Have a look at this bug for instance:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_activity.cgi?id=531343
It was closed two months ago as "WORKSFORME", still ABRT adds more and
more users to the Cc-list.
Obviously something is not working for someone, but ABRT seems to ignore
the fact that the bug is closed
On 19. aug. 2011 16:00, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 08/19/2011 12:35 PM, Steve Grubb wrote:
>> On Friday, August 19, 2011 03:41:33 AM Tim Waugh wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 16:52 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
It's not so much cups start up being slow as discovering network
pri
configuration of IPv6-servers a lot
easier, as you do not need to turn off dynamic addresses to give the
server a static address.
(I'd love to have the same feature in IPv4 too, but currently my main
focus is IPv6, so that is my main cincern right now).
Rgds.
Ola Thoresen
--
devel ma
On 14. nov. 2011 13:59, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:06:36AM +0100, Ola Thoresen wrote:
>>
>> There is - however - one option I am missing: Some form of combined
>> static and dynamic configuration.
>> IE. I want the server to obtain an IPv6
On 11/14/2011 06:43 PM, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 02:43:10PM +0100, Ola Thoresen wrote:
>>
>> So you say that both
>>
>> IPV6_AUTOCONF=yes
>> IPV6ADDR_SECONDARIES=2001:840:0:11::30/64
>>
>> Shoudl work?
>> (Have no
On 11/14/2011 11:03 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
>> This is with NetworkManager-0.9.1.90-5.git20110927.fc16.x86_64
>
> NM should allow static addresses in addition to RA/DHCP ones. While the
> UI currently might restrict that (should get fixed) I'd expect it to
> work with the right bits in the ifcfg
local users?
This was working fine on an older server, running vsftpd, but with
pam/nscd, not pam/sssd.
Rgds.
Ola Thoresen
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 15. nov. 2011 13:03, Ola Thoresen wrote:
> I have successfully set up pure-ftpd with LDAP-auth directly, instead of
> relying og sssd, and that works fine.
> Except users do not have access to folders woth "rwx"-permissions for a
> secondary-group the are member of.
>
On 15. nov. 2011 14:44, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> It should be working with *just* PAMAuthentication. Can you check to see
> if /var/log/secure is showing any errors during login?
>
> Also, please attach your /etc/pam.d/pure-ftpd
> and /etc/pam.d/password-auth files so we can see if they're
> m
>
>
> Everything here looks correct. Seems like SSSD is authenticating the
> user just fine. I'd say the bug is with pure-ftpd, then. File a BZ.
>
I'd have thought so as well, if at least one of pure-ftpd, proftpd or
vsftpd had worked.
But they all show the same symptoms.
But I filed a report ag
access some tools that is
needed by the script) then there is no need to edit any scripts, ant
this whole debate is quite meaningless...
--
_,--', _._.--._
.--.--';_'-.', ";_ _.,-' Ola Thoresen
.'--'. _.'{`'-;_ .-.&g
11 matches
Mail list logo
