Re: systemd (Was Re: tmpfs for strategic directories)

2010-06-11 Thread Paul Jakma
lex, logical dependencies which are not visible to systemd, and hence which apps will still have to deal with and resolve between themselves. In short, we will still need that app-layer. We need to consider how that impacts architecturally on the worth of solving a subset of problems in a lower

Re: systemd (Was Re: tmpfs for strategic directories)

2010-06-11 Thread Paul Jakma
ne/string/stream processing programming language, it's quite sad so many don't realise this and only use it to print fields by number. regards, -- Paul Jakma p...@jakma.org Key ID: 64A2FF6A Fortune: In every non-trivial program there is at least one bug. -- devel mailing lis