Hi,
I'm working on bringing the msp430 cross-compilation toolchain
up-to-date. About a year ago, the mspgcc project made a big jump
forwards and this has changed some things about how the project works.
There's a C library for the msp430 micro-controllers called msp430-libc.
This used to contain
On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 14:48 +0100, Rob Spanton wrote
> So I'd like to submit a new "msp430mcu" package for review.
I've now submitted this for review. Thanks for the feedback everyone.
It'd be great if someone could find the time to review it:
https://bugzilla.redha
Hi,
There are an increasing number of ARM Cortex-M based boards around, and
I'd like to get a cross-compilation toolchain for them into the Fedora
repositories. I'd like to make it just as easy to compile for Cortex-M
chips under Fedora as it is to compile for AVR or MSP430 targets right
now (i.e
Hi Ralf,
I wrote:
> So is it best to attempt to get one arm-binutils package and remove
> redundancy, or is it going to be more productive to just put up with
> the redundancy for now?
Ralf wrote:
> No, this will hardly work and would be a nightmare to maintain.
I had guessed that binutils didn'
Hi,
Unfortunately I find myself having to orphan these packages:
* msp430-binutils
* msp430-gcc
* msp430-libc
* msp430mcu
* mspdebug
When I originally brought them into Fedora, I was doing a fair amount of msp430
firmware development. Now almost everything I do is Cortex-M based, so I don'
