On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Valent Turkovic
wrote:
> Hi,
> just wondering is there a plan to have Meego packages in Fedora repos?
> Fedora has been really fast to include latest Moblin packages so will
> this continue or have you decided to drop Meego from Fedora repos?
Its under review. I'
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Chen Lei wrote:
> 2010/5/30 Peter Robinson :
>> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Valent Turkovic
>>
>> Its under review. I'm waiting for a few upstream updates that need to
>> hit as part of the gnome 2.31.2 release. There'
Hi Kevin,
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Peter Robinson wrote:
>> Not decided about the handset side of things yet. The vast majority of
>> the components from "MeeGo Core" are already in rawhide (and F-13 for
>> that matter). Most of the N
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 6:51 PM, Dan Horák wrote:
> Matt Domsch píše v Po 31. 05. 2010 v 12:43 -0500:
>> Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64
>> using rawhide from 2010-05-27
>>
>> This is a full rebuild, the first for Fedora 14's rawhide. The
>> builders all have Fedora 13 instal
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 4:52 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 22:43:25 +0200,
> Gland Vador wrote:
>> On 05.04.2010 14:48, Dan Horák wrote:
>> >
>> > I was trying to install i686 variant of F-13 to an Alix board (2D13 with
>> > Geode LX) and got into troubles. The kernel boots
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 06/02/2010 12:09 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> It does work in F-12, the response for the lack of support in F-13 was
>> 'deal with it'. There is suppose to be a patch to emulate it in the
>> kernel but
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I use the tools in dvb-apps so rarely that it would benefit from a maintainer
> who uses them more. This is a low maintenance package, and a fix is on its
> way to F-12+ updates repo for the only currently open bug. Ownership is
>
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Paul wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is anyone else having issues with Ev 2.31.2-2?
>
> Currently, it's refusing to expunge files (I've removed the usual
> culprits, but still nada), it's refusing to preview emails and quite
> enjoys crashing with a segmentation fault. If I doubl
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:25 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
> Has anyone been tinkering with Lightspark in Fedora
> (http://www.osnews.com/story/2/Lightspark_Reaches_Beta_Status
> and http://lightspark.sourceforge.net/ )
>
> Seems interesting even if there is a way to go yet before it is really usabl
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 6:35 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-06-12 at 08:22 +0200, Iain Arnell wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> > The current url is
>> > pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/ and that works with git:// and
>> > ssh://.
>>
>> Any chance of making
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 10:09 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
>> No announcement was made that there was an update available for testing.
>
> I know it's a PITA, but it's generally worth reading the updates-testing
> reports that get mailed
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm orphaning google-gadgets -- there are trivial crashing bugs (like
> Miro before it switched away from xulrunner, the crashes do not
> terminate the application itself, but in the age of abrt, do generate
> a lot of sp
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 7:23 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 6/25/10 10:50 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> Until AutoQA is in place to tackle this, the obvious option is for there
>> to be a process improvement whereby whoever's doing stable update p
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Chen Lei wrote:
> 2010/6/30 Michael Schwendt :
>> On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 14:04:51 +0800, Chen wrote:
>>
>>> 2010/6/30 Rich Mattes :
>>> > Hi all,
>>> >
>>> > I'm trying to build a package that has a BuildRequires: libjpeg-devel in
>>> > Rawhide [1]. I get a message
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Will Woods writes:
>> On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 15:04 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Yes I can. I have two critpath packages that are in testing with
>>> security bugs, both pretty small and easy to test, and both still have
>>> karma zero. That seems
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 8:37 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 06/30/2010 03:29 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Will Woods writes:
>>> On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 15:04 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Yes I can. I have two critpath packages that are in testing wi
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 4:06 AM, Dave Young wrote:
> On 07/01/15 at 09:08am, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 1:36 AM, Dave Young wrote:
>> > Pratyush,
>> >
>> > Thanks for the effort, let's cc Fedora devel list, see if we can get help
&g
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 11:59:47AM +, opensou...@till.name wrote:
>> libgnomecups orphan, ajax, alexl, caillon, 2 weeks ago
>> caolanm, group::gnome-sig, hadess,
>> johnp,
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 09:21:29AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>> On Tue, 2015-07-07 at 13:04 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> > Looks as if there's a lot of fall out from this.
>> >
>> > rpm -qi says "GNOME library for CUPS integr
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 04:38:52PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> There's no deliberate dependency. Maybe ocaml-lablgtk has a binding
>> for it, but we'd just drop that if the library is obsolete.
>
> Apparently the dependency chai
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Thomas Daede wrote:
> I currently use Mumble quite a bit, but it has been orphaned in F22+. I
> have emailed the previous maintainer but didn't get a response.
>
> I would be interested in maintaining the package, but this would be the
> first that I have done for
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Jonathan Underwood
wrote:
> On 14 July 2015 at 23:01, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>
>> I just got a bug filed against my package not working with Python 3.5
>> ... in *Ubuntu*?! That sort of thing never happens since normally
>> Fedora is usually so far ahead of
>>> Furthermore, I run my rawhide machine today and tried `dnf update`,
>>> which didn't offer me the update of the evolution-data-server. I'd
>>> expect to have it offered after two days of the koji build.
>>>
>>> Maybe I missed some policy/update change?
>>>
>> Hi again,
>> it looks like a
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 1:27 PM, David Tardon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:46:51PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> Any problems rebuilding either open a bug or feel free to email me or
>> ping me on IRC (my freenode nick is 'redi') and I'll be happy to help.
>
> This is a work-in-p
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Tomas Tomecek wrote:
> I can see that RCs of development version of kernel are being built in
> rawhide.
> Which is really great to test new stuff. But I would be pretty scared to run
> RC
> kernel normally.
No, I don't see how that adds value, the kernels RCs
>> > I can see that RCs of development version of kernel are being built in
>> > rawhide.
>> > Which is really great to test new stuff. But I would be pretty scared to
>> > run RC
>> > kernel normally.
>>
>> No, I don't see how that adds value, the kernels RCs are generally OK
>> and how is it an
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 01:00:26PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> A bunch of packages depend on /usr/bin/execstack, provide by prelink.
>> If prelink goes away, they'll be ftbfs immediately. What is
>> the plan here? Can we mov
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 2:34 AM, Dan Callaghan wrote:
> Excerpts from paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade's message of 2015-07-27 00:05
> +10:00:
>> Should I make the doc packages arch specific?
>
> Rather than trying to make Sphinx spit out bitwise-identical output on
> every arch (which sounds like
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 4:37 AM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
wrote:
> 2015-07-27 22:34 GMT-03:00 Dan Callaghan :
>> Excerpts from paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade's message of 2015-07-27 00:05
>> +10:00:
>>> Should I make the doc packages arch specific?
>>
>> Rather than trying to make Sphinx sp
> * Firefox is still Gtk2 (and there is only one Martin Stránský
> working on the transition, and although he is an übermensch,
> the transition is still far from complete
It's been running on GTK3 in Fedora since F-22.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorap
>> > Perhaps it is time that we evaluate where i686 stands in Fedora more
>> > closely. For a starting suggestion, I would recommend that we do not
>> > treat it as a release blocking architecture. This is not the same as
>> > demotion to secondary architecture status. That has broader
>> > impl
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-08-18 at 10:21 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Tue, 2015-07-21 at 12:36 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/pyorbit.git/plain/dead.package
>> >
>> > > last user has been retired, package E
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 9:19 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> We have a bug report [1] that 'dnf fedup download' fails on aarch64.
> The error is:
> Error: Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'updates' from
> 'https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=updates-released-f23&arch=aarc
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 5:38 AM, Kaleb KEITHLEY wrote:
> I must have missed some announcement?
>
> Submitting from an up to date f22 box I get:
You need python-fedora-0.5.5-1 , it's in updates-testing, announcement was:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2015-August/213557.html
> %
>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 5:38 AM, Kaleb KEITHLEY
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I must have missed some announcement?
>>>
>>> Submitting from an up to date f22 box I get:
>>
>>
>> You need python-fedora-0.5.5-1 , it's in updates-testing, announcement
>> was:
>>
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/de
Fedora 23 Alpha Release Announcement for aarch64 and POWER
==
The Fedora 23 Alpha is here, right on schedule for our planned
October final release. Download the prerelease from our Get Fedora
site:
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora-sec
>> > I would like to propose that the no-bundled-libraries policy be
>> > amended as follows: "Any package that has an existing mechanism to
>> > link against a shared system library and functions correctly when
>> > doing so must link against that library and not bundle it
>> > internally.
>> > A
> На 12.09.2015 в 08:48, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski написа:
Question is how to deal with these because they appear to be in the
hundreds ?
>>>
>>>
>>> How many, exactly? We have around 2 SRPMs in the distribution.
>>
>>
>
> From today's Rawhide snapshot my script counted
Fedora 23 Beta Release Announcement for AARCH64 and POWER architectures
===
The Fedora 23 Beta is here for AARCH64 and POWER architectures, right
on schedule for our planned October final release! Want to help make
Fedora 23 be th
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>
>> > [trustedqsl]
>> > tqsllib-devel-2.4-9.fc23.1.i686 requires tqsllib(x86-32) =
>> > 0:2.4-9.fc23
>> > tqsllib-devel-2.4-9.fc23.1.x86_64 requires tqsllib(x86-64) =
>> > 0:2.
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Kalpa Welivitigoda
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> How can I update to f23 beta from f22?
Same way as on other releases, with fedup (see thread on this list
against the release announcement for details) or "dnf distro-sync" as
per docs [1]
Peter
[1]
https://fedoraproject
ote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Peter Robinson
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Kalpa Welivitigoda
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi all,
>>> >
>>> > How can I update to f23 beta from
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 6:20 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> On 09/24/2015 07:12 PM, Christopher wrote:
>> I don't really understand what's going on with the netbeans-platform
>> package, or why accumulo would be affected. Upstream accumulo doesn't have
>> any dependencies on netbeans. Before I try
>> >> > [trustedqsl]
>> >> > tqsllib-devel-2.4-9.fc23.1.i686 requires tqsllib(x86-32) =
>> >> > 0:2.4-9.fc23
>> >> > tqsllib-devel-2.4-9.fc23.1.x86_64 requires tqsllib(x86-64) =
>> >> > 0:2.4-9.fc23
>> >
>> >
>> > This is due to the fact that upstream puts both the application and libra
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 9:06 PM, Les Howell wrote:
> Hi, everyone...
> I have been trying for three days now to mount a galaxy phone to my F22
> system.
> Problems: Phone does not mount.
> Things checked:
> 1. Nautilus does not have the side pane any longer. I re
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 3:23 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any possibility to have Erlang 18.1 on F23?
Too late, we're post beta so it should be polish and bugfixes now.
Even with the current release there''s a whole bunch of erlang
packages that are FTBFS. It should be landning
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Les Howell wrote:
> Hi, everyone,
> I just had a thought about IoT for the future...
>
> In a typical house for one of us, I suspect that our current
> modems supply up to 25 or 30 connections when we have company, given
> cellphones, desktops, lapt
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> Hello All!
> Yes, It's a bit too late. Also I *personally* believe this release is
> a little bit fragile - some new features (maps) are still unstable.
> See these threads for further details (unfortunately they are in third
> Erlang develo
On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 4:43 AM, Jerry James wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
>> polymakejjames, rmattes
>
> At long last I have been able to fix this. The polymake maintainers,
> based on their experience with some unspecified Linux distributions,
> n
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
> Sorry about this. Peter Robinson sent me mail about this issue.
> I've updated tracker to 1.1.1 from 1.0.2, but have not announced this.
>
> We need to rebuild brasero, rygel and some packages. We should have no
> issu
>> If the udpate broke packages: a) it should not have been updated on stable
>> releases (was it?),
>
> Two updates have been filed hours ago,
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/json-c-0.12-1.fc20
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/json-c-0.12-1.el6
>
> and it seems the upgrade
>> You're not quite right about how the overlay works.
>>
>> The default in-memory overlay is just 512MB. And the device-mapper docs
>> note that "if it fills up the snapshot will become useless and be
>> disabled, returning errors."[1].
>>
>> You should also note that the overlay is a block-level
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 8:36 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 03:16:30PM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> > * Rawhide tracks glibc master.
>> > * Fedora release is branched from Rawhide.
>> > * glibc release is made upstream.
>> > * Fedora branch is rebased on glibc upstream rele
commit a62da7915f58e0fb99033cf9e48d9368602a32b1
Author: Peter Robinson
Date: Sun Aug 17 17:31:07 2014 +
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_22_Mass_Rebuild
perl-Syntax-Feature-Loop.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a
Christopher,
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 4:24 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
> I haven't seen any efforts from Claudio or whosoever to rebuild all
> mono packages (it's a MUST as Mono is not a _small_ package, he could
> use koji or his personal computer to do that) and feedback the results
> (most of s
>> > What's the rationale here? I mean, we have so many dependencies, if
>> > you want to minimize them, you have a lng way to go...
>>
>> When I bootstrapped Fedora for ARM way back when, I had to deal with
>> these dependencies. A lot. Finding a minimal set of RPMs to
>
> Well, Fedora is no
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:41 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Ter, 2014-08-26 at 15:57 -0600, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
>> Guys, does anyone know what's up with this (in mock_output.log):
>>
>> ...
>> Start: build setup for iwhd-1.6-12.fc22.src.rpm
>> ERROR:
>> Exception(/var/tmp/koji/tasks/63
>>> It's a package that fakes systemd presence in system. It's solely
>>> intended for Docker images as we don't want systemd there (at least
>>> as long as it takes to prepare systemd-container Michal is working
>>> on). I made a mistake and it ended up being pulled in buildroot.
>>>
>>> Ping me o
Hi All,
I intend on retiring celt. It's long been merged into opus EOL
upstream and opus provides a lot more. There's no packages in Fedora
that depend on it any longer.
Peter
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code o
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As I was curious of any of my packages depends on
> any of these I've run some repoqueries to see what
> depends on these, and we still have a ton of
> dependencies on these.
>
> So unless we want to drop a ton of packages, we really
>> >> on http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/199113
>> >> *you* complain about systemd-readahead - guess what - if a virtual
>> >> machine is detected it is skipped
>> >
>> > And why is it a good idea to skip it on a virtual machine?
>>
>> guess what happens if you fire up 20
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Robert Rati wrote:
> I noticed that some updates to java packages have moved the jar file
> locations or changed the jar name, which has broken symlinks in dependent
> packages. I know log4j12 changed the location of the jar and
> org.eclipse.osgi_3.10.0.v20140731
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 9:42 PM, poma wrote:
> On 11.10.2014 21:17, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> Poma, please remember the code of conduct in regards to your subject line.
>> Remember, this is done by volunteers working to build something, and no one
>> is acting in bad faith. Using sardonic language
Hi All,
A new version of the libimobiledevice stack is on it's way to rawhide.
There's some soname bumps but I'll deal with any rebuilds necessary.
Peter
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedo
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> Yep, this again. I'm just as thrilled as you are. 3.5 is necessary for
> proper ppc64le support, as well as some minor radeonsi features in Mesa.
And massively improved aarch64 support
> One problem this time around appears to be python-ll
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 04:47:29PM +0200, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
>> >> [cduce]
>> >>cduce-0.5.5-9.fc21.armv7hl requires ocaml(Camlp4) =
>> >> 0:ebd368022fd2bc7b305a42902efa4c90
>>
>> This fails to rebuild:
>> https://koji.fedorapro
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-10-17 at 19:16 +0200, Sergio Pascual wrote:
>> 2014-10-17 16:00 GMT+02:00 Peter Robinson :
>
>> So I'm OK with retiring python-llvmpy if a patch doesn't appear soon.
>
> I would be too, but I&
I'm pleased to announce the arrival of the Fedora Alpha release for the
ARM aarch64 architecture. Feel free to take it for a drive [1].
The initial release of Fedora for aarch64 focuses on the Fedora Base and Server
product with support for hardware plarforms such as the APM Storm
platform includi
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 7:39 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> Hi folks! Here is your start-of-the-week blocker bug status report.
>
> We currently have the following open accepted blockers which need to be
> resolved for RC2:
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1156354 - "ValueError:
> c
I'm pleased to announce the arrival of the Fedora Alpha release for the POWER
ppc64 and ppc64le architectures. Feel free to take it for a drive [1].
This release of Fedora for POWER focuses on the Fedora Base and Server product
with support for existing big endian hardware plarforms as well as new
Hi,
> there has been a request to move
> golang-googlecode-net-0-0.16.hg90e232e2462d.fc21 package [1] into stable
> from 2014-10-17 14:18:36. Taskotron checks passed. Now it is almost two
> weeks since that time. Moreover, builds for this package can not be moved to
> buildroot-overrides.
Well th
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 2:15 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/AArch64/F21_Alpha/Installation
>
> What's this?
A cut and paste error.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fed
> Is there way how to setup some virtual network inteface, which would
> always work, no matter if I use ethernet, wireles, VPN or whatever else
> network connection on background?
>
> * It is pretty annoying that every time I change my location, I have to
> change configuration of my virtual machi
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>>
>> Today is also the Alpha freeze[4]. This means that only packages which
>> fix accepted blocker or freeze exception bugs[5][6] will be marked as
>> 'stable' and included in the Alp
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 1:16 AM, David Airlie wrote:
> So the rebuild to use hardened builds by default in rawhide, broke X.org.
>
> Thanks guys, my system is more secure, but I can't run any apps.
>
> Anyways enough snark from me, the problem seems to be that hardening
> makes bind now override RT
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 9:38 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Hi,
> in case some of you are interested it is possible to run Fedora 21 on
> Raspberry Pi 2 with few tweaks -
> http://jonarcher.info/2015/02/getting-fedora-21-raspberry-pi-2/
There's a lot of discussion of the RiPi2 on the arm l
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> The default CFLAGS set by RPM include “-mtune-atom”.
That's for i686 only
> Why? I doubt Atom CPUs are Fedora's primary target. It's not even a
> documented GCC option. There is such a wide variety of CPUs under this
> label that it's n
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:08 AM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> After a brief flirtation with a FreeRDP 1.2.1-beta snapshot, we
> concluded that the API breakage was too much to handle and we've
> reverted to a slightly earlier snapshot of 1.2.0-beta.
>
> The 1.2.1 packages were briefly visible in rawh
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> The glibc team has a fix for a longstanding issue, which is that
> "instlangs" hasn't worked in the installer. This means that in a
> minimal image of about 400MB, 100MB is translation information. (Of
> course we want Fedora to be internat
> 2015-03-16 15:52 GMT+01:00 Jaroslav Reznik :
>
> = Proposed Self Contained Change: Disabled Repositories Support =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DisabledRepoSupport
>
>
> "Disabled Repositories Support" sounds better than "Help People Install
> Non-Free Software in Fedora", but the res
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:46 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2015-03-19, Elio Maldonado wrote:
>> nss-3.18 was released. Please see the upstream release notes at
>>
>> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Projects/NSS/NSS_3.18_release_notes
>>
> It took only 7 years to make TLS 1.2 default
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Mar 17, 2015 3:30 PM, "Chris Murphy" wrote:
>>
>> What's it going to take to fix this? Ubuntu supports it, openSUSE
>> supports it, GRUB 2 has supported it for many years now.
>>
>> This is a 2.5 year old bug, with patches to fix the probl
>> >> What's it going to take to fix this? Ubuntu supports it, openSUSE
>> >> supports it, GRUB 2 has supported it for many years now.
>> >>
>> >> This is a 2.5 year old bug, with patches to fix the problem for ~9
>> >> months, which have been tested and work
>> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> The end result would be that we don't show applications that have
> failed the previous two releases mass rebuilds in GNOME Software i.e.
> we don't show f19 packages in f21, and we don't show f20 packages in
> f22. Should be pretty non-cont
Fedora 22 Alpha Release Announcement
The Fedora 22 Alpha release for the AARCH64 and POWER 64 secondary architectures
has arrived, with a preview of the latest free and open source technology under
development. Take a peek inside!
• Get Fedora 22 Alpha Serve
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Eike Rathke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> icu-54.1-2.fc23 armv7hl had a build failure when executing test cases
> for number formatting, see
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9469050
> Same happened building icu-54.1-3.fc22, but the logs are gone.
>
> Howeve
>> > icu-54.1-2.fc23 armv7hl had a build failure when executing test cases
>> > for number formatting, see
>> > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9469050
>> > Same happened building icu-54.1-3.fc22, but the logs are gone.
>> >
>> > However, I tried to reproduce building armv7hl f22
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Robert Rati wrote:
>> oozie rrati, coolsvap, moceap
>
>
> This break occurred because of a very late change (April 22) to enable
> building/running the hadoop ecosystem on ARM. A dependency broke during
> that set of changes and will need to be l
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Björn Persson wrote:
> Kalev Lember wrote:
>> In two weeks we will be entering the F22 Final Freeze. At that point,
>> Fedora release engineering retires any packages that still have broken
>> dependencies in the F22 tree.
>
> Do you mean that they'll be retired
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Björn Persson wrote:
> Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Björn Persson
>> wrote:
>> > Kalev Lember wrote:
>> >>Package (co)maintainers
>> >>
>> > Kalev Lember wrote:
>> >>Package (co)maintainers
>> >>
>> >> aunit landgraf
>> >> aws landgraf
>> >> florist landgraf
>> >> gnatcolllandgraf
>> >> ma
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 04/28/2015 09:10 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
>> On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 16:33 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
>>> My concern is that there's probably a lot of 3rd party apps that use
>>> gnutls. Even if it's just as simple as rebuilding, i
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Björn Persson wrote:
> Peter Robinson wrote:
>> I'm having issues with:
>> aws
>> gnatcoll
>> matreshka
>>
>> All of which have issues other than gnat 5. If you could have a look
>> at those and if you need help
Fedora 22 Beta Release Announcement
===
The Fedora 22 Beta release for aarch64 and POWER secondary architecutres
has arrived, with a preview of the latest free and open source technology
under development. Take a peek inside!
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora
On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 10:13 PM, Björn Persson wrote:
> Peter Robinson wrote:
>> That built, update submitted, just gnatcoll and matreshka to go.
>
> OK, here we go:
> · one patch to Gnatcoll for GCC 5
> · one patch to Matreshka for GCC 5
> · another patch to build M
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 10:39 PM, Björn Persson wrote:
> Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 10:13 PM, Björn Persson wrote:
>> > OK, here we go:
>> > · one patch to Gnatcoll for GCC 5
>> > · one patch to Matreshka for GCC 5
>> > · ano
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 3:40 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 12:31:46AM +1000, Philip Rhoades wrote:
>> People,
>>
>> I have been watching the dnf arguments over the last year or so with a
>> little interest but now I am exposed to an actual problem - I have been
>> making V
On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 8:00 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> I was just about to file a bug.
>
> rsync-3.1.1-3.fc21..rpm contains these unit files:
> /usr/lib/systemd/system/rsyncd.service
> /usr/lib/systemd/system/rsyncd.socket
> /usr/lib/systemd/system/rsyncd@.service
>
> rsync-3.1.1-3.fc22..rpm does n
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Timotheus Pokorra
wrote:
> Hello Dan,
>
> I was made aware on IRC, that Claudio or myself should answer this question.
>
>> as Mono 4 adds support for the ppc64le architecture (and aarch64
>> support was probably added earlier), we (the Secondary arches team)
>> w
>> > as Mono 4 adds support for the ppc64le architecture (and aarch64
>> > support was probably added earlier), we (the Secondary arches team)
>> > would like to see a full bootstrap and subsequent update of %
>> > mono_arches
>> >
>> > For any questions regarding secondary arches, please don't hes
201 - 300 of 1607 matches
Mail list logo
