soname changing parted heading for rawhide

2010-01-11 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, Today I've rebased parted to parted-2.1, this means that the libparted soname has changed, and all libparted using packages need to be rebuild: [h...@localhost ~]$ sudo repoquery -q --whatrequires 'libparted-1.9.so.0()(64bit)' qtparted-0:0.4.5-22.fc12.x86_64 DeviceKit-disks-0:009-3.fc12.x86_

RFC: gtk v4l2 (webcam) control panel app + applet

2010-01-12 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, As you most likely know I've been steadily working on improving webcam support under Fedora. As you also might know I used to work at a Dutch University teaching Computer Science. I recently got a request from them if there were any software engineering assignments I could come up with. Whic

Re: soname changing parted heading for rawhide

2010-01-14 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 01/14/2010 04:41 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Adam Williamson (awill...@redhat.com) said: >>> [h...@localhost ~]$ sudo repoquery -q --whatrequires >>> 'libparted-1.9.so.0()(64bit)' >>> qtparted-0:0.4.5-22.fc12.x86_64 >>> DeviceKit-disks-0:009-3.fc12.x86_64 (now udisks) >>> gparted-0:0.4.8-

Re: RFC: gtk v4l2 (webcam) control panel app + applet

2010-01-15 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 01/12/2010 01:13 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote: > Good idea, apart from: > > On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 12:39 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: >> >> For Fedora-14 (to be released November 2010) it would be nice to have >> a >> gtk application for controlling va

Re: soname changing parted heading for rawhide

2010-01-15 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 01/12/2010 03:42 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 08:19:58PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Today I've rebased parted to parted-2.1, this means that the libparted >> soname has changed, and all libparted using packa

Re: RFC: gtk v4l2 (webcam) control panel app + applet

2010-01-15 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 01/12/2010 02:25 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > > Le Mar 12 janvier 2010 12:39, Hans de Goede a écrit : > >> Which remembered me that it would be nice to have a gtk app for >> controlling webcam settings like brightness, contrast, etc. > > It would be nice

Re: RFC: gtk v4l2 (webcam) control panel app + applet

2010-01-15 Thread Hans de Goede
On 01/12/2010 02:26 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > > Le Mar 12 janvier 2010 14:25, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit : >> >> Le Mar 12 janvier 2010 12:39, Hans de Goede a écrit : >> >>> Which remembered me that it would be nice to have a gtk app for >>> controll

Re: RFC: gtk v4l2 (webcam) control panel app + applet

2010-01-15 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 01/12/2010 02:30 PM, Fabian Deutsch wrote: > Hello, > > Am Dienstag, den 12.01.2010, 12:39 +0100 schrieb Hans de Goede: >> For Fedora-14 (to be released November 2010) it would be nice to have >> a >> gtk application for controlling various camera settings (b

Re: RFC: gtk v4l2 (webcam) control panel app + applet

2010-01-15 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 01/15/2010 11:33 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote: > On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 11:14 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 01/12/2010 01:13 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote: >>> Good idea, apart from: >>> >>> On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 12:39 +0100, Hans de Goed

Re: Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications

2010-01-15 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 01/15/2010 02:48 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 07:27 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote: > There's a patch logged against this now FWIW > >> Removing Io-language also removes: > Thanks, given I owned this once upon a time I was also working on a fix (np), but it took me a bit

glade2 orphaned ??

2010-01-15 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi All, While checking over the orphaned package list (because I noticed an old package of mine got orphaned, I thought I would check for others). I noticed glade2 is orphaned, that cannot be right ?? Is there something replacing it ? If so someone should mark it dead.package and retire it in pk

Re: glade2 orphaned ??

2010-01-15 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 01/15/2010 03:28 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 15:27 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> While checking over the orphaned package list (because I noticed an >> old package of mine got orphaned, I thought I would check for others)

Re: Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications

2010-01-16 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 01/15/2010 09:01 PM, Till Maas wrote: > On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 01:17:28PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:00:50AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote: >>> The following 30 packages, with respective FTBFS bugs, have been open >>> since the Fedora 11 time frame, and continue to

Re: Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications

2010-01-16 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 01/15/2010 09:06 PM, Matt Domsch wrote: > On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 09:01:20PM +0100, Till Maas wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 01:17:28PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:00:50AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote: The following 30 packages, with respective FTBFS bugs, h

Re: Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications

2010-01-16 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 01/16/2010 12:14 AM, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 22:58 +0100, Till Maas wrote: >> But what about the other packages by these maintainers that do not fail >> to build but are probably as unmaintained as the packages that fail to >> build? >> > > Because this isn't a fully pr

Re: Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications

2010-01-16 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 01/15/2010 08:17 PM, Matt Domsch wrote: > On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:00:50AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote: >> The following 30 packages, with respective FTBFS bugs, have been open >> since the Fedora 11 time frame, and continue to fail to build. These >> are the oldest non-building packages in

Re: Desktop categories

2010-01-16 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 01/16/2010 02:43 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sat, 2010-01-16 at 02:25 +0100, Alain Portal wrote: > Putain ! Mais c'est pas possible ! C'est à se cogner la tête contre les murs !!! Un vrai dialogue de sourds... Please, is there a french speaking fedor

Re: Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications

2010-01-16 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 01/16/2010 03:50 PM, Matt Domsch wrote: > On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 10:13:32AM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: >> It's a more fundamental problem, though. The AWOL-process is for people, >> not for packages. The people may still be active (and even known to be >> active somewhere) and not AWOL

Re: libcdio update

2010-01-19 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 01/19/2010 09:43 AM, Adrian Reber wrote: > I would like to update libcdio to the latest version (0.82). This > requires a rebuild of its dependencies: > > audacious-plugins > gvfs > kover > libcddb > oxine > pycdio > qmmp > xfce4-cddrive-plugin > xmms2 > > If the maintainers of the above pa

No mouse + keyb in X in latest rawhide + fix (selinux)

2010-01-30 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, This might be a dup, and I'm a bit under the weather so in no mood to search BZ. Anyways for other people who might hit this if your mouse and keyb in X in rawhide all of a sudden are gone, this is due to haldaemon not starting, which is caused by some selinux issue. Setting selinux to permiss

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED, v2] orphaned packages in F-14

2010-08-24 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 08/20/2010 10:25 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > The attached list shows currently orphaned packages in F-14. If they are > not claimed by the end of next week, they will be blocked, potentially > breaking dependencies (and causing more things to be blocked...) > > If you already co-maintain t

Re: Linux and application installing

2010-09-13 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 09/08/2010 02:43 PM, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 8 September 2010 13:16, Adam Williamson wrote: >> First off, I think this is a great idea and very much needed, thanks for >> working on it. > > Cool, thanks. Some positive feedback at last! Too... much... stop... energy... > Oh, But Adam i

Re: Broadcom wifi drivers in F-14?

2010-09-14 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 09/14/2010 01:31 PM, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 00:40 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: >> IIRC they require a firmware blob that has a license that we cannot >> distribute >> unlike say the Intel firmwares. I could be wrong though. > > That's still true of the b43 firmware f

Re: pushing updates for FTBFS

2010-09-24 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 09/22/2010 07:37 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 03:25:25PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 10:06:09 -0700 >> Eric Smith wrote: >> >>> A bug was filed against meshlab because of an FTBFS for Fedora 14. I >>> added a patch to resolve it and submitted a

Orphaning some packages

2010-11-05 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi All, Unfortunately I don't have the time to proper maintain the packages below. So I believe it is better to orphan them, and have just done so. If you're interested in any of these feel free to pick them up bochs - Portable x86 PC emulator I believe everyone is pretty much using qemu now. If

Bringing a retired package (tritonus) back from the dead?

2010-11-05 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, I would like to bring tritonus back from the dead (as it is a dependency for vorbisspi, which is needed to be able to playback .ogg files under java). I'm pretty sure this has been discussed before, but there does not seem to be anything written about it on the wiki (or I cannot find it).

Re: Poll: Does ACPI lid state work on your Linux laptop?

2011-07-14 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 07/13/2011 07:47 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 11:35 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: >> On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 16:57 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: >> >>> Maybe it it is an idea to build a whitelist for machines which do >>> have working ACPI l

orphaning / looking for new owner for monkey-bubble

2011-07-26 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, I've been thinking about orphaning monkey-bubble for a while now, mostly because it is dead upstream and it is using various obsolete gnome technologies (esound, libgnomeui, bonobo). Yesterday it came to my attention that monkey-bubble also contains at least 1 sound sample which we should not

Re: Intent to package GNOME Shell frippery

2011-07-29 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 07/29/2011 09:47 AM, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 10:48 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Just a quick heads-up that I plan to look unto packaging the >> gnome shell frippery extensions this weekend, if you've the >> same plans or are already work

Re: orphaning / looking for new owner for monkey-bubble

2011-08-01 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 08/01/2011 03:01 PM, Vinzenz Vietzke wrote: > Am 26.07.2011 13:57, schrieb Bruno Wolff III: >> Even though I normally like to save games, I think letting this one go >> is probably a good idea. Upstream is really gone. > +1 > > IMHO it doesn't make sense to put efforts in fixing and maintai

Re: PokerTH orphaned

2011-08-02 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 08/01/2011 09:44 PM, Ryan Rix wrote: > On Mon 1 August 2011 19:43:37 Tomas Mraz wrote: >> On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 10:29 -0700, Ryan Rix wrote: >>> On Mon 1 August 2011 11:46:00 Jussi Lehtola wrote: Hi, I've just orphaned PokerTH, since I'm trying to free myself some t

Re: Default services enabled

2011-08-24 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 08/24/2011 04:56 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 15:10 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 09:06:22AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: >>> On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 14:37 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: Why not? If the service is enabled but the daemon no

Re: floppy support

2011-08-31 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 08/30/2011 10:22 PM, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Simo Sorce said: >> They do not 'hang', they just take longer to boot, sometimes a lot >> longer. > > How much longer? Much much longer, when I was still on the anaconda team we had numerous bug reports about this (esp during RHE

Re: floppy support

2011-08-31 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 08/31/2011 05:41 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > Below is a proposed specfile for the floppy case. (Analog joystick would be > very similar.) I haven't tested the package for functionality yet, but did > test it with rpmbuild and rpmlint. Is this what we want? I don't know about others, but I

bluez and hci's which initially come up as hid (was Re: Some days it just doesn't pay to update)

2011-09-02 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi Jonathan, Adam, et all, Wed Aug 31 Jonathan Corbet wrote: > So, I thought...LWN writing is almost done for the day, why not do an > update and see what happens? > > What happened: > > - My Logitech bluetooth keyboard, which has Just Worked for years, >doesn't work anymore. Grub still

Re: bluez and hci's which initially come up as hid (was Re: Some days it just doesn't pay to update)

2011-09-03 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 09/02/2011 05:37 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote: > If we wanted to do things properly, we'd use the specs so that the > transition between HID and HCI was invisible to the user. Except that we > don't have the specs (or it would be fixed already, it's one of my major > gripes for a number of year

Re: bluez and hci's which initially come up as hid (was Re: Some days it just doesn't pay to update)

2011-09-05 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 09/03/2011 12:22 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote: > On Sat, 2011-09-03 at 10:10 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > >> With that said, you're the Fedora bluetooth maintainer, so you are the >> boss. The easiest way to make this opt-in, and I think also a good one, >> is to

Warning todays F-16 updates-testing breaks gnome3, both glibc and glib2 are bad!

2011-09-09 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, This took me some time to figure out, so I hope this mail will save others some grieve. After installing the glib2 update from todays updates-testing: glib2-2.29.90-1.fc16.x86_64 The following happens: [hans@shalem gspca]$ ldd -r /usr/libexec/e-addressbook-factory linux-vdso.so.1 (0

Re: Warning todays F-16 updates-testing breaks gnome3, both glibc and glib2 are bad!

2011-09-09 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 09/09/2011 06:31 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > This took me some time to figure out, so I hope this mail > will save others some grieve. > > After installing the glib2 update from todays updates-testing: > glib2-2.29.90-1.fc16.x86_64 > > The following ha

Re: orphaned packages

2011-09-18 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 09/17/2011 12:26 AM, Stepan Kasal wrote: > > Hello, > Here is the list of orphaned packages: > > Xaw3d -- A version of the MIT Athena widget set for X > fig2ps -- Utility for converting xfig pictures to PS/PDF I've taken these 2. Regards, Hans -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedor

Critpath updates process broken for certain components

2011-10-01 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi All, Please note that I'm not claiming that the critpath process is broken in general. But it does not work for certain components. To be specific it does not work for Xorg drivers for non common hardware. This morning bodhi send me 3 mails with the following subjects: [Fedora Update] [CRITPAT

F-16 suspends my *desktop* after 30 minutes at the gdm , making it impossible to ssh in

2011-10-01 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi All, The subject more or less says it all. When I startup my desktop machine (which thus is always on AC), and leave it at the gdm screen it will suspend after being left alone for 30 minutes. This is not good, since I only leave it powered on when I intend to access it remotely. I would lik

Re: F-16 suspends my *desktop* after 30 minutes at the gdm , making it impossible to ssh in

2011-10-02 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 10/01/2011 05:07 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: >> The subject more or less says it all. When I startup my desktop machine >> (which thus >> is always on AC), and leave it at the gdm screen it will suspend after be

Re: Critpath updates process broken for certain components

2011-10-02 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 10/01/2011 11:13 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> Please note that I'm not claiming that the critpath process is broken >> in general. But it does not work for certain components. To be speci

Re: F-16 suspends my *desktop* after 30 minutes at the gdm , making it impossible to ssh in

2011-10-03 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 10/02/2011 10:13 PM, Jason D. Clinton wrote: > On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 02:02, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Imagine I'm running a screen session with my irc client in there on my >> Fedora box, > > There has perhaps never been a better sentence written demonstrating &g

Re: Shared library permissions in Debian-land and Red Hat-land

2011-03-29 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 03/28/2011 10:11 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote: > On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 16:05 -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote: >> On 03/24/2011 02:49 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: >>> On Thursday 24 March 2011, you wrote: Hmm, I thought there'd be a catch. What's executable permission needed for? Isn't t

Re: Self Introduction

2011-04-27 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 04/26/2011 11:47 AM, Martin Cermak wrote: > Hi all, I'm a RH QA engineer located in Brno. Nice to meet you. I'm a long time Fedora contributor, and since 2.5 years a software engineer for RH :) > I searched the web for some nice > command line calendar which could track events and I found

Re: Self (Re)Introduction

2011-04-29 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 04/29/2011 01:19 AM, Andy Grimm wrote: > Hello, all. A brief bio on me: > > I started using Red Hat Linux in college in 1997. I spent half a decade > as a Linux sys admin, and long ago I used to lurk in #redhat and #fedora > giving tech support to new users. I first met some of these fi

Re: New packager introduction

2011-04-29 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 04/29/2011 12:37 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: > Hello, > > I've been a Fedora user since FC6 and a little RH6 before that. Our > family pretty much uses Fedora exclusively, including my desktop, > MythTV box, and wife's laptop. The wife's laptop can still dual boot > Vista, but she never uses it

Re: Self Introduction

2011-04-29 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 04/29/2011 06:53 PM, John Brier wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, I'm new to contributing but not new to Linux. I started on RHL 7.1 > around 2000 and have used Slackware, Gentoo and Debian in the past. I > was active at my university LUG and Gaming Club (runn

Re: illegal instruction - create compile variants ?

2011-05-01 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 05/01/2011 09:14 AM, David Timms wrote: > On 01/05/11 16:47, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> Rpm's and Fedora's philosophy is to let rpm specify/dictate CFLAGS, >> which packages are supposed to respect. > Yes, I still have VSs bug (514991) regarding opt flags still open. > > So, for the lesser CP

Re: illegal instruction - create compile variants ?

2011-05-02 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 05/01/2011 09:56 AM, David Timms wrote: > On 01/05/11 17:41, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Erm, specifying a minimum support CPU in the package description is >> not acceptable IMHO. The fix here is to patch the packages buildsystem, >> so that it gets build for the minim

Intent to package GNOME Shell frippery

2011-06-01 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi all, Just a quick heads-up that I plan to look unto packaging the gnome shell frippery extensions this weekend, if you've the same plans or are already working on this, please let me know. So we can avoid doing double work. I plan to use 1 subpackage per extension of the frippery extension col

system-config-keyboard needs some loving, any takers?

2011-06-03 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi All, The mass posting of please check if this bug still happens with newer versions to F-13 bugs made me look at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545738 Which sadly still has not been fixed yet. While trying to reproduce 545738 I hit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646

Re: Installing bash-completion by default in F-16

2011-06-04 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, I somehow missed the top post, so sorry for replying in the middle of the thread. Adding bash-completion by default gets a +1 from me. Note that Ubuntu has been doing this for ages AFAIK, so it is being used by a large group of users without very vocal complaints for years now. Regards, Han

Re: F15 / VirtualBox

2011-06-11 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 06/10/2011 06:12 PM, Thomas Sailer wrote: > - USB is not really workable. Trying it just now with up2date F15 > crashed qemu (guest rawhide) when trying to assign a host USB device to > the guest > If you're seriously interested in usb redirection, I'm working on seriously improving that

Re: SYSTEMD: Give us a option for upstart

2011-06-13 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 06/12/2011 11:23 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: May I point out that we've a be excellent to each other policy on this mailing list. Your latest series of emails seems to be anything but excellent, please stop this. You're clearly unhappy about the switch to systemd, my cents on that are that

scorched3d needs a new owner

2011-06-17 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, I've not been able to give scorched3d the attention it deserves lately. Specifically it is lagging with upstream for a while now and really needs to be rebased to upstream latest. Is anyone willing to become a new (co)-maintainer for scorched3d and do the rebase? Regards, Hans -- devel m

Re: scorched3d needs a new owner

2011-06-18 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 06/18/2011 02:23 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 08:16:26 +0200, > Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've not been able to give scorched3d the attention it deserves lately. >> Specifically >> it is lagging with upstre

Re: scorched3d needs a new owner

2011-06-18 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 06/18/2011 02:34 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 08:16:26 +0200, > Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've not been able to give scorched3d the attention it deserves lately. >> Specifically >> it is lagging with upstre

Re: Packages that will be orphaned

2011-06-21 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 06/20/2011 07:34 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > Due to the requirement for contributors to sign the FPCA by Thursday of last > week, certain package owners who haven't yet signed will be removed from the > packager group soon. When that happens, the packages that they own will be > orphaned.

Re: Unresponsive Package Maintainer - Jeroen van Meeuwen

2011-06-27 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, Good to have you back! On 06/27/2011 01:53 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote: > Vít Ondruch wrote: >> I'm following the procedure at: >> >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers >> >> Does anyone know how to contact Jeroen van Meeuwen? He is not answering >> e-

Headsup: soname changing allegro update heading to rawhide

2011-07-12 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi all, I've just prepared and started a build of allegro-4.4.2 for rawhide, updating allegro from the somewhat old 4.2.x release we had. The new 4.4.2 comes bundled with alleggl and jpgalleg. I'll start rebuilds for allegro using libs, then apps tomorrow (too tired now). Regards, Hans -- deve

Re: Poll: Does ACPI lid state work on your Linux laptop?

2011-07-13 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 07/13/2011 04:11 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 15:22 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:01:25PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: >>> Please don't. ACPI lid state is not reliable on a range of hardware for >>> a bunch of reasons, ranging from open even

Re: Unblocked orphans

2010-02-16 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 02/16/2010 07:11 AM, Jesse Keating wrote: > There are still a few orphans which are unblocked due to dep issues. > Please somebody take ownership of these: > > Unblocked orphan SDL_image > Unblocked orphan SDL_mixer > Unblocked orphan SDL_net > Unblocked orphan SDL_ttf Amazing these got or

Re: Fedora Linux Format software review: January 2010

2010-02-18 Thread Hans de Goede
On 12/31/2009 04:31 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > On 12/30/2009 02:15 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: >> It would be nice if others could join in (be it virtual not necessarily >> physically). So are there any takers for this ? > > It might be useful to have a wik

Re: FESCo wants to ban direct stable pushes in Bodhi (urgent call for feedback)

2010-02-26 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, > at the FESCo meeting on Tuesday, everyone except me seemed to be set on > wanting to disable the possibility to queue updates directly to stable in > Bodhi. The only reason this was not decided right there (with no outside > feedback) is that Matthew Garrett (mjg59) wants to write down a p

Re: Impasse on packaging JOGL and Gluegen

2010-02-28 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 02/28/2010 03:39 PM, Henrique Junior wrote: > Hi, gentlemen, > For some time the inclusion of the software Scilab [1] in our repos has > been barred by various dependencies, which were being resolved with > time. Currently, the biggest reason we do not have this software in our > repos is t

Re: [HALL-MONITORED] Update threads are now hall-monitored

2010-03-04 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 03/03/2010 10:30 PM, Doug Ledford wrote: > On 03/03/2010 02:27 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: >> Okay. This has gone on long enough. The signal is gone from the >> following threads: > > The signal is not entirely gone, although it is getting weaker. > >> * FESCo wants to ban direct stable

Re: To semi-rolling or not to semi-rolling, that is the question...

2010-03-04 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 03/04/2010 09:59 PM, Doug Ledford wrote: > Obviously, some people want this and some don't. It isn't appropriate > to simply hand down an edict that things will be one way or the other if > we truly consider Fedora a community run project. It must be a > community decision. That means, a

Re: To semi-rolling or not to semi-rolling, that is the question...

2010-03-06 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 03/05/2010 06:56 PM, Doug Ledford wrote: > On 03/05/2010 02:52 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: >> One size does still not fit all, although this is a great idea for >> most packages in Fedora for packages in certain niches this is a bad idea. >> >> I've said thi

Re: To semi-rolling or not to semi-rolling, that is the question...

2010-03-06 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 03/05/2010 06:32 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 08:52:56AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: >>> Make rawhide consumable as a semi-rolling release itself. >> >> We already have this it is called early branching of the next release. I >> would f

Re: Fedora has become fat!

2010-03-22 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, Maybe somehow fluid-soundfont-gm or fluid-soundfont-lite-patches is getting dragged in ? Those are quite big. Regards, Hans On 03/22/2010 01:50 AM, Christoph Wickert wrote: > Why has Fedora become so fat in the F13 development cycle? > >* The LXDE Spin has grown from 464 MB to 509

Headsup new soname changing parted coming to rawhide

2010-03-30 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, I'm updating parted to the 2.2 release. This is mostly a bugfix update. But one of the fixes is a change in the soname, the soname now no longer is in the form of parted-2.x.so, but instead has become a regular versioned soname. The positive side of this is that we no longer will need to rebu

Re: urgent testing call: F13 kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13

2010-04-07 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, kernel-2.6.33.1-19.fc13 works for me (amd64 system with nvidia chipset). Regards, Hans On 04/06/2010 11:53 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi, everyone. We're looking at pulling kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13 into > Fedora 13 Beta, quite late, because current Beta candidate builds > include kernel-2

Re: urgent testing call: F13 kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13

2010-04-07 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13 works for me (amd64 system with nvidia chipset). Regards, Hans On 04/06/2010 11:53 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi, everyone. We're looking at pulling kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13 into > Fedora 13 Beta, quite late, because current Beta candidate builds > include kernel-2

Re: Two new applications to package and add to Fedora

2010-04-09 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 04/07/2010 02:34 PM, Damian Brasher wrote: > Hi List > > I'm new to this list, a brief intro - I currently work for the University > of Southampton (ECS) as a systems administrator / programmer and also run > my small development company, Interlinux Ltd. See LinkedIn > http://www.linkedin.c

Re: libpng mass rebuild status, 2011-12-06

2011-12-14 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 12/06/2011 06:17 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: After yesterday's rebuilds, there remain 271 binary packages from 232 source packages that still require libpng-compat. No FTBFS bugs have been filed at this time. There's a pretty wide variety of failures represented here. In addition to the li

Re: Self introduction

2011-12-23 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 12/20/2011 11:06 PM, Mattia Verga wrote: Hi all, my name is Mattia Verga, I live in Italy, and even if I don't work in the IT sector (I work for a telephone company) I would be glad to become a Fedora contributor. My experience in Fedora started with Fedora Core 1 (even before I occasio

Re: Review swaps

2012-01-06 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 01/05/2012 04:31 PM, Brendan Jones wrote: On 12/15/2011 07:14 PM, Brendan Jones wrote: I would like to swap reviews for the following. All are very tiny so feel free to swap 2 for one. Listed in descending priority: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760270 lv2-ams-plugins - LV

Re: Review swaps

2012-01-06 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 01/06/2012 06:09 PM, Brendan Jones wrote: On 01/06/2012 05:03 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote: Hello All! 2011/12/15 Brendan Jones: I would like to swap reviews for the following. All are very tiny so feel free to swap 2 for one. Listed in descending priority: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/s

Orphaning higlayout

2012-01-12 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi all, Once upon a time I packaged higlayout because it was a dependency for bolzplatz2006, but: -bolzplatz2006 no longer needs it -upstream is dead -nothing else in Fedora needs it So I'm orphaning it now. Regards, Hans -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedor

Packaging guidelines for packaging vala bindings

2012-01-16 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, More and more packages are getting / installing vala bindings. While adding vala bindings to the spice-gtk package I've noticed that there are some issues / inconsistencies with how vala bindings are packaged: 1) Some packages put them in their regular -devel, others in a separate -vala 2)

Re: Packaging guidelines for packaging vala bindings

2012-01-17 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 01/16/2012 11:21 AM, Marc-André Lureau wrote: On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: Eitherway I think we need some (minimalistic) guidelines on howto package vala bindings so that we can do this consistently and with proper directory ownership. Note that the bindings

Re: Packaging guidelines for packaging vala bindings

2012-01-17 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 01/17/2012 04:22 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 02:16:19PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 01/17/2012 02:08 PM, Marc-André Lureau wrote: Hi On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: I disagree. Like other "exotic languages", anything related to i

Re: Packaging guidelines for packaging vala bindings

2012-01-18 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 01/17/2012 11:54 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:05:36PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: Once that is done, then just adding the vala bindings to the devel-package likely takes less disk space for those who do install them, then the meta data needed for a separate

Re: Why should I ever bother filing another bug?

2010-11-09 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 11/09/2010 07:14 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 11:49 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote: >> Adam Williamson wrote: >>> Only point to note is that it would definitely be a good thing to fix >>> Bugzilla to merge the CC lists, I'll file a bug on that. =) >> >> Filed 9 years

Re: still a 2TB limit in F14 Anaconda, for LVM PV size

2010-11-12 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 11/11/2010 08:54 PM, Eric Smith wrote: > I just tried to install F14 on a new server with a 7.6 TB RAID (five > Hitachi 2 TB drives on a 3ware 9750). I was pleased to see that the > disk partitioning interface in Anaconda recognized the array and didn't > have a problem with the size, repo

Fixing the glibc adobe flash incompatibility

2010-11-16 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi all, For those who do not know it yet, recent Fedora glibc updates include an optimized memcpy (which gets used on some processors) which breaks the 64 bit adobe flash plugin. The problem has been analyzed and is known, as well as a fix for it, see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=

Review swaps

2010-11-17 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, I'm looking for someone to swap 2 reviews with, I would like to see the following reviewed: cortado - Java media framework: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=649781 CEGUI library 0.6 for apps which need this specific version: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650643 Reg

Re: Fixing the glibc adobe flash incompatibility

2010-11-20 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 11/19/2010 10:39 AM, Richard Zidlicky wrote: > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:28:58PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > thanks for looking at it. > >>> However for some of the reports it is only the matter of someone looking >>> at them as they contain the obvious solution to the problem. >>> >>>

Fedora release model (was Re: Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2010-11-17))

2010-11-22 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 11/22/2010 12:59 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 23:04 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > >> In short: Want higher-quality updates for previous releases? Then push >> version upgrades wherever possible (even and especially for libraries, as >> long as they're ABI-compatible or

Re: Package rebuilds for gcc bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634757

2010-11-23 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 11/24/2010 12:45 AM, Jesse Keating wrote: > On 10/5/10 3:27 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: > > Here is a list of the current known potentially bad builds and what > action could be or has been taken: > > wildmidi - my rebuild can be tagged > tecnoballz - my build can be tagged These 2 are min

Re: Fedora default services (was: Re: F15 Feature - convert as many service init files as possible to the native SystemD services)

2010-12-06 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 12/06/2010 06:34 AM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: > Hi, > > W dniu 3 grudnia 2010 09:14 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski > napisał: > [..] >> What services are installed by default when installong form Live >> GNOME/KDE/etc and DVD? > > Ok, let's ask the question differently - what services shoul

Re: Adding ARM Cross generation patch to gcc and binutils specfiles

2010-12-25 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 12/24/2010 01:43 PM, Andy Green wrote: > Hi - > > I see Hans looks after arm-gp2x-linux-gcc which is also stuck in a gcc-4.1.2 > timewarp that maybe my uplevelled patch can also help. arm-gp2x-linux-gcc is deliberately stuck at 4.1.2, because that is the version the gp2x community has

Re: Orphaning packages

2010-12-30 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 12/29/2010 08:04 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > Johan Cwiklinski wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm going to orphan following packages: >> - BackupPC ([1], [2], [3], [4]) >> - childsplay ([5], [6]) >> - gcompris (several open bugs, see [7]) >> - homebank ([8], [9]) >> - php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysqli (no open b

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-08 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 02/07/2011 09:59 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Each release, we undergo the effort to track down owners for orphaned > packages in the release, and block those orphaned packages where > necessary. It's that time again for Fedora 15. > > The following packages are currently orphaned and exist

Re: v4l1 (linux/videodev.h) and libv4l

2011-02-09 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 02/09/2011 09:11 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Hi, > > several of the build failures in Rawhide are due to the removal of v4l1 from > the kernel, which manifests itself as a missing header. > (I think there was a thread about that on this list already, but I can't > find it now.) > > My questi

Re: v4l1 (linux/videodev.h) and libv4l

2011-02-09 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 02/09/2011 09:11 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Hi, > > several of the build failures in Rawhide are due to the removal of v4l1 from > the kernel, which manifests itself as a missing header. > (I think there was a thread about that on this list already, but I can't > find it now.) > > My questi

Package review swaps

2011-02-10 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, I've a package in need of a review, I'll happily swap another review in return: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671883 Bug 671883 - Review Request: v4l-utils - Utilities for video4linux and DVB devices Thanks & Regards, Hans -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org h

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >