SPICE is already here!
rootless remote apps, ie Wayland network clients, that's a need I can
understand. But with my near-to-zero knowledge about Wayland, I don't
see why we couldn't do that.
--
Pierre Carrier
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
If you have good reasons to put language information in the input
layer of the UI infrastructure, I'd love to hear which :)
And I'd be really pleased if software kept letting me get rid of the
Magic most might want.
That's one big criteria when I pick my alternatives.
Cheers,
Hello packagers,
As djvulibre is (optionally, build-time choice) required by apvlv,
which I am currently packaging ( http://pcarrier.fedorapeople.org/wip/apvlv/ ),
I am taking ownership of the package in EPEL4,5,6.
No bug reports related to EPEL ATM.
Cheers,
--
Pierre Carrier
--
devel
Hello packagers,
Taking ownership of sos in Fedora*.
It appeared in EPEL4-5 in pkgdb. Retired as sos is part of the default
install of RHEL 4.5- (sysreport), RHEL4.6+ (sosreport) and RHEL5
(sosreport) anyway.
My signature should explain why I care about this package :)
Cheers,
--
Pierre
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 21:23, Michel Alexandre Salim
wrote:
> Rebuilding the same package without any change fixes the issue. Anyone
> has any idea what's going on here?
No idea, but you might be on the way to an hexadecimal dollar!
Regards,
--
Pierre Carrier
--
devel mailing
