On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:10:29AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 13:15:41 +0200
> Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > I'm still in search of a howto. A howto about the user-interface, the
> > various filters and rules, and real documentation about how to use it.
>
> I don't think there
r the spam.
-Ralph Bean
[1] -
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure%40lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/5AGAHCBFUTGDIK7LQV6U6QHLZKQRG2WZ/
[2] - https://github.com/fedora-infra/the-new-hotness/pull/69
[3] -
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/datagrepper/raw?category=hotness&st
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 04:34:11PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> nodejs-grunt-contrib-copy ralph
> nodejs-grunt-saucelabs ralph, piotrp
> nodejs-proxy-agent ralph, piotrp
These three got rebuilt this morning (made possible by piotrp's hard
work on the rest of the dep chain).
signature.asc
D
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 09:33:01AM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 07/18/2014 05:47 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:59:12PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >>Dne 17.7.2014 16:22, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
> >>
> >>Why is the filter called filter? Isn't filter supposed
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 04:22:59PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> So please, register on FMN:
> https://apps.fedoraproject.org/notifications/
>
> Test it and open bug tickets and RFEs here:
> https://github.com/fedora-infra/fmn/issues
As a result of surge of new users, FMN is performi
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:04:48PM -0400, Ralph Bean wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 04:22:59PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > So please, register on FMN:
> > https://apps.fedoraproject.org/notifications/
> >
> > Test it and open bug tickets and RFEs here:
Dear all,
We would like to invite you to take a closer look at the Fedora Notification
service: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/notifications/
This service will allow you to customize the notifications you receive, you may
ask it to send you IRC notification for successfull koji builds and email
n
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 09:44:01AM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> https://badges.fedoraproject.org/badge/flock-2014-attendee
>
> I would like to know how to add the Flock 2014 attendee badge to my list of
> badges. Is this something I could do myself?
>
> Leonardo Menezes Vaz and Toshio
There have been some people asking if we can update python-requests
in f20 from 1.2.3 to 2.3.0.
I'll create an update for it in a few days unless there are any
objections.
pgpTysJSbVd8l.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraprojec
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 01:16:29PM -0700, Ed Marshall wrote:
> Is it API-compatible?
Not exactly
https://github.com/kennethreitz/requests/blob/master/HISTORY.rst#230-2014-05-16
pgpwJFv1un9XY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedora
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 01:15:14PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 10/23/2014 10:57 PM, Ralph Bean wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 01:16:29PM -0700, Ed Marshall wrote:
> >> Is it API-compatible?
> >
> > Not exactly
> > https://github.com/kennethreitz/reque
On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 11:44:18AM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 11/05/2014 11:35 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/7943/8047943/mock_output.log
> >
> > Something is broken. fedpkg maybe?
> >
> > Rich.
> >
>
> missing/incompatible dep fo
On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 01:58:24PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 15:36:11 -0500, Ralph Bean wrote:
>
> > If you encounter bugs or have requests for enhancement, as always please do
> > file them[6][7][8]..
>
> Done. Thanks for a premature April F
Recall that the infrastructure team has been working on a new notifications
system[1] in an attempt to unify some of the notifications that get pushed out
by our infrastructure. As the new system improves (and as we get time to clean
house), we will be turning off the native notifications of vario
The Messaging SIG has been working on building a messaging bus for
Fedora Infrastructure and the main obstacle to testing stuff in our
staging environment is a boatload of package reviews.
If anyone is up to help, it would be much appreciated. I'm willing to
swap reviews as well if you need a rev
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 10:33:20AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> Just FYI, you probably want to set the fedora-review flag to '?' on those so
> they're more visible to potential reviewers
Done. Thank you.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 10:39:27AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 09:37:04AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> > On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Neil Horman wrote:
> > > Just FYI, you probably want to set the fedora-review flag to '?' on those
> > > so
> > > they're more visible to
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 09:03:54AM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Ralph Bean wrote:
> > If anyone is up to help, it would be much appreciated. I'm willing to
> > swap reviews as well if you need a reviewer for yours.
>
> I offered a review
The Messaging SIG has been meeting on Tuesdays at 16.00 UTC. Turnout
has been a little low and we concluded that it's not the best time.
If you're interested in participating in meetings, please fill out the
following survey so I can get a good idea of when to place them:
http://whenisgood.net
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 09:00:29AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I'd suggest all maintainers should periodically check:
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?user=&status=testing
> For their updates that are in testing.
Noting here that there's an easy link to that url from your Bodhi
profile
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 10:41:45AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> We are planning a re-work/re-write of the application entirely, but
> it's not happened yet. ;(
Small correction, we started on it at the end of last week!
https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages/pulse/weekly
We'll put out a
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 03:01:49PM -0500, Ray Strode wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Adam Miller
> wrote:
> > If we were to go with the former rather than the latter, we would need
> > to find a way to "namespace" container images so they can be
> > determined as different. I've
Outage: Pkgdb2 and dist-git upgrade (namespacing) 2015-12-17 15:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2015-12-17 15:00 UTC, which will last
approximately 1.5 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2015-12-17 15:00 UT
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 11:44:54AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 10:19:50 -0500
> Steve Grubb wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Something started sending me emails about $SUBJECT. The email says
> > this is due to my preferences and give an URL. Clicking on that URL
> > leads to a pa
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 06:00:48PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Anyone knows what this cryptic message is trying to tell?
> What kind of "update" does it refer to?
> Is this a belated notification about 0.9.11 which is in koji
> since Dec 2015 already?
>
> [...]
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 06:37:25PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 12:19:07 -0500, Ralph Bean wrote:
>
> > > https://release-monitoring.org/project/8847/
> >
> > Yeah, looking at the message history for eicil helps show what
&
Hello,
Anyone interested in swapping package reviews?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853252
Thanks in advance-
-Ralph
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 04:37:31PM +0200, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> fedora-review development team proudly presents :-)
>
> Release of fedora-review 0.3.0 [1-3]
Exciting! Thanks for working on this!
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:08:22PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> python-offtrac
I'll take this one!
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 01:38:29PM +, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 11/30/2012 12:09 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> >Benjamin Boyter has recently indexed the entire Fedora Source code.
> >I.E. all 2 billion lines, 11K packages, 132 GB of it.
> >
> >For details including search syntax, please see:
>
>
Anyone interested in a package review swap?
python-logutils:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884041
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 10:01:32PM +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> Hello,
>
> http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/ URLs no longer work, they
> redirect to https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/error which appears
> to be some kind of a 404 Not Found page. Known issue?
Sorry for the troubles.
I switched
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 11:54:07PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-12-07 at 08:42 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> > In fact in some area it takes me 1 min to finish loading the
> > page..
>
> Bugzilla has been veeery slow for the last week or two. Painfully slow.
> Incredibly ef
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 04:57:00PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> There used to be
>
> http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/SOURCE-RPM-NAME
> e.g.
> http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/gnome-packagekit
>
> Whoever has installed the new non-working software on that server,
> could it be replaced with the
A question has come up in #fedora-apps as to whether or not we should
publish fedmsg messages for voting. In particular, we're looking
now at the new "nuancier" webapp[0] that will be used to vote on
supplemental wallpapers. It is in development. There is a demo
instance[1].
There is a pull req
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 02:46:17PM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 10 September 2013 14:24, inode0 wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Ralph Bean wrote:
> > > If we are able to add fedmsg messages to this, then we will be able to
> > > award badges for
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 05:57:45PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > > > you can opt out of all badge-stuff in one click ("Deactivate
> > > > Account").
> > >=20
> > > Does this deactivate your FAS account, or just the badges?
> >
> > Just the badges. You won't show up on the badges.fp.o frontpage, or
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 05:00:11PM -0500, inode0 wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Ralph Bean wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 05:06:58PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> >> Does this deactivate your FAS account, or just the badges?
> >
> > Just the bad
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 05:06:58PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> > FWIW, if you log in to https://badges.fedoraproject.org/ and visit
> > your profile,
>
> I got "Internal Server Error" when I tried this... and now I'm on the
> home page, when what I really wanted was to make sure I had nothing t
t no actual
> > votes?)
> >
> I had thought that this would trigger off of someone hitting submit on the
> election page. That should vote 0 for all candidates if no votes are
> assigned but still meet the trigger condition. Not sure if that meets the
> criteria for objector
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 05:30:43PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 09:55:51AM -0500, inode0 wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Ralph Bean wrote:
> > > Hm, its not worth doing if we're going to make it complex like this.
> > > I t
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:37:16AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> - Setup your own fedmsg consumer to look for the messages and do
> whatever you want on getting them. email you?
If you want help doing this, feel free to ask in #fedora-apps on
freenode.
http://www.fedmsg.com/en/latest/consuming/#
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 07:51:37PM +0200, Thomas Moschny wrote:
> 2013/4/19 Kevin Fenzi :
> > It's true that you cannot do that from the command line interface.
> >
> > However, there's a bunch of other ways to get that info:
> >
> > - Subscribe to the koji recent builds rss feed:
> > http://koji.f
Last week the infrastructure team launched a new version of Fedora
Tagger[1].
It is a webapp that allows users to upvote/downvote tags on packages as
well as rate packages themselves. The data will end up getting pulled into
yum repo metadata by the bodhi masher and into the Fedora Packages[2]
in
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:43:34PM +0200, Richard Marko wrote:
> On 05/14/2013 05:32 AM, Ralph Bean wrote:
> > Try it out, help improve package search, and climb your way to the
> > number-one tagger spot!
> >
>
> It takes too long to load the next card after user cl
On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 06:14:00PM +0200, Adam Samalik wrote:
> Thanks for the response. I agree, asking you "I am building something I
> haven't described, how do you want to use it?" might have not been the best
> idea... So please, let me try that again and better. :-)
Thanks Adam :)
> I have
Hi all!
First, check out the logs/minutes from today's Modularity WG meeting:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/modularity_wg/modularity_wg.2016-08-30-15.00.html
We identified that we needed a doc on how to fool around with our
prototype build infrastructure (partly staging, partly a dev
e
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 10:32:39AM +0200, Adam Samalik wrote:
> We definitely needed something like that, great!
>
> Do you think it would make sense to split the instructions into two parts?
> Something like:
>
> 1. Prepare your environment to make it work with our dev infra - "the stuff
> you w
A month ago, I switched over the http://bugz.fedoraproject.org alias from the
current pkgdb bugs app[1] to the new "packages" app[2]. There was a response
from the community that this shouldn't have happened during that phase of the
release cycle and that the new app was broken and too slow[3][4].
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 05:11:34PM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Ralph Bean wrote:
> > I've since done some work to fix bugs and speed up the new app and would
> > like
> > some feedback if you could provide it. It is up in our
I'm going to be bumping python-requests in epel6 from 0.11.1 to
0.14.1. If you are using python-requests and think this will cause
issues for you, let me know so we can work out a solution.
pgpRRqi0OEQnf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://
I'm working on the unbundling effort for python-requests. One
stepping stone in that path is the following review request (for which
I am soliciting potential reviewers):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907688
That one is the highest priority, but there are a few other reviews I'
Hi, this is a test message.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
This is just a test message.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
There will be an outage of the 'fedora-packages' service starting at 2015-01-21
18:00 UTC, which will last approximately 4 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run:
date -d '2015-01-21 18:00'
Reason for outage:
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 10:55:40AM +0100, Remi Collet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any way to get the Fosdem 2015 badge ?
>
> The URL retrieved on the Fedora booth is already not working anymore..
Here's the original ticket for the badge:
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-badges/ticket/334
eischman
it in the web interface.
The cut-over will happen next week on Wednesday, February 11th.
Thank you,
Ralph Bean
[1]
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2014-September/001434.html
[2] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/notifications/
pgpGFpMitqgdo.pgp
Description: PGP
I'm proud to announce that the Infrastructure team has finished deploying the
first iteration of our replacement for the older, wiki-based Upstream Release
Monitoring tools this week. You can read about the details of the trio of
systems[1] now used to coordinate upstream release monitoring on the
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:33:29PM +0100, Petr Hracek wrote:
> In our project called rebase-helper https://github.com/phracek/rebase-helper
> we would like to analyze a new upstream version against an old upstream
> version
> and let user now what is changed. E.g. Binaries are missing, soname bump
Hello,
As part of the Factory 2.0 and Modularity efforts[1], we’ve been
developing a plan to migrate to an “arbitrary” branching model from
our current model of one branch per release (as had been discussed at
Flock and DevConf[2]).
The main motivation behind this is to enable functionality requi
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 12:41:57PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 26.5.2017 v 21:42 Ralph Bean napsal(a):
> > Any feedback before that would be
> > greatly appreciated.
>
> PkgDB handles Koschei and upstream monitoring settings too. How I can do that
> after the migr
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 01:09:28PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hello , pkgdb also have Monitoring settings, Koschei integration,
> timeline and Anitya , where do we have this on Pagure over Dist-Git ?
The Koschei integration is going to move into Koschei's web UI.
(Koschei actually already has
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 07:46:28PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 12:35:13PM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 19:21:53 +0100,
> > Till Maas wrote:
> > >
> > >What are your opinions about this? I already checked with Dennis
> > >Gilmore, he is ok with t
Hello,
A while ago, I wrote a trio of gnome-shell search providers:
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/gnome-shell-search-fedora-packages
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/gnome-shell-search-github-repositories
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/gnome-shell-search-pinboard
They o
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 08:59:24PM +, Christopher wrote:
> I occasionally get notifications from Koschei about my packages failing to
> build. When I look (
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13071213), I see a
> python stack trace which looks like it has nothing to do with my
On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 07:44:21PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 05:12:19PM +0100, Dave Love wrote:
> > How do you change the homepage listed in a project's apps page and
> > "upstream" in pkgdb (e.g. in
> > https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/powerman and the diffe
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 12:59:40PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 05:52:44PM -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
> > Another point to note is that we need to determine how this should be
> > handled
> > in BZ components for bug reporting as well as for filing review requests.
>
> Ma
ce =
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ModuleBuildService
> >
> > Change owner(s):
> > * Ralph Bean
> >
> >
> > We will deploy an instance of the Module Build Service to production
> > in Fedora Infrastructure. Other teams will use this service t
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 05:55:21PM -0500, Ben Rosser wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 4:13 AM, Jan Kurik wrote:
>
> > For the Fedora 26 timeframe, we will lock down the users who can
> > submit to the MBS to a small number of Modularity WG members. This is
> > not ideal, but the thought is that we
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 10:32:49AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 01:57:34PM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> > Here's something I didn't expect from the new ABI gate. Which, before
> > I go further, I think will be a great idea nearly all of the time. I
> > think avoiding
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 02:21:02PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-01-23 at 10:32 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >
> > We just sent an announcement about this, sorry for being late on this.
> >
> > Basically, you can "waive" test results using waiverdb-cli (dnf install
> > waiverdb
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 08:13:02AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 10:32:49AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > We just sent an announcement about this, sorry for being late on this.
> >
> > Basically, you can "waive" test results using waiverdb-cli (dnf install
> > waiver
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 06:37:56PM +0100, Rafael dos Santos wrote:
> On 23 January 2018 at 18:20, Ralph Bean wrote:
>
> I've removed the abicheck requirement from the greenwave policies for
> > now until we know more:
> > https://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/c
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 06:35:45PM +0100, Rafael dos Santos wrote:
> I get this error after clicking the authorization link:
>
> [16450:16491:0123/182437.407698:ERROR:browser_gpu_channel_host_factory.cc(120)]
> Failed to launch GPU process.
> Created new window in existing browser session.
> 127.0.
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 10:33:01PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Tuesday, 23 January 2018 at 20:16, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 12:25:56PM -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > > > There are three tests that must pass in order for updates to go to
> > > > stable:
>
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 12:23:49PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-03-19 at 15:57 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 03:41:15PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
> > > On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 14:06:56 +0100
> > > Dan Horák wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sun, 18 Mar 2018 20:25:31
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 08:53:41AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> I have attempted to create waivers for two updates, but they are still
> unable to be pushed. What have I done wrong?
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-c5a0e704d6
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/F
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 07:15:36PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a suggestion. After some confusions that I have made related
> with notifications with a big delay .
>
> Please add the date of notification on the notification .
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Sérgio M. B.
Makes sense. Can you fi
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 05:34:23PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 03/21/2018 01:52 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
> > On 03/21/2018 04:45 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >> On 03/20/2018 11:02 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I've rec'd about 30 of these in the last hour or so, fedora-28,
> >>> fedo
> Is there an active plan on figuring out these Service Levels? Is there
> a ticket? Is there a specific person who owns this? I think we need at
> least a preliminary understanding of what goes here for the F27 beta
> (freeze on Sept. 9th, so... I guess by then?)
Thanks for starting this. I'm no
This is a writeup on a problem we’re facing with modularity, and some ideas on
how to resolve it.
# The "Problem"
Imagine I have an **httpd module**. To simplify things, let’s say that this
module has only one stream: **2.4**. Today, in the modulemd for this module, I
declare build and runtime d
Found it. The fix needs to land in pagure itself. See the infra ticket for
more details.
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/6315
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedor
:)
Pierre was able to hotfix pagure prod with the watchers fix.
I confirmed that the sync script worked correctly on the nodejs-accepts package
- it set the default cc list to the nodejs sig mailing list stored in FAS.
I started a full run to reset all projects, but it takes quite a while to
c
83 matches
Mail list logo
