Hi all,
First of all, I would like to apologize for opening a new topic, but I
wasn't signed on the list, so I can't really reply to the original
thread, "Unity For Fedora (As in OpenSUSE or Arch)"[1] by Manuel
Escudero.
I would like to clarify a few things:
* Unity is not available for openSUS
n/listinfo/test
>
>
> ___
> test-announce mailing list
> test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https:
Thanks a lot. Going for a ride with it now .)
NM
2012/2/21 Jon Ciesla :
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Nelson Marques wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please forgive my lack of knowledge, but could you please provide a
>> link to a .iso ? :)
>>
>> Thx.
>>
trial/error fixed it.
I'm going to give it a ride later and check a bit more of it.
NM
2012/2/21 Adam Williamson :
> On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 15:11 +, Nelson Marques wrote:
>> Thanks a lot. Going for a ride with it now .)
>
> For the record, we intentionally don't include a
evel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
--
Nelson Marques
// I've stopped trying to understand sandwiches with a third piece of
bread in the middle...
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
;
> Richard
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
--
Nelson Marques
// I've stopped trying to understand sandwiches with a third piece of
bread in the middle...
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedor
Is there anything I can help (main packaging related or triage/bug
fix) regarding GNOME in Fedora?
--
Nelson Marques
// I've stopped trying to understand sandwiches with a third piece of
bread in the middle...
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraprojec
Hi all,
fedora-updates-testing as a new version of ImageMagick which is
currently not updating due to inkscape (error suggests inkscape needs
to be rebuilded against the new ImageMagik libraries.
NM
--
Nelson Marques
// All that is needed for evil to triumph is that good men do nothing
No dia 26 de Abril de 2012 01:08, Stephen Gallagher
escreveu:
> On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 22:43 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>>
>> Why not just drop the sponsorship process and just raise the barrier of
>> entry for the packaging process instead?
>>
>> Like having to have been a comaintainer
No dia 26 de Abril de 2012 12:40, Adam Williamson
escreveu:
> On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 12:18 +0100, Nelson Marques wrote:
>
>> I was asked by a upstream to maintain a package for Fedora due to the
>> high demand it has from Fedora users, unfortunatly I backed down from
>>
No dia 26 de Abril de 2012 19:49, Toshio Kuratomi escreveu:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 12:58:59PM +0100, Nelson Marques wrote:
>> No dia 26 de Abril de 2012 12:40, Adam Williamson
>> escreveu:
>> > On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 12:18 +0100, Nelson Marques wrote:
>> >
&
vote box. It would result in me
> giving much more karma then I do now and speed up the process, though it
> would not handle karma for specific bugs that a specific update is
> supposed to fix.
>
> Paul
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.or
No dia 26 de Abril de 2012 21:35, Toshio Kuratomi escreveu:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 08:49:32PM +0100, Nelson Marques wrote:
>> No dia 26 de Abril de 2012 19:49, Toshio Kuratomi
>> escreveu:
>> > On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 12:58:59PM +0100, Nelson Marques wrote:
>
Dear all,
Following a previous thread debate about Unknown Horizons:
1) I'm available to maintain unknown-horizons (UH) in Fedora and EPEL (RHEL6);
2) For 1) to happen I would like to maintain also FIFE, which doesn't
seem to see much love for quite some time; I ask this because FIFE
flagship p
No dia 27 de Abril de 2012 18:44, Toshio Kuratomi escreveu:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 12:44:01PM -0400, Rich Mattes wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Nelson Marques
>> wrote:
>>
>> 1) How to check who currently maintains those packages;
>>
>
ackage the sponsor has reviewed. Doing
> packaging and reviewing a package is one thing, being intimately familiar
> with the packaged software is another. Review-time testing of the packaged
> software is only a SHOULD in the guidelines. It is assumed that the
> package submitter is familiar wi
fe-libs (the dynamic shared objects, not supported by upstream in any way)
- fife-devel
Any comments? Simon?
[1] - http://fifengine.de
--
Nelson Marques
// I've stopped trying to understand sandwiches with a third piece of
bread in the middle...
--
devel mailing list
devel@list
2012/5/11 Toshio Kuratomi :
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 08:20:47PM +0100, Nelson Marques wrote:
>> The FIFE[1] Engine package in Fedora in the past provided public
>> static and shared objects; From one of my talks with 'prock' from
>> upstream he stated that:
>&g
st welcome.
--
Nelson Marques
// I've stopped trying to understand sandwiches with a third piece of
bread in the middle...
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Thanks, looks cool to me, I'll use that if there are no objections :)
2012/5/14 Richard Shaw :
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Nelson Marques wrote:
>> One of the packages I'm submitting for Unknown Horizons support
>> (python-enet or pyenet) has no real version a
Hi all,
Is there a %fdupes macro that packagers can use in %install? If not,
whats the current policy regarding using fdupes in %install? Any
recommended scriptlet or it's just a 'don't do it' policy ?
NM
--
Nelson Marques
// I've stopped trying to understand sandwic
Richard,
How can I help to make it happen ?
NM
2012/5/15 Richard Shaw :
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Nelson Marques wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Is there a %fdupes macro that packagers can use in %install? If not,
>> whats the current policy regarding us
ges/python-enet/
Maybe if you get bored you can help ;)
NM
2012/5/14 Toshio Kuratomi :
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 08:00:22PM +0100, Nelson Marques wrote:
>> Thanks, looks cool to me, I'll use that if there are no objections :)
>>
>> 2012/5/14 Richard Shaw :
>> &g
/admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
--
Nelson Marques
// I've stopped trying to understand sandwiches with a third piece of
bread in the middle...
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
If anyone can help with reviewing this 2 topics, it would be awesome,
considering that UH is on the Games SIG wishlist
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718430
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744432
--
Nelson Marques
// I've stopped trying to understand sandw
Hi all,
I have a doubt regarding the '.so's' in devel packages... From my
understanding they go in devel packages to allow the installation of
several packages with different versioning
Who defined this? Is this part of some standards (ex: LSB, etc) ?
Is there some written documentation abou
Adam,
Thanks, this helps a lot understanding a bit more around shared libraries;
NM
2012/6/18 Adam Williamson
> On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 18:23 +0100, Nelson Marques wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
>> I have a doubt regarding the '.so's' in devel packages...
d i can have
> access to old specs and gits!
>
> Best Regards.
> Bersam
>
> --
> And Still Nobody Cares
> contact me:
> Gmail : Bersam.k [at] gmail
> Weblog : http://bersibug.blogspot.com
> GPG Key : 6B6B7E27
>
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lis
Hi all,
For Reference: BZ#767649
LCM is a library for message passing and data marshaling targeted at
real time systems where high-bandwidth and low latency are critical.
It provides a publish/subscribe message passing model and a XDR-style
message specification language with bindings for applica
Dangerous road you follow. Best of luck.
On Jul 19, 2012 11:23 AM, "Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ)" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This morning, I woke up to the news that a group of developers have
> managed to successfully make Ubuntu's Unity Desktop work on Fedora 17[1].
> What kind of work would be needed to get
> It would be better to think of this as a starting point for porting
> and to work out the packaging issue instead of an enduser consumable.
> Porting Unity outside of Ubuntu is not going to be easy for anyone.
> There's a reason why its not in Debian yet at all.
Jeff,
The GNOME:Ayatana repo was
2012/7/19 Jef Spaleta :
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Nelson Marques
> wrote:
>> Are you ready to accept patches on GTK+ and potentially on Xorg that
>> were declined from upstream? This should be your initial thoughts!
>
> Can you point me to the relevant dis
2012/7/19 Jef Spaleta :
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Nelson Marques
> wrote:
>> I've asked Ken to provide me some additional info on this; I will mail
>> tomorrow or during the weekend the links to this list.
>
> Let's get an accurate picture of what is
m
> drop most of their menu-related patches.
>
> This work was done in cooperation with Canonical, and we've invested
> considerable effort into narrowing the gap - or preventing it from
> becoming a permantent rift.
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproj
Hi,
I would like to make available to f17 and f16 a package I currently
own and maintain (currently only available for f18, EL5 and EL6); What
would be right procedure?
NM
--
Nelson Marques
// Before all else, be armed!
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
Thanks. I've asked recently on the IRC but my VPN was causing strange
issues and I got disconnected.
NM
2012/7/20 Kevin Fenzi :
> On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 21:42:53 +0100
> Nelson Marques wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to make available to f17 and f16 a package
2012/7/24 Kevin Kofler :
> Nelson Marques wrote:
>> + 043_ubuntu_menu_proxy.patch ( to export menus through DBus, this
>> one is still used, and if I understood correctly, this is currently
>> the only remnant of non-upstreamed patches and I believe it was
>> decli
Dear all,
I've submitted an update to LCM for EL5 and EL6:
* https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lcm-0.9.2-1.el5
* https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lcm-0.9.2-1.el6
While 0.9.2 doesn't bring any 'proffit' to Linux users, 0.9.1 does, specially:
- add --flush-interval option to perio
Question: Does this affect mock builds on koji ?
NM
2012/12/21 Kevin Fenzi :
> Just a heads up to everyone using f18 right now:
>
> with fedora-release-18-1 that just pushed out to updates-testing
> yesterday, the updates-testing repo is now by default disabled.
>
> This means you may well see so
39 matches
Mail list logo
