I noticed that some updates to java packages have moved the jar file
locations or changed the jar name, which has broken symlinks in
dependent packages. I know log4j12 changed the location of the jar and
org.eclipse.osgi_3.10.0.v20140731-1655.jar changed versions to
org.eclipse.osgi_3.10.0.v20
On 09/23/2014 10:49 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 09/23/2014 04:41 PM, Robert Rati wrote:
I noticed that some updates to java packages have moved the jar file
locations or changed the jar name, which has broken symlinks in
dependent packages. I know log4j12 changed the location of the jar
I'm looking for people who are interested in being co-maintainers for
the following packages:
apache-log4j-extras
greenmail
hadoop
hbase
jamon-api
jamon-java-parent
jamon-maven-plugin
jamon-nodegen-plugin
jamon-parent
jamon-processor
jamon-runtime
jung
oozie
Most of these are pretty simple and
I get connection.
Best Regards,
Swapnil Kulkarni
irc : coolsvap
On 03-Mar-2015 8:59 pm, "Robert Rati" mailto:rr...@redhat.com>> wrote:
I'm looking for people who are interested in being co-maintainers
for the following packages:
apache-log4j-extras
greenmail
oozie rrati, coolsvap, moceap
This break occurred because of a very late change (April 22) to enable
building/running the hadoop ecosystem on ARM. A dependency broke during
that set of changes and will need to be looked at. I don't think this
package should be retired if i
Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Robert Rati wrote:
oozie rrati, coolsvap, moceap
This break occurred because of a very late change (April 22) to enable
building/running the hadoop ecosystem on ARM. A dependency broke during
that set of changes and will need
Could someone add https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/392 to the agenda
for today's meeting? I believe I have provided all the information the
FPC asked for the last time it was discussed.
Rob
On 03/05/2014 04:27 PM, James Antill wrote:
Following is the list of topics that will be discusse
I recently installed a rawhide system for some testing and found that
running 'systemctl status' resulted in a return code of 0 regardless of
whether the service was running, stopped, or even non-existent.
Is that the new expected behavior or a systemctl bug?
Rob
--
devel mailing list
devel@li
I've been working on updating the hadoop package to the latest 2.4.0
release and at this point I've resolved all the issues but I'm now
blocked by the log4j2 update. log4j2 breaks the hadoop build pretty
severely, and it doesn't seem the log4j2 team has spent much time
thinking about how to pr
rtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Rati"
To: "Fedora Big Data SIG" , "Development
discussions related to Fedora"
, "Fedora Java Development List"
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 7:03:42 PM
Subject: Hadoop + log4j2 =
I'm trying to run some docker containers and it appears the runuser in
rawhide isn't functional in the container:
# runuser
runuser: System error
I can run runuser in a physical system running rawhide however. These
same images created off of F20 containers worked fine.
Has anyone run into
" if I use it
to do anything, even nothing.
Rob
On 06/04/2014 02:37 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 06/04/2014 02:27 PM, Robert Rati wrote:
I'm trying to run some docker containers and it appears the runuser in
rawhide isn't functional in the container:
# runuser
runuser: System err
x27;s not
util-linux at all. The docker version in rawhide is newer (I'm running
rawhide host and rawhide in the container), but I wouldn't expect that
to affect runuser.
Rob
On 06/04/2014 03:54 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 06/04/2014 03:17 PM, Robert Rati wrote:
I checked the
I think there is another data point to include in the discussion. As
Pete mentioned, a lot of the effort to get Hadoop into Fedora has
revolved around updating the dependencies. Most of these changes are
being sent upstream in the hopes of moving them forward on their
dependencies.
However,
Bjorn has been reviewing the hadoop package, but I haven't seen him
online for about a week now and there's been no comments on the review
BZ. I suspect he is on vacation. Would someone be willing to step in
and help out with the review? Maybe give it a review so there will be
less (no) work
Thanks gil!
Rob
On 08/06/2013 12:04 PM, punto...@libero.it wrote:
Il 06/08/2013 17:58, punto...@libero.it ha scritto:
Il 06/08/2013 17:39, Robert Rati ha scritto:
Bjorn has been reviewing the hadoop package, but I haven't seen him
online for about a week now and there's been no c
I'm working with the Big Data SIG to package hadoop for Fedora. We're
targeting Fedora 20, but right now there are a number of packages that
hadoop will depend upon that are awaiting review. All dependent
packages have review BZs logged.
Packages needing review for inclusion into Fedora:
boo
Hi Bjorn,
Thanks so much for picking these up and reviewing them!
Rob
On 06/11/2013 03:04 AM, Björn Esser wrote:
Am Montag, den 10.06.2013, 15:42 -0400 schrieb Robert Rati:
I'm working with the Big Data SIG to package hadoop for Fedora. We're
targeting Fedora 20, but right now t
I don't have the time to properly maintain these.
Rob
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Packages without co-maintainers:
condor-ec2-enhanced
condor-ec2-enhanced-hooks
condor-job-hooks
condor-low-latency
Packages with co-admins:
jung
apache-log4j-extras
greenmail
jamon-api
jamon-java-parent
jamon-maven-plugin
jamon-nodegen-plugin
jamon-parent
jamon-processor
jamon-runtime
wso2-wsf-c
20 matches
Mail list logo
