On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 09:17 +0200, Pierre-Yves wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 09:12 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> >
> > Looks like it was rebuilt for Rawhide and Fedora 14. Are you sure
> > you are not looking ong f13 branch?
> I looked right after doing my fedpkg clone when I edited the spec f
On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 03:46 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> The "lesser of 2 evils" is no solution. Only NO evil at all will keep the
> user's freedom. Users should NEVER use proprietary software, be it as
> JavaScript or using a proprietary protocol.
Shouldn't users be free to make that decision
Hi,
First of all, let me apologize if this is the incorrect place to ask.
I've asked on IRC and got little or no response that actually helped me.
In gnome 2 there was an amazing tool called hamster-applet. Now, since
gnome 3 doesn't support applets anymore, i notice i'm missing
functionality. Su
On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 21:31 +, Clint Savage wrote:
> Hi Léon,
>
> I'm also an avid user of Hamster Applet and have been using it
> successfully in Gnome Shell.
>
> I suggest you launch it using 'Time Tracker' and then look at the
> bottom right bar. If you have it setup to let you know an act
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 22:55 +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> I recetly had 30 hours of ssh brute force attack on my system. I'm
> using strong passwords, but still can be geneated from /dev/random, so
> I switched to rsa authentication. What's your favourite way to deal
> with such attacks? Please
Hi,
I'm trying to create a package [1], and run into a slight problem when
running rpmlint on the resulting rpm:
$ rpmlint -i googsystray-1.1.4-2.fc12.noarch.rpm
googsystray.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-xlib
You must let rpm find the library dependencies by itself. Do not put
unneed
On Sun, 2010-03-28 at 14:41 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> My cert was expired. I D/L new cert and rename to ~/.fedora-cert. Then run
> fedora-packager-setup and it crashes:
>
> fedora-packager-setup
> Setting up Fedora packager environment
> You need a client certificate from the Fedora Account
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 02:09 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> Anyway, do we have a Fedora policy to remove software just because
> they are old and unmaintained upstream? If there is a happy userbase
> and a maintainer willing to take care of the package, what is the big
> deal?
I still use an old net
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 01:31 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> You should be pressuring the author of the game you use to use GTK 2.0.
> If your game is no longer maintained, then you should update it yourself.
The game isn't maintained anymore, indeed. But unfortunately i'm not a C
programmer.
On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 00:28 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > I still use an old nethack-like game that unfortunately depends on gtk
> > 1.2. Since i'll never be able to get it into Fedora, i just install gtk
> > myself then i'm good to go again. I would regret it if my favorite
> > distro drops t
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 11:34 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 13:07:45 +0530, Rahul wrote:
>
> > IMO, there is absolutely nothing wrong with anyone
> > with commit access updating packages in Rawhide
>
> Of course there is. There ought to be prior communication about such pl
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 13:34 +0200, Laurent Rineau wrote:
> > So grab fedora-packager-0.4.2.3 (may have to enable updates-testing)
>
> For the moment, Yum on Fedora 13 says:
>
> Error: Package: fedora-packager-0.4.2.3-1.fc13.noarch (updates-testing)
>Requires: GitPython >= 0.2.0
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
