On 26/08/2010, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> Just to be clear.. its the clickity nature of the initial system wide
> configuration that is the barrier for you? if you had a reasonable
> non-clickity way to add a system wide on-boot activated network
> controlled networkmanager via cli would that suffice?
On 27/08/2010, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> NM can use old style /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-*. Can't
> you just write those out from your %post section?
Those would be the old school files I was referring to, I hadn't found
the NH-rh plugin, but as long as the RH network init script exists
On 27/08/2010, Mark Chappell wrote:
> On 27/08/2010, Chuck Anderson wrote:
>> NM can use old style /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-*. Can't
>> you just write those out from your %post section?
>
> Those would be the old school files I was referring to, I hadn&
On 27/08/2010, Till Maas wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 06:56:33PM +0100, Mark Chappell wrote:
>
>> I should point out that if NM gained a CLI so that I could do
>> something like that then I wouldn't mind the old RH scripts going
>> away, all I want is *a* method t
On 27/08/2010, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On 08/27/2010 02:22 PM, Mark Chappell wrote:
>> Indeed, which would be useless for my use case. I may of course be
>> the only one doing such things, but I suspect that at the very least
>> Jon may be too...
>
On 27/08/2010, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> NM doesn't (yet?) support:
> - bridges: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558982
> - vlans: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492377
That would explain why I couldn't figure out how to do it :)
> Nb. there is following feature:
> http://
commit 2fa1aa7532e58509552074fd13c3407f9935db85
Author: Mark Chappell
Date: Mon Aug 30 21:23:34 2010 +0100
Add in CGI as a BR, it's needed in EL6
perl-Test-MockObject.spec |6 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Test-MockObject.spec b
commit 175b442591c86daed9cb0f605335e3bd57495363
Author: Mark Chappell
Date: Wed Sep 1 16:07:17 2010 +0100
Sync with perl-Class-Trigger-0.13-2.1.el6.src.rpm from the latest RHEL 6
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Class-Trigger.spec | 21 -
sources
commit 26e92c452be1d789b53a477f2187cf43769214c3
Author: Mark Chappell
Date: Wed Sep 1 16:07:37 2010 +0100
Sync with perl-Class-Data-Inheritable-0.08-3.1.el6.src.rpm from the latest
RHEL 6
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Class-Data-Inheritable.spec | 10 --
2
commit 66adfd475d87cbd96beb23723a2530c30cce3c24
Author: Mark Chappell
Date: Wed Sep 1 16:07:55 2010 +0100
Sync with perl-Class-Accessor-0.31-6.1.el6.src.rpm from the latest RHEL 6
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Class-Accessor.spec |6 +-
2 files changed, 6 insertions
commit 82c630adf58162b622eb8ac6193c6820e74e4110
Author: Mark Chappell
Date: Wed Sep 1 16:06:53 2010 +0100
Sync with perl-File-Copy-Recursive-0.38-4.el6.src.rpm from the latest RHEL 6
.gitignore|1 +
perl-File-Copy-Recursive.spec |8 +---
2 files changed, 2
Summary of changes:
30ea45a... Fix typo that causes a failure to update the common directo (*)
58612f3... - rebuild against perl 5.10.1 (*)
9769845... - massive spec cleanups, etc. - update by Fedora::App::Main (*)
9e3b465... - Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0 (*)
746be3f... dist-git conver
commit b0b2c86b3963a6c2371e03346cf6bab00a8000a5
Author: Mark Chappell
Date: Mon Sep 13 21:49:08 2010 +0200
import from RHEL6 SRPM
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/rhel/beta/5.90Workstation/optional/source/SRPMS/perl-MIME-Types-1.28-2.el6.src.rpm
.gitignore |1 +
perl-MIME
commit a892b97fb4a655717fa4c97e8bbc92909cef9857
Author: Mark Chappell
Date: Mon Sep 13 21:50:41 2010 +0200
import from RHEL6 SRPM
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/rhel/beta/5.90Workstation/optional/source/SRPMS/perl-Test-MockObject-1.09-3.1.el6.src.rpm
.gitignore|1
2010/9/20 Michał Piotrowski :
> PostgreSQL 9 was released
> http://www.postgresql.org/about/news.1235
>
> Are there any chances to get this for F14? The new version supports
> basic replication scenarios, so I would not have to use PgPool :)
Way too late for updating the main postgres packages, bu
On 1 October 2010 19:21, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> What I am trying to say is, a redesign of an interface _usually_ have
> valid reasons. Those users who don't want their menu items moving
> around want to live like automated machines. Forbidding such changes
> promotes lazyness.
No, they don't want
On 5 November 2010 19:47, Tim Niemueller wrote:
> Koji Builds:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2580299
That then points to
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2580322
Note the
Result : BuildError: error building package (arch noarch), mock
exited with stat
Author: tremble
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Test-YAML-Valid/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv12703
Modified Files:
perl-Test-YAML-Valid.spec
Log Message:
Fix Source URL
Index: perl-Test-YAML-Valid.spec
===
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-YAML-Meta:
9f7db9e1699e25bb254315141ef9306c Test-YAML-Meta-0.16.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
:1%{?dist}
Summary:Validation of the META.yml file in a distribution
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -59,6 +59,18 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{_mandir}/man3/*.3pm*
%changelog
+* Wed Jun 30 2010 Mark Chappell - 0.16-1
+- Update for new
}
Summary:Validation of the META.yml file in a distribution
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -59,6 +59,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{_mandir}/man3/*.3pm*
%changelog
+* Wed Jun 30 2010 Mark Chappell - 0.16-1
+- Update for new upstream version
Thu Jul 01 2010 Mark Chappell - 0.04-2
+- Add in missing BR for extra tests
+
* Wed Jun 30 2010 Mark Chappell - 0.04-1
- New upstream version
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
ht
Matěj Cepl wrote:
> b) if you don't like provenpackagers to mess with your packages, go and
> make a switch in pkgdb.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Provenpackager_policy
To exclude a package from provenpackagers access, you have to open a
ticket at FESCo issue tracker and explain why provenpack
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 10:33:52 +0100, Mark wrote:
>
>> ProvenPackagers are there precisely to do what it looks like happened
>> with : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=8618
>
> Wait a minute, it's not that easy. Provenpackagers are not supposed to
>
Patrice Dumas wrote:
> I think that this is very wrong. I don't know the specifics of this package
> either, but I remember that for one of my packages, I had to hold of
> correcting a FTBS because it meant upgrading, and I coudn't do that
> because of some incompatibilities.
So at least comment
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
It takes three weeks which can be frustrating, the initial "can we
push this update to testing" might count as the initial ticket
creation, dropping it down to 2 weeks from here...
Mark
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.
On 5 July 2010 12:33, Pierre-Yves wrote:
> If we include the absence of reaction in this review:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=585817
> (last comment on Mai 08th) then we are over these 3 weeks.
Yeah, just depends if pinging on those tickets is sufficient. In which case
"After a
perl-Email-Date-Format, cairomm and wordnet appear to be in all arches
for beta 2 and should probably be removed from EPEL-6
perl-HTML-Format, perl-Class-Data-Inheritable, perl-Class-Trigger,
perl-Font-AFM, perl-PadWalker, perl-File-Copy-Recursive and libart_lgpl
appear to be newer versions in E
On 10 January 2014 21:54, Jerry James wrote:
> Well, there's a comprehensible error message! Anyway, does anybody have
> an alternate means of contacting Mark?
>
Apologies for the delay in responding (and thanks to Michael for poking me
through other channels) I'm hideously behind on my Fedora
29 matches
Mail list logo
