We are ready to help with other modules or issues with migration on
> seli...@lists.fedoraproject.org mailing list.
>
>
> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SELinuxPolicyStoreMigration
>
> Petr
>
--
Miroslav Grepl
Senior Software Engineer, SELinux Solutions
Red Hat, Inc.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
iming would
be helpful.
Thanks.
Mirek
>
> Thanks a lot to everybody who already tested this!
>
> Please test the new version, any feedback much appreciated!
>
> Lennart
>
--
Miroslav Grepl
Senior Software Engineer, SELinux Solutions
Red Hat, Inc.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 08/06/2015 01:47 PM, Miroslav Grepl wrote:
> On 07/31/2015 08:49 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> On Thu, 30.07.15 19:57, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) wrote:
>>
>>> Heya!
>>>
>>> I'd like to ask everybody to test kdbus on Rawhide. Jos
ples as my next step.
Thx.
>
> Cheers!
>
> --alec
>
> [3] https://github.com/fedora-selinux/selinux-policy/issues/38
>
>
>
>
--
Miroslav Grepl
Senior Software Engineer, SELinux Solutions
Red Hat, Inc.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
ace upstream obtained on F20 and F21 policy.
For example, we should do a better job for bugs like
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098446
I will attach an upstream discussion related to this topic.
And of course we want to get real results/numbers once it is a part of
rawhide by
off and be mounted only very late at
> boot. Is that a problem for this proposal, and if not, why not?
>
> Does this require changes in systemd? Does this require changes
> anywhere in the core OS, outside of selinux' own userspace?
>
> And so on...
>
> Lennart
>
--
causes problems you have no time to fix, you will do "selinux=0
> dnssec=0"
Whoops.
Why "selinux=0"?
Do you think it would be better to tell people to set "enforcing=0" and
collect AVCs with a report instead of saying "selinux=0"?
> --
> devel mailing list
&
On 01/20/2014 06:48 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 12:17 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 08:10:29PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
A simple "yum -y update ; reboot ; Oh, everything seems to work" has not
been enough this time. And it was an update with a s
