Re: Fedora 17 Change Freeze

On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Paul Howarth wrote: > On 05/03/2012 08:50 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> >> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 8:26 AM, Paul Howarth  wrote: >>> >>> On 05/01/2012 07:30 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>

Re: Fedora 17 Change Freeze

On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Paul Howarth wrote: > On 05/03/2012 09:22 AM, Paul Howarth wrote: >> >> On 05/03/2012 09:17 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Paul Howarth wrote: >>>> >>>> On 05/03/2012 08:5

Re: Proposed F18 feature: MiniDebugInfo

On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Alexander Larsson wrote: > I just wrote a new Feature proposal for shipping minimal debug info by > default: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MiniDebugInfo > > The feature page lists some of the background and statistics. It also > lists some options in how

Re: Like C++? Not afraid of quirky build systems? Seeking LLVM co-maintainers

On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 4:17 AM, DJ Delorie wrote: > >> Is LLVMpipe needed on, say, ARM? (Does anyone have a screenshot of >> GNOME Shell running on such a system?). > > Is this close enough? > > http://www.delorie.com/arm/f15-gnome-on-olpc.jpg And currently OLPC uses gnome-panel although there i

12.1.0 devel build 10 released, for the XO-1, XO-1.5 and XO-1.75

The "Just when you thought it was safe to go back in the water... " release. This is the end of the development cycle. We're now headed into the stabilisation and bug fixing phase. http://wiki.laptop.org/go/12.1.0/Release_plan Fixed bugs: #11796 XO-1 os8 (12.1.0) - 'rpm' fails to run #11766 sy

Re: x32 abi support?

On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 5:19 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:28:29AM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: >> Matthew Garrett wrote: >> >> > [...] >> >So, overall, x32 is only really beneficial for embedded platforms rather >> >than general purpose ones. As Josh says, if there's

12.1.0 devel build 10 released, for the XO-1, XO-1.5 and XO-1.75

The "They're Having So Much Fun It's Illegal." release. This is the end of the development cycle. We're now headed into the stabilisation and bug fixing phase. http://wiki.laptop.org/go/12.1.0/Release_plan Fixed bugs: #11850 12.1.0 os10 image too large to fit on a XO-1 #11828 olpc UID has chan

Re: The package erlang-erlzmq2 can't be built for F-17 and F-18 (blocked)

On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote: > Hello. > > This package was retired for some time and now it was re-enabled (see > review request in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/810205 ). Unfortunately > it still can't be built for F-17 anf F-18. Koji fails and returns > quite cryptic mess

Re: glusterfs rename

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > On 05/30/2012 12:44 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> >> >> To be honest it's a pain in the neck to deal with such packages, and >> unless there's an overwhelming need, I can't recommend it.  Does any >> user really need to parallel instal

Re: glusterfs rename

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > On 05/30/2012 01:34 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: >> >> On 05/30/2012 01:25 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> >>> >>>> And FWIW, doing nothing doesn't resolve the glusterfs in EPEL

Re: glusterfs rename

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > On 05/30/2012 02:23 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> >> Yes, for the Fedora side of things I think gluster 3.2 is the best >> strategy with a fedorapeople repo of 3.3 if it's considered worthwhile >> for thos

Re: Fedora ARM and SecureBoot

On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > What is Fedora ARM planning to do about the upcoming Microsoft hardware > certification spec requiring Secure Boot? By the spec, there must be a way > to disable it on x86, but on ARM they expressly prohibit turning it off. I > guess the c

Re: Fedora ARM and SecureBoot

On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 9:30 PM, drago01 wrote: > On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 10:02 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: >> On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 21:12 +0200, drago01 wrote: >>> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Przemek Klosowski >>> wrote: >>> > What is Fedora ARM planning to do about the upcoming Microsoft hardwar

Re: Deleting a package from f18/rawhide builds?

On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > How do I do this? (The package is hekafs.) > > I have retired the package in f18. > > I have removed the f18 tag from all the fc18 builds. > > Bit the rawhide build is still pulling the fc17 version of the package. > > There are no dependenc

Re: Fedora ARM and SecureBoot

On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Gerry Reno wrote: > On 06/08/2012 09:00 AM, drago01 wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Gerry Reno wrote: >>> On 06/08/2012 08:07 AM, Mario Torre wrote: On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 14:34 -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > that would not allow custom kernel a

Re: Fedora ARM and SecureBoot

On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Gerry Reno wrote: > On 06/08/2012 01:04 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 14:07 +0200, Mario Torre wrote: >>> On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 14:34 -0500, Chris Adams wrote: >>> that would not allow custom kernel and such.  Don't support the locked

Re: Fedora ARM and SecureBoot

On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Richard Vickery wrote: > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Oron Peled wrote: >> >> On Friday, 8 בJune 2012 20:07:20 Gerry Reno wrote: >> > On 06/08/2012 01:04 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >> > > That is only assuming that Windows on ARM is successful, of which so >> >

Re: ARM is a dead end

On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Hi, > > I've been pointed to a news item about a (apparently the first) x86 (Atom) > based smartphone: > http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/14/orange-san-diego-review/ > > So even smartphones are going x86 now. It looks like x86 is going to defe

Re: ARM is a dead end

On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:08 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 01:57:18AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > >> So I would urge Fedora not to waste our time on a low-end architecture >> filling a temporary niche which will become obsolete as demand for >> performance increases. We sho

Re: Rawhide updated breaks yum

On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Somehow it's possible to update rpm but not yum and break Rawhide, > using just 'yum' commands, not rpm directly and no forced installs. > Anyway my machine now says: > > $ sudo yum install yum > error: db5 error(-30969) from dbenv->op

Re: UFS / AFFS filesystems

On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Ian Chapman wrote: > Hi, > > Have the ufs / affs and other file systems been intentionally dropped from > the F17 kernel, or is that just an oversight? They're still there but they've been moved to the kernel-modules-extra sub package. Peter -- devel mailing lis

Re: Fedora.NEXT Products and the fate of Spins

> > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Christian Schaller < cscha...@redhat.com > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > The difference here is that the resources for GNOME (or anything else Red Hat > > needs for future versions of RHEL) are > > provided by Red Hat. So if you want the spins to the logically the

Re: Has support for Pentium III been terminated?

On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 4:23 AM, Felix Miata wrote: > I have a F20 I switched to Rawhide on host gx150. Shortly after getting KDE > started, the system reboots. Something similar happens in openSUSE: > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856606 > > Older releases are OK, so hardware should

Re: fedpkg build failing (due to NSS?)

>>> I've left a negative karma there, they forgot to add the new nss-util >>> into overrides list. >> >> No, it's been added, but then it was expired: >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/override/edit?build=nss-util-3.15.5-1.fc20 >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/override/edit?build

Re: F21 System Wide Change: u-boot syslinux by default

>> Add syslinux support to u-boot enabling both pxelinux and extlinux support. >> simplifying booting arm machines, making anaconda installs easy and overall >> providing for a better user experience. Default u-boot to using syslinux >> config >> files for booting. pxelinux for network and extlinu

Re: F21 System Wide Change: u-boot syslinux by default

>> Add syslinux support to u-boot enabling both pxelinux and extlinux support. >> simplifying booting arm machines, making anaconda installs easy and overall >> providing for a better user experience. Default u-boot to using syslinux >> config >> files for booting. pxelinux for network and extlinu

fltk blocked?

So it seems fltk has been blocked from F-21. This in and of itself is fine but there's been no bugs filed against packages that built against it, no announcement that I can see and the package itself hasn't been retired in git, nor can I see a rel-eng ticket. Is this an oversight? Peter -- devel

Re: fltk blocked?

On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > On 03/19/2014 04:05 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > > fltk has been blocked from F-21 > > Huh? What are you refering to? indeed there are no recent builds for 21 in > the main koji (last one is from August) See Kevin&#

heads up: plist/usbmux/imobiledevice soname bumps

Hi All, There's a new devel release of the above just landed. I'll be looking to get them into rawhide over the new couple of days but there's been quite some change so I'm going to deal with it all locally first to see what the impact is before I push it. Peter -- devel mailing list devel@lists

Re: heads up: plist/usbmux/imobiledevice soname bumps

>> There's a new devel release of the above just landed. I'll be looking >> to get them into rawhide over the new couple of days but there's been >> quite some change so I'm going to deal with it all locally first to >> see what the impact is before I push it. > > > Glad I read this although I alre

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Java 8

On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > On 03/22/2014 06:15 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote: >> Given the known large number of failures (OptionalJavadocs says "80% build >> failure rate" without saying that all are JavaDoc-related), we really >> should do a mass rebuild to identify wh

Re: Maybe it's time to get rid of tcpwrappers/tcpd?

>> I wonder whether it wouldn't be time to say goodbye to tcpwrappers in >> Fedora. There has been a request in systemd upstream to disable support >> for it by default, but I am not sure I want to do that unless we can >> maybe say goodbye to it for the big picture too. > > I have decided now to d

Re: Orphaning java-1.5.0-gcj

> There have been a few discussions about this in the past but no action. > With feature freeze approaching for F21, I think this is a good time to > address this. > > I will be orphaning java-1.5.0-gcj in Fedora on April 8th. If anyone > wants to take over, please let me know. Please do keep in mi

Re: arm kernel does not support SCTP?

> I'm updating socat to run all its test cases, and I'm running into an > error only on the arm architecture: > > test 151 SCTP4LISTENFORK: SCTP4 listen handles 2 concurrent > connections... !port 40157 timed out! FAILED > 2014/04/09 01:36:12 server[6004] E socket(2, 1, 132): Protocol not supported

Re: heads up: plist/usbmux/imobiledevice soname bumps

On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > Hi All, > > There's a new devel release of the above just landed. I'll be looking > to get them into rawhide over the new couple of days but there's been > quite some change so I'm going to deal with it

Re: heads up: plist/usbmux/imobiledevice soname bumps

>> > There's a new devel release of the above just landed. I'll be looking >> > to get them into rawhide over the new couple of days but there's been >> > quite some change so I'm going to deal with it all locally first to >> > see what the impact is before I push it. >> >> Slightly later than plan

Re: F21 System Wide Change: (A)Periodic Updates to Images

On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 10:55:21PM +0200, drago01 wrote: >> This would make sense for non cloud images as well. Is there any >> reason why we have to restrict that to the cloud? > > Somewhere to start, mostly. I'd love to see it extend acr

Re: F21 System Wide Change: (A)Periodic Updates to Images

On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 07:38:29PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: >> > Somewhere to start, mostly. I'd love to see it extend across the project. >> It would be very useful for ARM images too. > > Cool. Maybe

Re: PkgDB2 is now in production

On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 3:44 AM, Christopher Meng wrote: > There are many broken redirect links, please fix asap. There's a trac instance on the project page to report bugs https://fedorahosted.org/pkgdb2/ Peter -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update

>> Hi All, >> >> I am in the process of tagging the mass rebuild into f21 it will land >> in the next rawhide which due to the size will take some time to >> compose, and sync out to the mirrors >> >> The tagging script tells me it is "Checking 13923 builds..." there is a >> very large number of fa

Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update

On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > - Original Message - >> From: "Adam Jackson" >> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Sent: Monday, June 9, 2014 6:02:08 PM >> Subject: Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update >> >> On Sat, 2014-06-07 at 08:51 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wro

Re: [fedora-arm] ExcludeArch tracker doesn't appear to be effective

On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 7:28 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485251 is depressing. Nine > bugs have been closed - of these, one is a review request that was > dropped, two were incorrectly closed after an ExcludeArch was added and > one was closed as a dupl

Re: [fedora-arm] ExcludeArch tracker doesn't appear to be effective

>> So at the moment there's around 15,000 source packages in Fedora >> mainline and you're getting depressed over exactly 24 of them? I'm not >> sure how 24 packages is providing a inconsistent experience. In some >> cases the maintainer of the package hasn't bothered to close the bug >> when suppo

Re: [fedora-arm] ExcludeArch tracker doesn't appear to be effective

On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 09:49:58PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: >> > What's depressing is the trend, not the absolute count. I'd expected it >> > to head rapidly towards zero after the first release, but

Re: [fedora-arm] ExcludeArch tracker doesn't appear to be effective

On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:37 PM, Adam Goode wrote: > I seem to remember some kind of koji diff report that would come out > periodically. Is there an automated run of this? I would love a > dashboard or NxN matrix of diffs between all the arches. A timeseries > would be perfect (to see the trends

Re: [fedora-arm] ExcludeArch tracker doesn't appear to be effective

On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 11:07 PM, drago01 wrote: > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 11:52 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> [...] >> So moving on from that why don't you feel comfortable pointing to >> the ARM port? > > The question wasn't really directed at me but add

Re: [fedora-arm] ExcludeArch tracker doesn't appear to be effective

>> If you're going on just the bug tracker possibly but there's a lot of >> stuff we fix and enhance that doesn't even make the that tracker, the >> Ada stuff I mentioned earlier is but one example. Rightly or wrongly >> it's not the canonical source of information. For example if I >> discover an

Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update

On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Ter, 2014-06-10 at 17:40 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >> On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 23:24:41 +0100 >> Sérgio Basto wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > On Sáb, 2014-06-07 at 08:51 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >> > > [2] http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f21

Re: rawhide report: 20140611 changes

Hi John, > ptpd-2.3.0-2.fc21 > - > * Tue Jun 10 2014 Jon Kent - 2.3.0-2 > - restricted Arch to i686 and x86_64 > > * Sun Jun 08 2014 Jon Kent - 2.3.0-1 > - Updates to ptpd 2.3.0 I'm wondering why you've restricted ptpd to just x86? It builds fine on all the other architectures (I

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Fedora 21 Make 4.0 Update

On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:50 AM, Omair Majid wrote: > * Jaroslav Reznik [2014-04-14 08:32]: >> = Proposed System Wide Change: Fedora 21 Make 4.0 Update = >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F21Make40 > >> == Detailed Description == >> The purpose of this update is to synchronize Fedora wit

Re: [fedora-arm] ExcludeArch tracker doesn't appear to be effective

> I pulled git and have the following for ExclusiveArch: %{arm}: > > joystick-support While ARM doesn't have traditional joystick ports there have been some people hook them up via GPIO and the like, enabled. > mcollective-qpid-plugin > perl-qpid These were both legacy hangover from before qpid-

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21 v3

On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Christopher Meng wrote: > I'd like to claim the ownership of blktap and alliance. Is there any point in blktap? I thought, and I might be wrong here, that it's functionality had been folded back into xen. Peter -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.or

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora ARM Status Meeting Minutes - 2014-07-02

> * 1) Kernel Status Update (pwhalen, 20:07:46) > * Peter's '3.15 Fedora ARM kernel status' (pwhalen, 20:08:13) > * LINK: http://nullr0ute.com/2014/06/3-15-fedora-arm-kernel-status/ > (pwhalen, 20:08:13) The beaglebone patchset was rebased for this release so please test. > * kernel t

Re: ebay-cors-filter's builds started to fail in f24

Known issue, see threads [1] [2] plus possibly others. [1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2015-October/001685.html [2] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2015-October/215611.html On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 7:14 AM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > Looks like DNF is

Re: New package distribution-gpg-keys

On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 2:46 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 07:37:15PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >> fedora-repos should have all the keys needed for upgrade. So the only thing >> needing the keys is mock. However I'm not sure you should include rpmfusion >> k

Re: Bodhi updates not pushed?

On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Christopher wrote: > On https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272694 it was brought to my > attention that my updates for the zookeeper package weren't pushed to the > f22 and f21 updates-testing repos, though I do see the one in the f23 repo. > > Did I do s

Re: C++11 enabling in F22?

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Marek Skalický wrote: > Hello everyone, > I would like to ask what do you think about enabling c++11 in library in > F22? Is it permitted by Fedora guidelines? > > I am asking because of this bug - > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274307 . And I want

Re: Fedora IPv6 testing and improvements - request for ideas

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Pavel Simerda wrote: > Hi all, > > I am writing to Fedora development mailing lists to get opinions > and ideas regarding our project on improving IPv6 support in > Fedora across its components. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Networking In the above page: *

Re: Fedora 23 Final RC10 status is GO !

On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Sex, 2015-10-30 at 17:47 +0100, Jan Kurik wrote: >> At the third round of Fedora 23 Final Go/No-Go Meeting, that just >> ends, has been Fedora 23 Final-RC10 declared as GOLD. >> GA of this release is planed on Tuesday 2015-Nov-03. >> > Today

Re: gcc 5.2

>> Am 02.11.2015 um 15:29 schrieb Xose Vazquez Perez: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Will it be updated/included in F23? >> > troubles with ARM? >> >> no, dunno why there where builds long ago for F22 which never became >> testable because dependencies >> >> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?pack

Re: STOP messing with nfs-utls... PLEASE!!!

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Steve Dickson wrote: > I realized over the weekend the following > commits were make to fix the build and > they did not!! The build is just as > broken as before!!! Well maybe if you'd tested all your changes locally and pushed everything at once and not broken ra

Re: Fedora IPv6 testing and improvements - request for ideas

>> In the above page: >> * Network configuration: I see NetworkManager in there but nothing >> about systemd-networkd > > I used browser search in that page and 'systemd' (which is the name > of the source package that provides systemd-networkd) is listed. I wasn't sure whether it meant systemd in

Re: [HEADS UP] Ongoing rebuild of Python3.5 in Rawhide

>> On 11/04/2015 12:23 PM, Robert Kuska wrote: >> > There is ongoing rebuild of Python3.5 in rawhide's side-tag f24-python3. >> > >> > I would like to ask all maintainers to rebuild their packages (which >> > depend on python3) within the f24-python3 side-tag. >> > >> > To rebuild your package simp

Re: COPR for ARM?

>>> On Nov 7, 2015 13:50, "Neal Gompa" wrote: >>> > >>> > Why don't we do emulated builds (like how OBS does it for ARM)? >>> > >>> > >>> >>> The attempts at emulated builds have usually been slower than the hardware >>> builds >> >> Are they unusable? I find it hard to believe that emulated build

Re: wayland in rawhide

>>> That's fine. I don't have a problem adding "GNOME on Xorg" option to >>> the session >>> menu in the interim. I'll do it tomorrow. >> >> This is what the feature page said would happen in the first place. So >> I'm also confused why you didn't just do that. > Initially the feature page was wri

HEAD UP: python 3.5 landed in rawhide

Hi All, I've just tagged the python 3.5 rebuild into rawhide. I'm just building a few packages that have newer versions already in rawhide, they'll be there shortly. There's still a few packages with issues according to repoquery [1] so maintainers please ensure these are fixed as soon as possibl

Re: Failing builds on rawhide

On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Jan Synacek wrote: > I'm getting this error: > > bash: /usr/bin/rpmbuild: No such file or directory > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11804093 I suspect that's due to python 3.5 being tagged in, it should be OK shortly, I'm keeping an eye on

Re: HEAD UP: python 3.5 landed in rawhide

>> Hi All, >> >> I've just tagged the python 3.5 rebuild into rawhide. I'm just >> building a few packages that have newer versions already in rawhide, >> they'll be there shortly. >> >> There's still a few packages with issues according to repoquery [1] so >> maintainers please ensure these are fi

Re: Failing builds on rawhide

On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Jan Synacek wrote: >> I'm getting this error: >> >> bash: /usr/bin/rpmbuild: No such file or directory >> >> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11804

Re: HEAD UP: python 3.5 landed in rawhide

>> Hi All, >> >> I've just tagged the python 3.5 rebuild into rawhide. I'm just >> building a few packages that have newer versions already in rawhide, >> they'll be there shortly. >> >> There's still a few packages with issues according to repoquery [1] so >> maintainers please ensure these are fi

Re: FedRTC.org SIP and XMPP service - help needed

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > > On 13/11/15 00:00, Jared K. Smith wrote: >> >> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Daniel Pocock > > wrote: >> >> I've been looking at ways to expand on the fedrtc.org >> service and woul

Re: rs6000-cpus.def not found in PowerPC builds on F22+

On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 3:14 AM, Dave Johansen wrote: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256839 > I don't have access to PowerPC hardware, so can anyone give any advice on > how to fix the above issue? Not sure that rs6000 would be supported on ppc64le but it's likely a question best

Re: Some analysis on the size of the minimal and Server installs of Fedora 23

> I think in my ideal world, we would have Cockpit become capable of > interacting with PackageKit so that it could install whatever portions > of the system the admin wanted to manage on demand, rather than ahead > of time. Why not dnf API? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org htt

Re: Include livenet and nbd dracut plugins on the Fedora Live ISO

On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Lukas Zapletal wrote: >> dracut itself contains the configuration about what modules get built >> into the initramfs in what situations. Live images use a generic (--no- >> hostonly) initramfs. I'd talk to the dracut maintainer about the >> appropriate way to add t

Re: Xapian library needs rebuild on rawhide

> I am attempting to build notmuch on rawhide, and see the following > warning from the Xapian library, indicating it needs to be rebuilt... > > /usr/include/xapian/version.h:29:2: warning: #warning The C++ ABI > version of compiler you are using does not exactly match [-Wcpp] > #warning The C++ A

Re: RFC: switching from grubby to grub2-mkconfig

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:30 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: >> Since the old proposal to have the bootloader automatically enumerate >> boot options never went anywhere, can we do the next best thing? >> >> Specifically, these days grub2-mkconfig

Re: Bodhi

On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 5:04 AM, Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich wrote: > Hi! > > Could anybody help to figure out what gone wrong here? > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-6ec19b0161 I've seen it a couple of times this week while doing the updates pushe, not sure what's going on but I've

Re: Cannot find relevant tag

> What does mean this warning on Bodhi? It's some aversion that bodhi has developed recently to F-22 updates, I've reported it upstream here https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/746 See other bodhi threads on the list for other discussion -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.

Re: nodejs/npm coupling

On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 1:36 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: > Hi, > I'm currently looking into using npm v3 with nodejs v4. The problem I've > run into is that npm is apparently part of the main nodejs package which > effectively joins them at the hip for no apparent good reason. > > Upstream sh

Re: HEADS UP: libwebp, ucommon soname bumps

On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: > Hello > > I'll be building libwep-0.5.0 and ucommon-7.0.0 this weekend. > > Affected packages for libwebp: > > efl > freeimage > gdal > gegl03 > GraphicsMagick > gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free > ImageMagick > kde-runtime-libs > leptonica > librast

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Golang 1.6

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Jan Kurik wrote: > = Proposed System Wide Change: Golang 1.6 = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/golang1.6 > > Change owner(s): > * Jakub Čajka < jcajka AT redhat DOT com > > > Rebase of Golang package to upcoming version 1.6 in Fedora 24, > including rebuil

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Golang 1.6

On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 5:30 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 01:31:30AM +0000, Peter Robinson wrote: >> Will there be an ABI guaranteed beta or RC so that this can be >> complete before branching as per the schedule [1]? All major rebases >> should

Re: Boost 1.60?

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Tom Hughes wrote: > Are we expecting boost 1.60 to land in Rawhide today? > > I see 1.60.0-1 built in the f24-boost side tag yesterday and then 1.60.0-2 > this morning in the main f24 tag? There's been no request on the rel-eng ticket to tag it all back in so I s

Re: F24 Self Contained Change: Micro Bit

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Jan Kurik wrote: > = Proposed Self Contained Change: Micro Bit = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Micro_Bit > > Change owner(s): > * Kushal Das > > Enable the use of BBC Micro Bit on Fedora systems. Users will be able > develop, and put in new code to thei

Re: nss_myhostname as default in Fedora

>> >>> It is intended as a convenient fallback mechanism, and is only supposed >> >>> to have an effect if 'gateway' is not defined in the local DNS (the >> >>> 'domain' or 'search' zones). Would it help if those limitations were >> >>> more explicit, e.g. documented in nss-myhostname(8)? >> >> >>

Re: Build root prepared by DNF is way larger

>> > So it appears this thread was probably not enough. Which keeps us with >> > interesting state where mock by default does not install weak >> > dependencies where Koji installs them. It causes interesting issues >> > already. >> >> mock/koji not installing weak dependencies == anything wanting

Re: Xulrunner - intent to remove from Fedora 24

does anyone use the xulrunner package? (and gecko-devel actually). Mozilla does not maintain it any more and the XUL as technology is going to be removed/deprecated. I'd like to remove the package from Fedora 24. >>> >>> >>> PackageKit has a npapi plugin that I'm guessing is soo

Re: Mass rebuild for Fedora 18 Complete

On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:39:31 -0500 > Dennis Gilmore wrote: > >> it was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5222 that >> we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 18 for >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DwarfCompressor and >> h

Re: Mass rebuild for Fedora 18 Complete

On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Christophe Fergeau wrote: > Hey, > > On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 02:21:10PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> The mass rebuild has completed and been tagged back into rawhide, they >> should appear in tomorrow's rawhide compose. >> >> 11057 packages were successfully rebuil

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v3] Retiring packages for F-18

On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Tom Lane (t...@redhat.com) said: >> Bill Nottingham writes: >> > Before we branch for Fedora 18, as is custom, we will block currently >> > orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 16. >> >> > The following pac

Re: Mass rebuild for Fedora 18 Complete

On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 18:11 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > >> http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f18-needsbuilt.html > > How is this list generated? It claims vbetool needs rebuilding, but > vbetool has been deadpackaged. It's not been blocked fr

retiring Pimlico suite of apps (contacts / dates / tasks)

Hi All, The pimlico suite of apps originally designed for phones but useful standalone have been dead upstream for quite some time and with the restructuring of evolution are often breaking. Upstream gnome now has standalone Contacts and Calendar apps with a Tasks app planned and there's others th

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v4] Retiring packages for F-18

On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:26 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 15:45 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 13:15 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: >> > > Package qtparted (fails to build) >> > >> > H... >> > >> > http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/qtparted >> > >> > 7

Re: OBS Fedora

On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Damian Ivanov wrote: > First Thanks for the link and the answer. > The guy ported it ten days later and it seems to work perfect now: > http://www.martin-juhl.dk/2012/04/cbs-ready/ > > Second the problem with koji is that I have no web interface. I am It does have

Re: Suggestion: Continuous mass rebuild

On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Dan Horák wrote: > Richard W.M. Jones píše v Ne 29. 07. 2012 v 18:38 +0100: >> Currently we're doing a mass rebuild about every couple of releases, >> ie. once a year. >> >> Since Dennis Gilmore has written this rebuild script already, why >> don't we run the scrip

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] [FINAL NOTICE] Retiring packages for F-18

On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > I'm looking into these: > > Bill Nottingham wrote: >> Package komparator (fails to build) >> Package krecipes (fails to build) >> Package qalculate-kde (fails to build) >> Package tesseract (fails to build) > > but since the build.log files ar

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora ARM weekly status meeting 2012-08-01

On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Paul Whalen wrote: > Good day all, > > This weeks Fedora ARM status meeting will take place today (Wednesday Aug > 1st) in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode. > Times in various time zones (please let us know if these do not work): > > PDT: 1pm > MDT: 2pm > CDT: 3pm > E

Re: Orphaning trac plugins

On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 09:53:37 -0700 > Jesse Keating wrote: > >> I'm no longer responsible for trac administration and I cannot give >> these packages the attention they need. >> >> trac-git-plugin >> trac-iniadmin-plugin >> trac-mercurial-plugin

Re: rawhide report: 20120824 changes

On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Dodji Seketeli wrote: > Hello, > > Fedora Rawhide Report a écrit: > >> firefox-14.0.1-3.fc19 >> - >> * Wed Aug 22 2012 Dan Horák - 14.0.1-3 >> - add fix for secondary arches from xulrunner > > With this update and ... > >> xulrunner-15.0-1.b6

Re: Fedora Infrastructure announces status.fedoraproject.org

On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > I'm happy to announce the general availability of our > status.fedoraproject.org site. > > This site provides an easy way for Fedora contributors and users to > check on the status of services provided by Fedora Infrastructure. >

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >