On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 9:06 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> I've installed kernel-5.8.0-0.rc0.20200608gitaf7b4801030c.1.fc33.x86_64 but
> not rebooted (still running 5.6.0-0.rc5.git0.1.fc33.x86_64 on the host).
>
> However /lib/modules/5.8.0-[...] has not been fully created in some way.
> In part
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 12:17 PM Justin Forbes wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 9:06 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > I've installed kernel-5.8.0-0.rc0.20200608gitaf7b4801030c.1.fc33.x86_64 but
> > not rebooted (still running 5.6.0-0.rc5.git0.1.fc33.x86_64 on th
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 6:33 AM Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> > From what I understood of the thread it's purely removing the akmod
> > and the new kernels have the module so how does it break their VPNs?
>
> If you remove akmod-wireguard it will also remove the wireguard package which
> will cause the
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 10:30 AM Lennart Poettering
wrote:
>
> On Fr, 26.06.20 10:42, Ben Cotton (bcot...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BtrfsByDefault
>
> If this is decided to be the way to go, please work with kernel
> maintainers to make btrfs.ko a built-in ker
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 2:05 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 8:45 pm, Markus Larsson
> wrote:
> > I strongly agree. BTRFS has been 5 years from production ready for
> > almost a decade now, please don't force this on users that doesn't
> > know any better.
>
> This is hard
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 5:17 PM Gerald B. Cox wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 2:30 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 2:53 PM Gerald B. Cox wrote:
>>
>> > Why would we be installing something by default that has widely known
>> > broken functionality?
>>
>> Because the
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 10:00 AM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 10:26 am, Stephen Gallagher
> wrote:
> > For the record, as this directly affects the Workstation deliverable,
> > I will be voting -1 until and unless the Workstation WG votes in
> > favor.
> >
> > Yes, it's a
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 1:39 PM John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, June 30, 2020 8:22:00 AM MST Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 at 11:09, Michael Catanzaro
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 10:26 am, Stephen Gallagher
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > For th
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 4:02 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 4:30 PM Justin Forbes wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 1:39 PM John M. Harris Jr
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tuesday, June 30, 2020 8:22:00 AM MST Stephen John Smoogen w
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 4:29 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 5:19 PM Justin Forbes wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 4:02 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 4:30 PM Justin Forbes
> > > wrote:
> >
On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 7:54 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 9:03 PM Michael Catanzaro
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 7:16 pm, Stephen John Smoogen
> > wrote:
> > > The issue isn't that you haven't done your work. It is that it looks
> > > like you were set
On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 5:24 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RawhideKernelNodebug
> links to
> http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/rawhide-kernel-nodebug/fedora-rawhide-kernel-nodebug.repo
> which gives 404 now. The kernels seems to be there though. But with
FC1 32bit was a little bit different. Technically x86_64 was a secondary
arch at the time, in fact the RH build system couldn't get everything
together and the ISOs were built on my home system. By FC2, this wasn't an
issue anymore. I would not be surprised if the archives were a bit off as
the o
Also, intel wasn't shipping x86_64 systems at the time, FC1 was pretty
specifically AMD64, and there was a lot of weirdness back then.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:08 PM, Justin Forbes
wrote:
> FC1 32bit was a little bit different. Technically x86_64 was a secondary
> arch at the ti
1028 | Jared Smith (jsmith)
> 675 | Kalev Lember (kalev)
> 669 | Parag Nemade (paragn)
> - ----+--
> 666 | Justin Forbes (jforbes)
> 526 | Germano Massullo (Caterpillar / germano)
>
>
> Congratulations to the winning candidate
As a follow up, we are aware that the nvidia driver does not currently work
with the 4.7 kernel. Nvidia is aware, and given their history of monthly
releases, I expect they will have a working release this week. Should they
fail to do so, I will do a blog post with a workaround.
Justin
On Mon, A
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> | As a follow up, we are aware that the nvidia driver does not currently
> work
> | with the 4.7 kernel. Nvidia is aware, and given their history of monthly
> | releases, I expect they will have a working release this week. Should
> th
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> On Aug 20, 2016 4:50 PM, "Andrew Lutomirski" wrote:
>>
>
>>
>> How about ordinary earlyprintk to serial?
>>
>> Try booting with nokaslr, though. There was a bug, now fixed upstream (I
>> think) that broke AMD early microcode if kaslr w
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2017-02-10 16:00 UTC'
Links to all issues below ca
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2017-02-10)
===
Meeting started by jforbes at 16:00:31 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2017-02-10/fesco.2017-02-10-16.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
-
On Feb 10, 2017 7:09 PM, "Kevin Kofler" wrote:
Justin Forbes wrote:
> * AGREED: Allow the update, encourage everyone to work through the
> process better next time (7,0,0) (jforbes, 16:51:10)
The context:
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1675
#1675 Libglvnd update breakin
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 09:29:33AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 07:48:27 +0100
>> Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>>
>> > I have:
>> > page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(1 && PageCompound(page)), kernel
>> > BUG at include/linux/p
The 4.10 kernel was released on Sunday, and built into rawhide on
Monday. We plan to rebase Fedora 25 once we feel that 4.10 has
stabilized enough. With history as an indicator, that should be the
4.10.2 stable release, but this is not set in stone. We will be
monitoring closely. Fedora 24 will r
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 7:28 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 04:02:19PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> Well, first time it did that. Second time, I got this, and the boot
>> hung:
>>
>> [0.937752] EXT4-fs (sda1): mounting ext2 file system using the ext4
>> subsystem
There are no issue pending for the agenda. As next Friday
(2017-04-14) is a holiday for many people, the next FESCo meeting
will be on 2017-04-21.
Thanks,
Justin
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to de
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 09:14 -0400, Christian Schaller wrote:
>> Actually isn't Cockpit our 'YAST', I mean it is not a 1to1 thing, but
>> for a lot of things Cockpit provides the featureset a sysadmin would
>> want.
>
We could always bring
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 7:19 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:18 PM, Adam Williamson
>>> It was tried for
>>> Fedora years ago, and discarded with a passion.
>>
>> What 'was tried for Fedora'? What are you referring to?
>
> Linuxconf, which was much like YaST. It was in s
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2017-04-21 16:00 UTC'
Links to all issues below can b
==
#fesco: FESCO (2017-04-21)
==
Meeting started by jforbes at 16:00:16 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2017-04-21/fesco.2017-04-21-17.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
---
* init proc
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2017-05-26 16:00 UTC'
Links to all issues below ca
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2017-06-02)
===
Meeting started by jforbes at 16:00:27 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2017-06-02/fesco.2017-06-02-16.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
-
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2017-06-30 16:00 UTC'
Links to all issues below ca
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2017-07-07)
===
Meeting started by jforbes at 16:00:14 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2017-07-07/fesco.2017-07-07-16.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
-
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 10:26:03PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> I ran into this unannounced change:
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Stop_Building_i686_Kernels
>> If this is accepted, all x86 hardware on which Fedora can run wi
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2017-07-14 16:00 UTC'
Links to all issues below ca
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 10:05 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Justin Forbes wrote:
>> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
>> FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
>> irc.freenode.net.
>>
>>
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2017-07-14)
===
Meeting started by jforbes at 16:00:06 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2017-07-14/fesco.2017-07-14-16.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
-
With the 4.5 kernel out and the merge window for 4.6 opened up, we had
to make a decision on what the release kernel for F24 would be. The
decision has been made to ship F24 with the 4.5 kernel with 4.6
available as an update once it is ready. Timing wise, 4.6 *should*
release just before the fin
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 11/30/2016 04:20 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:08:55PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 02:07:13PM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
I'm trying to build python-cvxopt, b
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Justin Forbes wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> On 11/30/2016 04:20 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:08:55PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>>>
>&g
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 1:00 PM Nicolas Mailhot via devel
wrote:
>
> Le mercredi 25 mars 2020 à 17:33 +0100, Aleksandra Fedorova a écrit :
>
> > My point was to highlight that ELN is not a "stable edition" like
> > Fedora Server. ELN is Rawhide, its quality is no better than Rawhide
> > quality, i
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 10:47 AM David Cantrell wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 10:32:26AM +0100, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote:
> >As Ben is on PTO, I'd like to present the System-Wide Change
> >
> >https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ELN_Buildroot_and_Compose
> [snip]
>
> It has taken me some
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 2:09 PM David Cantrell wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 01:48:15PM -0500, Justin Forbes wrote:
> >On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 10:47 AM David Cantrell wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 10:32:26AM +0100, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote:
>
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 2:42 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 12:02:40PM -0400, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> > Stephen Gallagher writes:
> > > It is under discussion whether this snapshot will have its own
> > > installation media. For now the preferred way to test ELN
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 5:24 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 06. 04. 20 23:53, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > * Clarify that the time limit on PRs is only for determining if the
> > maintainer is responsive. If they reply, the timer is cleared.
>
> As a side note (probably out of scope of this proposal
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 3:10 AM Tom Hughes via devel
wrote:
>
> On 06/04/2020 22:53, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> > Changes in this version of the proposal[2]:
> >
> > * Improve our explanation of why we are doing ELN in the first place
>
> I agree that the proposal is now a lot clearer and I certa
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 11:56 PM Michel Alexandre Salim
wrote:
>
> Apr 16, 2020 18:02:33 Demi M. Obenour :
>
> >
> > Finally, some packages should have all updates considered as security
> > updates. This includes anything based on a web browser (Firefox,
> > Thunderbird, SeaMonkey, Chromium, we
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 1:43 AM Jan Kratochvil
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 06:55:10 +0200, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > For kernel updates this is probably not a good idea. Given that updates
> > potentially introduce regressions, being able to distinguish updates with
> > known CVEs that
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 5:13 PM Michel Alexandre Salim
wrote:
>
> On 4/16/20 11:42 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 06:55:10 +0200, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> >> For kernel updates this is probably not a good idea. Given that updates
> >> potentially introduce regressions, be
On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 10:21 AM Daiki Ueno wrote:
>
> Hello Ondrej,
>
> Ondrej Mosnacek writes:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 11:12 PM Ondrej Mosnacek
> > wrote:
> >> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 8:50 PM Ondrej Mosnacek
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 10:12 AM Daiki Ueno
> >> > wrote
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 11:43 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2020-05-05 at 17:45 +0200, Tomas Tomecek wrote:
> > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 1:41 PM Petr Pisar wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 12:41:06PM +0200, Tomas Tomecek wrote:
> > > > Petr, I should have probably stressed that our targe
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 5:50 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 22. 05. 20 3:06, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.9, we are running a coordinated
> rebuild in a
> > side tag.
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.9
> >
> > If you see a "Rebuilt for Python 3.9"
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 10:17 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 26. 05. 20 16:14, Justin Forbes wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 5:50 AM Miro Hrončok > <mailto:mhron...@redhat.com>> wrote:
> >
> > On 22. 05. 20 3:06, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2019-11-11 15:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
> F32 System-Wide Change: Modules in non-Modular Buildroot
> https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2257
>
Sorry, this is actually https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2255
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le
=
#fedora-meeting-1: FESCO (2019-11-11)
=
Meeting started by jforbes at 15:00:23 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2019-11-11/fesco.2019-11-11-15.00.log.html
.
Meeting s
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 6:20 PM Steven Munroe wrote:
>
> > kernel-headers is related to the userspace API and is not tied to a
> > particular kernel version.
> > If the userspace API doesn't change there's no need to rebuild. Is there a
> > problem you're
> > seeing by not having an updated kern
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2019-12-02 15:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
=
#fedora-meeting-1: FESCO (2019-12-02)
=
Meeting started by jforbes at 15:00:40 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2019-12-02/fesco.2019-12-02-15.00.log.html
.
Meeting s
On Sat, Dec 7, 2019 at 5:01 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=39456403
>
> DEBUG util.py:596: No matching package to install: 'kernel'
>
> I can see that ppc64le was temporarily added to nobuildarches in
> kernel.spec, and then removed. How
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 12:04 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> Action summary
>
>
> Accepted blockers
> -
> 1. dracut-modules-olpc — Cannot be installed due to unsatisfied
> 'bitfrost' dependency — NEW
> ACTION: dracut-modules-olpc to resolve dependency on desired bitf
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2019-08-26 15:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
Due to the US holiday, several of us won't be there. The next meeting
will be on Monday (2019-09-09).
Thanks,
Justin
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 2:51 AM John M. Harris Jr. wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, September 11, 2019 12:28:31 AM MST Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > On 9/10/19 11:01 PM, John M. Harris Jr. wrote:
> >
> > > On Tuesday, September 10, 2019 9:54:50 AM MST Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > >
> > >> Sure there are... from the ch
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 7:11 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 8:01 AM Aleksandra Fedorova
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Chris,
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 4:29 PM Chris Adams wrote:
> > >
> > > Once upon a time, Aleksandra Fedorova said:
> > > > Similarly to what Josh said, we want
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 7:46 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 8:43 AM Justin Forbes wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 7:11 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 8:01 AM Aleksandra Fedorova
> > > wrote:
>
On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 5:42 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 22. 01. 20 12:33, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 12:12 PM Kevin Kofler
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-10/porting_to.html#common
> >>>
> >>> "Default to -fno-common
> >>>
> >>> A
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 7:03 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> I tried out this kernel:
>
> - kernel-5.6.0-0.rc0.git1.2.fc32.x86_64
>
> It gets to grub, lets you select the kernel, but apparently no
> further. It's kind of frustrating to debug because either it produces
> *no* messages at all even
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 7:16 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 02:37:13PM -0500, John Florian wrote:
> > Can this be improved? I'm sure it can be. I'm genuinely curious
> > what dracut does that an rpm couldn't ship. I'd also hate to lose
> > the versatility that
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 8:26 PM Brendan Conoboy wrote:
>
> On 11/16/18 7:50 AM, Paul Frields wrote:
> [snip]
> > We should skip the F31 release cycle and leave F30 in place longer in
> > order to focus on improving the tooling and testing changes. These
> > tooling changes will improve the overall
On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 7:39 AM Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 12:37:24 -0600,
> Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> >On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 14:29:15 +,
> > "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> >>
> >>Anyway it seems like Rawhide isn't getting new nodebug kernels.
> >>
> >>- Latest node
The 4.20 kernel was released just before the end of the year, but the
first stable update should be dropping in the next day or two. We
have a 4.20 test day scheduled for Tuesday, January 15th. Depending
on the results of that test day, Fedora 29 will be rebased very
shortly afterwards, followed
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2019-02-11 15:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
=
#fedora-meeting-1: FESCO (2019-02-11)
=
Meeting started by jforbes at 15:00:14 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2019-02-11/fesco.2019-02-11-15.00.log.html
.
Meeting s
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2019-03-18 15:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
=
#fedora-meeting-1: FESCO (2019-03-18)
=
Meeting started by jforbes at 15:00:14 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2019-03-18/fesco.2019-03-18-15.00.log.html
.
Meeting s
=
#fedora-meeting-1: FESCO (2019-03-25)
=
Meeting started by zbyszek at 15:00:10 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2019-03-25/fesco.2019-03-25-15.00.log.html
.
Meeting s
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Friday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2019-05-03 15:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be di
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2019-05-06)
===
Meeting started by jforbes at 15:00:05 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2019-05-03/fesco.2019-05-03-15.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
-
For those of you wondering the Fedora status of the MDS CVEs that went
public on Tuesday. Here is where we stand:
kernel-5.0.16 and microcode_ctl-2.1-29 contain the initial mitigations
for kernel/microcode, and are in stable updates for F29 and F30, The
kernel is still in updates-testing for F28 as
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Friday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2019-06-21 15:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be di
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2019-06-21)
===
Meeting started by jforbes at 15:00:42 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2019-06-21/fesco.2019-06-21-15.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
-
little late to start on. Howver as the below mentioned absentee
>> sponsor of i686.. I have no problems with this.
>
>
> Does this affect i686 multilib support in x86_64?
No, the kernel-headers package will still be built for i686, and 32bit
userspace is still being built, we ju
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 11:41 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 11:11:41AM -0500, Justin Forbes wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 10:41 AM Fabio Valentini
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 24, 201
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 1:39 PM Nicolas Mailhot via devel
wrote:
>
> Le lundi 24 juin 2019 à 18:50 +0200, Igor Gnatenko a écrit :
> > But packages will be still built for i686 architecture and then
> > shipped in repos (not completely sure if having i686-only repo is
> > useful, but they will be
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 9:37 PM Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>
> On 6/21/19 7:26 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Stop_Building_i686_Kernels
> >
> > == Summary ==
> > Stop building i686 kernels, reduce the i686 package to a
> > kernel-headers package that can be used to bu
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 9:38 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
> The introduction of namespaces may break some scripts written for
> gawk 4.2.1 due to different variable names. (This is considered to
> be a bug by the upstream and there is a patch fixing this)
>
It seems that the patch fixing this would be c
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2018-10-08 15:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
=
#fedora-meeting-1: FESCO (2018-10-08)
=
Meeting started by jforbes at 15:00:03 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-10-08/fesco.2018-10-08-15.00.log.html
.
Meeting s
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2018-10-22 15:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
=
#fedora-meeting-1: FESCO (2018-10-22)
=
Meeting started by jforbes at 15:00:05 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-10-22/fesco.2018-10-22-15.00.log.html
.
Meeting s
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2018-10-29 15:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
=
#fedora-meeting-1: FESCO (2018-10-29)
=
Meeting started by jforbes at 15:01:10 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-10-29/fesco.2018-10-29-15.01.log.html
.
Meeting s
This is related to an open ticket to Release Engineering
(https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7840) which was brought to FESCo
(https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2003). We understand the need to
enable this, but there is an impact to workflow for local builds. It
is possible that some of this could be alle
On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 7:47 AM Dan Horák wrote:
>
> On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 14:28:46 +0100
> Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>
> > Does anybody know why?
> >
> > Last kernel available there is 2 weeks old.
> >
> > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/rawhide-kernel-nodebug/x86_64/
>
> I've already pinged #fedo
On Wed, Apr 5, 2023 at 5:05 AM Zamir SUN wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm working on libtraceevent and libtracefs update. There will be soname
> bump happening to them. Namely,
>
> libtraceevent.so 1.6.3 -> 1.7.2
> libtracefs.so 1.5.0 -> 1.6.4
>
> IIRC only kernel-tools (for perf and rtla) and trace-cmd dep
onday, that way it
will automatically follow into stable Fedora as they get the 6.3
rebase.
Justin
> John Kacur
>
> On Sun, Apr 9, 2023 at 12:12 AM Zamir SUN wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 4/5/23 23:49, Justin Forbes wrote:
>> > On Wed, Apr 5, 2023 at 5:05 AM Zamir
On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 04:31:53PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 3:26 PM Fedora Rawhide Report
> wrote:
> >
>
> Can we please make the kernel RPM not have 2000 lines of changelog
> every time there's a version bump?
> It doesn't make sense to include the entire git commi
On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 3:44 PM Demi Marie Obenour
wrote:
>
> I noticed that by default, Qubes OS has voluntary kernel preemption
> as opposed to full preemption. I found that enabling full preemption
> (preempt=full on kernel command line) makes the system significantly
> more responsive under h
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 6:53 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> On Monday I observed that the Fedora 37 and 36 Python CI tests on the Testing
> farm fail.
>
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/c...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/YOXVRWJNJMNSTUG6O43KE4K6Q57GV7DR/
>
> The same tests w
1 - 100 of 205 matches
Mail list logo
