Hi,
I'm not starting by filing this as a bug as it encompasses a number of
issues and it's not clear where the problem really lies, so I thought
I'd start a discussion here first.
I posted on what I'm trying to do previously (in F13) here:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2010-Octob
On 4 November 2011 13:21, seth vidal wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 10:25:54 + (UTC)
> Bojan Smojver wrote:
>
>> Adam Williamson redhat.com> writes:
>>
>> > > Yeah, I got that bit. But I'm sure all you folks are in the know,
>> > > so I asked.
>> >
>> > No more than anyone - there really is no
On 4 November 2011 14:36, drago01 wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
>>
>> This is essentially giving up. It's frustrating to be stuck on
>> overview mode on a four core machine while gnome-shell is doing
>> /something/ but you don'
On 4 November 2011 17:23, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Ian Malone wrote:
>> If I filed every bug in the distro in upstream I'd have a dozen
>> different bugzilla accounts by now.
>
> So what? Maintainers are not messengers, they have other work to do than
> forwarding the
On 5 November 2011 00:50, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 11/04/2011 05:39 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
>> On 4 November 2011 17:23, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>>> Ian Malone wrote:
>>>> If I filed every bug in the distro in upstream I'd have a dozen
>>>> diff
On 30 June 2015 at 16:33, Ahmad Samir wrote:
> On 30 June 2015 at 17:22, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 30.06.2015 um 17:02 schrieb Ahmad Samir:
>>>
>>> IIUC, what's happening here is that they bundle the extension with
>>> Thunderbird 38 so it's installed and enabled by default; so when you
>>
On 1 July 2015 at 14:02, Ahmad Samir wrote:
> On 1 July 2015 at 12:14, Ian Malone wrote:
>
>>
>> It appears to have broken the ability to install the gdata provider,
>> at least when I installed a new F22 system at the weekend I found I
>> couldn't install i
On 12 August 2015 at 09:33, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 12.08.2015 um 02:42 schrieb Thomas Daede:
*if* you use binary tarballs they *should not* be extracted in a user
writeable location as *no binary* whenever possible should have
permissions allowing a ordinary user to change
Hi,
It seems Fedora Jam is not included in current test composes for F23
and is not being included in nightly composes
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?state=all&view=tree&method=livecd&order=-id
(not failing to build as Live Workstation is, simply not being
included in attempted builds).
On 4 September 2015 at 11:17, Ian Malone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems Fedora Jam is not included in current test composes for F23
> and is not being included in nightly composes
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?state=all&view=tree&method=livecd&order=-id
>
On 7 September 2015 at 13:21, Miloslav Trmac wrote:
>
> Also, it seems to me that it would be useful to, at least conceptually, to
> not think about Fedora as a self-hosting perpetual motion^Wrecompilation
> machine, but as “just another huge application” being built using compilers
> and other t
On 14 September 2015 at 16:47, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
> They simply have welcomed their new container overlords and are using only
> the recommended upstream method for installing for their application (
> pip,gem etc since developers can use the upstream support community for
> those ) in
On 15 September 2015 at 10:11, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
>
>
> On 09/15/2015 08:41 AM, Ian Malone wrote:
>>
>> On 14 September 2015 at 16:47, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
>> wrote:
>>
>>> They simply have welcomed their new container overlords and are u
On 16 July 2014 10:28, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 07/16/2014 11:00 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 10:55:57AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>>
>>> On 07/15/2014 07:22 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 10:40 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
> Did
On 15 August 2014 03:11, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I'm part curious and part venting
>
> I am trying to get a cross-platform project I'm working on building natively
> on win32 as I've already got it working nicely on Fedora and Fedora mingw.
>
> I've ended up with the MSYS2 project, which while a
On 15 August 2014 12:30, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 5:28 AM, Ian Malone wrote:
>> (I'm very sympathetic to your plight as I've been waiting months to
>> try and get a known patch from the actual author of the original code
>> into the kernel.)
On 29 September 2014 12:40, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 29 September 2014 12:23, Matěj Cepl wrote:
>> Couldn’t we just stop this madness of bitmaps?
>
> SVGs are not a silver bullet. You'd want a very different source SVG
> file for an icon that's designed to be displayed at 22x22, to an icon
> de
On 30 September 2014 02:09, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 22:05 +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
>> Who is using magnifying glasses to view icons?
>
> Icons are displayed far larger in GNOME Shell than in other desktop
> environments, and the difference between
On 2 October 2014 07:33, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 01.10.14 22:39, Rahul Sundaram (methe...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Is it worth considering using Dash as the default (non-interactive) shell
>> in Fedora? Other distributions including Ubuntu and Debian (
>> https://lwn.net/Articl
On 2 October 2014 17:13, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 10/02/2014 03:07 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
>>
>>
>> If that's the case, why do we have the /bin/sh symlink? Just remove
>> it
>> and make the bash dependency explicit (so
On 2 October 2014 13:59, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering said:
>
>> In general, I am pretty sure that except a couple of programming
>> language or UNIX aficionades very few people can actually correctly
>> separate bashisms from true bourneshellisms.
>
> It isn't that
On 6 October 2014 09:41, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
> One of the long standing features that were enabled by default in yum is
> support for delta rpms. dnf developers have disabled this and I think this
> change deserves a broader discussion
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148
On 6 October 2014 16:57, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 02:29:53PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> > >Is it worth considering using Dash as the default (non-interactive)
>> > >shell in Fedora? Other distributions including Ubuntu and Debian
>> > >
On 6 October 2014 17:28, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> > At that point switching anything to dash can _only increase_, not reduce,
>> > the disk space needed, and is very likely to increase the total page cache
>> > usage/requirement as well. Bringing the benefits of sup
On 8 October 2014 12:35, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
Been away for a week and come back to this nonsense. Why put so much
effort into arguing *against* having the right interpreter listed at
the top of a script. Seems pretty perverse to insist it should be
/bin/sh to maintain a conflation that's unique
On 22 October 2014 20:07, Michael Stahl wrote:
> On 17.09.2014 13:58, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>> On 09/17/2014 11:54 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>>> All those OSes require reboots when updating the OS.
>>
>> Define OS.
>>
>> Firefox is definitely not OS. While systemd is OS.
>> I am fine with reboot a
On 1 April 2015 at 14:32, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 28/03/15 16:45 -0300, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
>>
>> 2015-03-28 16:06 GMT-03:00 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
>> :
>>>
>>> Is this expected to not compile with -fno-implicit-templates?
>>>
>>> ---%<---
>>> $ cat test.cc
>>> #inclu
On 1 April 2015 at 16:09, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 01/04/15 15:16 +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
>>
>> Do you mind clarifying? I thought should provide that
>> http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/string/string/operator+/ or is that
>> what fno-implicit-templates is t
On 27 April 2015 at 06:47, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Time in UTC is just as absurd and arbitrary as time in a local
> timezone, so if Windows is going to get berated for not dealing with
> UTC properly, then Fedora can be berated for not dealing with local
> time properly.
>
Not really, as multiboot
On 27 April 2015 at 09:54, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 04/27/2015 09:34 AM, Ian Malone wrote:
>>
>> On 27 April 2015 at 06:47, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>>> Time in UTC is just as absurd and arbitrary as time in a local
>>> timezone, so if Windows is going to g
On 27 April 2015 at 21:36, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Simon Farnsworth wrote:
>
>> Windows doesn't work fine with RTC in local time, unless you have one and
>> only one Windows install on the system. If you (say) dual-boot Windows 95
>> and Windows NT 4.0 (I've done t
On 24 June 2015 at 04:28, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
>> Certainly, but with none of the features in Btrfs actually emitting scary
>> "experimental" warnings anymore, and even all features working in btrfs RAID
>> 5/6 now, I think we should
Hi,
I put in a RFE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806534 for
a udev rule for the Fender Mustang amplifier and got a very quick
response from Kay Sievers (some needs to tell RedHat about weekends).
Obviously things have moved on since I last looked at permissions and
their use with dev
On 24 March 2012 19:01, Ian Malone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I put in a RFE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806534 for
> a udev rule for the Fender Mustang amplifier and got a very quick
> response from Kay Sievers (some needs to tell RedHat about weekends).
> Obviously th
On 25 March 2012 13:22, Ian Malone wrote:
> On 24 March 2012 19:01, Ian Malone wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I put in a RFE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806534 for
Taken to systemd-devel.
--
imalone
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://ad
Hi,
I'm interested in getting Plug http://piorekf.org/plug/download/
included in Fedora, this is a package that supports control of the
Fender Mustang range of amplifiers via USB, licensed under GPL3. It
has dependencies on qt4 and libusb and is currently packaged through
OpenSUSE. I've looked at
On 27 March 2012 19:00, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-03-25 at 13:22 +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
>
>> Or indeed, if anyone can show me where this is documented. All I've
>> managed to find with google are git commits and irrelevant mailing
>> list fragments. sy
On 30 March 2012 22:41, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Ian Malone wrote:
>> Interesting, not sure how you'd tell that. I've now noticed the header
>> #This file is part of systemd.
>> And rpm -qf confirms that, but why don't systemd and udev get into
>> confli
On 30 March 2012 00:25, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>>>>>> "IM" == Ian Malone writes:
>
> IM> So, what's the next step? If necessary I can volunteer to maintain
> IM> it myself (and would have to volunteer as a maintainer), but would
> IM> be
On 4 April 2012 10:42, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Ian Malone wrote:
>> Is it acceptable to repackage the tarball too? The prep stage seems to
>> expect a particular structure within it.
>
> %setup takes some arguments to deal with strange tarballs.
>
That looks like the thing
On 23 April 2012 14:06, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> I'm not against release names because some people are supposed to have
> been offended by the words 'Beefy Miracle'
I don't know about offended, it just sounds silly. Maybe it's a UK/US
thing, or that it started as a RedHat in-joke, but to this
On 29 April 2012 01:05, Richard Vickery wrote:
> On 2012-04-26 10:50 AM, "Michał Piotrowski" wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> W dniu 9 kwietnia 2012 17:46 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
>> napisał:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Is it possible to upgrade now from F16 to F17 with preupgrade?
>> >
>> >
>>
>> Has anyone
On 1 May 2012 19:30, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all,
>
> the fedora 17 schedule
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/17/Schedule lists the final
> change freeze as 2012-05-07 this means that you need to make sure that
> any changes you want i
On 2 May 2012 10:16, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 12:00 +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
>
>> However, one pre-upgrade bug that may prevent you installing and is
>> not on the blockers list:
>
> The blocker list is specifically intended to be open to nominati
On 3 May 2012 00:16, Ian Malone wrote:
> On 2 May 2012 10:16, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 12:00 +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
>>
>>> However, one pre-upgrade bug that may prevent you installing and is
>>> not on the blockers list:
>>
>>
On 13 June 2012 13:31, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Roman Kennke"
>> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>>
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 3:15:14 PM
>> Subject: Re: Important kernel update should not break stuff
>> > - How can pro
On 12 February 2014 14:44, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Matthew Miller
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 03:36:00PM +0100, Kai Engert wrote:
>>> Question (1)
>>> Are we allowed to ship software in Fedora that dynamically loads
>>> advertisements from the web and shows th
On 13 February 2014 18:50, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
> Le Jeu 13 février 2014 19:40, Rahul Sundaram a écrit :
>> Hi
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>
>>> A party who is molesting me with ads and tries to spy on me, hardly is
>>> my
>>> friend.
>>
>>
>> That certain
On 14 February 2014 06:08, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 02/13/2014 07:50 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>>
>>
>> Le Jeu 13 février 2014 19:40, Rahul Sundaram a écrit :
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>>
A party who is molesting me with ads and tries t
On 17 February 2014 08:45, Christian Schaller wrote:
>
> Well with GCC we are assuming people will read docs and figure out the command
> line parameters needed to use gcc. So expecting people to read the docs on how
> to use yum or 'yum search' is not expecting to much in my opinion.
>
> That s
On 28 February 2014 20:45, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 23:16 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> On Feb 27, 2014, at 11:07 PM, James Wilson Harshaw IV
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I apologize, I guess I did not get the whole background out of it.
>> >
>> > What filesystems are we considering?
On 1 March 2014 18:57, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-03-01 at 12:04 +0000, Ian Malone wrote:
>> On 28 February 2014 20:45, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 23:16 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> As you say they are 'plain' filesystems. Tho
On 1 March 2014 21:37, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 03/01/2014 02:30 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
>> On 1 March 2014 18:57, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2014-03-01 at 12:04 +, Ian Malone wrote:
>>>> On 28 February 2014 20:45, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>>>
On 2 March 2014 14:56, Ric Wheeler wrote:
> On 03/02/2014 01:17 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
>>>
>>> Can we get some definition of "legacy" here? kernel/nfs-utils versions?
>>> >
>>
>> I'd have to check what I can share. If it helps: not cur
On 1 April 2014 02:50, David wrote:
> On 3/31/2014 8:37 PM, Corey Sheldon wrote:
>> Whatever if they can't learn the basics and the fundamental basis of
>> Linux or the "Patent" issues and what have you then go somewhere else
>> like to mac or windows..sometimes you need to work for things and
On 1 April 2014 21:11, Matthew Miller wrote:
> Reposted from
> http://fedoramagazine.org/five-things-in-fedora-this-week-2014-04-01/
>
> This is the third installment of this series, and I'm still calibrating
> a few things. I'm aiming at a wide audience, but I'm not quite sure how
> much explain
On 2 April 2014 21:46, drago01 wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
>>> ** possibly adjust spec files to require or build-require lbzip2 instead of
>>> bzip2.
>> Is this necessary? Wouldn't it be better to have lbzip2 Provide bzip2
>> or something so that
On 8 April 2014 23:01, Corey Sheldon wrote:
> I'm glad to supply a mirror site for initial seeding for such actions as
> needed (GMT-4 (US ES/DT)
> Also great mailing list but curious do you plan on creating a blog or
> podcast with such info for those not always near email client ..been
> for
On 14 April 2014 14:40, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> = Proposed Self Contained Change: SDDM as the default KDE display manager
> instead of KDM =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SDDMinsteadOfKDM
>
> Change owner(s): Martin Briza & KDE SIG
>
> Retire KDM as the default display manager of the
On 16 April 2014 00:11, William Brown wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 13:49 -0700, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>> I don't think we want a 'firewall' UI anyway; the firewall is not
>> something most users can or should understand and make decisions of.
>
> Never take decisions away from users.
>
> The O
On 30 April 2014 14:10, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> = Proposed Self Contained Change: The Shogun Machine Learning Toolbox =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/shogun
>
> Change owner(s): Björn Esser
>
> SHOGUN is a large Scale Machine Learning Toolbox, being implemented in C++ and
> offering i
On 17 June 2014 19:11, David wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 6/17/2014 1:59 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> Am 17.06.2014 19:26, schrieb David:
>>
>> before you call others "zealots" you should ask yourself if you
>> are just only a ordinary user with his single mach
Kevin Fenzi on bugzilla:
> Hey folks. There are 47 people cc'ed on this bug.
>
> Can we please be kind to them and refrain from discussion here unless you
> have some new information that hasn't already been noted in the last 35
> comments?
Quite a sensible comment. We got to this situation becaus
On 23 June 2014 23:54, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> First of all thank you for your reasoned response. I simply disagree.
>
> I understand the fact about require bugs, and the tons of dependent
> packages. I've seen that also when I've tried to remove a package and
> noticed it had a myriad of depende
On 24 June 2014 11:03, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 24.06.2014 11:40, schrieb Florian Weimer:
>> On 06/24/2014 11:31 AM, Thomas Bendler wrote:
>>> Hopefully you don't write professional software with this kind of
>>> attitude.
>>
>> Please don't try to win arguments by labeling the opposition as
On 24 June 2014 12:51, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 24.06.2014 12:56, schrieb Ian Malone:
>> On 24 June 2014 11:03, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 24.06.2014 11:40, schrieb Florian Weimer:
>>>> On 06/24/2014 11:31 AM, Thomas Bendl
On 8 October 2015 at 23:58, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Matthew Miller wrote:
>> In many cases, this effectively means creating a Fedora-specfic fork of
>> the project.
>
> Only if you call patches to the build system (with little to no changes to
> the actual code) a "fork".
>
>> Even if we accept unbu
On 11 October 2015 at 12:43, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Haïkel wrote:
>> And what happens if the library is consumed by other packages
>> requiring the new API?
>
> Of course you have to support both the new and the old one.
>
>> Let's keep Ian example:
>> You keep the deprecated function in the new li
On 12 October 2015 at 16:27, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Ian Malone wrote:
>> Maybe there's some confusion about the point I was making. I'm
>> referring to the case where the bundled library has functions that are
>> no longer present in the fedora version and the applic
On 15 October 2015 at 11:50, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2015-10-14, Alexandre Moine wrote:
>> But, we have to be very careful with this software since it downloads
>> scripts and icons from the web (in the automated installer part)...
>> And it can install for example IE or steam by simply clicking a
On 15 October 2015 at 06:55, drago01 wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>>
>>
>> - Original Message -
>>> Dne 14.10.2015 v 16:50 Bastien Nocera napsal(a):
>>> > If the application cannot work without downloading anything, or being
>>> > supplied
>>> > third-pa
On 2 November 2015 at 09:14, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm working on bringing libraries/tools for neuroscience and neuroimaging
> into Fedora[0]. Now I'm packaging ANTs[1] (Advanced Normalization Tools
> (ANTs)), but we already have package ants[2] (game).
>
> How do I proceed with it?
On 18 November 2015 at 20:09, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 11:53 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>
>> I don't understand. If a user who has the right to act as root asks
>> to authorize a program to run as root on their behalf, we should grant
>> that request. And, once we grant i
On 18 November 2015 at 20:24, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 15:09 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
>> On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 11:53 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> > I don't understand. If a user who has the right to act as root asks
>> > to authorize a program to run as root on th
On 18 November 2015 at 23:38, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 18.11.2015 um 19:49 schrieb Adam Jackson:
>>
>> On Tue, 2015-11-17 at 17:30 +, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/02/2015 03:05 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
But, why take the risk exposure, when you could simply not?
>>>
>>>
>>> H
On 19 November 2015 at 03:18, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 03:09:34PM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
>> To the bug in question: probably we should make it so 'sudo gedit' does
>> work, but I'd still strongly discourage anyone from actually doing so.
>
> Actually, there's a better wa
On 19 November 2015 at 15:31, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 21:45 +0000, Ian Malone wrote:
>
>> Not really getting this. For any configuration task where you replace
>> editing a root owned text file with access through some authorised
>> gui, that gui is st
On 12 November 2015 at 14:59, Ray Strode wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 5:51 AM, Jared K. Smith
> wrote:
>> I've been testing Wayland myself since around the F22 time period, but
>> "middle click paste" and the occasional odd bug keep annoying me enough to
>> go back to X. Can you elab
On 25 November 2015 at 22:01, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-11-25 at 15:40 -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
>> On 11/25/2015 03:25 PM, drago01 wrote:
>> > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:17 PM, Adam Williamson
>> > wrote:
>> > > On Fri, 2015-11-20 at 14:
On 30 November 2015 at 12:29, Steve Clark wrote:
> On 11/26/2015 06:32 AM, Ian Malone wrote:
>>
>> On 25 November 2015 at 22:01, Adam Williamson
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The wiki page explaining the GNOME-on-Wayland approach to middle-button
>>> paste
On 8 January 2016 at 12:02, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Samuel Sieb writes:
>
>> On 01/07/2016 08:34 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>>>
>>> I decided I would instruct Byron in how to unsubscribe from our mailing
>>> list, when I discovered *I don't know how.*
>>>
>>> It seems with HyperKitty we no long
On 14 January 2016 at 19:29, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>
> On Jan 14, 2016 9:34 AM, "Nicolas Chauvet" wrote:
>>
>> 2016-01-14 18:05 GMT+01:00 Neal Gompa :
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Reindl Harald
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Am 14.01.2016 um 16:56 schrieb Neal Gompa:
>>> >>
>>> >> I've r
On 18 January 2016 at 01:32, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 12:55:54AM +0100, Heiko Adams wrote:
>> But it seems to be broken since Feb 2015, which is IMHO unacceptable
>> since a default package manager and all of its features have to work
>> absolutely reliable.
>
>
On 21 January 2016 at 09:10, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-01-20 at 15:50 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> If you're on freshly installed Fedora 23 (x86-64), then
>>
>> dnf install gtk3-devel.x86_64
>> ..
>>
>> Is this a bug or is it not expected this would work or I am doing it
>> w
On 21 January 2016 at 14:25, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>
> However I really think we need to sit down and rethink multilib. I would like
> to start by changing the multilib method to runtime. So you only get runtime
> libraries and nothing to build 32 bit apps on 64 bit. For 32 bit building you
> sh
On 21 January 2016 at 15:15, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Ian Malone wrote:
>> On 21 January 2016 at 14:25, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> However I really think we need to sit down and rethink multilib. I would
>>> like
&g
On 22 January 2016 at 09:05, Paul Howarth wrote:
> On 21/01/16 22:24, Ian Malone wrote:
>>
>> Since RHEL/CentOS 7 already does not exist in a native 32bit version I
>> do wonder what would actually be running in a hypothetical
>> mock/container/VM to build and run 32 b
On 22 January 2016 at 13:38, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 6:53 AM, Ian Malone wrote:
>> On 22 January 2016 at 09:05, Paul Howarth wrote:
>>> On 21/01/16 22:24, Ian Malone wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Since RHEL/CentOS 7 already does not exist in a
On 28 Jan 2016 19:42, "DJ Delorie" wrote:
>
>
> I've been around for a while, but as I'm taking on a new role inside
> Red Hat, I'll be showing up in different places here and upstream, so
> I figured I'd refresh everyone's memory as well as announce the change :-)
>
Meanwhile, on LKML, "From: Li
On 3 February 2016 at 14:35, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2016-02-02, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> May packages assume that /usr/sbin is on PATH when they are built?
>>
>> If you need a program which is currently only in /usr/sbin, should a
>> package use an absolute path, or reset PATH to include /usr/sbi
On 3 February 2016 at 23:00, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> Really, it is not realistic to expect people who need to urgently fix
> something to write up a polite e-mail and wait possibly days for you to
> reply (especially if you then answer that you don't want the change and more
> days are wasted goi
Hi,
I'm trying to build a spin on F16 against F17 (specifically the
fedora-jam spin, ssh://git.fedorahosted.org/git/music-creation
spin-kickstarts/fedora-jam/fedora-live-jam-kde.ks, with the
mono-bristol package removed).
I'm using the command:
# setenforce 0
# livecd-creator --config=/home/.../f
On 14 August 2012 08:49, Ian Malone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to build a spin on F16 against F17 (specifically the
> fedora-jam spin, ssh://git.fedorahosted.org/git/music-creation
> spin-kickstarts/fedora-jam/fedora-live-jam-kde.ks, with the
> mono-bristol package remo
On 14 August 2012 15:02, Brendan Jones wrote:
> On 08/14/2012 12:45 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
>>
>> On 14 August 2012 08:49, Ian Malone wrote:
>
>
> Ian, have you go the latest version? There was an missing EOF tag in one of
> the cat statements which could be causing p
On 14 August 2012 14:33, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> On 08/14/2012 03:49 AM, Ian Malone wrote:
>> I'm trying to build a spin on F16 against F17 (specifically the fedora-jam
>> spin, ssh://git.fedorahosted.org/git/music-creation
>> spin-kickstarts/fedora-jam/fedora-live
On 14 August 2012 15:13, Ian Malone wrote:
> On 14 August 2012 14:33, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>> On 08/14/2012 03:49 AM, Ian Malone wrote:
>
>>> I'm trying to build a spin on F16 against F17 (specifically the fedora-jam
>>> spin, ssh://git.fedorahosted.org/git
On 14 August 2012 15:10, Ian Malone wrote:
> On 14 August 2012 15:02, Brendan Jones wrote:
>> On 08/14/2012 12:45 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
>>>
>>> On 14 August 2012 08:49, Ian Malone wrote:
>>
>>
>> Ian, have you go the latest version? There was an mi
On 15 August 2012 17:44, Brian C. Lane wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 08:49:15AM +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm trying to build a spin on F16 against F17 (specifically the
>> fedora-jam spin, ssh://git.fedorahosted.org/git/music-creation
>> spin
On 15 August 2012 17:52, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> On 08/15/2012 10:44 AM, Brian C. Lane wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 08:49:15AM +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm trying to build a spin on F16 against F17 (specific
Hi, think this is a dependency bug, though thought I'd check here
before filing it. I'm building a F18 compose in a F18 mock root and
getting these two errors, I've added coreutils explicitly to the
kickstart, but it doesn't get installed till later in the process.
readlink:
Installing: genisoimag
1 - 100 of 219 matches
Mail list logo
