Graphical Rescue Mode

2012-04-04 Thread Mike Manilone
the rootfs. maybe we can load everything we need to the RAM. * Be full-internationalized. Be friendly to all the people. fbterm is helpful for this feature. I don't think it's too hard to implement except the fourth one. I hope end-users (and I :-) can see the great feature in Fedora in future

Re: Graphical Rescue Mode

2012-04-04 Thread Mike Manilone
On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 11:59 +0100, Bryn M. Reeves wrote: > Maybe it would be an idea to extend livecd-tools to allow a live image > to be installed to the hard disk and booted via grub to allow a > graphical environment to boot up when the main install is hosed for > some reason. Surely it also wo

Re: Graphical Rescue Mode

2012-04-04 Thread Mike Manilone
On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 19:06 +0800, Mike Manilone wrote: > On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 11:59 +0100, Bryn M. Reeves wrote: > > Maybe it would be an idea to extend livecd-tools to allow a live image > > to be installed to the hard disk and booted via grub to allow a > > graphical e

Re: Graphical Rescue Mode

2012-04-04 Thread Mike Manilone
On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 12:05 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote: > This can be done with install dvd, > troublshoot > recsue installed system > chmod /mnt/sysimage (iirc) > startx If there's a grub entry will be more user-friendly. However, if the DVD broke, what can I do? signature.asc Description: This

Re: Graphical Rescue Mode

2012-04-04 Thread Mike Manilone
On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 12:28 +0100, Bryn M. Reeves wrote: > On 04/04/2012 12:06 PM, Mike Manilone wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 11:59 +0100, Bryn M. Reeves wrote: > >> Maybe it would be an idea to extend livecd-tools to allow a live > >> image to be installed to t

Re: Graphical Rescue Mode

2012-04-07 Thread Mike Manilone
On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 10:34 +0100, Andrew Clayton wrote: > What makes you think they'd fair any better using a shell under a GUI? > > The point being that to _rescue_ a system generally requires > underlying knowledge of the system and working in the shell > running various commands and editing c

"security" repo

2012-07-16 Thread Mike Manilone
s to it. I believe that there are people like me disabled updates repo. They are very dangerous! Please review whether this is okay. Thanks! -- ------- Regards, | 祝好 Mike Manilone http://www.ekd123.org --- signature.asc Description:

Re: "security" repo

2012-07-16 Thread Mike Manilone
於 二，2012-07-17 於 08:40 +0800，Mike Manilone 提到： > They are very dangerous! They are in danger... Typo... -- --- Regards, | 祝好 Mike Manilone http://www.ekd123.org --- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed mess

Re: "security" repo

2012-07-16 Thread Mike Manilone
於 一，2012-07-16 於 22:02 -0400，Paul Wouters 提到： > On Tue, 17 Jul 2012, Mike Manilone wrote: > > > I think we can create a new repo called "security" like Debian. Push all > > the security updates to it. > > Uhm, we have that. It is called

Re: "security" repo

2012-07-16 Thread Mike Manilone
updates but not other > updates in the background. Well. I know they are categorized and I know there's a yum plugin called "security"... Must I use the GUI? gpk-update-viewer seems that it doesn't have this option. Maybe I forgot something? -- --

Self introduction

2013-08-11 Thread Mike Manilone
iew request may last for long because libbson has no stable releases yet. I will package other software for Fedora or contribute in other ways. :-) Thank you all. Best wishes, Mike Manilone signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fed

Tcl/Tk 8.6

2013-08-14 Thread Mike Manilone
Hi all, I noticed that Tcl/Tk 8.6 isn't landed in Fedora yet, what's wrong? 8.5.13 is definitely outdated, even 8.5.14 is released. Sincerely, Mike Manilone signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject