Re: [fedora-java] Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications

2010-01-15 Thread Jeff Johnston
On 15/01/10 09:04 AM, Mary Ellen Foster wrote: > 2010/1/15 Matt Domsch: >> OK, re-run, removing the three packages noted as fixed overnight. >> >> - >> Removing geronimo-specs also removes: > [ lots of stuff! ] > > Almost all of these are due to the dependency chain jms (virtual > p

Re: Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications

2010-01-20 Thread Jeff Johnston
On 15/01/10 01:00 AM, Matt Domsch wrote: > The following 30 packages, with respective FTBFS bugs, have been open > since the Fedora 11 time frame, and continue to fail to build. These > are the oldest non-building packages in the distribution, everything > else (over 8800) managed to build for Fed

How should chains be done in non-rawhide?

2010-04-14 Thread Jeff Johnston
I am trying to update the eclipse-egit package to 0.7.1 and it requires eclipse-jgit >= 0.7.1 which I just built. I would like both packages to be in updates-testing at the same time since use of the eclipse-egit package is the real test of the eclipse-jgit package. For rawhide, I just used th

Orphaning eclipse-cdt

2019-10-25 Thread Jeff Johnston
The eclipse-cdt package is being superseded by modules and it has missing dependencies such that it FTBFS so I am orphaning this project. -- Jeff J. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists

Re: Orphaning eclipse-cdt

2019-10-25 Thread Jeff Johnston
. On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 2:26 PM Code Zombie wrote: > Hey Jeff > > What do you mean by modules? > > Regards > Mehdi > > On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 9:22 PM Jeff Johnston wrote: > >> The eclipse-cdt package is being superseded by modules and it has missing >