On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> No, it does not prevent malicious attacker from subverting the
> executable. The integrity check prevents just inadvertent modification
> of the executables/libraries which contain the certified code.
Like prelink? ;-)
m
--
martin.langh...
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 8:03 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> The separate /lib directory tree seems the way to go, to me. That way
/usr/share instead of /lib seems more appropriate -
m
--
martin.langh...@gmail.com
mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect
- ask interesting questions
- don't get
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> don't want malware landing on my machine because someone did a MITM
> attack on a Fedora maintainer's unencrypted "git fetch" and inserted
> some extra patches to get pushed back to the real repository later.
The git protocol makes it extre
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 4:50 AM, JB wrote:
> I have difficulty swallowing the fact that there are so many Red Hat, Oracle,
> and other famous technology names involved (officially or dev's private
> contributions) in development of BTRFS, and at the same time they practice
> such loosely approach
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 5:10 AM, JB wrote:
> Well, then you have to read the thread more carefully before you bark back -
> right in the first OP's post you have references, e.g.
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/6/18/144
Heh - now that you provide links it's better... anyway, that's a
completely hi
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Well, if they didn't need fixed before, they'll certainly need fixed
> when you make them start keeping their configuration info someplace else
Yeah -- daemons that can be configured with commandline options or
envvars are Just Fine.
If those op
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Johannes Lips
wrote:
> Done.
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727646
>
> Hope someone is reviewing it in a short while.
thanks! Abiword (actually libabiword) is an important part of the OLPC
& Sugar desktop environment.
cheers,
m
--
martin.langh.
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> The builder I've enabled runs on the new OLPC within a chroot and that seems
> to work very well. I'm not sure if the kernel is a hfp one, but I don't
> think that was a requirement.
Excellent! The kernels we provide atm are not hfp afaik --
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 7:27 PM, Jef Spaleta wrote:
> As more projects become git based over time, the preferred form for code
> development might actually be a bisectable git checkout
+100 -- some of the git primitives seem to be here to stay - a hash
identifying a commit or tree as the key ident
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Wishlist item:
>
> At the same time that RPM allows you to bundle a git repo, perhaps we
> can finally get rid of %changelog?
I suspect that fedpkg is a better integration point. Between the
"fedora patches" branch discussed in my other
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Here's what I did:
...
> 4. Note the time from the first "date" output to the "database system is
> ready to accept connections" message getting logged
Tom,
your methodology is sound. You're too kind to say but given the
"completion criteria" of
2011/9/15 Michał Piotrowski :
> 2011/9/14 Tom Lane :
>> 3. As root, do
>> date --rfc-3339=ns ; systemctl start postgresql.service ; date --rfc-3339=ns
>
> with dropped cache
>
> date --rfc-3339=ns ; systemctl start postgresql.service ; date --rfc-3339=ns
> 2011-09-15 08:44:40.348239703+02:00
> 2011
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> The subject more or less says it all. When I startup my desktop machine
> (which thus
> is always on AC), and leave it at the gdm screen it will suspend after being
> left
> alone for 30 minutes. This is not good, since I only leave it power
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
>> 2) The machine has a server function. In this case working wake on lan and
>> stay active on lan are a must have and until we have those it should not
>> auto suspend.
>
> WOL for a network server is madness. It shouldn't have been s
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Camilo Mesias wrote:
> Thanks for the explanation... There is an alternative to endless
> explanation - roll out your best effort at a heuristic and let the
> crowd contribute to an ever growing set of exceptions.
Well, actually, people complain a lot more than wha
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 7:54 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> With this upload Fedora and Suse have already adopted /run now. Debian
> folks will suggest this for their coming release. Ubuntu has agreed with
> introducing /run as well.
Bravo!
m
--
martin.langh...@gmail.com
mar...@laptop.org
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Adam Miller
wrote:
> however, a little concerned with the precedence it is either creating or
> following in the path of.
This has behind is something IMHO bigger than FESCo: the agreement of
key maintainers across distros. That's hard enough to pull -- and it's
a
While smarter people than me fix the boostrapping of F14 on ARM, I am
looking at whether we can automate driving koji in an optimal order.
I am looking at mass-rebuild.py from the releng scripts repo; and at
yum-builddep.
- mass-rebuild gets a git checkout, bumps the rev, commits, pushes,
we don
When you open a page with Armenian characters such as
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armenian_language the font server (or
perhaps xulrunner) digs around to find a font that has that codepoint.
Often it's just one font in your system that can provide it (so if you
ask for it to be styled in serif, sa
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Putting them in your path's just going to break things.
The plan is to have them _prefixed_ in your path, and un-prefixed in a
specified directory so you can frob the path to run scripts that
expect p9 utilities.
I am not sure what this p
I am hacking on a slighly modified kernel spec file for an OLPC arm
test kernel. While chasing strange build errors, I find that
%{image_install_path} isn't always being expanded.
The resulting build script looks like
http://fpaste.org/LQwR/#82
where %{image_install_path}, defined earlier as
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Panu Matilainen
wrote:
> Hard to say without the entire spec, but one typical cause of "sometimes
> works sometimes doesn't" issues with macros are %define's inside macro
> {} blocks, which "work" until the first parametrized macro is called,
> and after that it do
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Domingo Becker wrote:
> The shortest way is by using keyboard, as Rahul says:
>
> 1. Press the key between Ctrl and Alt.
> 2. Type in what you search, at least the first letters. After that,
> some icons are shown and you may use up and down arrow keys to select.
>
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> You know, I'd prefer if you take up your beef with "ls" first. Have you
> ever compared the output of "ls" and of "ls | cat"? And that's just the
> most obvious case.
Indeed, ls, grep, git and many many modern cli tools use this conven
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> The future
> --
>
> Defining the purpose of Fedora updates is outside the scope of Fesco.
> However, we note that updates intended to add new functionality are more
> likely to result in user-visible regressions, and updates that alt
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>> 3) Sufficient testing of software inherently requires manual
>> intervention by more than one individual.
>>
> This isn't entirely true either.
#3 is so true that is central to what distros are about. Upstream
probably released a good upda
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 7:39 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> You're willing to say that if I update one of my packages that has a script
> of 30 lines, is a leaf node, and the update is to give the script an
> optional argument to print output to stdout instead of writing to a file
> that I'm incapabl
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Stable_Release_Updates_Proposal
>
> Here is the link. I'm going to start a new thread here.
Thanks for drafting this. Would it make sense to look at the API &
coupling dimension?
When a package provides an AP
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> As of tomorrow's rawhide [1], gnome-session will no longer treat
> llvmpipe as an unsupported driver. This means gnome-shell will run even
> on hardware without a native 3D driver, including virt guests.
>
> There are probably bugs! I've done
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Details of rawhide builds for them here[1], the XO-1 build isn't
> tested but the XO 1.5 one works fine, I'll be testing further and
> likely the next build I do I'll add all the components to test the
> llvmpipe feature on them.
>
> [1] http
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> My problem came in the case where someone has already *not* done this -
> they've updated f16 separately from, and more than, master, and I wanted
> to get them back in sync.
If you want to keep merging as long as possible, and you are in
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> Fedora 17 will locate the entire base operating system in /usr. The
> directories
> /bin, /sbin, /lib, /lib64 will only be symlinks:
> /bin → /usr/bin
Interesting!
Do we need to teach rpm / yum about the equivalence, when resolving
depende
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Assuming /bin -> /usr/bin link is packaged, yes.
Wow, it follows the symlink created by a 3rd package.
clever,
m
--
martin.langh...@gmail.com
mar...@laptop.org -- Software Architect - OLPC
- ask interesting questions
- don't get d
On Jan 30, 2012 5:37 PM, "James Antill" wrote:
> > > For a trivial example -- if package A depends on /bin/foo, will yum &
> > > rpm be satisfied with /usr/bin/foo?
> >
> > Assuming /bin -> /usr/bin link is packaged, yes.
>
> No, not in any meaningful way, although I assume all of the problems
>
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) said:
> When calculating local on-system provides, it should - in fact, I'd be
> surprised if it doesn't. Admins sometimes move directories around and
> replace them with symlinks.
Well, that's a very differ
for my laptop. I'm sure many running rawhide will want
it :-) -- upgrade/test/file bugs if it breaks/rollback if it's real bad.
cheers,
m
{ Martin Langhoff - one laptop per child }
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 8:30 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 15.02.2012 14:25, schrieb Miloslav Trmač:
>> I haven't seen this work and I don't think such snaphots can be relied
>> upon: /boot, /etc and /var are affected by installs as well
Miroslav -- you haven't seen this work because the tasks ar
Hi Fedorans,
we are facing a very strange Python segfault in an OLPC build, based
on F14, for XO-1.5 (I know, do you remember _that_ far ago?).
The state of the OS and disk is well known, but we cannot make it
happen at will. So I got my hands on a coredump, installed the exact
same OS (so exact
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Jan Kratochvil
wrote:
> All those GDB messages mean your system libraries do not match the core file.
Well, that should just not be. The machine that fails, and my machine
have both been installed from the same disk image, which gets written
to disk with a process
Hi John,
thanks for the reply - looping back devel@lfo and devel@llo...
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 5:14 PM, John Gilmore wrote:
> Irreproducible bugs are a real pain.
Indeed --
> Try typing "info files" to gdb and see what sections it sees in the
> core file and in the executable.
I can't make m
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 1:57 AM, Jan Kratochvil
wrote:
>> And both machines pass rpm -Va just fine. So the binaries should, um,
>> be the same.
> +
>> It is a core from yesterday,
>
> There can be difference one of the machines has the files prelink-ed while the
> other one does not. prelink runs
Mar 2012 20:46:16 +0100, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>> Argh, that could be. But our kernel is a custom built rpm,
>
> You have a bug for Fedora there, in the core file by readelf -l:
> Program Headers:
> Type Offset VirtAddr PhysAddr FileSiz MemSiz Flg Align
> [...]
>
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:12 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> That electricity would be eaten up on developer workstations...
...flaming endlessly on a topic where
- the glibc patch is clear
- the external workaround (which avoids changing glibc) is trivial
and has been posted
m
--
martin.la
Hello list,
Fedora currently ships nxt_python 0.7 (packaged by John McLean) -- a
library to generate Lego NXT bytecode from python.
The upstream library has moved forward under a new lead developer
(Marcus Wanner, cc'd). The current code - nxt 2.0.1 - uses the same
name, but breaks API.
Upstream
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
>> - Work with John to upgrade nxt_python from 0.7 to 2.0.1, break with
>> the past. Unclear whether it is widely used (do we have anything like
>> popcon?)
>
> I'd vote for this one with the proviso that the API break is only done
> for Ra
Consider this file from nxt_python package:
cat /etc/udev/rules.d/70-lego.rules
BUS=="usb", SYSFS{idVendor}=="0694", GROUP="lego", MODE="0660"
Is it safe & sane to include an identical udev rule file in the nbc
package with different filename? To state the obvious -- it'd use the
same group
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 3:16 AM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> FWIW, I'd really like to see the console user have access to this by
> default. Then, uploading a file to the NXT brick would be plug and
> play.
Yeah. Trouble is - I know nothing about ConsoleKit policy. What's the
trick to change this ud
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> - I read this list every day, and am very mindful of feedback from
>> developers. Any communication media is good, IMHO. My mailbox is also
>> always open. I think many become discouraged with the mailing list
>> the
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Some risks are so low that they're basically negligible. If the 2 options
> are keeping an existing regression (which missed testing) in updates for a
> few more days or risking the off chance that there MAY be another regression
> with a proba
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
>> How are the SSH host keys supposed to be generated with systemd?
>> Currently the initscript creates them, if they do not exist.
>
> Well, I believe the right place to create them would be in sshd
Hi Lennart,
as a downstream of Fedor
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:07 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> Maybe a distribution of PandaBoards/R-Pi for every FAS account holder could
> help, any sponsor? :D
OLPC is starting mass production of XO-1.75 units, based on an ARMv7
Marvell Armada 610. School kids in Uruguay and Nicaragua will start
th
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 7:01 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> Where is the hardware? Do you see signs of ARM boards coming in the
>> near future (next 1 year or so) on which users can install operating
>> systems of their choice?
>
> I wonder where you've been. See Raspberry Pi and Trimslice for a
> co
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 2:20 PM, drago01 wrote:
> Which is exactly what I am trying to say as soon as you want to create
> content you want a "real device". (keyboard! & interface)
Folks! In this mailing list I'd expect people to know: an arch is an
arch is an arch.
Some ARM CPUs will control yo
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
>> Buy a trimslice and run it with iSCSI.
>
> This is not good enough for me to become involved with Fedora on ARM.
> Glad it works for you, but I need a real system, like a Netwinder.
Whatever floats your boat! ARM SoCs are available in every
I am diagnosing a bug/odditywith a python library that uses Pyrex and
other oddities. In the course of that, I have installed python.i686 on
my F16 x86_64 system, and I'm trying to run it and... no dice!
According to rpm, python.x86_64 and python.i686 both own
/usr/bin/python and /usr/bin/python2.
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> Welcome to rpm. ELF files have a wacky concept called "color", which means
Color me impressed. That's one thing I didn't know!
> Use a chroot or an i686 vm. Or possibly just do rpmdev-extract on the i686
> version and run it directly.
I'
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> That someone's name wasn't listed in the right places may _explain_ their
> non-inclusion in a copyright change discussion
That seems to be what is being stated.
> Perhaps his contributions were too insignificant to earn copyright
> covera
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> If
> you're not able to keep track of all your copyright holders then
> changing the license is something you should only do with the aid of
> good lawyers.
While the pendantics do have a pendantic point, in practice the mere
*cost* of dem
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> Unify the crypto policies used by different applications and libraries. That
> is
> allow setting a consistent security level for crypto on all applications in a
> Fedora system.
As others have noted, crypto tech compatibility is tricky.
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> The idea is to allow config file divergence via the alternatives system as
Will this handle user customization? IME alternatives is not geared to
handle config files, customizable shell scripts, etc.
cheers,
m
--
martin.langh...@gma
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> 2) If we allow switching between products, we probably have to treat
> the entire Product configuration of a package as a single unit.
ok.
> Edits to somefile.conf would change whatever's on the other end of the
> link. The alternative
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> It may be that vanilla alternatives is unsuitable but we want something
> alternatives-like (an external tool that updates the config file) rather
> than something based on rpm metadata (Conflicts which causes you to have
> either one or th
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 11:27 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> What's wrong with just dropping the defaults in /etc in the Product's live
> kickstart? (Yes, that assumes the Product is delivered as a live image. We
For server images, Live isn't so hot. Can anaconda be taught to
execute a %product Foo ki
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
> One model I'd like to aim for here is we say "the repository will take up at
> most N GB" (where e.g. N=100) and we keep an intelligently-scheduled series
> of snapshots, like backup systems do.
What happens to a client that is more than 1
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
> Remember OSTree is a content-addressed object store (like git), not a chain
> of deltas (like Subversion, and other systems out there such as Chromium
> Autoupdate, and Docker).
Ouch -- so updates fetch EVERY file regardless of whether it ha
My Lenovo X220, running up-to-date F20 occasionally gets into a state where
closing the laptop lid does not trigger suspend.
I want to narrow down on the problem, but I'm slightly lost on how
"the signal is routed" through the stack. udev->?-> systemd-suspend ->
kernel ?
thank you!
m
--
mar
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 6:38 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> I wonder whether this is related to the fact that, on most Lenovos, if
> you press the suspect button twice without waiting long enough, the
> second press is ignored.
>
Seems unlikelye. I am very careful with double-presses, and my tes
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> systemd-inhibit --list
>
Fantastic info - Tomasz and Lennart. Thanks!
m
--
martin.langh...@gmail.com
- ask interesting questions
- don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first
~ http://docs.moodle.org/en/User:Martin
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> I wonder whether it wouldn't be time to say goodbye to tcpwrappers in
> Fedora. There has been a request in systemd upstream to disable support
>
As Stephen points out, they are used. Does systemd+xinetd match their
functionality?
chee
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 8:00 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> A firewall has mechanisms to filter for all domains, however only
> covering a smaller number of generic, low-level matches and actions.
>
>From a usability PoV, /etc/hosts.{allow,deny} is good. I wonder if teaching
firewalld to support
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Martin Langhoff
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 8:00 PM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
>
>> A firewall has mechanisms to filter for all domains, however only
>> covering a smaller number of generic, low-level matches and actions.
>>
>
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 6:16 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> In other words you are telling us that now to get something implemented or
> removed in Fedora we have to not only deal with our usual politics and
> bureaucracy but also all the downstream distribution to us as well...
One way t
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Normally when you close the lid logind should log something about "Lid
> closed" or so... Look around the logs around this to figure out what
> mightbe going on.
>
Thanks -- this has worked and led me to a local service of mine (an open
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> What gives you the impression that fail2ban is "crusty"? It's being
> actively developed upstream and integrates with firewalld now. Are
> those particularly onerous dependencies?
and with journal integration, python-inotify can probabl
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 03.04.2014 20:00, schrieb Adam Jackson:
>> On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 19:31 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>> and if someone asks why i called Lennart in #1072368
>>> names
>>
>> We didn't, and no justification would matter. It's not acceptabl
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 03.04.2014 22:32, schrieb Adam Williamson:
>> On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 19:31 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> will that below ever get fixed in F20?
>>
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072368
>>
>> The developer does not conside
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> So, I'd question the usefulness of not installing man-pages, because their
> sizes are comparatively small on today's disk-scales, e.g. on my primary
> system:
> # du -sh /usr/share/man
> 89M /usr/share/man
>
> That's almost neglibile in
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 10:49 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
wrote:
> It's more about getting to the point of being able to remove them and or
> have the option not to install them.
See my other email on this thread. Following on what I wrote there,
instead of reworking all the packages across the di
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 2:33 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
> One way to fix this that goes with my general direction of moving things out
> of %post into systemd: a dynamic uid reservation system that saves state
> persistently.
> Crudely, this would be ExecStartPre=/usr/sbin/useradd -r ...
> except we
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Fri, 11.04.14 16:09, Colin Walters (walt...@verbum.org) wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Martin Langhoff
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >If you move in this direction, you have to create file
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> The communication between the two daemons is done over standard HTTPS,
Interesting. One quirk of current syslog-style remote logging over UDP
is that it is fairly tolerant to dataloss.
With quite a bit of experience in the field... I have
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> the upload client is like any other journal client -- it is fully asynchronous
> wrt. to journald writing log entries. (It's something like
> 'journalctl -o export|curl -X POST https://some.where/upload'.)
Fantastic, so there i
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>> So I'll ask you about this other aspect -- what about stateless
>> clients with very limited or no local storage?
> Not supported by this, unfortunately. There needs to be at least
> temporary storage in tmpfs for this scheme t
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> don't get me wrong but you are talking bullshit
>
Reindl, your SNR is way way high. Maybe try sending /less/ emails,
concentrating in being clear and helpful?
Don't worry, there is _always_ someone who's wrong on the internet. You
can't a
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> defense in depth means limit the attack surface as much as you can
>
As folks are trying to point out to you, these principles are well
understood in this group.
However, _any minimally usable environment will have a scripting engine_ --
/b
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Reindl Harald said:
> > however, thank you to show me that any discussion with you is worthless
>
> Right back at you.
>
The CoC does say a few things on this topic.
I am finding Reindl's trollish behavior extremely annoyi
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Nicolas Mailhot
wrote:
> Please consider that in the Oracle vs Google case, Oracle ended up with
> 9-line copying (plus a few test files), and the judge decided that *as*
> *a* *matter* *of* *law* copyright infringement had occurred for those 9
> lines.
Yes. And a
Just an informational anecdote. My main dev machine is a vanilla
Lenovo X220 laptop, running an up-to-date F16. At OLPC, we are damned
close to *shipping* a F17-based distro on our XO laptops, so I thought
it'd be good to update.
Worried about /usr move, I decided to DTRT: use preupgrade.
First,
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Um. I think you might be working from a completely false premise. If you
> did a fresh install of Fedora 16 you should have grub2. Not grub.
Hmmm. This laptop has had F14, but IIRC it got a wipe-and-reinstall
treatment. You may be right on
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 19:26 +0000, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> > Um. I think you might be working from a completely false premise. If you
>> > did a fre
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> We're pleased to announce the release of OLPC OS 12.1.0 for XO-1,
> XO-1.5 and XO-1.75. Details of new features, known issues, and how to
Congrats to all the team! Good press coverage at
http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/02/olpc-delivers-big-os
Changes stemming from the switch to systemd mean that if you set the
system clock with ntpdate or date and you are not running ntpd... your
changes are not recorded in the RTC, ever.
There are some good reasons for this change, but at this time only the
systemd side is done, leaving date, ntpdate,
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Allan Day wrote:
> It's important to recognise the negative effects of delays to the release.
OLPC is downstream of F18, and planning to ship an "OLPC OS" version
13.1.0 first week of December 2012 (approx); which will be based on
F18.
We are not affected by Anac
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 7:47 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby
wrote:
> One thing I would recommend would be to correctly detect SSD:
> ATM, I installed my Fedora over an SSD and it did not ajust the mount
> settings nor suggest an appropriate setting for the SSD.
> If we can at least detect SSD and sug
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Martin Langhoff
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 7:47 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby
>> wrote:
>>> One thing I would recommend would be to correctly detect SSD:
>>> AT
7PM -0400, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>
>> Would you run tuned on a server?
>
> It was written with that in mind.
>
> --
> Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> (Just to mention this: we are neither the pioneer on the
> no-default-syslog feature nor on no-default-sendmail... A lot of other
As a cross-distro chap, I can attest to this. Specially with sendmail.
Everytime I spot sendmail in a Fed
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> You'd usually mount your journal files dir, then direct "journalctl -D
> /path/to/the/journal/files/dir" to it. It will then collect all files in
> that dir, interleave them and present them to you.
Thanks! And that -D would be to the d
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> And, despite your statement to the contrary, "journalctl" (without -f)
Hey Chris!
You might be hitting a bug, have a surprising pager envvar or
something. My general experience is that it does page things. I don't
think there's a conspiracy a
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
>> It's a feature you don't get traditionally because syslog drops the
>> priority information from the on-disk format.
>
> I'd expect that if somebody thought that was an important default, the
> log format would have been updated years ago when
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
