Weird, I know I am submitting a f16 update to f16. So not sure why
mine isn't going. I tried two different packages of mine and still
gives me a problem.
Though with one "clex", after I run fedpkg build, after koji
finishes, it gives me:
BuildError: package clex is blocked for tag f16-updates-can
I am not able to submit packages as an update through bodhi web interface
nor via fedpkg update. I have the package in F15, but I am trying to send it
to F16 and both ways give me the error that "newlisp not tagged as an update
candidate"
Also I get a weird error for clex when I run fedpkg build "
file
through git. The problem is getting bodhi to accept the package as an update
for F16.
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 5:57 PM, John5342 wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 18:22, Nathan O. wrote:
> > I am not able to submit packages as an update through bodhi web interface
> > nor
I am looking at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text .
It sounds to me that upstream must provide the COPYING file. I am reviewing
pipebench at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731219
The issue with the one the upstream author provided contained some
Hmm seems like there is either a spammer or an non-spam account's user has
got a virus or so.
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 8:49 PM, nayan kumar wrote:
> .Do you want to be a sex-machine?
> http://lelunapark.com/com.friend.php?xID=37si9
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> http
I am curious or maybe giving an idea, but I have my package listed there and
currently there is an update for the package I have added to the list. Well
I have the package in bodhi, which I believe is in testing right now. The
problem is that the URM(Upstream release monitoring) keeps opening a ne
11, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Nathan O. wrote:
> > I am curious or maybe giving an idea, but I have my package listed there
> and
> > currently there is an update for the package I have added to the list.
> Well
> > I have the package in bodhi, which I believe is in testing right now
Thanks for all the help, and glad it seemed to help you find a issue with
URM, Till
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 09:35:33AM -0500, Nathan O. wrote:
> > I am curious or maybe giving an idea, but I have my package lis
Thanks, and your welcome
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 03:07:11PM -0500, Nathan O. wrote:
> > Thanks for all the help, and glad it seemed to help you find a issue with
> > URM, Till
>
> Thank you for the report. I dug a little
Curious to know, I am thinking about getting a Yubikey to use on FAS and
other related logins. I seen you must burn the key. I am concidering getting
the Yubikey with the Lasspass subscription included. The question is, if I
burn the key first then is it still usuable on Lastpass? I am assuming tha
Enjoy your two-week vacation :)
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 1:23 PM, seth vidal wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 21:19 +0300, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > just to let you know - I'm taking a two-week holiday starting
> > tomorrow, during which time I probably won't have internet access. So,
I think requiring a minium sized password that is pretty long, like maybe
15-20 or larger. The chance of somebody cracking those sized passwords would
be smaller. Also I know there was a previous issue about the Yubikey as part
of security. In my opinion requiring a 15-20 long password added with a
Thanks for the help, I will put this email in Saved so I will have it later.
:-)
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Mario Ceresa wrote:
> Hello all!
>
> I'm an happy possessor of a yubikey and I use it both for FAS
> authentication and for ssh access.
>
> The configuration is the following:
>
> slo
If it is a new version from upstream then the release will be 1 but if you
are updating the SPEC file you would increment the release number.
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> This is my first time as a contributor to run into this.
>
> Do I simply need to increment by relea
Well there may be a chance this tool may eventually become officially
adopted by QA after it gets tested and used long enough to consider it
safe/stable.
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 7:48 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky <
sochotni...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Excerpts from "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"'s message of Mon
15 matches
Mail list logo
