On Tue, 2025-01-21 at 19:18 +0100, Samyak Jain via devel-announce
wrote:
> there are 1875 failed builds
> that need to be addressed by the package maintainers.
Hi,
am I trying to rebuild my packages too early, maybe in some middle time
of the merge of the rebuild tag into the rawhide? The
On Sat, 2025-04-19 at 18:38 +0200, Peter Robinson wrote:
> You don't say which image you use, an image like XFCE would be more
> suited to a device with 2Gb of RAM than say Workstation.
Hi,
you are right, it was the Workstation (the rpi 5 did not get to the gdm
either). The Raspberry OS u
On Tue, 2025-04-29 at 19:08 +0200, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I don't know why we didn't catch this in pre-testing;
Hi,
no problem, good the change in behavior was discovered. It's not a bad
thing per se, but it's also true the gnome-software can prepare updates
in the background, at least d
Hello,
I realized I maintain the libsoup package, but everything else I
maintain and what used to use the libsoup had been ported to libsoup3
long time ago, thus it does not make much sense to me to maintain the
package I do not use, neither depend on. There are sill plenty of users
of it (
On Mon, 2025-04-14 at 18:19 +0200, Neal Gompa wrote:
> It definitely is.
Ah, I see, you are right, the dnf4 has a history entry from the pkcon.
Nice.
Bye,
Milan
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
On Mon, 2025-04-14 at 09:07 +0200, Dominic Hopf via devel wrote:
> the list of `dnf repoquery --whatrequires=libsoup`
Hi,
I see I'm dull and did not include the list, even I should. Let me
correct it now (see below).
Bye,
Milan
$ dnf repoquery --whatrequires=libsoup
Updati
On Mon, 2025-04-14 at 16:48 +0200, Neal Gompa wrote:
> Common history was always a thing.
Hi,
are you sure? The `pkcon update` is not part of the `dnf4 history`, is
it? I cannot imagine how that could be, but it's a long time I looked
on any such thing, thus I could be wrong.
Bye,
On Mon, 2025-04-14 at 16:30 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Does it mean we will finally have common history for DNF5 and G-S?
Hi,
yes, it means both the history and the cache will be common between the
two. No more disk space wasting.
Bye,
Milan
--
_
On Wed, 2025-04-16 at 14:50 +0200, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> They do a lot of special work in everything from kernel patches,
> kernel tuning, and compile time flags for many applications.
Hi,
I see, that makes sense now. Thank you both for the answer.
Bye,
Milan
--
_
Hi,
I'd like to switch gnome-software in rawhide to use a dnf5 plugin, to
move away from its dependency on the PackageKit. This had been
announced together with the dnf5 change proposal some time ago [1], but
due to some missing work on the gnome-software side it had been
postponed. As the
Hi,
just out of interest, I tried Fedora 42 Beta image on Raspberry Pi 4
with 2GB RAM and it was, well, more than sluggish. Their OS based on
the Debian Bookworm was lightning fast, using the same SD card and all
the hardware for both images.
Then I thought Raspberry Pi 5 with 8GB RAM woul
On Wed, 2025-04-16 at 13:58 +0200, Richard Shaw wrote:
> While I agree with the general premise of this change, I don't think
> it's practical for all affected packagers to browse through over 2300
> builds to look for their packages.
Hi,
sort the table by the Status column, it's easier to
On Tue, 2025-04-15 at 11:28 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> So is this using the dnf5-daemon over dbus, or is this
> directly invoking dnf5 ?
Hi,
it's using the D-Bus API, calling the dnf5daemon-server under the hood.
Bye,
Milan
--
__
On Mon, 2025-04-14 at 10:02 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> I'll wait for two weeks and unless some strong objection is arose here
> I'll do the switch to the dnf5 plugin in rawhide, for the Fedora 43.
Hi,
I just made an update for the rawhide [1] to do the switch, the
gnome
On Tue, 2025-02-18 at 09:32 +0100, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> Is there any other way to push my new code to the RPM repository?
Hi,
I usually run:
kinit u...@fedoraproject.org
before using any fedpkg command which requires the user credentials and
then it works fine. I do not know whether i
On Wed, 2025-03-12 at 00:11 +0100, Miro Hrončok via devel-announce
wrote:
> This change will land to rawhide first and later to all stable
> releases as well.
Hi,
are you really going to intentionally break all the stable releases? I
thought there is a strict policy, and a big no-no, to _n
On Mon, 2025-02-10 at 10:36 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> I believe it's time to retire the MAPI protocol in Fedora. I'll wait
> with the orphan for one week.
Hi,
as announced the last week, I just orphaned evolution-mapi and
openchange packages in the Fedora (I clicked the
Hi,
the upcoming 3.57.1 unstable release of the evolution-data-server (to
be done by the end of the next week) will contain a soname version bump
of the libcamel library. It contains several API changes incompatible
with the previous version, but with very straightforward
replacements/chang
On Wed, 2025-06-18 at 06:54 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> chatty-0:0.8.8-2.fc43.src
> elementary-calendar-0:8.0.0-2.fc42.src
> elementary-mail-0:8.0.0-2.fc42.src
> evolution-0:3.56.2-1.fc43.src
> evolution-ews-0:3.56.2-1.fc43.src
> evolution-rspam-0
Hi,
I wanted to reference a message I know is in the mailing list, but to
get its link I needed to open the web interface and search for it. To
my surprise, the search like:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/search?q=mcrha&page=1&mlist=devel%40lists.fedoraproject.org&sort=date-desc
On Fri, 2025-06-27 at 12:45 +0200, Tomi Lähteenmäki wrote:
> Chatty is now taken care of.
Hi,
thank you. The other packages are also taken care of now, thus I filled
the update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-d4c372f8cb
There will be one more soname version bump
On Fri, 2025-07-04 at 14:10 +0200, Maxwell G wrote:
> It sounds like an infra issue, so
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Hi,
thanks, I opened:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/12634
Bye,
Milan
--
__
On Mon, 2025-04-14 at 10:02 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> I'll do the switch to the dnf5 plugin in rawhide, for the Fedora 43.
Hi,
it took longer than expected, but it finally happened and the rawhide
with gnome-software-49~alpha-1.fc43 uses dnf5 instead of PackageKit
under the hood
Hi,
the upcoming 3.57.2 unstable release of the evolution-data-server (to
be done by the end of this week; I forgot to send the email earlier)
will contain a soname version bump of the libcamel library. It dropped
CamelObject from its API.
According to `dnf repoquery --whatrequires "libcam
On Thu, 2025-07-31 at 08:12 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> I'll reply to this thread once I've a side tag ready with the
> evolution-data-server built in it.
Hi,
the side-tag is f43-build-side-115950 , you can build into it with:
fedpkg build --target f43-build-side-115950
201 - 225 of 225 matches
Mail list logo
