Re: [systemd-devel] question

On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 23:15 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 13.09.2011 21:41, schrieb Sérgio Basto: > > thanks for this information , could I update systemd to systemd-35 in > > Fedora 15 with rebuilding the src.rpm , I don't get in trouble ? or we > > have some

Re: what if native systemd service is slower than old sysvinit script?

Hi, On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 01:03 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote: > Hi > > 2011/9/13 Tom Lane : > > (This isn't new with 9.1, btw --- the last version or so of 9.0 > > for F16 was the same, since we switched over to native systemd > > files.) > > I used this service file on F15 and it starts slow

Re: [systemd-devel] question

On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 09:05 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > and force > a switch to systemd at the same time and then force the users to > upgrade again to F16 as soon as possible to get systemd updated > is simply the wrong way I agree! other piece of email : > And FYI to all those that glorious

need update kBuild on F15

Hi, We need that bug be resolved https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734870#c3 Since last kernels updates on F15 , we can't compile VirtualBox-OSE-kmod the fixes are in next major version of VirtualBox , but to compile new version we need kBuild updated like it is on F16. Can someone pus

Re: rawhide java versioning issue?

On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 09:02 -0500, Deepak Bhole wrote: > Java 7 needs to become the default JDK for rawhide. We will start working > on this over the coming few days. Until done, Java stuff might be broken > here and there. yeah new Java breaks build of VirtualBox-4.1.6 (from rpmfusion) I got th

About: Orphaned packages

Hi, when upgrade Fedora, some programs that we had used was been dropped because are orphaned but many times it is because we have better choices . So my idea is that we may have a data base of possible replacement of the package that has been orphaned . For example smb4k have been dropped on F

Re: About: Orphaned packages

On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 03:15 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Sérgio Basto wrote: > > For example smb4k have been dropped on F16, have we any replacement that > > search the windows "network neighborhood" ? > > smb4k simply needs somebody to sign up as a new mai

Re: rawhide java versioning issue?

On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 19:38 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > As a workaround, you can manually install > java-1.7.0-openjdk{,-devel} > > and it should be fine. Hi, well I fix my build with: -BuildRequires: java-devel >= 1.6 +BuildRequires: java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel hope that

Re: Changing kernel API / Breaking VirtualBox - update criteria violation?

On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 11:32 -0800, Josh Stone wrote: > On 11/28/2011 12:47 PM, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > > On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 10:06:32 -0800 > > Josh Stone wrote: > > > >> On 11/22/2011 09:51 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > >>> -#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(3, 1, 0) > >> > >> It may hav

Re: Changing kernel API / Breaking VirtualBox - update criteria violation?

On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 15:41 -0800, Josh Stone wrote: > On 12/05/2011 01:05 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > Hi, Now I'm co-maintaining VirtualBox on rpmfusion > > you got on my external link VB 4.1.4 for F15 > > http://www.serjux.com/virtualbox/ > > if you try it

Re: rawhide report: 20111212 changes

On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 11:56 +, Rawhide Report wrote: > 6:kdeutils-4.7.90-1.fc17.noarch requires sweeper >= 0:4.7.90 > 6:kdeutils-4.7.90-1.fc17.noarch requires superkaramba >= > 0:4.7.90 > 6:kdeutils-4.7.90-1.fc17.noarch requires kremotecontrol >= > 0:4.7.90 > 6:kdeutils

Re: F16 release to Rawhide upgrade failure

On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 16:42 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > A fresh install of Fedora 16 x86_64 DVD, then enabled fedora-release-rawhide > and disabled updates and updates-testing. It wants to pull in i686 packages, > and the full output with --skip-broken is this: > > http://mschwendt.fedorapeo

Re: kde-partitionmanager orphaned

On Sat, 2011-12-17 at 03:55 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Robin 'cheese' Lee wrote: > > kde-partitionmanager doesn't build with parted 3.0. And upstream seems far > > away from a new release. > > I'm planning to get a parted2 compatibility package into Fedora ASAP (and I > am really angry at the

Re: rawhide report: 20111221 changes

On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 11:37 +, Rawhide Report wrote: > pida-0.6.2-2.fc17.x86_64 requires gnome-python2-gtkhtml2 I also have this problem on F16 . -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Announcing - A new way to make live media with livemedia-creator

Hi, anaconda-devel-l...@redhat.com, Discussion list about Kickstart and Discussion of Fedora build system are 3 Mailing List about same thing :), you choose anaconda-devel-l...@redhat.com, but if you post on build...@lists.fedoraproject.org , I would appreciate . any you have a new post there

Re: Announcing - A new way to make live media with livemedia-creator

On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 09:58 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 08:51:14 -0700, > Kurt Seifried wrote: > > Where's the project webpage for lorax? Google doesn't seem to find it. > > Thanks in advance. > > rpm -qi lorax says its: > http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=lorax.gi

Re: Printing issue in Fedora 16

On Sun, 2011-12-25 at 22:05 +0530, Kalpa Pathum Welivitigoda wrote: > Hi, > > I can print a file with 'lp' but I can't print the same file opened in gedit. > My printer is Espon LQ-300 > > Any help is highly appreciated. gnome-control-center -> Printers . What you have here ? -- Sérgio M. B

Re: Printing issue in Fedora 16

On Mon, 2011-12-26 at 07:01 +0530, Kalpa Pathum Welivitigoda wrote: > 2011/12/26 Sérgio Basto : > > On Sun, 2011-12-25 at 22:05 +0530, Kalpa Pathum Welivitigoda wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I can print a file with 'lp' but I can't print the same f

Re: Printing issue in Fedora 16

On Mon, 2011-12-26 at 07:01 +0530, Kalpa Pathum Welivitigoda wrote: > But the parallel port one is > not detected such and the ports listed for installation are serial > port 1 and serial port 2 parallel port and serial port are different , serial ports are for old modems and very old mouses befo

Re: Printing issue in Fedora 16

On Mon, 2011-12-26 at 08:44 +0530, Kalpa Pathum Welivitigoda wrote: > It seems that the parallel port connected one is not detected. I had use: system-config-printer to configure my epson stylus color in parallel port. -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org h

Re: Printing issue in Fedora 16

On Mon, 2011-12-26 at 09:59 +0530, Kalpa Pathum Welivitigoda wrote: > > I had use: > > system-config-printer > > > > to configure my epson stylus color in parallel port. > > > > I put URI as paralle:/dev/lp0 and driver as Epson 24-pin recommended > and now it is working. I just check and for the

Re: Printing issue in Fedora 16

On Thu, 2011-12-29 at 08:32 +0530, Kalpa Pathum Welivitigoda wrote: > 2011/12/29 Sérgio Basto : > > On Mon, 2011-12-26 at 09:59 +0530, Kalpa Pathum Welivitigoda wrote: > >> > I had use: > >> > system-config-printer > >> > > >>

Re: Printing issue in Fedora 16

On Thu, 2011-12-29 at 08:32 +0530, Kalpa Pathum Welivitigoda wrote: > 2011/12/29 Sérgio Basto : > > On Mon, 2011-12-26 at 09:59 +0530, Kalpa Pathum Welivitigoda wrote: > >> > I had use: > >> > system-config-printer > >> > > >>

Re: Bad coding practices in Fedora packages

On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 11:15 -0500, Genes MailLists wrote: > On 01/03/2012 09:16 AM, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > > > # cat /proc/meminfo >/tmp/1; killall tracker-store; sleep 1; cat > > /proc/meminfo >/tmp/2; cat /tmp/1 /tmp/2 | grep MemFree > > MemFree: 1940372 kB > > MemFree: 1963860

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 18:30 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > The list of orphaned packages is here: > https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/attachment/ticket/3046/to-be-orphaned.txt > > The list of packages that lsot comaintainers is here: > https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/a

git version of xserver fails to compile and gcc-47

/usr/include/xorg/os.h expected identifier or '(' before '__extension__' https://www.libreoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43235 had the same problem , but libreoffice bugzilla is down I just see using google cache #include "xf86.h" from /builddir/build/BUILD/VirtualBox-4.1.8_OSE/src/VBox/A

Re: rawhide version of xserver fails to compile

after all the bug report is : https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43235 I am getting the following error, when try to build VirtualBox on rawhide with mock . On Fri, 2012-01-13 at 00:11 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > /usr/include/xorg/os.h expected identifier or '(' before &

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for F-17

On Fri, 2012-01-13 at 11:11 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages. > It's that time again for Fedora 17. > > New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have > failed to build since before Fedora 15. > > The followin

Re: Removing SysV Init Scripts

On Fri, 2012-01-13 at 22:51 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > I'm not so sure how you figure out that this bug is not valid and how > you come to the conclusion that it's not a requirement to switch to > native systemd units and still shipping legacy sysv init script is > already considered o

Re: Removing SysV Init Scripts

On Sat, 2012-01-14 at 00:32 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > > what exactly is the problem to convert a existing > sysv-init script to a systemd-unit I don't know convert ? , took hours ? I don't have time to understand how systemd works , have you any magic script to covert it ? or o quick todo ?

Re: Removing SysV Init Scripts

On Sat, 2012-01-14 at 18:59 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 14.01.2012 18:26, schrieb Rahul Sundaram: > > > > > > On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 6:03 AM, Reindl Harald > > > > Am 14.01.2012 01:17, schrieb Sérgio Basto: > > > On Sat, 2

BTW: Removing SysV Init Scripts

> > what about looking at existing ones? > > no,, it takes some minutes for 90% of all services > > > > If you believe so, file patches > > well, attached are the one i am using with F15 > most of them written by myself or derived > from F16/F17 packages > > CAUTION: they are from mixed

Re: Removing SysV Init Scripts

On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 16:42 -0600, BJ Dierkes wrote: > My question is… for existing users still on SysV in Fedora < 17 …. are > there any safeguards I need to put in place as to not break them… or > should I just rip out all the SysV stuff and hope for the best? I read that shouldn't or not allow

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v2] Retiring packages for F-17

On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 09:17 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Since no one else seemed to want to, I have taken vte. > > Co-maintainers quite welcome. Good news, I could be a co-maintainer but I don't have any commit permissions yet , I will submit smb4k to review be readd to fedora, after that I ho

Packaging:ScriptletSnippets

Hi, from here http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache I see /usr/bin/update-desktop-database &> /dev/null || : what does mean this part of the code "|| :" ? thanks, -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.

gcc 4.7 changes binary behaviors ?

Hi, hope that also could help Has package builder we also build kBuid http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=7356 , after use kBuid compile with gcc 4.7 I got this error on building virtuaBox /usr/bin/kmk_sed: file /builddir/build/BUILD/VirtualBox-4.1.8_OSE/src/VBox/Runtime/c

Re: gcc 4.7 changes binary behaviors ?

On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 21:15 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 07:12:43AM +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > Hi, hope that also could help > > > > Has package builder we also build kBuid > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID

Re: gcc 4.7 changes binary behaviors ?

On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 22:01 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 21:15 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 07:12:43AM +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > Hi, hope that also could help > > > > > > Has package bui

Re: gcc 4.7 changes binary behaviors ?

On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 12:08 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:12:43 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > /usr/bin/kmk_sed: file > > /builddir/build/BUILD/VirtualBox-4.1.8_OSE/src/VBox/Runtime/common/err/errmsg.sed > > line 31: Unmatched [ or [^ > > kmk

Re: gcc 4.7 changes binary behaviors ?

On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 05:22 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > UPDATE : > sed seems that stop work at all , nothing is replaced ! sorry this is not true. -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: PCRE 8.30 will break API

On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 16:52 +, Petr Pisar wrote: > It's long time since PCRE (Perl-Compatible Regular Expression) library > has changed API or ABI. Version 8.30 is different. Besides UTF-16 > support, the incompatible changes are described by upstream with these > words: > > . The pcre_info()

Re: F-17 Branched report: 20120212 changes

On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 11:25 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote: > On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 10:08 +, Branched Report wrote: > > Compose started at Sun Feb 12 08:15:07 UTC 2012 > > Think this compose worked as now see all the images/efi and everything > else got created. Gonna try a test install to see w

Re: F-17 Branched report: 20120212 changes

On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 10:54 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > template command error in x86.tmpl: runcmd mkefiboot --label=ANACONDA --apple --icon=/tmp/treebuild.20120212/output/work/x86_64/installroot/usr/share/pixmaps/bootloader/fedora.icns /tmp/treebuild.20120212/output/17/x86_64/os/EFI/BOOT /tmp/t

Re: F-17 Branched report: 20120213 changes

On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 10:33 +, Branched Report wrote: Hi, on http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/branched/i386/os/images/ we got boot.iso on http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/branched/x86_64/os/images/ we got macboot.img and efiboot.img what happened to boot.iso ? . To start one

Re: F-17 Branched report: 20120213 changes

On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 12:49 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:36:21 + > Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 10:33 +, Branched Report wrote: > > > > Hi, > > on http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/branched/i386/

Re: F-17 Branched report: 20120213 changes

On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 18:07 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 19:36 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 10:33 +, Branched Report wrote: > > > > Hi, > > on http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/branched/i386/os/images/ >

Re: F-17 Branched report: 20120213 changes

On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 20:16 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > But sure, if you spin your own boot.iso and it happens to work well, > by > all means, use it. Nothing will explode. :) I just built one because don't found any, in next test I will use one from Testings , of course, to help on tests.

Re: F-17 Branched report: 20120212 changes

On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 11:29 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote: > On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 11:49 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote: > > On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 11:46 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote: > > > On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 11:25 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote: > > > > On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 10:08 +, Branched Report wro

Re: Provenpackager? Want to help out?

On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 14:42 -0600, Jon Ciesla wrote: > Hey! > > As you're aware, as of F15 we changed our default init system from > sysvinit to systemd. But we have lots and lots of packages with > daemons, and not all have thus far been migrated. Hi, 3 things 1- I like have help on convert

Re: Don't be afraid to ask for help

On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 08:42 -0600, Jon Ciesla wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > I am sending this because, we have a lot of FTBFS packages which I have > > see at least one blog griping about, I accidentally fixed something that > > was blocking other work (in t

Re: Help needed for virtualbox ( Was Provenpackager? Want to help out? )

On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 04:52 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 02/28/2012 02:09 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > Hi, > > 3 things > > 1- I like have help on convert: > > vboxweb-service from VirtualBox on rpmfusion. > > "http://cvs.rpmfusio

Re: Issues with yum

On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 00:34 +0100, Jarosław Górny wrote: > >>> 4) Quit on single CTRL-C. Users expect an application to quit on > >>> pressing CTRL-C. > >>> Reason to have this feature : Better user experience > >> > >> never used ctrl-c, normally use "killall yum" > >> if required. Ctrl-Z and k

Re: Torvalds:requiring root password for mundane things is moronic

On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 20:49 -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > On 03/01/2012 05:43 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: > > On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 16:39 -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > > > >> I believe Fedora 17 has an add user to admin group checkbox when > >> adding the initial user, not sure if it is checked on

Re: ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)

On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 19:33 +0100, Mario Santagiuliana wrote: > In data domenica 26 febbraio 2012 18:39:14, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto: > > Hello. > > > > ImageMagick-6.7.6-5 will land to rawhide in short time. Soname change > > happened (.so.5), so dependency rebuild needed. Does it land on F17

Re: ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)

On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 21:04 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 19:33 +0100, Mario Santagiuliana wrote: > > In data domenica 26 febbraio 2012 18:39:14, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto: > > > Hello. > > > > > > ImageMagick-6.7.6-5 will land to

what means is defined in DSO /lib64/libz.so.1

Hi , I found this error /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.0/../../../../lib64/libgpac_static.a(base_encoding.o): undefined reference to symbol 'deflate' /usr/bin/ld: note: 'deflate' is defined in DSO /lib64/libz.so.1

Re: what means is defined in DSO /lib64/libz.so.1

yeah ,I think, I install zlib-devel and fix the problem , because detect zlib. Thanks On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 18:21 +0100, Fabian Deutsch wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 06.03.2012, 17:10 + schrieb Sérgio Basto: > > Hi , I found this error > > > > /usr/bin/ld: > >

Review Swap: smb4k

Hi, I'd like that someone sponsor me, to reinsert smb4k in Fedora. I have follow upstream and update the package to last stable version. The .spec is just an update of previous version, so should be easy to review , or is already reviewed . https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799651 Th

Rereview swaps: smb4k, need a reviewer.

On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 23:46 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hi, > I'd like that someone sponsor me, to reinsert smb4k in Fedora. > I have follow upstream and update the package to last stable version. > The .spec is just an update of previous version, so should be easy to > re

Re: User switching is broken

On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 23:04 +0100, nodata wrote: > User switching between different users on X is broken. > > It's not just broken for me, everyone I have asked has experienced the > same problem: > > Clicking "Switch user" will often or sometimes lead to a hung screen. > The switcher doesn't sho

Re: Pre-nonresponsive maintainer request

On Qua, 2015-07-01 at 21:33 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > I haven't gone through all the requirements but it seems pretty clear > that brasero is unmaintained. > > > There are 15 open bugs and looking through the package changelog I > can't find the last time it was updated by it's maintainer, Xa

Re: Pre-nonresponsive maintainer request

On Qua, 2015-07-01 at 21:46 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 9:44 PM, Sérgio Basto > wrote: > > > yeap , Xavier is the infrastructure maintainer of RPMFusion , > you find > him in irc:#rpmfusion-admin wit

Re: FESCO Elections - June 2015 - Results

On Seg, 2015-06-29 at 13:47 +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 29/06/15 12:00, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 3:50 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: > >> Greetings, all! > >> > >> The elections for FESCo - June 2015 have concluded, and the results > >> are shown below. > >> > >> FESCo is electing

Re: Fedora 21 updates broke support for 4K displays :(

Hi, On Qui, 2015-07-02 at 21:21 +0200, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote: > Are there any Intel Haswell users with Chromium running having similar issues? > > On 2 July 2015 at 09:35, valent.turko...@gmail.com > wrote: > > This album shows how badly this affects productivity when using Fedora > >

Re: Investigation of the F23 mass rebuild

Hi, On Qui, 2015-07-02 at 11:55 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 16:24 +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote: > > On 2 July 2015 at 15:49, Adam Jackson wrote: > > > Following up on the hardened cflags change in F23, I wanted to gather > > > some statistics on the actual impact: what

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-08)

On Qua, 2015-07-08 at 21:55 +, opensou...@till.name wrote: > nightfall mmahut, astronomy-sig 60 weeks > ago version available on Fedora : nightfall-1.62-15.fc20 version available upstream : nightfall-1.86.tar.gz No wonder does not compile, but the package aren

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-08)

On Qui, 2015-07-09 at 08:36 +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote: > Hi Sergio, > > On 9 July 2015 at 01:07, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Qua, 2015-07-08 at 21:55 +, opensou...@till.name wrote: > >> nightfall mmahut, astronomy-sig 60 weeks

nightfall Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-08)

On Sáb, 2015-07-11 at 21:15 +0200, Till Maas wrote: > On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 07:22:25PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > I am , anyway patch in attach , this app is based on gtk2 , I wonder if > > Thank you, I applied the patch and submitted a new build. Sorry just after s

Re: nightfall Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-08)

On Dom, 2015-07-12 at 22:02 +0200, Till Maas wrote: > On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 08:05:07PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > Sorry just after send first patch, I made more 2 fixes > > if you could also apply it , it was great . > > This patch is the last one , if you could

Re: rawhide report: 20150715 changes

On Qua, 2015-07-15 at 12:32 +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: > [gnome-python2] > gnome-python2-bonobo-2.28.1-16.fc23.i686 requires > pyorbit(x86-32) >= 0:2.0.1 pyorbit was retired 7 days ago , with this commit [1] I think dnf is given wrong results dnf repoquery --whatrequires pyo

Re: rawhide report: 20150715 changes

Hi, On Qui, 2015-07-16 at 01:33 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Qua, 2015-07-15 at 12:32 +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: > > [gnome-python2] > > gnome-python2-bonobo-2.28.1-16.fc23.i686 requires > > pyorbit(x86-32) >= 0:2.0.1 > > pyorbit was retired 7

Re: pyorbit

On Ter, 2015-07-21 at 12:36 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/pyorbit.git/plain/dead.package > > > last user has been retired, package EOL > > Error: nothing provides pyorbit(x86-64) >= 2.0.1 needed by > gnome-python2-bonobo-2.28.1-16.fc23.x86_64 > > What's the

Systemd Preset Policy

Hi, Let me see if I understand , on 2015-05-20 [1] FESCo has decided to merge some of the policy around service units, socket units and timer units into a single policy that treats all units that run as default the same way. Note: decision made 6 days before Fedora 22 Final Release. We got some

Re: Systemd Preset Policy

Hello , On Sáb, 2015-07-25 at 05:00 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 04:10:28AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: (snip) > > This kind of scriptlet still works on Fedora 22 (updated), on a new > > installation ? > Yes, that still works, but shou

Re: About making noarch package arch specific, when contents differ.

On Dom, 2015-07-26 at 11:05 -0300, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: > I had this build failure: > > Package:sagemath-6.5-7.fc22 > Status: failed > Built by: pcpa > ID: 672175 > Started:Sat, 25 Jul 2015 22:52:10 UTC > Finished: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 07:57:28 UTC > > Close

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-27)

On Seg, 2015-07-27 at 15:23 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Matthew Miller > wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 01:00:26PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > >> A bunch of packages depend on /usr/bin/execstack, provide by prelink. > >> If prelink goes away,

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-27)

On Seg, 2015-07-27 at 15:28 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Seg, 2015-07-27 at 15:23 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Matthew Miller > > wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 01:00:26PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > >

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-27)

On Seg, 2015-07-27 at 07:19 +, opensou...@till.name wrote: > opengrok lkundrak 62 weeks ago Patch in attach : Update to 0.12.1.5 . - Update Source0 URL to github. - Drop lucene35 patch, upstream source changed a lot. - Drop jflex patch, it was just one comment

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-27)

On Seg, 2015-07-27 at 17:18 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Seg, 2015-07-27 at 07:19 +, opensou...@till.name wrote: > > opengrok lkundrak 62 weeks ago > > Patch in attach : > Update to 0.12.1.5 . > > - Update Source0 URL to github.

and legacy software Re: pyorbit

On Ter, 2015-07-28 at 16:48 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/pyorbit.git/plain/dead.package > > > > > last user has been retired, package EOL > > > > Error: nothing provides pyorbit(x86-64) >= 2.0.1 needed by > > gnome-python2-bonobo-2.28.1-16.fc23.x86_64 > >

Re: and legacy software Re: pyorbit

On Qua, 2015-07-29 at 10:05 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Wed, 2015-07-29 at 12:47 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 21:27:45 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > > As I have thought for some time, I think we should have a team to > >

Re: and legacy software Re: pyorbit

On Qua, 2015-07-29 at 18:04 +0200, Matěj Cepl wrote: > On 2015-07-29, 14:31 GMT, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > FWIW I found the port of Gtk3 pretty straightforward for > > my Entangle application and find it quite alot nicer to work > > with than Gtk2 in general, so has been a big plus overall. >

Re: and legacy software Re: pyorbit

On Sex, 2015-07-31 at 02:34 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Matěj Cepl wrote: > > I take Gnumeric and Emacs, but all other ones are in-Gnome > > projects, aren't they (at least having repository in > > git.gnome.org)? > > Gnumeric is part of GNOME Office, so it is also under the GNOME umbrella > the

Re: and legacy software Re: pyorbit

On Qua, 2015-07-29 at 16:10 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Qua, 2015-07-29 at 10:05 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-07-29 at 12:47 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 21:27:45 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > > > > As

Re: noarch vs. all, x86_64 vs. amd64, kernel vs. linux and PAE

On Sáb, 2015-08-15 at 21:22 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > On 8/14/15, Wei-Lun Chao wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Is there already any discussion about: > > rename arch name "noarch" to "all" > > rename arch name "x86_64" to "amd64" > > rename package name "kernel-PAE" to "kernel" > > and even rename p

Re: noarch vs. all, x86_64 vs. amd64, kernel vs. linux and PAE

On Sáb, 2015-08-15 at 15:33 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Sérgio Basto > wrote: > > On Sáb, 2015-08-15 at 21:22 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > > On 8/14/15, Wei-Lun Chao wrote: > > > Hi, > > >

Re: F23: Copr build failure: glibc

Hi, redirecting to copr-devel On Qua, 2015-07-29 at 09:18 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Wed, 2015-07-29 at 15:15 +0200, Rajeesh K V wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Copr fails to build for F23 (i686, x86_64) due to error: > > > > Error: Package glibc-2.21.90-21.fc23.x86_64.rpm is not signed > >

Re: F23: Copr build failure: glibc

On Seg, 2015-08-17 at 13:35 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 16.8.2015 v 21:05 Sérgio Basto napsal(a): > > I still have those failures in fedora-23-ppc64le [1] and > > fedora-rawhide-ppc64le buildroots . > > > > Should we open bug reports in bugzilla , product Copr [

Re: pyorbit

On Ter, 2015-08-18 at 10:58 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2015-08-18 at 10:21 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-07-21 at 12:36 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/pyorbit.git/plain/dead.package > > > > > > > last user has been retired, pac

[HEADS-UP] po4a-0.47 on rawhide and F23, please test it !

Hi, I just submit po4a-0.47 into F23 ... , po4a don't have any soname bump [1] but is wild used , so some attention is advised . [1] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=6751460 Thanks, -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproje

Re: Kernel development on Fedora

Hi, On Sáb, 2015-09-12 at 18:31 -0400, W. Michael Petullo wrote: > I am interested in doing some kernel development on Fedora. I am familiar > with kernel internals, but I am looking for some tips to help manage the > build, compile, and install cycle. Unfortunately, I am developing against > the

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Sex, 2015-09-11 at 22:41 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: > > On 09/11/2015 09:09 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > What does Fedora users gain with "dnf > > install rails" or "dnf install ipython" versus "gem install rails" and "pip > > install ipython"? > > This indeed is very good question.

Re: request for more visible KDE netinstall

Hi, On Qua, 2015-09-16 at 08:49 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > This came in in Bugzilla filed against the > fedora-productimg-workstation, which isn't the right place for it, so > I'm passing it on: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263565 Well , after some analyze the bug report is

Re: request for more visible KDE netinstall

Hi, On Sex, 2015-09-18 at 10:29 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:31:13AM +0200, Petr Spacek wrote: > > > But, it's really that the netinstall is hard to find from the KDE page. > > > It's reasonably easy to find if you know what to look for on > > >

Re: How to make .spec Requires for libXXX.so.VER

Hi, On Seg, 2015-09-28 at 09:11 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Sat, 01 Aug 2015 21:48:24 +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 10:25 PM, Jan Kratochvil > > wrote: > > > (1) How to make a dependency on librpm.so.7? > > > > > > librpm.so.7 is in rpm-libs-4.12.90-3.fc24.x86_64 wh

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new Point of Contact

On Qua, 2015-09-30 at 13:40 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > p7zip (el5) > p7zip (el6) > p7zip (epel7) > p7zip (f21) > p7zip (f22) > p7zip (f23) > p7zip (master) I took it , I already had opened some bugzilla reports, I done some work on this package . I can take some more packages, if no one take it

Re: kde-4.13.x update for f20

On Sex, 2014-07-04 at 12:12 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 04.07.2014 12:02, schrieb Sérgio Basto: > > http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/fedora/kde.repo > > have 3 repos is to use kde stable ? this will equal to future Fedora > > 20 , with kde 13 , many years ago I t

Re: kde-4.13.x update for f20

On Qui, 2014-07-10 at 15:18 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 10.07.2014 15:15, schrieb Sérgio Basto: > > On Sex, 2014-07-04 at 12:12 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > >> Am 04.07.2014 12:02, schrieb Sérgio Basto: > >>> http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/fedo

Re: Unresponsive maintainer: kanarip

On Qui, 2014-07-17 at 11:21 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:02:57AM +0200, Johannes Lips wrote: > >On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon > >wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 10:08:13AM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > > On 07/16

lvm2 bug on rawhide

Hi, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119946 can anyone do a build lvm2 with specific patch from upstream , to be able to build VirtualBox on RpmFusion ? I need recompile VirtualBox for rawhide / F21 on RPMFusion , because x11-server-abi changed and the current VirtualBox-guest need

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >