Re: Heads-Up: Beware of xmlCleanupParser() when your package links against libxml2

On 01/13/2010 09:07 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Lennart Poettering writes: >> if you have code that links against libxml2 and calls >> xmlCleanupParser() please verify that your project does that at the >> appropriate place (i.e. immediately before exiting, and only once). > > Why exactly is this a mis

Re: Heads Up: FESCo is considering to block packages providing sysvinit services without systemd unit

On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 13:52 +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 01:41:28PM +0100, drago01 wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Tomas Mraz wrote: > > > On the today's FESCo meeting we discussed the request to move forward > > > the conversion of the sysvinit scripts to system

Re: Heads Up: FESCo is considering to block packages providing sysvinit services without systemd unit

On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 12:07 +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: > 2011/11/9 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" : > > On 11/09/2011 05:49 AM, Ian Kent wrote: > > > That only leaves this relevant sections from that quick look that needs > > some work and remains questionable if that

Re: Heads Up: FESCo is considering to block packages providing sysvinit services without systemd unit

On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 11:01 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 11/09/2011 05:49 AM, Ian Kent wrote: > >>What other form of encouragement can you suggest? > > This email thread for a start. > > We have had email threads like this for two release cycl

Re: Heads Up: FESCo is considering to block packages providing sysvinit services without systemd unit

On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 11:01 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > > Now taking a quick look at the autofs service which I assume you are > referring too I'm not seeing anykind of massive rewrite in order for the > daemon ( which generally is an exception that a rule ) to work in > systemd uni

Re: Heads Up: FESCo is considering to block packages providing sysvinit services without systemd unit

On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 14:05 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Thu, 10.11.11 11:07, Ian Kent (ra...@themaw.net) wrote: > > > On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 11:01 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > > > On 11/09/2011 05:49 AM, Ian Kent wrote: > > > >&g

Re: Heads Up: FESCo is considering to block packages providing sysvinit services without systemd unit

On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 14:15 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Thu, 10.11.11 11:24, Ian Kent (ra...@themaw.net) wrote: > > > On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 11:01 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > > > > > > Now taking a quick look at the autofs service whi

Re: Heads Up: FESCo is considering to block packages providing sysvinit services without systemd unit

On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 14:36 +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > I can see only one difference - starting the daemon from a command > line within a user's session without double forking would leave the > process "attached" to the user's session in the process tree; however, > given that the process was

Re: /etc/mtab

On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 12:12 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Wed, 22.12.10 22:38, Bernie Innocenti (ber...@codewiz.org) wrote: > > > What's preventing us from symlinking /etc/mtab to /proc/mounts and get > > rid of confusing situations when mtab gets out of sync with the > > kernel? > > Some

Re: [HEADS-UP] util-linux[-ng] and mtab

On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 18:35 +0100, Karel Zak wrote: > I have pushed new util-linux into rawhide. The project has been > renamed from util-linux-ng back to util-linux. > > The util-linux v2.19-rc1 contains support for systems without > /etc/mtab (the file is replaced with symlink to /proc/mounts

Re: [HEADS-UP] util-linux[-ng] and mtab

On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 09:55 +0100, Karel Zak wrote: > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 02:08:50PM +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 18:35 +0100, Karel Zak wrote: > > > I have pushed new util-linux into rawhide. The project has been > > > renamed from util-

Re: btrfs as default filesystem for F22?

On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 13:18 +0200, Juan Orti Alcaine wrote: > El 2014-10-03 11:38, Steven Whitehouse escribió: > > Hi, > > I should also add (just in case anybody gets the wrong idea!) that I > > think it should definitely be made as easy as possible for anybody who > > wants to evaluate running bt

Re: Ditch RPM in favor of DPKG

On Thu, 2020-07-16 at 10:11 +, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > > Simply put, "no". Debian and Ubuntu ".deb" packages too often don't > > follow the File System Hierarchy, they may have different layouts > > and > > package naming capitalization schemes for matching Fedora packagers > > like "PyYAML"

Re: Stop the git abuse

On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 10:23 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 05/21/2012 09:56 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > > - Original Message - > >> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 07:07:56PM +0200, Remi Collet wrote: > >>> And definitvely, for me, (and probably only for me), git is really > >>> not a good tool

Re: [HEADS UP] Upcoming soname change for libtirpc

On Fri, 2015-10-30 at 14:16 -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: > > On 10/30/2015 12:36 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 11:50:48 -0400 > > Steve Dickson wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > Well place sources tell me in the upcoming > > > libtirpc release the soname will be changing > >

Re: [HEADS UP] Upcoming soname change for libtirpc

On Sun, 2015-11-01 at 18:48 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote: > On 10/30/2015 05:36 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 11:50:48 -0400 > > Steve Dickson wrote: > > > 2) find and rebuild all the dependencies? > > > > Should be something like: > > > > % sudo dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libt

Re: [HEADS UP] Upcoming soname change for libtirpc

On Mon, 2015-11-02 at 11:02 +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > On Sun, 2015-11-01 at 18:48 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote: > > On 10/30/2015 05:36 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 11:50:48 -0400 > > > Steve Dickson wrote: > > > > 2) find and rebuild all t

Re: [HEADS UP] Upcoming soname change for libtirpc

On Mon, 2015-11-02 at 11:15 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2015-11-02 at 11:02 +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > > On Sun, 2015-11-01 at 18:48 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote: > > > On 10/30/2015 05:36 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 11:50:48 -040

Re: [HEADS UP] Upcoming soname change for libtirpc

On Mon, 2015-11-02 at 18:46 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 09:49 +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > > > > This policy is clearly sensible and necessary, no question about > > that. > > > > But this appears to be an opportunity for improvement

Re: [HEADS UP] Upcoming soname change for libtirpc

On Mon, 2015-11-02 at 19:55 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 11:30 +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > > > > Still, with COPR I would need to find a suitable location to put > > the > > repo. so perhaps the mock method would suit me better. > > COPR *

Re: [HEADS UP] Upcoming soname change for libtirpc

On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 15:00 +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > On Mon, 2015-11-02 at 19:55 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 11:30 +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > > > > > > Still, with COPR I would need to find a suitable location to put > > > the &g

Re: STOP messing with nfs-utls... PLEASE!!!

On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 16:26 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote: > On 11/03/2015 04:08 PM, Steve Dickson wrote: > > commit 7765dd87e174beaa44a16a89530d4b956d9abdba > > Author: Kalev Lember > > Date: Sun Nov 1 16:48:00 2015 +0100 > > > > Disable bootstrap > > > > commit 6ea94b72ac9dfdb6c6d93f8bf975c

Re: STOP messing with nfs-utls... PLEASE!!!

On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 14:41 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: > In conclusion (which is why I'm top posting) > > Two bzs have been open up in other packages: > To take out the circular dependency in fedfs-utils >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277666 > > and remove a bad nfs-utils depe

Re: STOP messing with nfs-utls... PLEASE!!!

On Wed, 2015-11-04 at 06:28 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: > Hey, > > On 11/04/2015 01:35 AM, Ian Kent wrote: > > > I feel this is a better way to handle these issues > > > > than the bootstrapping option (which will be > > > > reverted from nfs-utils). >

Re: [INPUT REQUESTED] Fedora Policy on generated code

On Sat, 2015-12-19 at 00:34 +0100, Lars Seipel wrote: > There may be reasonable exceptions, but I'd consider them pretty > rare. > Even outside of the context of licensing, I think the concept of > "preferred form for modification" is a useful one here. That's what > should be in the SRPM and shoul

Re: On packager motivation

On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 08:44 -0700, Jerry James wrote: > > I think we need to ask ourselves, as a project, what behaviors we want > to motivate and what behaviors we want to demotivate in our packagers. > I think we need to take human nature, flawed as it is, into account > when doing so. I fear t

Re: On packager motivation

On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 16:04 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > If I send these two provenpackagers a somewhat hostile email, are you > > going to blame me? I have no problem with most provenpackager > > changes. In general, they have an obvious purpose and save me the > > work of making the same

Re: On packager motivation

On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 18:44 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, 04 Feb 2016 09:09:33 +0800 > Ian Kent wrote: > > > I agree. > > > > I believe that package ownership has at least a couple of clear > > advantages for obvious reasons and I find it hard to under

Re: Default libkrb5 ccache location

On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 08:07 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 03:27 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Mon, 29.07.13 21:11, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 02:08 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > > On Mon, 29.07.13 23:56, David Woodhouse

Re: nfs bug - any info on bugzilla 1324635

On Wed, 2016-06-01 at 17:15 -0700, Jagga Soorma wrote: > Hi Guys, > > Anyone have any information on bugzilla 1324635. This seems like a private > bug being tracked by redhat but is major and impacting us. Basically nfs gets > impacted with large writes. It looks to me like there's work being d

Re: Are we rebasing xorg-x11 packages in F20?

On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 09:14 +0100, Lukas Zapletal wrote: > Hello, > > my desktop was completely broken this morning because my startup scripts > rely on xrandr utility. An older update from this summer which I applied > recently changed it's output so device ids now contain dash characters > (e.g.

Re: Are we rebasing xorg-x11 packages in F20?

On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 14:04 +0100, Simone Caronni wrote: > On 25 November 2014 at 13:20, Lukas Zapletal wrote: > I don't understand why I noticed this today, it looks like the > latest > update was a Critical Path one (???) when Fedora 20 was stable > for six >

Re: 1794117 – Disabling support for UDP for NFSv3

On Wed, 2020-01-22 at 14:25 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: > FYI... > > NFS over UDP will be deprecated in the 5.6 kernel. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1794117 > > Its not clear what or if any havoc this could cause > but the commit (f745bfdc) has been accepted upstream. > Just

Re: nsswitch.conf: list of module packages that enables themselves

On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 14:38 +0100, Pavel Březina wrote: > On 11/26/18 2:21 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 8:16 AM Pavel Březina wrote: > > > > > > This e-mail is long so I just put the question here before explanation: > > > > > > Do you know about any package that inst

Re: AMD ROCm

On Wed, 2019-01-09 at 11:50 +0100, Germano Massullo wrote: > Hello, > AMD ROCm - Open Source Platform for HPC and Ultrascale GPU Computing[1] > is packaged by upstream only for RHEL/CentOS and Ubuntu. > Is anybody working on packaging it for Fedora? If not, is anybody > interested in setting up a t

Re: AMD ROCm

On Mon, 2019-01-21 at 08:39 +0100, Felix Schwarz wrote: > Am 09.01.19 um 11:50 schrieb Germano Massullo: > > AMD ROCm - Open Source Platform for HPC and Ultrascale GPU Computing[1] > > is packaged by upstream only for RHEL/CentOS and Ubuntu. > > Is anybody working on packaging it for Fedora? If not

Re: AMD ROCm

On Mon, 2019-01-21 at 12:58 +0100, Felix Schwarz wrote: > Am 21.01.19 um 09:11 schrieb Ian Kent: > > As much as I would like to help I need to get an additional SSD > > for my NUC8i7HNK (Radeon™ RX Vega M GL graphics) for that (I hope > > fairly soon). > > > > A

Re: How to install a mountpoint directory from an rpm?

On Tue, 2019-04-30 at 17:29 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 01:12:43PM -0400, Robert Marcano wrote: > > On 4/30/19 11:45 AM, David Howells wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I need to install a directory (/afs) that will be a mountpoint that a > > > systemd > > > serv

Re: How to install a mountpoint directory from an rpm?

On Fri, 2019-05-03 at 00:30 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 8:25 PM Ian Kent wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2019-04-30 at 17:29 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 01:12:43PM -0400, Robert Marcano wrote: > >

Re: [HEADS UP] util-linux based on new mount API coming to rawhide/f39

On 21/3/23 20:16, Karel Zak wrote: Hey all, util-linux v2.39-rc1 coming to rawhide, Release Notes: https://kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/util-linux/v2.39/v2.39-ReleaseNotes I usually don't report util-linux Fedora updates, but this one is special. This new version provides libmount wit

Re: static USERMODEHELPER_PATH

On 6/1/23 09:17, Steve Grubb wrote: Hello, I work on RHEL security problems. I have been looking into a number of exploits and I think we have a problem that has an easy fix. We are not using the CONFIG_STATIC_USERMODEHELPER_PATH kernel config option. There are a number of exploits that overwrit

Re: static USERMODEHELPER_PATH

On 6/1/23 10:12, Steve Grubb wrote: Hello, I want to add some missing information... On Thursday, January 5, 2023 8:43:34 PM EST Ian Kent wrote: On 6/1/23 09:17, Steve Grubb wrote: I work on RHEL security problems. I have been looking into a number of exploits and I think we have a problem

Re: gdb: No symbol table info available

On 10/12/17 02:13, Richard Shaw wrote: > I'm working on a segfault in the latest version of hedgewars and I can > reproduce the crash easy enough and I have installed both the debuginfo for > hedgewars and all the packages gdb suggested but the end of the log[1] still > says: Getting all the de

Re: rpcgen?

On 09/01/18 23:31, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 01/09/2018 03:32 PM, Steve Dickson wrote: >> >> >> On 01/09/2018 06:10 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >>> >>> https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Changes/SunRPCRemoval&oldid=508864 >>> says: >>> >>>    "Packages which need rpcgen will have to add

Re: Btrfs question for Fedora 33 beta. How can I add nocow to /var

On Sun, 2020-10-25 at 20:38 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 6:56 PM Leslie Satenstein via devel > > > I also intend to do the same with /sys on this, my beta system, > > I'm not sure about this. /sys is a pseudo-filesystem, the contents > aren't really on the root file system

Re: F36 Change: Drop NIS(+) support from PAM (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, 2021-10-27 at 13:40 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 04:37:18PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > > == User Experience == > > For some users this change may be a bit disruptive and it may > > require > > some learning curve for switching to alternative solutions. > > I've sp

Re: F36 Change: Drop NIS(+) support from PAM (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Thu, 2021-10-28 at 10:41 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Thu, 2021-10-28 at 10:28 -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > > Stephen John Smoogen writes: > > > > > Mainly because it is the authentication service equivalent of > > > telnet**. Very simple to set up, very simple to use, and very > > > easy

devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

On 07/04/18 05:58, Pierre-Francois RENARD wrote: > Hello guys, > > with F28 I tried to use autofs and nfs. > I had the following error “Too many levels of symbolic links” > I had to change SELinux mode to permissive to be able to make autofs usable > ... I had a report that appeared to be sel

devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

On 07/04/18 10:13, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > On 6 April 2018 at 22:58, Pierre-Francois RENARD wrote: >> Hello guys, >> >> with F28 I tried to use autofs and nfs. > > BTW autofs: is it any particular reason why in Fedora kernels autofs > support is compiled into the kernel and is not provided as loa

Re: What services / tools still require NIS domain?

On 16/05/18 23:17, David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] wrote: > On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 5:07 PM, Stephen Gallagher > wrote: > > I don't think SSSD or FreeIPA *require* it. They offer netgroup > functionality that can be used with it. Maybe I misunderstood your question? > Are

Re: Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Tue, 2021-08-24 at 10:53 +0200, Ondrej Dubaj wrote: > Hello, > > In the near future, there is a plan to merge autoconf-2.71 to > rawhide. Due to the size of the change and possible breakage of > multiple packages going FTBFS. The number of these packages should > not be many, currently we have

Re: Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

here when autoconf- > 2.71 will be stable. > > Thanks for your cooperation and hope to see very few failures this > week :) > > Regards, > Ondrej > > On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 2:36 PM Ian Kent wrote: > > On Tue, 2021-08-24 at 10:53 +0200, Ondrej Dubaj wrote: > > &g

Re: Follow-up on Fedora Aide Project Bug Report

On 24/2/25 11:07, Jian Peng wrote: Dear Fedora Development Team, I hope this email finds you well. I have submitted a bug report on Fedora's Bugzilla regarding an issue with the Aide project (ID: 2346091 ), which involves a patch fix and mod