Review swaps

Hi, I've been working on packaging lcd4linux (to use together with the digital picture frames I also wrote a libgphoto driver for a while ago). The packaging is complete and now I'm looking for reviewers for the following 3 packages. As usual I'll gladly swap a review for a review. Note that the

File SDL_Perl-v2.2.6.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by jwrdegoede

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-SDL: 445950ca7b9991f34ec792bbac8386b6 SDL_Perl-v2.2.6.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listin

[perl-SDL] - Rebase to 2.2.6 upstream release (#679313)

commit b0a8882f1eb8a47fc631c5b0d44c23e05d4d31f7 Author: Hans de Goede Date: Tue Feb 22 09:58:58 2011 +0100 - Rebase to 2.2.6 upstream release (#679313) .gitignore |1 + filter-provides.sh |2 +- perl-SDL-gfxPie.patch | 34

[perl-SDL/f15/master] - Rebase to 2.2.6 upstream release (#679313)

Summary of changes: b0a8882... - Rebase to 2.2.6 upstream release (#679313) (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https:

Re: 42 Orphaned packages

Sven Lankes wrote: > basket I'll take this. Regards, Hans -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: 42 Orphaned packages

Hi, On 03/10/2011 09:16 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Sven Lankes wrote: >> basket > > I'll take this. Ugh, I mistakenly confused this with bastet, untaking it, sorry for the pkgdb acl change spam to those involved. Regards, Hans -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fed

Re: Realtek 8192se on F12/F13

Hi Jos, On 05/10/2010 12:38 PM, Jos Vos wrote: > Hi, > > What is the status of support for the Realtek 8192se WiFi > controller in F12 and F13? > > I see in some wiki page a reference to the Realtek website, > at least for (stock) F12. > > Is this chipset in the meantime supported in the F12 kerne

Re: ImageMagick update

Hi, On 05/17/2010 03:13 AM, Chen Lei wrote: > > > 2010/5/16 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) > > > > About ABI breakage there separate problem in ImageMagick - > > http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-bugs-d...@lists.debian.org/msg736218.html > So, upstr

Headsup: ABI changing libebml bump coming to rawhide

Hi All, A new libebml version is coming to a rawhide near you. This version does not change the soname, yet the C++ ABI is still changing So all packages using libebml will need to be rebuild: [h...@localhost ~]$ sudo repoquery -q --whatrequires --alldeps libebml libebml-0:0.7.8-3.fc12.x86_64 li

Re: libjpeg for F14

Hi all, On 05/22/2010 05:55 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > hi there, > > Can it be updated to upstream version in rawhide ? > > The libjpeg version(6b) in Fedora is quite old(27-Mar-1998). > And newer versions were released on: > > Version 7 27-Jun-2009 > Version 8 10-Jan-2010 > Version 8a 2

Headsup: ABI changing libebml bump coming to rawhide

Hi All, A new libebml version (1.0.0) is coming to a rawhide near you. This version properly bumps the soname as already should have been done with the 0.8.0 release. So all packages using libebml will need to be rebuild: [h...@localhost ~]$ sudo repoquery -q --whatrequires --alldeps libebml libe

Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps

Hi, On 07/14/2010 03:24 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > Heya, > > b) if you maintain a package which includes a daemon/service from > outside the default install, it would be awesome if you could ship > native unit files too, even though I don't have any ready for > you. Writing unit files is n

Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps

Hi, On 07/19/2010 07:33 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mon, 19.07.10 11:44, Mike Christie (mchri...@redhat.com) wrote: > >>> But if that's the case, why do you believe you gain anything by checking >>> whether the root directory is on iscsi? >> >> For root on iscsi we always need it on. > > Bu

ABI breaking libsidplayfp update coming to rawhide

Hi All, I've just started a build of libsidplayfp-1.8.0 for rawhide, this new version breaks the ABI, and as such comes with a soname bump. The API is not changed, some functions have been marked as deprecated, fixing things for this if / when they get removed should be trivial. I'll take care

Re: Orphaning some packages

Hi, As I was curious of any of my packages depends on any of these I've run some repoqueries to see what depends on these, and we still have a ton of dependencies on these. So unless we want to drop a ton of packages, we really need someone to pick these up: [hans@shalem ~]$ sudo repoquery --wha

Re: F21/F22: xorg-x11-drv: which for SiS?

Hi Felix, > xorg-x11-drv-sis seems to have disappeared. Did that happen on purpose? It > still exists as a selelection in Bugzilla. Xorg is looking for sis module but > cannot find it. Gfxchip here is Z7/Z9 (XG20 core). Is it now supposed to be > using some other (not installed) driver? Before tod

Latest F-21 updates cause non-booting system on some Haswel systems + workaround

Hi All, Just spend some time debugging this and thought I should share this, see: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=762195 for details, I've filed a bug to track fixing this in Fedora: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147062 There are 2 ways this problem shows itsel

Re: Latest F-21 updates cause non-booting system on some Haswel systems + workaround

Hi, On 09/26/2014 08:37 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi All, > > Just spend some time debugging this and thought I should share this, see: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=762195 > > for details, I've filed a bug to track fixing

Re: Request for testers: glibc update to work around Intel TSX errata microcode_ctl problems.

Hi All, On 09/26/2014 08:34 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > Developers. > > Testers wanted immediately for: > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glibc-2.18-16.fc20 > > and > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glibc-2.20-4.fc21 > > For Fedora 21 and Fedora 20 we will be disabling In

Re: Request for testers: glibc update to work around Intel TSX errata microcode_ctl problems.

Hi, On 09/26/2014 09:26 PM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 08:53:59PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: >> I've just tested the F-21 update for this, and I'm afraid that the >> problem is still present there. I've also regenerated my initrd to make

Looking for xorg-x11-* package co-maintainers

Hi All, As you probably know the graphics team always has more work to do then we've manpower. As the person taking care of various old xor-x11 apps / utilities and utility libraries I'm looking for co-maintainers to help with maintaining these. You do not need to be a hardcore X hacker to help

Re: Looking for xorg-x11-* package co-maintainers

Hi, On 10/22/2014 12:09 PM, Simone Caronni wrote: > On 22 October 2014 11:25, Hans de Goede wrote: > >> You do not need to be a hardcore X hacker to help here. 2 things >> with which I really could use help is keeping all the various bits >> and pieces up2date with upstr

Re: Looking for xorg-x11-* package co-maintainers

1.11 (1.10 in f21) > -xrandr 1.4.3 (1.4.2 in f21) > -twm-1.0.8 (1.0.7 in f21) > -imake 1.0.7 (1.0.6 in f21) > -gccmakedep 1.0.3 (1.0.2 in f21) > > On 22 October 2014 12:17, Hans de Goede wrote: > >>> I'm no hacker, but I can help with packaging. >> >>

Re: Looking for xorg-x11-* package co-maintainers

Hi, On 10/22/2014 01:59 PM, Matthieu Gautier wrote: > Le 22/10/2014 11:25, Hans de Goede a écrit : >> Hi All, >> >> As you probably know the graphics team always has more work to do >> then we've manpower. >> >> As the person taking care of various

Headsup updating miglayout to 4.2 for F-21+

Hi, I'm working on updating freecol to 0.11 and that needs a new miglayout, so I'm updating miglayout too, and I'll push them in tandem. This should not be a problem, since according to repoquery freecol is the only user of miglayout. Regards, Hans -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproje

ode updated to 0.13.1 in rawhide, all packages using it need to be rebuild (abi and soname change)

Hi All, I've just started a build of ode for rawhide updating it to 0.13.1, it includes some changes which break the abi, and upstream has bumped the soname because of this, so all packages using it need to be rebuild. I expect a simple rebuild to suffice in most cases, for a detailed list of ABI

Re: Font issues in F21

Hi, On 10/30/2014 11:01 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > As a fix for this: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046341 > > The following symbolic link was added to xorg-x11-font-utils: > > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 12 Aug 18 23:08 /usr/share/fonts/X11 -> ../X11/fonts > > This causes fon

Re: Font issues in F21

Hi, On 10/31/2014 10:20 AM, nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote: > De: "Hans de Goede" > Hi, > > On 10/30/2014 11:01 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > >>> Can some font experts weigh in on how to properly solve the first issue >>> without triggering the se

Re: Mass reassign and orphan: steve

Hi, On 11/11/2014 01:03 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Dear all, > > This morning I processed another round of point of contact changes. > According to https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1233, all the perl-* > packages > from the FAS user steve have been reassigned to psabata and the rest of

Re: Failed to load vesa with undefined symbol (was: Re: hardening breaks X.org)

Hi, On 02-03-15 12:00, Moez Roy wrote: On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 1:30 AM, Christopher Meng wrote: Ok, this time is vesa's problem: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/2015-February/057183.html But hardening breaks it indeed. -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://cicku.me https://bugzill

F22: gnomekeyring no longer remembering unlocked ssh keys?

Hi All, I've setup things so that the first time I want to unlock an ssh keys I need to explicitly type the unlock password (I do not want this to get remembered and the keys to automatically get unlocked the moment I log in). This used to work fine in F21 and in F22 till aprox 1-2 weeks ago. Bu

Strange link error on rawhide

Hi, ClanLib currently fails to build properly on rawhide, I've narrowed the problem down to a link error while building a conftest from the configure script: configure:15948: g++ -o conftest -I/usr/include/freetype2 -Wl,-z,relro -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld conftest.cpp -lfre

Re: Strange link error on rawhide

Hi, On 02-04-15 15:03, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 02:59:01PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, ClanLib currently fails to build properly on rawhide, I've narrowed the problem down to a link error while building a conftest from the configure script: configure:15948: g

Re: Fedora 22 and missing applications

Hi, On 05/26/2015 05:33 PM, Richard Hughes wrote: Quite a few people are going to be installing Fedora 22 in the coming days, searching for things in the software center and not finding their esoteric GUI tool. This is because some applications still don’t ship AppData files, which have become c

Re: Unretiring cx18-firmware, if anyone else still wants it in the distro

Hi, On 30-05-15 11:57, Gilles J. Seguin wrote: On Wed, 2015-03-18 at 17:34 +, Simon Farnsworth wrote: Hello all, I've got the misfortune of maintaining a small number of systems that use the cx18 driver for their HVR-1600 cards; I'm just in the process of bringing these systems up to Fedor

Rawhide FTBFS errors and the mass rebuild

Hi, So I've been getting some failed build mails from the mass rebuild for F-23. I'm wondering how to fix these since the mass rebuild is happening inside a side-tag, do I just do a normal master build with the cause fixed, or should I build into the side-tag ? If the latter what is the command

Review Swap

Hi All, I've just submitted a small / simple package for review: 1234468 - Review Request: envytools - Tools for people envious of nvidia's binary driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234468 And I would like to swap a review of that for a review of one of your packages. Regards

Re: Updating SFML to 2.3

Hi, On 06/23/2015 03:34 PM, Pranav Kant wrote: I unorphaned SFML couple of days back. I plan to update the version to latest upstream version, SFML 2.3 in f21, f22 and rawhide. Affected package : marsshooter $ repoquery --whatrequires SFML SFML-devel marsshooter To build marsshooter against la

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: swap on zram

Hi, On 6/5/20 9:43 PM, John M. Harris Jr wrote: On Friday, June 5, 2020 12:38:01 PM MST Igor Raits wrote: On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 12:18 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote: On Friday, June 5, 2020 12:12:40 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote: On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 1:07 PM John M. Harris Jr < joh...@splenti

Re: Bodhi 5.4.0 in production

Hi, On 6/22/20 9:53 AM, Clement Verna wrote: Hi all, I have just deployed Bodhi 5.4.0 (https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/releases) in production. We were running 5.2.2 so that deployment brings the improvement and bug fixes from 5.3.0 and 5.4.0 (see release notes) One high level feature

Re: Disable dmraid.service on first run if no dmraid sets are found - Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal

Hi, On 6/29/20 10:57 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 3:45 pm, Michael Catanzaro wrote: We might need to explicitly disable systemd-udev-settle.service during the system upgrade to turn it off? Doesn't work... I tried 'systemctl disable systemd-udev-settle.service' and

Re: Remove device-mapper-multipath from the Fedora workstation livecd - Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal

Hi, On 6/29/20 10:29 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 4:20 PM Chris Murphy wrote: On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 2:05 PM Ben Cotton wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RemoveDeviceMapperMultipathFromWorkstationLiveCD Multipath support is only necessary for installations in

Re: Disable dmraid.service on first run if no dmraid sets are found - Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal

Hi, On 6/30/20 12:59 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 3:37 pm, Samuel Sieb wrote: But that should be running concurrently.  Does the plot show anything important waiting for it?  Your desktop should be able to load before that service is finished starting. Well notably: p

Re: Remove device-mapper-multipath from the Fedora workstation livecd - Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal

having device-mapper-multipath on the livecd is not really necessary. For installations which do actually need this device-mapper-multipath the server installation iso can be used and this is a better fit for such installations. == Owner == * Name: [[User:jwrdegoede| Hans de Goede]] * Email: hdego

Re: Disabling lvm2-monitor.service (was Disable dmraid.service on first run if no dmraid sets are found - Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal)

Hi, On 6/30/20 11:42 AM, Zdenek Kabelac wrote: Dne 30. 06. 20 v 11:34 Vitaly Zaitsev via devel napsal(a): On 30.06.2020 11:23, Igor Raits wrote: Sadly you can't have lvm2 not installed: Yes, but it can be disabled. Of course, you can disable this yourself if you are skilled admin and you

Re: Disabling lvm2-monitor.service (was Disable dmraid.service on first run if no dmraid sets are found - Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal)

Hi, On 6/30/20 12:27 PM, Zdenek Kabelac wrote: Dne 30. 06. 20 v 12:18 Hans de Goede napsal(a): Hi, On 6/30/20 11:42 AM, Zdenek Kabelac wrote: Dne 30. 06. 20 v 11:34 Vitaly Zaitsev via devel napsal(a): On 30.06.2020 11:23, Igor Raits wrote: Sadly you can't have lvm2 not installed:

Re: Disabling lvm2-monitor.service (was Disable dmraid.service on first run if no dmraid sets are found - Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal)

Hi, On 6/30/20 1:27 PM, Zdenek Kabelac wrote: Dne 30. 06. 20 v 12:43 Hans de Goede napsal(a): Hi, On 6/30/20 12:27 PM, Zdenek Kabelac wrote: Dne 30. 06. 20 v 12:18 Hans de Goede napsal(a): Hi, On 6/30/20 11:42 AM, Zdenek Kabelac wrote: Dne 30. 06. 20 v 11:34 Vitaly Zaitsev via devel

Re: Better Thermal Management for the Workstation - Fedora 33 Self-Contained Change proposal

Hi, On 6/30/20 5:48 PM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: On 30.06.2020 15:25, Ben Cotton wrote: Better thermal management and peak performance on Intel CPUs by including thermald in the default install. Good, but thermald is absolutely useless without configs. Configs can be extracted from DPT

Re: The future of legacy BIOS support in Fedora.

Hi, On 6/30/20 8:29 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: On 30.6.2020 17:49, John M. Harris Jr wrote: On Tuesday, June 30, 2020 6:34:27 AM MST Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: Given Hans proposal [1] introduced systemd/grub2/Gnome upstream changes it beg the question if now would not be the time to st

Re: The future of legacy BIOS support in Fedora.

Hi, On 7/6/20 9:36 PM, John M. Harris Jr wrote: On Monday, July 6, 2020 5:51:40 AM MST Gerd Hoffmann wrote: Image boots in both uefi (sd-boot) and bios (grub2) mode, and the config file for the latter is so short that I can include it here without hitting the mailing list size limit ;) ---

Re: Very strange compiler/linker related build failures in rawhide

Hi, On 7/24/20 10:31 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote: Hi all, I'm starting to see various very strange kinds of build failures in rawhide, that seem to have started with either of these updates (or a combination of them): - annobin 9.21-1.fc33 → 9.22-1.fc33 - binutils 2.34.0-6.fc33 → 2.34.0-7.fc33 -

Re: We have to talk about annobin... again

Hi, On 7/25/20 5:25 PM, Jeff Law wrote: On Sat, 2020-07-25 at 10:46 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 10:35 AM Neal Gompa wrote: Hey all, So I was trying to update libseccomp last night, and I was able to build it for everything except aarch64 on Rawhide because it says th

Re: Non responsive packager: amitshah

Hi, On 7/27/20 10:36 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: Good Morning Everyone, I have been trying to contact packagers without a proper bugzilla account associated with their FAS email for a while now. The first email to devel-announce is from June 13th [1]. This is a requirement for packagers whi

Re: Orphaning qjackctl

Hi, On 7/26/20 11:08 PM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: Hi all, This wants to go to a new owner: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/qjackctl I am the "official" maintainer, something I had completely forgotten about (this was a VERY long time ago). Orcan (Ogetbil) took care of it for a long ti

Re: Non responsive packager: amitshah

Hi, On 7/27/20 11:15 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:52:34AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 7/27/20 10:36 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: Good Morning Everyone, I have been trying to contact packagers without a proper bugzilla account associated with their FAS

Dropping libusb1-static package ?!

Hi, While working on updating the libusb1 package I noticed it still provides a libusb1-static package. I would very much like to drop this, so 2 questions: 1) Any objections? 2) I'm afraid my repoquery-foo is too weak to figure out if anything BuildRequires libusb1-static, can someone give m

Re: Eliminating automatic provides on private libs

Hi, On 04/27/2012 10:13 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote: I started once again looking at ways to eliminate the unwanted provides on private libs such as dlopen()'ed modules with minimal fuss and breakage. Been down this route more than once but I suspect the last time was before the major dependen

Re: Eliminating automatic provides on private libs

Hi, On 04/29/2012 05:13 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote: On 04/27/2012 07:36 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:13:47AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote: I'm going to add a switch to allow packages to control the behavior anyway. Whether rpm upstream defaults to the traditional behav

Re: TnL

Hi, On 05/10/2012 03:26 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: I recently updated Io-language to the current release. Finally. Anyway, TnL, which requires it, had been unable to run, at least for me, and now I can't even get it to build. So unless someone else wants to take a crack at it and fix it up, I'm go

Replacing libusb1 with libusbx

Hi All, I plan to replace libusb1 with libusbx, libusx is a fork of and a drop in replacement for libusb1. The libusbx fork was started by various libusb-1.0 developers (almost all of them *), because the official maintainer of libusb-1.0 refused to do any stable / tarbal releases for over 18 mo

Re: Replacing libusb1 with libusbx

Hi, On 05/22/2012 02:55 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote: On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 13:44 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi All, I plan to replace libusb1 with libusbx, libusx is a fork of and a drop in replacement for libusb1. The libusbx fork was started by various libusb-1.0 developers (almost all of

Re: Kernel 3.4 behaves weirdly with flash drives

Hi, On 06/19/2012 11:22 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote: Hi folks, In kernels 3.4 and 3.4.2, the kernel gets the size of my pen drives wrong: it thinks they're EB[1] in size, when they're actually only 4GB and 8GB. This issue is not present in the 3.3 kernel. I was wondering if any one else is facing th

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

Hi, On 07/06/2012 10:55 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: Package vorbisspi (fails to build) Fixed. Regards, Hans -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Educating packagers about always making changes in devel / rawhide first

Hi all, I've just upgraded my main workstation form F-20 to rawhide, and during the distro-sync I noticed that several packages in rawhide are older then in F-20. Although there will be some exceptions I believe that for most of them this is caused by some packages still not having a proper workf

Re: Educating packagers about always making changes in devel / rawhide first

Hi, On 02/10/2014 08:03 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi > > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> >> Would folks be ok with running it weekly or something? >> >> and on which path? The entire f19-updates-testing to rawhide? >> > > IMO, yes and yes +1 Thanks & Regards,

gnome-disk-utility orphaned ?

Hi, See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063259 Regards, Hans -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: gnome-disk-utility orphaned ?

Hi, On 02/17/2014 03:17 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > - Original Message - >> Hi, >> >> See: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063259 > > It's not, and it's probably just an oversight. Feel free to cherry-pick the > updates > from F20 into master. rhughes just bumped i

Re: Maybe it's time to get rid of tcpwrappers/tcpd?

Hi, On 03/20/2014 07:45 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Thu, 20.03.14 14:31, Martin Langhoff (martin.langh...@gmail.com) wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Lennart Poettering >> wrote: >> >>> I wonder whether it wouldn't be time to say goodbye to tcpwrappers in >>> Fedora. There has

Headsup: Rebased Xorg coming to a rawhide near you

Hi All, During the last few days I've been preparing a rebase of Xorg to 1.15.99.902 all packages have been build into the f21-xorg tag now, and I've just request rel-eng to move them to rawhide proper. So the next rawhide compose, or maybe the one after that will have an all new Xorg stack. I've

Re: PSA: don't make your polkit policies desktop centric

Hi, On 05/05/2014 11:47 AM, Stef Walter wrote: > Many of the polkit policy files services ship in Fedora have lines that > look like this: > > > no > no > auth_admin_keep > > > The no prevents use of the service from remote > sessions such as ssh or Cockpit. > > The

Re: first and only X needs to be on tty7

Hi, On 05/05/2014 05:45 PM, Felix Miata wrote: > On 2014-05-05 12:34 (GMT+0200) Lennart Poettering composed: > >> Felix Miata wrote: > >>> How can I get it to go there and stay there? When starting F21 in >>> multi-user, logging in on tty3 and running startx, KDE shows up on >>> tty3, where, as

Re: Fwd: Ophaning lcms(1)

Hi, On 06/02/2014 10:39 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > Hello, > > I'm orphaning lcms, this package has seen few security issue and upstream > claim it's deprecated over lcms2 > > rhel 7 doesn't depends on it for the few package, so it might be an option > not to build lcms support for certain pac

Re: [HEADS UP] ogre 1.9.0 building in rawhide

Hi, On 06/08/2014 03:01 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > Hi Michael, > On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: >> On Sun, 8 Jun 2014 01:15:51 +0400, Igor Gnatenko wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I just updated ogre to 1.9.0 in rawhide[0]. >>> >>> There was so much changes in spec file, patche

Headsup: New soname changing SDL_gfx build coming to rawhide

Hi, Upstream SDL_gfx has a new 2.0.25 release out for a while now. Since Fedora is supposed to be First it is time to upgrade to it. Unfortunately this release bumps the soname, so all deps need to be rebuild. I'll start rebuilds of all the affected packages myself, so unless the rebuild fails on

Re: Adding pkg-config not provided by upstream when packaging a library?

Hi, On 06/16/2014 08:57 AM, Kalev Lember wrote: > On 06/15/2014 11:32 PM, Eric Smith wrote: >> Since there are sixteen variants of the library, I am providing sixteen >> corresponding pkg-config files. When another program uses the library, >> by using pkg-config in their Makefile (or other build

Re: Lua 5.2

Hi, On 18-11-15 08:06, Germano Massullo wrote: Hi, I would like to ask "lua" and "compat-lua" maintainers if it is possible to have a packaged 5.2 lua version. A use case? Upstream Darktable ships a bundled Lua version 5.2, and it is not compatible with Lua 5.3. Fedora's Darktable does not ship

Re: Tuxmath needs help

Hi, On 22-12-15 12:59, Michael Schwendt wrote: Just received bugzilla messages for ancient tickets that have not been dealt with. Duplicates and EOL-closed ones have piled up: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=POST&bug_status=MODIFIED&bug_

Re: Heads up: LLVM repackaging in F24

Hi, On 27-01-16 19:22, Adam Jackson wrote: On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 11:25 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: Aren't clang, lldb, and compiler-rt still part of the main LLVM package sources, though? It would make sense to continue building them as part of the LLVM package since they ship together. They're

Re: Heads up: LLVM repackaging in F24

Hi, On 28-01-16 09:36, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 27-01-16 19:22, Adam Jackson wrote: On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 11:25 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: Aren't clang, lldb, and compiler-rt still part of the main LLVM package sources, though? It would make sense to continue building them as part o

Vacation hansg July 13th - July 20th

Hi All, I'm going on vacation for a week starting tomorrow, and I will *not* be reading email, etc. during that time. Regards, Hans -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v4] Retiring packages for F-18

Hi all, On 07/26/2012 12:24 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote: Removing: quesoglc chromium-bsu requires quesoglc-devel = 0.7.2-2.fc15 chromium-bsu requires libGLC.so.0 rss-glx requires quesoglc-devel = 0.7.2-2.fc15 rss-glx requires libGLC.so.0 warzone2100 requires quesoglc-deve

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] [FINAL NOTICE] Retiring packages for F-18

Hi, On 08/03/2012 11:27 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: 2012/7/31 Bill Nottingham : Before we branch for Fedora 18, as is custom, we will block currently orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 16. The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If you

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] [FINAL NOTICE] Retiring packages for F-18

Hi, On 07/31/2012 07:11 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: Before we branch for Fedora 18, as is custom, we will block currently orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 16. The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If you have a need for one of these

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] [FINAL NOTICE] Retiring packages for F-18

On 31 July 2012 18:11, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Package libcrystalhd (fails to build) Fixed (thanks to kwizard for providing the fix, I just committed it). Regards, Hans -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: F-18 Branched report: 20120810 changes

Hi, On 08/10/2012 07:25 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: ...snip... One quick note about this branched compose: Packages that failed to build in f18 were not included, because the mash setup doesn't pull them in via inheritance. They have now been manually tagged into things, so they should show up in t

Re: ODE upgrade

Hi, On 08/21/2012 12:00 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: Hello, all. Hans, the ode maintainer, has asked me to implement and coordinate the upgrade of ode to the current release, 0.12. The affected packages, so far as we've determined, are delelict, machineball, ompl, stormbaancoureur, xmoto and taoframe

Moving pid files from /var/run/$name.pid to /var/run/$name/$name.pid

Hi, Today I received a bug report to mv sensorsd's pid file from /var/run/sensorsd.pid to /var/run/sensorsd/sensorsd.pid, see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851428 As discussed there, I think / guess that the same request has probably been made for other daemons and I'm not sure i

Re: Packages in need of new maintainers

Hi, On 10/03/2012 08:23 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: As a result of FESCO ticket 952*, Lubomir Rintel's 200+ packages are in need of new maintainers. Under normal circumstances we'd simply orphan them all, but given the large number we want to handle this in a more orderly fashion. Please reply to th

Re: anacanda: should we ignore the bios raid information on a disk when the raid is broken?

Hi, On 10/15/2012 09:23 AM, Joshua C. wrote: I have a broken fake raid on my machine (intel p67 chipset with one of the disks missing) and when trying to install F17 yesterday (with up-to-date respin done with pungi) I was greeted with the following message "disk sdXXX has bios raid information

Re: anacanda: should we ignore the bios raid information on a disk when the raid is broken?

Hi, On 10/15/2012 10:41 AM, Joshua C. wrote: 2012/10/15 Hans de Goede : Hi, On 10/15/2012 09:23 AM, Joshua C. wrote: I have a broken fake raid on my machine (intel p67 chipset with one of the disks missing) and when trying to install F17 yesterday (with up-to-date respin done with pungi) I

Re: F20 System Wide Change: ARM as primary Architecture

Hi, On 07/11/2013 08:38 PM, Till Maas wrote: On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 08:58:11AM -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote: vnc installs if you want graphics. Or kickstart installs if you want automation. This sounds promising. Are there remix-anaconda images that can be used to test this on a Cubiebo

Away on vacation and for Guadec

Hi All, I'll be away on vacation Jul 18 - 26 (and not reading email), and I'll be at Guadec Jul 31 - Aug 7 (and sporadically reading my email). So if you're trying to reach me and I'm not responding immediately, that is why. I'll catch up with email, bugs, etc. when I return. Regards, Hans --

Announcing Fedora 19 ARM remix for Allwinner SOCs release 1, now with A20 support

Hi All, I'm very happy to announce the first release (r1) of my Fedora 19 ARM remix images for Allwinner A10, A10s, A13 and A20 based devices. This release is based on the official Fedora 19 Final for ARM images, with u-boot and kernel(s) from the linux-sunxi project: http://linux-sunxi.org/ Bes

Review swap: swap compat-lua review for ...

Hi All, lua in f20 has been bumped to 5.2, and Tom Callaway has been working hard to post most lua users over. Unfortunately for some apps the port is far from trivial. So for now we are going to introduce a compat-lua (5.1) package to allow those apps to keep building (currently they are FTBFS i

Python code not being byte-compiled when build on ARM ?

Hi all, During the F-20 mass-rebuild a noarch package of mine ended up being build on arm (which by itself is fine), but it failed to build because the numerous .py files were not byte-compiled ? See: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5753892 So is this a packaging bug in my pa

fpc (free pascal compiler) is now available on F20 armv7hl

Hi All, I spend mot of my time today bootstrapping fpc on ARM for F20. This is done now, and the result seems to work :) So if you've any packages which are FTBFS on F-20 due to fpc not being available, please re-submit a build for them, they should build fine now. Regards, Hans -- devel maili

Re: Python code not being byte-compiled when build on ARM ?

Hi, On 08/05/2013 11:03 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:41:18PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi all, During the F-20 mass-rebuild a noarch package of mine ended up being build on arm (which by itself is fine), but it failed to build because the numerous .py files were not

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: Announcing Fedora 19 ARM remix for Allwinner SOCs release 1, now with A20 support

Hi, On 08/30/2013 07:24 PM, elias@gmail.com wrote: Op vrijdag 19 juli 2013 00:12:35 UTC+2 schreef Hans de Goede: The following has been ported / is supported: -sound: analog in/out Fedora 19 ARM should also work on the following devices: * A13-OLinuXino (Olimex) Hi, thanks very

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: Announcing Fedora 19 ARM remix for Allwinner SOCs release 1, now with A20 support

Hi, On 09/12/2013 04:27 PM, hmandevt...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Hans, i tryed to use your fedora 19 remix on my Olinuxino A20 Rev.D but don't start, there is only red and green leds power on static (no blink) but i have always hdmi signal off (i verified that script is for hdmi). Have you tried h

Announcing Fedora 19 ARM remix for Allwinner SOCs release 2

Hi All, I'm very happy to announce the second release (r2) of my Fedora 19 ARM remix images for Allwinner A10, A10s, A13 and A20 based devices. This release is based on the official Fedora 19 Final for ARM images, with u-boot and kernel(s) from the linux-sunxi project: http://linux-sunxi.org/ He

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >