Re: Packages that will be orphaned

Hi. May I take the apache-commons-collections ? Thanks :] BR, Jaromir. -- Red Hat Czech, s.r.o. Software Engineer / BaseOS Email: jca...@redhat.com Web: www.cz.redhat.com Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45, Brno, Czech Republic IC: 27690016 - Original Message - From: "To

Heads up: procps-ng 3.3.2 introduction (can break more than 30 packages)

7.src system-config-users-0:1.2.113-1.fc18.noarch tabled-0:0.5.1-0.5.g33595340.fc18.src tog-pegasus-2:2.11.1-4.fc17.src tomcat-0:7.0.25-4.fc18.noarch tomcat6-0:6.0.32-20.fc17.noarch wallpapoz-0:0.6.1-2.fc17.noarch Thanks, Jaromir. -- Jaromir Capik Red Hat Czech, s.r.o. Software Engineer / B

Heads up: procps-ng 3.3.2 introduction (can break more than 30 packages)

7.src system-config-users-0:1.2.113-1.fc18.noarch tabled-0:0.5.1-0.5.g33595340.fc18.src tog-pegasus-2:2.11.1-4.fc17.src tomcat-0:7.0.25-4.fc18.noarch tomcat6-0:6.0.32-20.fc17.noarch wallpapoz-0:0.6.1-2.fc17.noarch Thanks, Jaromir. -- Jaromir Capik Red Hat Czech, s.r.o. Software Engineer / BaseOS

Re: Non responsive maintainer: Jaromír Cápík

umber of opened bugs to 80% during the last year. Not all of them can get my attention immediately and if you need something urgently, then ping me and try to ask me for help instead of playing this theatre. I'd be happy to switch to a different task, if possible. Thanks for your understandin

Fedora Bootstrap Project

nd we cannot succeed without your help. I'm looking forward for your cooperation and in case of any questions, I'm here for you. Best regards, Jaromir Capik. -- Red Hat Czech, s.r.o. Software Engineer / Secondary Arch Email: jca...@redhat.com Web: www.cz.redhat.com Red Hat Cz

Re: F23 System Wide Change: Mono 4

ecipe for target 'all-recursive' failed make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/mono-3.4.0' Makefile:381: recipe for target 'all' failed make: *** [all] Error 2 --- So, I guess the failure needs to be resolved fi

Re: procps-ng is a mistake (was: Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2012-05-14))

> > * #851 F18 Feature: procps-ng (next generation procps tools) - > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/procps-ng (sgallagh, > > 18:11:34) > > * AGREED: Feature procps-ng is accepted (9 +1) (sgallagh, > > 18:14:47) > > Ahem. I think is is a really bad idea. "-ng" packages point to

Re: procps-ng is a mistake (was: Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2012-05-14))

> From: "Matej Cepl" > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 9:01:00 PM > Subject: Re: procps-ng is a mistake (was: Re: Summary/Minutes from today's > FESCo Meeting (2012-05-14)) > > On 15.5.2012 14:03, Jaromir Capik wrote: >

Re: procps-ng is a mistake (was: Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2012-05-14))

> > You're partially right. > > If we talk about the Fedora's package name, then it could remain > > untouched. > > But since the new upstream name had to be changed and I wanted > > others to know > > they're installing the -ng version, I changed the name to > > procps-ng. > > Moreover, I initiall

Review Request: prboom-plus - Free enhanced DOOM engine

Hello everyone. I'm searching for volunteers willing to review the prboom-plus engine: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026517 Anybody want to help with that? Thanks in advance. Regards, Jaromir. -- Jaromir Capik Red Hat Czech, s.r.o. Software Engineer / Secondary Arch