxWidgets devs,
In Audacity (next), upstream has moved to wxGTK3. The only visible issue
I can see is with the placement of text within drop down fields.
The text is too low, and if it's too wide, the combo box isn't resizing
to fit the wi
On Tue, 8 Dec 2015, Vít Ondruch wrote:
I'm quite lost with the fedora notifications [0] for email. Do you
know which is the option to send me an email once a package is ready to
be pushed to stable? (i.e., when the waiting period has passed or the
feedback reached the threshold).
I don't thi
On Mon, 4 Jan 2016, Josh Boyer wrote:
* Update existing python-suds package to suds-jurko and ensure it
builds/works in Rawhide. (NOTE: proposal owner is not currently the
maintainer of python-suds, but would intend to assume maintainership
as part of this change.) The plan is to use the latest
I did get a response from Jeff Ortel (Suds upstream and Fedora maintainer)
with his input on this proposal (forwarded with his permission).
Regards,
Scott
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 12:18:45 -0600
From: Jeff Ortel
To: Scott Talbert
Subject: Re: F24 System
On Wed, 6 Jan 2016, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Chandan did contact him a while ago and I confirm that he did not
receive any answer.
Since maintainer is inactive for a while, I was thinking about doing
the update as provenpackager after a reasonable delay.
I think this whole thread is more something
On Wed, 6 Jan 2016, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Chandan did contact him a while ago and I confirm that he did not
receive any answer.
Since maintainer is inactive for a while, I was thinking about doing
the update as provenpackager after a reasonable delay.
I think this whole thread is more something f
All,
As discussed in [1], I've updated the python-suds package to use Jurko's
fork in Rawhide. As a result, Python 3 packages are now available.
I've been running with the package for about a month and haven't run
across any issues. Please test it out and let me know if you run into any
pr
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
Question: What if my application depends on GTK+ 2?
Answer: You must first port to GTK+ 3, then port to WebKit2. You may
find it more practical to stop using WebKitGTK+.
What is the WebKit2 package in Fedora? Is that webkitgtk4?
Scott
--
devel m
On Wed, 14 Sep 2016, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Tue, 2016-09-13 at 23:26 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
I've started filing bugs and will continue throughout the week.
Michael
Well nevermind that, I'm (mostly) finished:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375784
The one thing I
On Fri, 23 Sep 2016, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Hello ,
What is the status of this proposal ? or where/how I can follow the
status ?
My biggest concern is about wxGTK3 some package depend on it, also in
3rd part repos and gimp !
I'm working on porting wxGTK3 to WebKit2. If you want, you can foll
On Thu, 22 Sep 2016, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
Thanks for working on this Scott!
On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 20:37 -0400, Scott Talbert wrote:
Also, I plan to create a separate wxGTK3 subpackage containing the
webview
library that actually uses WebKit. That way, some of these
artificial
On Fri, 12 Dec 2014, Sudhir Khanger wrote:
icedtea-web-1.5.2-0.fc20.x86_64 requires
java-1.7.0-openjdk-1:1.7.0.71-2.5.3.0.fc20.x86_64
OpenJDK 7 has been dropped from F21. You would get prompt answer from fedora-
java mailing list.
$ rpm -qa | grep icedtea
icedtea-web-1.5.1-1.fc21.x86_64
$ rp
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
The plan is to make wxPython 3.0
co-installable with wxPython 2.8, similarly to what has been done with the
wxWidgets packages (wxGTK and wxGTK3).
What are the issues involved in updating everybody to wxPython 3.0?
It is certainly doable
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
The plan is to make wxPython 3.0
co-installable with wxPython 2.8, similarly to what has been done with the
wxWidgets packages (wxGTK and wxGTK3).
What are the issues involved in updating everybody to wxPython 3.0?
It is certainly doable
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
The plan is to make wxPython 3.0
co-installable with wxPython 2.8, similarly to what has been done with the
wxWidgets packages (wxGTK and wxGTK3).
What are the issues involved in updating everybody to wxPython 3.0?
It is certainly doable
All,
As discussed in [1], I've updated the wxPython package into Rawhide to
wxPython 3.0. I'll start working on testing all of the dependent
packages. If any maintainers of dependent packages can test their
packages, that would be helpful too. Please let me know the status, or
update the c
Hi all,
I'm working on testing wxPython 3.0 (which has now been built against
GTK+3) in Rawhide. As I'm going through the various wxPython
applications, I'm seeing issues in several of the applications with widget
sizing: buttons, text controls, combo boxes, etc - usually they are too
small.
On Fri, 6 Feb 2015, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I'm working on testing wxPython 3.0 (which has now been built against
GTK+3) in Rawhide. As I'm going through the various wxPython
applications, I'm seeing issues in several of the applications with
widget sizing: buttons, text controls, combo boxes, e
On Sat, 7 Feb 2015, Scott Talbert wrote:
I'm working on testing wxPython 3.0 (which has now been built against
GTK+3) in Rawhide. As I'm going through the various wxPython
applications, I'm seeing issues in several of the applications with
widget sizing: buttons, text contro
On Tue, 31 Jan 2017, Sérgio Basto wrote:
How about handling it the same way we handle old GtkWebKit versions?
As soon as F26 is branched from Rawhide (expected in 2017-02-21),
retire this package? This would give package maintainers enough time
to get their packages fixed (about 9 months) until
Hi,
I read the page about the PkgDB replacement[1] but it seems to focus
mainly on the "logged in" functionality of PkgDB. However, I also use
PkgDB as a convenient way for searching all of Fedora's packages. In
addition, I find the Builds status, Updates status, Package source, Bug
Reports
On Tue, 29 Mar 2016, John Florian wrote:
Somehow, somewhen, I wound up as the main contact for the 'ddclient'
package though I never intended to and know nothing at all about it.
I've noticed this a couple of times before and I guess I looked up why
but I forgot again and I'm sick of it, I don't
On Wed, 7 Dec 2016, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Hi, like webkit < 3 retirement , you shouldn't repoquery with
--recursive, If I am correct .
Again after wxGTK and wxGTK3 be updated all dependencies will be
solved
automatically , also same case for wxPython , If I am correct.
Incorrect. I was talking
On Fri, 27 Mar 2020, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
Hey,
I am trying to bump version of package named workrave which was not originally
added by me, I have been able to fix all the issues so far except one:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/7540/42797540/build.log
error: File not found:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
* Miro Hrončok [30/03/2020 20:24] :
perl-Data-Validate-Domain orphan 1 weeks ago
I've maintained this package for years now. Why is it considered it orphaned?
Because the maintainer (normunds) was non-responsive.
Is there a recommended way for detecting when a package is being built
under mock? I have a package where some tests fail due to various things
not being present in a mock container, e.g, /dev/log doesn't exist. I can
just disable these tests downstream, but upstream might take a change if I
On Tue, 7 Apr 2020, Paul Howarth wrote:
Is there a recommended way for detecting when a package is being
built under mock? I have a package where some tests fail due to
various things not being present in a mock container, e.g, /dev/log
doesn't exist. I can just disable these tests downstream,
On Wed, 8 Apr 2020, Petr Pisar wrote:
Is there a recommended way for detecting when a package is being
built under mock? I have a package where some tests fail due to
various things not being present in a mock container, e.g, /dev/log
doesn't exist. I can just disable these tests downstream, b
On Wed, 8 Apr 2020, Dominic Hopf via devel wrote:
Greetings,
I'm trying to build Geany and the Geany Plugins for EPEL8 currently and
stumble over an issue which seems to be
quite special in some kind for aarch64 and s390x:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43133907
Basica
On Wed, 8 Apr 2020, Dominic Hopf via devel wrote:
Thanks very much for your help Scott and Michael!
I now did both, changed the requirement to webkit2gtk3-devel and as this one
is also not available on the mentioned architectures,
excluded those architectures using ExcludeArch for this specific
On Mon, 13 Apr 2020, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
So how do I get a functional python2 interpreter and access to pip?
As a short-term solution, you can switch the runtime-version in your manifest
to 18.08, but this runtime will only be supported for four more months, until
August (when the 20.08
On Fri, 8 May 2020, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Not that it's a huge deal for me but I wouldn't call the upgrade smooth.
There were a bunch of python2 packages that needed to be removed which
necessitated --allowerasing which I've never had to do before.
This should not be the case. If
On Fri, 8 May 2020, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
Speaking of fedora-obsolete-packages, that package got removed from my
system on upgrade from F31->F32. Is that expected?
Without fedora-obsolete-packages installed, maintaining an upgrade path
becomes impossible. So that sounds bad. Probably it s
On Fri, 8 May 2020, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
That is kind of what I figured. BTW, I used the GUI method to upgrade.
Yeah me too. And my fedora-obsolete-packages is also gone.
It cannot be installed, either. I wonder: am I misunderstanding how this is
supposed to work? Or has something impro
On Sun, 10 May 2020, Barry Scott wrote:
I know that python2 is a dead language, but I have a need to use some python 2
code
on one of my servers. It's clearly on me to maintain the old code if I choose
to use it.
I use MoinMoin via mon_wsgi.
After upgrading to fedora 32 I took the trouble to
On Mon, 7 Oct 2019, Richard Shaw wrote:
I am in the midst of updating the freecad package in two major ways:
Qt4 -> Qt5 (via PySide -> PySide2, which also facilitates moving from Python
2 to 3)
and
Coin3 -> Coin4 (Which requires several other packages move to Coin4)
I have been working with the
Hi,
While looking into the packages on my F31 that were not rebuilt for F31, I
was looking at tk and why it was not rebuilt for F31 - it appears this
package has a noautobuild file in dist-git. Should packages still be
allowed to opt-out of mass rebuilds? I can't find any recent
documentati
On Fri, 1 Nov 2019, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Yeah, looks like mass rebuild just skips these packages:
https://pagure.io/releng/blob/master/f/scripts/mass-rebuild.py#_125
I am wondering if it wouldn't make sense to do a scratch build in that
case and proceed with normal FTBS policy [0] if it fails.
On Mon, 11 Nov 2019, David Timms wrote:
Issue:
Audacity development (git) requires linking against wxGTK3.1.
The normal Fedora wxGTK3 package is at wxGTK3-3.04 in F29/30/31/devel.
wxGTK3.1 is a development series which eventually leads to wxGTK3.2 release.
Upstream is currently at 3.1.3 and expe
On Tue, 12 Nov 2019, David Timms wrote:
David Timms wrote:
Audacity development (git) requires linking against wxGTK3.1.
Does it really? I cannot find this requirement in their git repository.
see: https://wiki.audacityteam.org/wiki/Building_On_Linux
or from the horse - (Mr Ed):
https://gith
On Mon, 11 Nov 2019, Scott Talbert wrote:
Audacity development (git) requires linking against wxGTK3.1.
Does it really? I cannot find this requirement in their git repository.
see: https://wiki.audacityteam.org/wiki/Building_On_Linux
or from the horse - (Mr Ed):
https://github.com/audacity
On Mon, 25 Nov 2019, Till Maas wrote:
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 10:33:54AM -0500, Steven A. Falco wrote:
Yet according to koji, there is no build for fc31:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=avr-libc
I'm not saying that anything is wrong - I'm just curious as to why the
On Thu, 15 Aug 2019, Greg Hellings wrote:
I'm trying to track down a build error in my package that appears only on
ppc64le architectures in Rawhide. As I have no access to ppc64le machines,
I'm attempting to boot a VM with qemu. But when I get into the system many
of the more useful commands ar
On Wed, 21 Aug 2019, Miro Hrončok wrote:
I'm hit by the above error in rawhide.
Is this expected or unexpected failure?
I just filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744292
But it may be expected?
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mesa/c/845287db528a3cd8f5c879c53a28a1dcb2aa00e8?
On Wed, 21 Aug 2019, Scott Talbert wrote:
I'm hit by the above error in rawhide.
Is this expected or unexpected failure?
I just filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744292
But it may be expected?
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/m
On Wed, 21 Aug 2019, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>> I'm hit by the above error in rawhide.
>>
>> Is this expected or unexpected failure?
>
> I just filed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744292
>
> But it may be expected?
>https://src
Hi,
I need to create a multi-package bodhi update for F30 and F31 to fix a
bug. Could a provenpackager help me out please? I only have commit
rights to wxpython.
For F31, please create an update with builds and tag bug #1739469:
python-fsleyes-0.30.1-1.fc31
python-fsleyes-widgets-0.8.0-1.fc
On Thu, 12 Sep 2019, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
The third one, python3-parso, has builds for 0.5.1-2.fc30 and
0.5.1-2.fc32, but there is no 0.5.1-2 build for fc31.
File a bug please. It's against the guidelines to have a
higher-numbered build in F30 compared to F31. Maintainers need
to
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019, Stefan Koch wrote:
Hi
My package usbauth-notifier has passed the review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1554022
The package have a repositiory now:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/usbauth-notifier
I have created a build for my package:
https://bodhi.fedora
On Fri, 10 Jan 2020, Breno Brand Fernandes wrote:
Hi all,
Recently, I've sent an email on epel-dev regarding this ownership
request[1].
So, somethings may be repeated for some of you (I'm sorry!).
The package Pound was retired about a year ago. It failed to build and at
that time the maintainer
On Tue, 28 Jan 2020, Bill Chatfield via devel wrote:
Are any of you on the java-devel list so that I could move my newb questions
there? I can guarantee that it's a low-traffic list so there's no risk in
joining it. :-)
google-http-java-client looks easy to fix. It won't build because it need
Does anyone know how to contact maintainer normunds?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806619
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797039
Thanks,
Scott
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an em
On Tue, 25 Feb 2020, Eduard Lucena wrote:
Hello team,
I'm writing this here, because I don't know of any other place, so if there
is another place to report it, I'll listen to go there.
I'm trying to install the package: python3-i3ipc
$ sudo dnf info python3-i3ipc
Last metadata expiration che
On Fri, 28 Feb 2020, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Can someone point me to a way to generate a list of non-retired packages that
I am a maintainer on? Thanks.
Hunting around for a "pagure cli" doesn't bring up much that seems active.
You could probably scrape it from here?
https://src.fedoraproje
On Tue, 3 Mar 2020, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
Quick question: if a new package A is in updates-testing, is it
available for koji to build another new package B that requires A? Or
do I need to wait until A reaches stable?
No, it is not available in the buildroot until it reaches stable.
However, you
On Sun, 8 Mar 2020, Gonçalo Camelo Neves Pereira wrote:
I have just submitted a build on copr and it has reported as failed, however
when I look to the logs it appeared to be successful. Can anyone helo me
understand what happened?
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/gpereira/freeehdl/buil
On Thu, 12 Mar 2020, Yongkui Han (yonhan) via devel wrote:
There is one minor problem with my package review request: I would like to
set the blocks for 177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=FE-NEEDSPONSOR, however, I tried
a few times, could not make my review request get the green
On Thu, 13 Dec 2018, Richard Shaw wrote:
I've never had this problem before but for the last week or so I frequently
get the following at some point before the build completes:
Could not execute build: ('Connection aborted.', RemoteDisconnected('Remote
end closed connection without response'))
On Tue, 18 Dec 2018, Cătălin George Feștilă wrote:
I try to install gyachi.x86_64 but I got errors.
A full search gives just some packages, I don't know if this is a bug
or a repo limited area. see my output.
root@desk mythcat]# dnf install gyachi.x86_64
Last metadata expiration check: 0:16:07
On Mon, 28 Jan 2019, Martin Gansser wrote:
Hi,
the build fails due dependencies [1] although lmfit is present in the rawhide
repo [2].
[1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=32312961
[2] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1176846
how can i resolve this ?
On Mon, 11 Feb 2019, Neal Becker wrote:
I haven't done any fedora packaging work for some time. I tried to fix
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1674789
today, but I get:
fedpkg push
Enumerating objects: 5, done.
Counting objects: 100% (5/5), done.
Delta compression using up to 4 thr
On Mon, 11 Feb 2019, Neal Becker wrote:
I haven't done any fedora packaging work for some time. I tried to fix
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1674789
today, but I get:
fedpkg push
Enumerating objects: 5, done.
Counting objects: 100% (5/5), done.
Delta compression using up to 4 thr
On Wed, 13 Feb 2019, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hi, I'm writing to devel to see if others would find this useful or not,
before I dig into finding whether it is mock or rpkg to bother about this :D
I build packages with `fedpkg mockbuild -N`. i iterate with spec changes and
try to build the package
On Thu, 28 Feb 2019, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Hi,
For one of my packages, doxygen is crashing on aarch64 (and not on any
other arch). Any ideas/tips on how to fix this?
Is the package name secret? More details are always good here. There's
generally no issues with doxygen in general on aarch64.
On Sun, 7 Apr 2019, Steven A. Falco wrote:
The KiCad package uses python3-wxpython4 - I'm one of the package
maintainers. KiCad is building correctly on Fedora 30, but my rawhide
builds are failing with the following error:
BUILDSTDERR: - nothing provides python3-sip-api(12)(x86-64) = 12.5
On Fri, 31 May 2019, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
On 5/30/19 2:18 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
Since I was looking at a copy of the F30 repo for amd64, here's a list
of a bunch of packages whose dist tag suggests they haven't rebuilt
successfully in any currently-supported Fedora release. I'm sure some
Hi,
After I upgraded to F30, I checked my system for packages that had not
been built for F30. I removed most of the leaf ones, but the ones that
were required by important packages, I went ahead and fixed in pull
requests. As these FTBFS were not fixed during the F30 cycle by the
package m
On Sun, 2 Jun 2019, Leigh Scott wrote:
Your fix for libtommath was incomplete.
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1277908
It was also having issues with parallel build for docs.
Sorry, a local mock build and the simple-koji-ci build passed, so I didn't
know. It looks lik
On Wed, 10 Jul 2019, Marius Schwarz wrote:
Hello,
there seems to be a problem with the trafficserver builds since 2016.
according to koji, they just fail and noone cares.
The package itself is outdated by 3 major releases of trafficserver itself,
and 6 Fedora cycles. The packages shipped are
On Wed, 10 Jul 2019, Marius Schwarz wrote:
Hello,
there seems to be a problem with the trafficserver builds since 2016.
according to koji, they just fail and noone cares.
The package itself is outdated by 3 major releases of trafficserver itself,
and 6 Fedora cycles. The packages shipped are
Hi,
Per Non-Responsive Maintainer policy, I'm attempting to contact Pavel
Cahyna (pcahyna). I have not gotten a response to a pull request or bug
report.
Bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1599538
Thanks,
Scott
___
devel mailing list
Hi,
Per Non-Responsive Maintainer policy, I'm attempting to contact Pavel
Alexeev (hubbitus). I have not gotten a response to a pull request or bug
report for DivFix++ package.
Bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1599541
Thanks,
Scott
___
Hi,
I'm slowly trying to move packages to wxWidgets 3.0 so we can get rid of
wx 2.8 which is not maintained since 2011. I have made a bunch of pull
requests but very frustratingly, many of them received no response (and no
response to the bugs I filed). Rather than go through the non-respons
On Thu, 16 Aug 2018, Miro Hrončok wrote:
I'm slowly trying to move packages to wxWidgets 3.0 so we can get rid of
wx 2.8 which is not maintained since 2011. I have made a bunch of pull
requests but very frustratingly, many of them received no response (and no
response to the bugs I filed). Rat
On Mon, 20 Aug 2018, Miro Hrončok wrote:
I'm slowly trying to move packages to wxWidgets 3.0 so we can get rid of wx
2.8 which is not maintained since 2011. I have made a bunch of pull
requests but very frustratingly, many of them received no response (and no
response to the bugs I filed). R
Hi,
I'm not the maintainer of this package (iaxclient), but I ran into this
build failure while working on a pull request. It seems to be fallout
from the -Wl,--as-needed change. Any idea why this is happening?
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=29342306
Thanks,
Scott
On Mon, 27 Aug 2018, Jerry James wrote:
I'm not the maintainer of this package (iaxclient), but I ran into this
build failure while working on a pull request. It seems to be fallout
from the -Wl,--as-needed change. Any idea why this is happening?
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?t
On Tue, 28 Aug 2018, Marek Kasik wrote:
I'm not the maintainer of this package (iaxclient), but I ran into this
build failure while working on a pull request. It seems to be fallout from
the -Wl,--as-needed change. Any idea why this is happening?
it could be a consequence of the bug #162307
On Fri, 21 Sep 2018, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=29796611
It's not very clear what the actual error is, but I am fairly sure
that I have uploaded the correct sources for this:
$ fedpkg new-sources libguestfs-1.39.10.tar.gz
/usr/lib/python2.7/s
On Fri, 21 Sep 2018, Scott Talbert wrote:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=29796611
It's not very clear what the actual error is, but I am fairly sure
that I have uploaded the correct sources for this:
$ fedpkg new-sources libguestfs-1.39.10.tar.gz
/usr/lib/python2.7
On October 27, 2018 9:57:21 AM EDT, Rex Dieter wrote:
>Rex Dieter wrote:
>
>> Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
>>
>>> I am attempting to build the latest matplotlib but it is failing to
>>> install python3-wxpython4 [1]:
>>>
>>>- nothing provides python3-sip-api(12)(x86-64) = 12.5 needed by
On Sat, 27 Oct 2018, Rex Dieter wrote:
The problem with using the bundled copy is that the bundled copy doesn't
include the sip binary. So if we use the wxpython bundled sip module code
with the sip package's sip binary, we could end with mismatched sip
versions.
Wow, that's seems like a frag
On Sat, 27 Oct 2018, Scott Talbert wrote:
The problem with using the bundled copy is that the bundled copy doesn't
include the sip binary. So if we use the wxpython bundled sip module code
with the sip package's sip binary, we could end with mismatched sip
versions.
Wow, that'
On Sat, 27 Oct 2018, Rex Dieter wrote:
The problem with using the bundled copy is that the bundled copy doesn't
include the sip binary. So if we use the wxpython bundled sip module
code with the sip package's sip binary, we could end with mismatched sip
versions.
Wow, that's seems like a frag
On Sun, 28 Oct 2018, Sérgio Basto wrote:
I am attempting to build the latest matplotlib but it is failing to
install python3-wxpython4 [1]:
- nothing provides python3-sip-api(12)(x86-64) = 12.5 needed by
python3-wxpython4-4.0.1-9.fc29.x86_64
dnf repoquery --disablerepo='*' --enablerepo=raw
On Sat, 27 Oct 2018, Rex Dieter wrote:
The problem with using the bundled copy is that the bundled copy
doesn't
include the sip binary. So if we use the wxpython bundled sip module
code with the sip package's sip binary, we could end with mismatched
sip versions.
Wow, that's seems like a frag
Hi,
What happened to the broken dependency notification emails?
Also, it seems that Anitya has not been creating bugs for new upstream
releases for several months. The problem doesn't seem to be with Anitya
as it knows about the new releases, but somewhere else in the chain. I
thought I had
On Sat, 27 Oct 2018, Scott Talbert wrote:
The problem with using the bundled copy is that the bundled copy
doesn't
include the sip binary. So if we use the wxpython bundled sip module
code with the sip package's sip binary, we could end with mismatched
sip versions.
Wow, that'
On Sun, 28 Oct 2018, Neal Gompa wrote:
Hi,
What happened to the broken dependency notification emails?
I rewrote spam-o-matic to use DNF, and it was finally merged ~2 months ago[1].
The releng team has since activated it without sending any mail[2],
but hopefully they'll start sending mail
Doing a 'dnf autoremove' after upgrading to F29, yum is one of the
packages it wants to remove. Is it safe to remove yum these days?
Scott
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedora
On Mon, 17 Apr 2023, Steve Dickson wrote:
Hello,
I'm getting a very strange mock error [1] on a package [2]
that was recently ported to python 3.
The package builds fine locally... only fails in a
scratch build... and that function that the error is c
complaining about does not exist in the pa
1 - 100 of 223 matches
Mail list logo
