On 09/27/2010 01:23 PM, seth vidal wrote:
>
> i686 will run on x86_64 and i686 machines and on the overwhelming
> majority of hw someone will happen to have.
>
Why not use the browser user agent to recomend the best option to the
user for the machine being used to download it?, with some way to w
Hi,
I need some help clarifying this issue in order to know if this is a bug
or limits of the NFSv4 / POSIX ACL mapping before reporting it
Creating a directory on the server with the following POSIX ACLs, rwx
for the group "sharedgroup" and same defaults:
#
On 07/26/2011 08:36 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 07/26/2011 08:03 AM, Misha Shnurapet wrote:
>> 26.07.2011, 18:34, "Andrew Haley":
>>> On 26/07/11 10:22, Misha Shnurapet wrote:
>>>
Since F15 ~/bin has been added to PATH, and commands that are
supposed to run user scripts will work
On 07/26/2011 09:04 AM, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> * Genes MailLists [26/07/2011 15:32] :
>>
>> Mmm ok ... Can I assume root is excepted from this?
>
> You can. That is the case.
a clean F15 install has PATH=$PATH:$HOME/bin, not the same
/etc/skel/.bash_profile but still has ~/bin
>
> Emmanuel
>> Can someone explain (or point to) the rationale appending these to PATH
>> rather than prepending them? I would have expected user binaries to
>> supersede system ones.
>
> Although there is probably only a small number of security
> vulnerabilities of user applications that would allow just cr
On 08/19/2011 10:08 AM, Ola Thoresen wrote:
> On 19. aug. 2011 16:00, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>> On 08/19/2011 12:35 PM, Steve Grubb wrote:
>>> On Friday, August 19, 2011 03:41:33 AM Tim Waugh wrote:
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 16:52 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> It's not so much cups s
On 10/04/2011 01:24 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
>
> I am clearly going to have to explain this one more time, forever.
> Let's see if I can't write it authoritatively once and simply answer
> with a URL from here out. (As always, use of the second person "you"
> herein is plural, not singular.)
On 10/06/2011 09:45 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 03:57:38PM +0200, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
>
>> But maybe a quick 'I know I have a 13.3" widescreen laptop, you know the
>> resolution, just make things work' should work for the single-screen
>> case (esp if we stick to
On 12/06/2010 10:55 AM, Matt Domsch wrote:
> Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64
> using rawhide from 2010-12-01
>
...
> kanatest-0.4.8-3.fc12 [u'631023 NEW'] (build/make) robmv
Fixed, updates in bodhi
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproje
On 12/22/2011 08:50 AM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
At $WORKPLACE I use a Java app (via javaws) - EMC NetWorker Management
Console - that won't work with OpenJDK (it pops up a username/password
window as expected but doesn't then pop up the main app window once the
username+password have been entered), w
I created a new bug [1] that explains that ssmtp is sending all cron
jobs output to an external SMTP server. I marked it as a security bug,
the security tag was removed and it was recommend to make it public,
something I can't do. I will resume the problem here, because there are
comments that
On 10/29/2014 04:08 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
On Oct 29, 2014 11:33 AM, "Miloslav Trmač" mailto:m...@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> > I created a new bug [1] that explains that ssmtp is sending all cron
> > jobs output to an external SMTP server. I marked it as a s
On 10/29/2014 05:06 PM, Moez Roy wrote:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Robert Marcano
wrote:
I created a new bug [1] that explains that ssmtp is sending all cron jobs
output to an external SMTP server. I marked it as a security bug, the
security tag was removed and it was recommend to make
On 02/12/2014 11:28 AM, H. Guémar wrote:
My *personal* opinion is that we should disable this kind of feature by
default.
+1
Actually, unless it tracks users, i don't think that our guidelines
forbids it, though it may influence our choice for the packages set
installed by default.
I accept
On 02/12/2014 11:55 AM, Nikos Roussos wrote:
On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 16:58 +0100, H. Guémar wrote:
My *personal* opinion is that we should disable this kind of feature
by default.
On a side note, why not disable also Google as the default searchbox
engine and replace it with a non-profit one?
On 04/30/2014 01:17 AM, P J P wrote:
On Wednesday, 30 April 2014 3:18 AM, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
On my home LAN, I run my own DNSSEC-enabled server using F20 & bind 9.
This local server also is my DHCP and Samba server. As usual, dynamic
clients receive the LAN local domain ID and DNS serve
On 07/16/2013 06:24 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
...
Additionally the following symlinks will be provided:
* /usr/share/javascript -> /usr/share/assets/javascript
* /usr/share/fonts -> /usr/share/assets/fonts (so any Fedora font package can
be used as a web font)
Not all fonts installed had t
On 07/19/2013 01:13 AM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Robert Marcano
wrote:
Not all fonts installed had the same licensing requirement, people install
fonts from other places that are not as careful as Fedora with the licenses.
It is problematic if someone install
On 07/22/2013 11:11 AM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Lun 22 juillet 2013 17:07, Robert Marcano a écrit :
Fonts has licenses, some of them require the license to be shown or the
copyright displayed, some fonts has the copyright added to their
metadata, I don't find for example that gnu-free-
On 07/23/2013 12:56 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Nicolas Mailhot
wrote:
Le Lun 22 juillet 2013 17:07, Robert Marcano a écrit :
Fonts has licenses, some of them require the license to be shown or the
copyright displayed, some fonts has the copyright added to
On 07/26/2013 12:30 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Lun 22 juillet 2013 21:58, Robert Marcano a écrit :
The real problem with publishing things is that if I distribute binaries
of many things I must follow the license, some say I need to distribute
sources, some say that I need to distribute a
On Aug 3, 2013 8:55 PM, "T.C. Hollingsworth"
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 5:48 AM, Robert Marcano
> wrote:
> > On 07/26/2013 12:30 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> >> Le Lun 22 juillet 2013 21:58, Robert Marcano a écrit :
> >>
> >>&g
On 08/06/2013 10:46 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 5:27 AM, Robert Marcano wrote:
You make the decision by installing a js-foo package, just like you
make the decision to provide a web application by installing a package
for it.
"You make a decision by installing a pa
On 08/06/2013 02:36 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 22:57 -0430, Robert Marcano wrote:
Do you know there are GNOME JavaScript applications? And that
JavaScript is being encouraged as a language for desktop applications?
So all those libraries that can be used on desktop and web
On 08/06/2013 05:10 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Robert Marcano wrote:
Do you know there are GNOME JavaScript applications? And that JavaScript is
being encouraged as a language for desktop applications? So all those
libraries that can be used on desktop and
On 08/09/2013 06:53 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Robert Marcano
wrote:
The directory is not called /usr/share/web-javascript, it is called
/usr/share/javascript, and the packaging guidelines draft explicitly says
that the intention is to avoid duplication of
On 08/12/2013 03:23 PM, Robert Marcano wrote:
This is a better explanation of why the use /usr/share/javascript: We
want to be compatible with others distribution that have the legacy idea
that JavaScript is a browser only thing, so in this directory we will
only store JavaScript that run on
On 08/14/2013 07:34 AM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Robert Marcano
wrote:
On 08/12/2013 03:23 PM, Robert Marcano wrote:
This is a better explanation of why the use /usr/share/javascript: We
want to be compatible with others distribution that have the legacy
On 06/01/2016 04:43 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 06:51:20PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
So there's tmux, screen, curl, wget, and probably quite a few others
that don't necessarily get daemonized that are probably affected.
I would really like to see a solution whereby tmux
On 06/14/2016 09:08 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
Certainly we're not going to come along and try to delete packages over
the maintainers' objections. In general, I expect package maintainers
would be deciding whether or not to make the switch, but yeah: if the
upstream developers request that we
On 08/23/2016 04:44 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
I can't seem to get firefox-48.0-5.fc24.x86_64 to work with kerberos
single sign on in a private window. It works fine when using a
non-private window.
Any ideas on why this would have broken? Anyone else seeing this?
I just noticed it after reading y
On 08/23/2016 05:06 PM, Robert Marcano wrote:
On 08/23/2016 04:44 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
I can't seem to get firefox-48.0-5.fc24.x86_64 to work with kerberos
single sign on in a private window. It works fine when using a
non-private window.
Any ideas on why this would have broken? Anyone
On 08/24/2016 12:29 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016, Dusty Mabe wrote:
I can't seem to get firefox-48.0-5.fc24.x86_64 to work with kerberos
single sign on in a private window. It works fine when using a
non-private window.
Any ideas on why this would have broken? Anyone else s
On 08/24/2016 08:41 AM, Robert Marcano wrote:
On 08/24/2016 12:29 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016, Dusty Mabe wrote:
I can't seem to get firefox-48.0-5.fc24.x86_64 to work with kerberos
single sign on in a private window. It works fine when using a
non-private window.
On 08/24/2016 10:43 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Wed, 24 Aug 2016, Robert Marcano wrote:
...
I wonder if the default setting for
network.negotiate-auth.trusted-uris=https:// is or isn't a leak.
No, it is not, at least not to the remote server you are trying to
visit.
Kerberos fl
On 12/08/2014 04:31 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Mon, 2014-12-08 at 07:41 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Hi,
I just happened to look at the firewalld default settings, and I was not
amused when I noticed this:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/firewalld.git/tree/FedoraWorkstation.xml
On 12/09/2014 08:53 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 09.12.2014 um 14:16 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 12:54:59PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Why we can't have something like this? And if you don't want a popup
asking, have something in the NetworkManager applet menu, where peop
On 12/09/2014 09:20 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Mon, 2014-12-08 at 17:08 -0430, Robert Marcano wrote:
Adding to that, this decision bring me memories to the awful old case
when someone decided that the install anything from the repositories
was
permitted to any user on the system by default
On 12/09/2014 09:27 AM, Robert Marcano wrote:
What I see frequently are applications that are installed from outside
the Fedora repositories, that can be forced to behave like Fedora
packaging rules, with secure defaults before sharing, being installed
and the user that don't know much
On 12/09/2014 11:01 AM, Christian Schaller wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Gerd Hoffmann"
To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2014 10:22:01 AM
Subject: Re: "Workstation" Product defaults to wide-open firewall
On Di, 2014-12-09 at 08:16 -05
On 12/09/2014 02:19 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 09.12.2014 um 19:45 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
Richard Hughes wrote:
So do I! I'm a developer, which spin do I use so that the firewall
doesn't get in my way? We can't develop a *product* based around what
you specifically want, not me, nor anyone e
On 12/09/2014 04:04 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 01:25:47PM -0700, Pete Travis wrote:
On Dec 9, 2014 12:55 PM, "Reindl Harald" wrote:
Am 09.12.2014 um 20:51 schrieb Pete Travis:
Hmm... a whitelist of things that are allowed to ask for firewall
accommodation doesn't hel
On 12/10/2014 12:38 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 05:46:32 +0100
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Pete Travis wrote:
Lets say I do have an understanding of network basics, just for the
sake of argument. I share my application with you. The
application is intended to listen on the network, yo
On 12/10/2014 12:01 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
In the end, this is a tempest in a teapot. The release is out and it is
done.
The release is out, but there are an expected 13 months of security updates,
of which this ought to be the first.
and there is a precedent of
On Dec 14, 2014 10:12 PM, "Kevin Kofler" wrote:
>
> Sudhir Khanger wrote:
> > Most decision are being made on two assumptions 1. people have fast and
> > unlimited internet connections and 2. people have high RAM and multiple
> > core CPU powerful computers. Both of these assumptions are arbitrari
On 12/15/2014 09:38 AM, Felix Schwarz wrote:
Am 15.12.2014 um 14:29 schrieb Richard Hughes:
At the moment the PK front-ends only download when on wifi or wired.
Do you have an actual use-case for per-network configuration?
Well I think the whole idea of "wifi === unmetered" is flawed. For exam
On 12/15/2014 10:02 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 15 December 2014 at 14:08, Felix Schwarz wrote:
Well I think the whole idea of "wifi === unmetered" is flawed.
It's as good a metric as we've got. When you set up a personal bridge
between UMTS/wifi, or even GPRS/wired there's no metadata on th
On 12/15/2014 10:15 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 15 December 2014 at 14:38, Reindl Harald wrote:
...grown up user expects
"grown up" users (whatever that means) can do "gsettings set
org.gnome.software download-updates false"
Devices designed for not "grown up" users has settings to disabl
On Dec 17, 2014 4:44 AM, "Richard Hughes" wrote:
>
> On 17 December 2014 at 00:00, Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
> > This particular setting is
> > frequently-requested and extremely important for users in the developing
> > world and users who tether, so I think it would be good to provide it
> > som
On 02/24/2015 05:04 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in
Fedora =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LegacyJDKsInFedora
Change owner(s): Jiri Vanek
Currently Fedora supports one main Java runtime and Java Development Kit (
.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
--
Robert Marcano
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Greetings. Is https://github.com/fedora-selinux/selinux-policy-contrib
the right place to contribute to the Fedora SELinux policy?
I added a pull request for a small update needed for a new release of
cups-pdf, but I am not sure someone is monitoring that. There is another
one from rhatdan the
On 03/23/2017 08:53 AM, Lukas Vrabec wrote:
On 03/23/2017 01:12 PM, Robert Marcano wrote:
Greetings. Is https://github.com/fedora-selinux/selinux-policy-contrib
the right place to contribute to the Fedora SELinux policy?
I added a pull request for a small update needed for a new release of
On 12/14/2016 11:17 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
You're right, it's better :)
By technology involved, true. But until there is a Fedora (or another
distribution) flatpack build service, there is no replacement for a
Fedora built RPM package. It doesn't matter you trust the developer, you
must i
On 01/31/2017 03:44 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Also: does this apply to /boot partition RAID 1? IIRC that didn't work
with LVM RAID at one time.
This is important, that mdraid is still available in anaconda and not
entirely replaced by LVM RAID. Not only /boot partition but UEFI boot
partition
Greetings. Where can I remove myself from bug emails for packages I am
not a maintainer anymore?
I am not maintaining eclipse-subclipse from a long time ago, I am not
listed as a member at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/eclipse-subclipse but I still get
FTBFS bugzilla emails.
Any help i
On 8/14/19 4:08 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
On 2019-08-13, Robert Marcano wrote:
I am not maintaining eclipse-subclipse from a long time ago, I am not
listed as a member at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/eclipse-subclipse but I still get
FTBFS bugzilla emails.
That's because synchroniz
On 8/26/19 9:07 AM, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
Well the thing is, blocknig ports tends to break applications that want
to use those ports. We're not going to do that, period. It also doesn't
really accomplish anything: either your app or service needs network
access and you have whitelisted
On 8/26/19 9:27 AM, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 4:15 PM, Robert Marcano
wrote:
This is a reasonable point of view, until you notice Linux desktops
evironments don't provide applications with a method to detect if they
are running on a private network or not
On 8/26/19 11:35 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
On Mon, 2019-08-26 at 09:15 -0400, Robert Marcano wrote:
On 8/26/19 9:07 AM, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
Well the thing is, blocknig ports tends to break applications that
want
to use those ports. We're not going to do that, period. It also
do
On 8/27/19 8:06 AM, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 4:23 AM, John Harris wrote:
At least in KDE, possibly not in GNOME as it lacks many of the
features available in KDE, you can specify the zone of the connection
in your NetworkManager configuration GUI.
We used to have t
On 8/27/19 8:18 AM, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 2:37 PM, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
There's no need to write "a new style of firewall". It would be as
easy as asking the user once whether a new connection is trusted or
not. That's it.
But, well, how do you do that? What do you
On 8/27/19 8:57 AM, Björn Persson wrote:
Robert Marcano wrote:
Maybe, now that NetworkManager implements now its own DHCP client, if
the IP received is not an private address (RFC 1918 for IPv4, some other
consideration should be done for IPv6), Notify the user the connection
is in a secure
On 8/27/19 9:10 AM, Robert Marcano wrote:
On 8/27/19 8:57 AM, Björn Persson wrote:
Robert Marcano wrote:
Maybe, now that NetworkManager implements now its own DHCP client, if
the IP received is not an private address (RFC 1918 for IPv4, some other
consideration should be done for IPv6), Notify
On 8/27/19 10:03 AM, John Harris wrote:
On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 5:35:08 AM MST Robert Marcano wrote:
On 8/27/19 8:18 AM, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 2:37 PM, Iñaki Ucar
wrote:
There's no need to write "a new style of firewall". It would be as
eas
On 9/2/19 11:14 AM, Dario Lesca wrote:
In Fedora Server there is a suit of package named samba and samba-dc*
These package, with some other, are useful to make Fedora an Active
Directory Domain Controller.
I have decide tu use it into a little lan and convert old samba NT 4
Style into AD-DC (cl
On 9/2/19 11:58 AM, Dario Lesca wrote:
Il giorno lun, 02/09/2019 alle 11.26 -0400, Robert Marcano ha scritto:
I switched to run Samba DCs on a container with non Fedora / RHEL /
CentOS provided RPMs.
Thank Robert for reply.
Then why don't release samba compiled with Heimdal kerberos?
On 9/2/19 4:52 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 3:33 PM Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Mon, 02 Sep 2019, Dario Lesca wrote:
Il giorno lun, 02/09/2019 alle 11.26 -0400, Robert Marcano ha scritto:
I switched to run Samba DCs on a container with non Fedora / RHEL /
CentOS
On 11/28/18 11:20 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 11/28/18 3:45 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Richard W. M. Jones:
Trying to track down a bug in IPP printing
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1653276).
We're down a rabbit hole where it seems that in Fedora 29
/etc/nssswitch.conf ought t
On 11/28/18 11:37 AM, Robert Marcano wrote:
On 11/28/18 11:20 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 11/28/18 3:45 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Richard W. M. Jones:
Trying to track down a bug in IPP printing
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1653276).
We're down a rabbit hole where it
On 11/29/18 7:46 AM, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 11/28/18 4:37 PM, Robert Marcano wrote:
On 11/28/18 11:20 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 11/28/18 3:45 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Richard W. M. Jones:
Trying to track down a bug in IPP printing
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1653276
On 1/7/19 2:28 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 06:24:14PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
* The Fedora community cares about privacy and is adverse to tracking
measures. We don't want to track; just count.
Uh, so what's the story there? i mean, if you pass over the uuid you
m
On 1/9/19 4:45 AM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le 2019-01-08 18:13, Robert Marcano a écrit :
On 1/7/19 2:28 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 06:24:14PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
* The Fedora community cares about privacy and is adverse to tracking
measures. We don't wa
I have been working on a private RPM for a Rust based program and
noticed that the RPM strip scripts are not reducing the binaries files
like when I execute strip directly on those binaries.
The first thing I checked is the brp-strip script. This one is filtering
executables where "file" repor
On 3/29/19 12:23 PM, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 29/03/2019 16:17, Robert Marcano wrote:
I have been working on a private RPM for a Rust based program and
noticed that the RPM strip scripts are not reducing the binaries files
like when I execute strip directly on those binaries.
The first thing I
On 3/29/19 1:44 PM, Josh Stone wrote:
On 3/29/19 9:17 AM, Robert Marcano wrote:
I have been working on a private RPM for a Rust based program
Side note on this -- if you do package Rust shared libraries, not just
executables, and you want them to be available for further linking, then
rustc
On 4/17/19 4:38 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Di, 16.04.19 09:06, Adam Williamson (adamw...@fedoraproject.org) wrote:
I think all of these are good ideas. "No udev-settle" seems like a nice
highlevel goal to shoot for.
Another one I might add: "No stuck stop jobs" - it annoys me every singl
On 4/30/19 11:45 AM, David Howells wrote:
Hi,
I need to install a directory (/afs) that will be a mountpoint that a systemd
service (also installed in the rpm) will mount upon.
What's the best way to encode this in the specfile?
I did have:
%files
/afs
but that doesn't upgrad
Greetings.
Current *-devel packages tend to pull a lot of dependencies, probably to
make developers life easier, but I think some of them are not needed.
For example, someone developing against krb5-devel for a GSSAPI client,
probably doesn't need openssl-devel installed, that they are linkin
On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 8:07 PM Rex Dieter wrote:
> Robert Marcano wrote:
>
> > For example, someone developing against krb5-devel for a GSSAPI client,
> > probably doesn't need openssl-devel installed, that they are linking
> > against Kerberos doesn't mean
On 08/12/2018 12:32 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 4:39 AM Robert Marcano <mailto:rob...@marcanoonline.com>> wrote:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 8:07 PM Rex Dieter mailto:rdie...@math.unl.edu>> wrote:
Robert Marcano wrote:
> Fo
On 08/12/2018 10:50 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 10:01 PM Robert Marcano
mailto:rob...@marcanoonline.com>> wrote:
Greetings.
Hello,
Current *-devel packages tend to pull a lot of dependencies,
probably to
make developers life easier, but I think s
On 08/12/2018 12:46 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
Robert Marcano wrote:
And thinking about it, a lot *-devel packages interdependencies should
be Recommends and not Requires
You keep saying this, I'd like to see some evidence to support that.
Example below. why do I need all these depende
GTK3, only needs gtk3-devel
to be built, the others devel packages are only needed if my code links
to them directly.
On 08/12/2018 11:07 AM, Robert Marcano wrote:
On 08/12/2018 12:46 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
Robert Marcano wrote:
And thinking about it, a lot *-devel packages interdepende
On 08/12/2018 03:57 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 9:19 PM Robert Marcano <mailto:rob...@marcanoonline.com>> wrote:
On 08/12/2018 02:07 PM, JD wrote:
> What about dependencies of dependencies? Have you thought of that?
Sorry, I don't get the qu
On 08/13/2018 06:17 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 11 Aug 2018, at 20:58, Robert Marcano wrote:
Current *-devel packages tend to pull a lot of dependencies, probably to make
developers life easier, but I think some of them are not needed.
Do you think they’re not needed, or are you sure
On 08/13/2018 09:12 AM, Rex Dieter wrote:
Robert Marcano wrote:
On 08/12/2018 12:46 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
Robert Marcano wrote:
And thinking about it, a lot *-devel packages interdependencies should
be Recommends and not Requires
You keep saying this, I'd like to see some eviden
On 08/13/2018 08:34 AM, Robert Marcano wrote:
On 08/13/2018 06:17 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 11 Aug 2018, at 20:58, Robert Marcano
wrote:
Current *-devel packages tend to pull a lot of dependencies, probably
to make developers life easier, but I think some of them are not needed.
Do you
On 08/13/2018 10:20 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On ma, 13 elo 2018, Robert Marcano wrote:
On 08/13/2018 06:17 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 11 Aug 2018, at 20:58, Robert Marcano
wrote:
Current *-devel packages tend to pull a lot of dependencies,
probably to make developers life easier, but
On 10/31/18 8:13 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
It will be nice to enable powerline theme by default system and user
wide. Simple reason is refresh the look of terminal while also providing
useful information especially for git branch. Since powerline does not
impact the performance, it will be gre
On 11/2/18 10:12 AM, John Florian wrote:
On 11/2/18 9:41 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 9:10 AM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
On Thursday, 01 November 2018 at 01:13, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
It will be nice to enable powerline theme by default system and user
wide
On 05/31/2018 06:52 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
...
This will basically get us back the F28 behavior of showing the
menu but only after a failed boot, I think that is a good
solution, do you agree?
What is the definition of a successful boot? I ask because a machine
could boot perfectly, and when
I am late to the discussion, and a lot of them are related to the
security implications. I am more worried about users overriding
dependencies of other programs. Let me explain with a hypothetical case:
1- There is a system installed application that manipulates PDFs and has
a requirement to G
On 6/5/20 12:31 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 16:23 +, devel-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 11:15:39 -0500
From: Steven Munroe
Subject: Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: CompilerPolicy
Change
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Messag
On 6/29/20 2:26 AM, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
On Sunday, June 28, 2020 5:37:08 PM MST Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, John M. Harris Jr said:
XFS proved to be troublesome, and still is up to the latest of RHEL7. It's
not uncommon to have to run xfs_repair on smaller XFS partitions,
espec
On 7/18/20 8:44 AM, Germano Massullo wrote:
All desktop oriented Fedora installers install on the system packages:
hunspell
hunspell-en
hunspell-en-GB
hunspell-en-US
When a user opens the language list of the spell checker, is has ~24
different English options, like English (Antigua and Barbuda
On 9/26/19 12:57 PM, Ken Dreyer wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 7:11 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 03:01:25PM +0200, Remi Collet wrote:
Le 26/09/2019 à 11:36, Pierre-Yves Chibon a écrit :
Here is what the vision we came to and that we would like to discuss:
○ Every cha
On 4/20/23 5:20 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
It’s time to transform the Fedora devel list into something new
===
As someone that read this list 99% ot the time and 1% for replying, I
have no problem with having a web based forum for d
On 4/21/23 8:17 AM, Robert Marcano wrote:
On 4/20/23 5:20 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
It’s time to transform the Fedora devel list into something new
===
As someone that read this list 99% ot the time and 1% for replying, I
have no
On 5/31/23 9:44 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 03:32:09PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 31/05/2023 14:53, Jiri Vanek wrote:
It is built from sources of course!
What make you think it is not?
For double ensurenes, see the fesco ticket in proposal.
IMO, repackaging
1 - 100 of 156 matches
Mail list logo
