Self Introduction

2011-09-08 Thread Gregor Tätzner
Ladies and Gentleman: Seemingly this is the first "Self Introduction" this month. I am working on a new unison package. I already filed a review request some days ago: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734531 I'm a gentle German student and loyal Linux user for several years. But I ne

unison formal review

2011-09-27 Thread Gregor Tätzner
Hi, Anyone want to review this one: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734531 I'm sure a lot of Fedora users are awaiting this update. Regards, Greg -- Vitamin C deficiency is apauling. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- devel mailing list devel@

Re: unison formal review

2011-09-27 Thread Gregor Tätzner
Am Dienstag, 27. September 2011, 19:46:08 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 05:13:46PM +0200, Gregor Tätzner wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Anyone want to review this one: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734531 > > > > I'm

Re: unison formal review

2011-09-30 Thread Gregor Tätzner
Am Freitag, 30. September 2011, 11:10:27 schrieb Tom Callaway: > On 09/28/2011 11:00 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > I checked the source code, and unison sends a header which contains > > the current major version number of the software (where "major > > version" is a string, currently "2.40").

Re: unison formal review

2011-10-03 Thread Gregor Tätzner
Am Mittwoch, 28. September 2011, 11:15:54 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 08:55:43AM +0200, Roberto Ragusa wrote: > > On 09/27/2011 07:46 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/unison213 > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/a

Re: unison formal review

2011-10-03 Thread Gregor Tätzner
Am Montag, 3. Oktober 2011, 20:26:11 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones: > On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 11:32:18AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 19:22:28 +0200 > > > > Gregor Tätzner wrote: > > > Any news from the FESCO team? What's the conclusion of thi

Re: Package review SIG dead?

2011-10-11 Thread Gregor Tätzner
Am Samstag, 8. Oktober 2011, 18:55:11 schrieb tim.laurid...@gmail.com: > On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 8:39 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 17:49 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >> On 10/07/2011 02:49 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: > >> > I know a lot of people wanted to have a discu

Re: unison formal review

2011-10-24 Thread Gregor Tätzner
Am Dienstag, 27. September 2011, 17:13:46 schrieb Gregor Tätzner: > Hi, > > Anyone want to review this one: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734531 > > I'm sure a lot of Fedora users are awaiting this update. > > Regards, > Greg The leaves ar

Re: Is FAS (Fedora Account System) broken?

2011-11-11 Thread Gregor Tätzner
Am Freitag, 11. November 2011, 10:47:12 schrieb Adam Tkac: > Hello, > > today I tried to upload new bind tarball via `fedpkg new-sources` > command but it failed with > "pycurl.error: (60, 'Peer certificate cannot be authenticated with given > CA certificates')" error. I have a similar problem wh

Re: Hello

2011-11-28 Thread Gregor Tätzner
Am Dienstag, 29. November 2011, 07:47:38 schrieb Dipesh Acharya: > This is the package > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/gnome-shell-extension-cpu-t > emperature > > It is already being maintained by fab. > > Should I post it for review again? > > Thank you :) > > Dipesh Acharya

Re: Hello

2011-11-29 Thread Gregor Tätzner
involved in making the extension better. Yes that would be cool. > > And how do I apply to be a co-maintainer? I think you should contact the existing maintainer. > Thank you :) np > > > Dipesh Acharya > http://motorscript.com > http://twitter.com/xtranophilist > >

Re: Review swaps

2012-01-06 Thread Gregor Tätzner
Am Donnerstag, 5. Januar 2012, 16:31:49 schrieb Brendan Jones: > On 12/15/2011 07:14 PM, Brendan Jones wrote: > > I would like to swap reviews for the following. All are very tiny so > > feel free to swap 2 for one. Listed in descending priority: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id

Re: Review swaps

2012-01-06 Thread Gregor Tätzner
Am Freitag, 6. Januar 2012, 18:09:08 schrieb Brendan Jones: > On 01/06/2012 05:03 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote: > > Hello All! > > > > 2011/12/15 Brendan Jones: > >> I would like to swap reviews for the following. All are very tiny so > >> feel free to swap 2 for one. Listed in descending priority: >

packages seeking new owner

2014-07-30 Thread Gregor Tätzner
Greetings Fedora People, I want to end my active contributions to fedora, so there are going to be some apps that need love soon. We are talking about following stuff: kde-plasma-publictransport -- Public Transport plasma applet ( master f21 f20 f19 ) kdesrc-build -- A tool to allow you to eas

Re: packages seeking new owner

2014-08-08 Thread Gregor Tätzner
On Wednesday 06 August 2014 08:29:08 Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2014-07-30 at 09:01 +0200, Gregor Tätzner wrote: > > Greetings Fedora People, > > > > I want to end my active contributions to fedora, so there are going to be > > some apps that need love soon. We

Re: incompatible upgrade of apache traffic server

2012-06-27 Thread Gregor Tätzner
On Tuesday 26 June 2012 20:56:24 Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote: > Will it be OK to do this upgrade in F15/F16/F17, or are we stuck on v3.0 ? I'm not a user of this particular apache service, but in general I would vote -1 There is a reason why those update policies exist: Fedora is no rolling releas

Review Swap: ownCloud Server

2012-11-05 Thread Gregor Tätzner
Hello guys and girls, I need a review for owncloud: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858841 the licences are good, note that there is not much time left if we want to achieve this approved f18 feature [1] I admit, this package is quite big. But in return I would be happy to review 2