On 30/01/10 08:42, Liu Yu Fei Eric wrote:
> So it doesn't have an official one?
>
Not in F12,
but as has been said.
You can update to 3.6
from Rawhide,
then disable rawhide again.
Which is what I have done,
no problems yet.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
--
devel mailing
rawhide to
> update it.
>
>--snipped--
True, but if necessary.
You can always yum downgrade x
Especially if you just need to check out package x.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Virt-Manager Guests: F14, F15.
I was running rawhide since 1 or 2 mths Before F14-Branch.
"systemctl enable graphical.target"
this it said we was already linked.
But If, I don't put init=/sbin/upstart on the kernel,
every second thing is a fail or a whinge.
Some errors don't
fc14,systemd-5-2.fc14?_csrf_token=ed15fe0617ae3d06dc5b861a4374ac3d0908e09e
>
Hasn't really helped in this situation.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
http://www.zimagez.com/zimage/screenshot-040810-185927.php
http://www.zimagez.com/zimage/screenshot-040810-190109.php
The full start up video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jO8OAr7bzl8
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
md and systemd unit.
>
> reboot and allow selinux to relable the filesystem and voila
> ( at least that works for me )
>
> JBG
Tried this, no go for me.
Completly borked the system.
even init-/sbin/upstart
won't boot afterwards.
I'll do a fresh F13 > F14-Br
--
Rega
On 05/08/10 17:02, Patrick MONNERAT wrote:
> Thanks in advance for any hint.
>
> Patrick
>
send an email to: ad...@fedoraproject.org
Subject: BFO
The right people will get back to you.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
devel mailin
7;s just being added automatically.
Would it be any benefit to the maintainers\bugzappers.
If abrt opened the existing link, before it would report?
So there wouldn't need be be so many replies of
please try xyz?, to help cut down on noise.
I could be talking out of my ear.
Just a thought.
-
oduce. I have never seen
> someone repost the same workaround in response to such a comment.
>
By that I mean the maintainer\Co-Maintainer\Good Citizen
retelling the same fix\workaround posted earlier in the bug.
To either enable\updates-testing or do xyz.
Because the bug report hasn't bee
added to" person.
>
> As I said, I have never seen that happen. Do you have an example?
>
I do it constantly, on such, as the older version after
workarounds would perhaps suggest,
newer versions are not being attempted.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559484
--
Regar
On 08/08/10 20:19, Matt McCutchen wrote:
>
> My advice: stop doing that.
Taken
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
confidential to a small group.
>
I plead innocent!
Scroll to bottom
http://boot.fedoraproject.org/faq
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
ly complaining to someone that gave you $5 that
> he did not give you $10?
No, I think more like someone who could have given him 10, gave him 5,
with a promise of another 5, if he paid 10.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproje
even if received freely.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
same broken updates to
F15(Rawhide)
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
s, it's using the litte grey matter left,
along with saving some blaas.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 12/08/10 15:11, Felix Miata wrote:
> I updated system yesterday, installed scd just now:
>
> [init 3]# system-config-display
Has it not been replaced by xrandr
for display porpoises?
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedorapr
both hard\virtual-ware. Which could be
inverted as it shows an increase in the continued interest in the
development of Fedora.
If it just dates is the worry, start testing for seven instead of six.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.
both hard\virtual-ware. Which could be
inverted as it shows an increase in the continued interest in the
development of Fedora.
If it just dates is the worry, start testing for seven instead of six.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.
ow of another method as of yet,
to get all my logs to a central pop.email account (my isp)
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
va apps like Azureus((Vuze),
Eclipse and any depends.
Currently cannot package anything.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 01/09/10 19:53, Brendan Jones wrote:
> What is the end game here? Is Fedora lacking contributors?
Like all areas of life, you win some you lose some.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.
On 05/09/10 13:53, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>
>
> Chrome 7.0.514.0 doesn't crash here. But there is an error message
> about ssl connection.
> Both url's without https works fine here.
>
> Regards,
> Michal
It's chromium not chrome.
--
Regards,
Fran
can I keep systemd?**
>
Test in in Rawhide(F15),
where it still is the default.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
e it.
For me inept brain.
You mean no swap partition?
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 06/10/10 16:29, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> Cool if you turn it on in rawhide. Helps those of us who are build
> challenged :-). I can test in raid and LV environments.
>
> Regards,
> OldFart
Likewise, if basic instruction provided.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
F
On 06/10/10 16:31, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>
>
> Maybe I'm being a bit too paranoid but it is your data after all :)
>
I just use Rawhide for testing,
so a little reinstall keeps you in practice :D
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
devel m
rt icon.
Removing abrt, does not preclude the bug from happening,
only the users knowledge that it happened.
Sent by a general user
(learning some code).
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
,
then tell the user.
"The maintainer would prefer a manully generated report,
please contact the package maintainer: foo-owner@ \
bugzilla component foo for further details"
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
m what you need.
"Don't shoot the messenger, help improve the message"
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 04/11/10 17:56, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> I just have.
Excellent.
>
> And not for the first time.
Constantly evolving.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
nable to bugs, to help the maintainers.
Just a thought.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 20/07/11 09:01, Lucas wrote:
>
> Ok. Where is located "systemd mailing list" ? Tell me please it URL?
>
> Thanks.
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of fedoraproject.org
--
de
can use:
>.include /the/original/unit/file
> and only override the specific options you need.
>
> Michal
Where would you place this line?
asked out of ignorance om my part.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of fedoraproject.org
--
devel mailing l
to rawhide. In the
> fedora openssh release process, isn't there some sort of sanity check
> that would catch this before inflicting it on all rawhide users?
Is not rawhide "the sanity check", even if used productively by many?
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend
k.
Maybe it has been done that way, honestly don't know.
But introduce in Rawhide, instead of Branched.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of fedoraproject.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 24/04/11 11:37, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> In general I like the auto-obsoleting feature in Bodhi, but is there a
> way to disable it for a particular update?
>
Not an answer to the problem?
But what about a fedorapeople repo?
Ask testers to enable it.
--
Regards,
Frank
exim
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
lacement for gnome-schedule?
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 06/05/11 23:51, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 09:03, Frank Murphy <mailto:frankl...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Any plans for a gui replacement for gnome-schedule?
>
>
> It doesn't appear to be abandoned:
> http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome
On 07/05/11 14:18, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
> On May 7, 2011 5:00 AM, "Frank Murphy" <mailto:frankl...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > On 06/05/11 23:51, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 09:03, Frank Murphy <mailto:frankl...
grade xorg*server*
I have x all the time as a result.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
enough boxes to spare these days to give real hw.
So thats 2 people at least ;)
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
blem.
>
> -Philip
>
Did you file a bugzilla report?
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 14/05/11 06:57, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> Also, now that we don't use upstart, what's the equivalent of:
>
> chkconfig service on
>
systemctl enable\disable foo.service
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.f
t;Can I run FN"
Which would list out possible problems that may have to be overcome.
Currently beyond my limited abilities.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 29/05/11 10:52, Gilboa Davara wrote:
>
> The irony is that according to Fedora 15 deployment guide (section 5.3,
> PackageKit architecture), gpk-update-icon is still a part of Fedora.
>
> What am I missing?
>
> - Gilboa
>
/usr/bin/gpk-prefs
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
On 29/05/11 11:24, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-05-29 at 11:06 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
>>
>> /usr/bin/gpk-prefs
>
> As far as I can see, gpk-prefs only handles the gpk configuration and
> cannot be used as a alert icon.
>
> - Gilboa
>
>
This might be
esting,
Being the world it is, you can never have enough testers.
in which
> case we'd have to actually do the testing, and we may as well just fix
> the problems rather than write a clever script to warn you about them...
known bugs ;)
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Enc
out why exactly it
> >fails. There are also some bugs untouched for long time.
> >
> >To sum it up, it is probably better to hand it over to someone else who
> >has more time and actually still uses it.
> >
> >Regards,
> >Jan Kaluza
>
Chec
What is the status of the MultiLiveCD,
that was being mooted last year.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 12/06/11 12:19, Jared K. Smith wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 5:57 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
>> What is the status of the MultiLiveCD,
>> that was being mooted last year.
>
> We were able to work through all the technical issues with the
> proposal, and Release Engin
,
kernel arg init=/sbin/upstart
YMMV.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
e --nodeps selinux-policy selinux-policy-targeted
yum install selinux-policy selinux-policy-targeted
touch /.autorelabel; reboot
and then all was ok.
ymmv.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
t;yum update" and waiting.
How can I allow yum-update to finish before login?
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of fedoraproject.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 16 June 2011 11:50, Michal Schmidt wrote:
> On 06/16/2011 11:20 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
>> nfs mounted local repo from an attached NAS.
>> (supplies a number of boxes)
>> yum-updateonboot used to update on boot. (sans rhgb quiet)
>>
>> In level 3, login prom
On 17/06/11 13:10, Frank Murphy wrote:
My apologies, I was looking at 2 unfixed boxes.
"Alert.." remains in fixed boxes.
So kudos to you Michal.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of fedoraproject.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject
On 17/06/11 15:42, Jared K. Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Domingo Becker
> wrote:
>>> What key between Ctrl& Alt?
>>
>> The key that can not be named!
>
> It can be named... it's called the "Super" key.
Mine's call
On 18/06/11 12:19, Cecil Funderburk wrote:
>
> I upgraded to release 3.0-0.rc3.git0.3.fc16.x86_64=3.0.0 gives version
> code 196608
>
Try:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=248428
see if it fixes anything for you.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encod
In terminal
systemctl status plymouth*
returns no units.
systemctl list-units
returns too much
What woul I use to list just a subsection,
like plymouth* or any other similar services.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of fedoraproject.org
--
devel mailing list
devel
On 18/06/11 13:22, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> How about "systemctl list-units| grep plymouth"
>
> Peter
>
Unfortunatly gives nothing as a return,
though there should be at least 4 services.
systemctl list-units | grep systemd
returns 14 services
so grep works.
--
Reg
On 18/06/11 13:41, Ian Chapman wrote:
> On 18/06/11 20:36, Frank Murphy wrote:
>
>> Unfortunatly gives nothing as a return,
>> though there should be at least 4 services.
>
>
> What about
>
> systemctl --all | grep -i plymouth
>
That did it, thank you.
--
the same...
+2
Easier tell the pecking order.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
;
>
Pending
NextStable
NextInLine
Countdown
PreStable
PreRelease
CuredHide
TheHeir
WeCouldNotThinkOfABetterNameSoThisIsIt
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
be a "branched.repo" config for testers.
So they won't be getting "rawhide.repo".
It that's what they want\need.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
;
> Björn Persson
>
I presume "branched" will then be repointed to an alpha F14.
rawhide F15
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 17/02/10 08:49, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 08:34:01 +,
> Frank Murphy wrote:
>>
>> I presume "branched" will then be repointed to an alpha F14.
>> rawhide F15
>
> That doesn't happen at the release of F13, but r
On 24/02/10 21:17, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 22:06 -0700, Robyn Bergeron wrote:
>>
>> * short (1-3 words)
>> * a call to action
>> * positive
>>
>>
>
> So, "Houston, we have a problem." is not acceptable?
>
>
Might n
d.
Bug fixes would also be applied.
>
> These kind of non-user-demand driven fixes should not be ignored in any
> noone-is-asking so dont release approach.
>
If it's not broken, don't fix it.
Thats what the F13/Rawhide boxes are for.
--
Regards,
Frank
plymouth stuff.
Do a yum --enablerepo=rawhide update kernel
check that they are indeed "fc13"
and see what it tries to pull in.
If you don't like waht you see type in "n"
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
ht
On 01/03/10 00:06, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> (Sorry, I reordered the replies a bit so I can reply to them without
> referring back and forth.)
It's also called "political licence"
>
> Frank Murphy wrote:
>> On 02/27/2010 04:30 PM, Mail Lists wrote:
>> an
&
On 01/03/10 11:17, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Frank Murphy wrote:
>> It's also called "political licence"
>
> No, it's not really the same thing. ;-)
>
> I didn't try to distort your viewpoint, just highlight the contradictions.
>
> But this time I&#x
ttempting to update from version
> 3.2.0-12.8.fc13.i686 to 3.2.0-12.9.fc13.i686.
>
> I'm happy to report this in bugzilla, but I'm not sure what I should
> report it against.
>
--snipped--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569352 ?
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8
;> 2) file is stored in UUID.$timestamp (or it is stored as a BLOB in the
>>> DB)
>>> 3) once a day a crawler reads all files and counts for each package how
>>> often they are installed,
What about uninstalled?
Update bring in upd to X, but package Y,Z. come in.
User
Will GDM being uninstalled be accouted for,
or will the install just matter?
Like XFCE update tends to pull in nautilus.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Michal
What version *.iso did you try installing with?
Have you a link?
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded, Fedora 12, 13, Rawhide: x86_64
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
a regular
> base, but hard for me to get it in my country. I will then complain
> and cry until they start to support me well.
Sure i could buy a
> different car that's older and needs just a bit oil from time to time,
> but hey, this is a free world, i can change anything.
>
On 12/03/10 11:56, Thomas Janssen wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
>> On 12/03/10 11:33, Thomas Janssen wrote:
>> -snipped--
>>
>> If I can be indulged.
>>
>>> it's because i can't believe that dial-up-land
On 12/03/10 12:04, Frank Murphy wrote:
--snipped--
> That is not, you are not intitled to voice your concerns,
s /That is not to say, you are not intitled to voice your concerns,
>
---snipped-
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded, Fedora 12, 13, Rawhide: x86_64
--
devel m
r.
>>
>> So you say.
>
> Well, all that complaining in this meag-threads makes it obvious that
> Fedora doesn't fit their needs, don't you think ;)
>
What doesn't fit their need is the infracstruture,
not the distro.
>>>>ins
Fedora fully updated
"A highspeed internet connection is recommended"
No, I'm not trying to help create a two-tier community.
Just maybe thinking on something.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded, Fedora 12, 13, Rawhide: x86_64
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 17/03/10 17:22, Karel Klic wrote:
--snipped--
> Is it "logwatch" really enabled by default on Fedora?
Currently you have to "yum install logwatch" with @live CD's install
not sure about the DVD.
--snipped--
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded, Fedora 12, 13
Is it possible to come up with some method.
Whereby you can automatically install a debug pks
for every rpm on a rawhide box.
Instead of having to install as and when problems,
or in a piecemeal fashion.
Not a dev (yet), so not something that could as yet come myself.
--
Regards,
Frank
/advisable.
But for that user can he wait maybe 2 releases to get the fix?
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded, Fedora.x86_64
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 31/03/10 10:10, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 03/31/2010 02:38 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
>>
>> Then ask the user Could you try "yum --enablerepo=rawhide update foo"
>>
>
>> From Fedora 13 onwards, this repo is not even installed by default
which will make fi
On 31/03/10 11:50, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> On Wednesday 31 March 2010 12:26:17 Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> On 03/31/2010 03:45 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
>>> which will make fixing bugs in current even more important.
>>
>> Not at all. Either the bug is important to fix i
On 31/03/10 12:25, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> On Wednesday 31 March 2010 12:55:58 Frank Murphy wrote:
>> On 31/03/10 11:50, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 31 March 2010 12:26:17 Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>>> On 03/31/2010 03:45 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
>&g
against.
>
> So there should be a COMMENT why it's closed in rawhide only - usually rawhide
> bugs should be closed in rawhide. But sometimes the fix could lead to
> difficult
> backport etc... So the only way is to fix it in Rawhide only.
As an end user a comment as suc
PackageKit allows a forced install of unsigned pkg.
yu does the following:
Package krb5-libs-1.7.1-7.fc13.i686.rpm is not signed
I know about --nogpgcheck.
But can I edit something to the effect of:
If unsigned don't include.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded, Fedora.x86_64 Kerne
I have created a hybrid box for myself.
Kernel.x86_64
All else i686 + noarch (no problems encountered)
bash-4.1$ uname -i (-m)
x86_64
How would I get\force it to return i686?
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded, Fedora.x86_64/i686
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 05/04/10 13:57, Seth Vidal wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 5 Apr 2010, Frank Murphy wrote:
>
>> I have created a hybrid box for myself.
>>
>> Kernel.x86_64
>> All else i686 + noarch (no problems encountered)
>>
>> bash-4.1$ uname -i (-m)
>>
to learn the complete list to --exclude ?
>
This would be some help.
But hopefully the autoqa,
thats talked about may prevent small stuff like this.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded, Fedora.x86 64-32 Hybrid
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Corporation 82G33/G31 Express
Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 02)
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded, Fedora.x86 64-32 Hybrid
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
but for novies it's hard to use.
Bookmark this:
http://ss64.com/bash/
Less typing, less for novices to forget.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded, Fedora.x86 64-32 Hybrid
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
her names?
--snip--
> 5. IMHO, that kind of users should not be using the terminal in the first
> place, it's what GUIs are for.
+1
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded, Fedora.x86 64-32 Hybrid
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 22/04/10 22:01, Jim Meyering wrote:
>
> There was only one: history-2010-03-08.sqlite
> BZ-attached here:
>
> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/584997
Read up on:
yum-plugin-protect-packages
if your going on autopilot.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded, Fedora.x86 64-32 H
On 25/04/10 09:20, Christoph Wickert wrote:
--snipped--
>
> And obviously a checkbox doesn't help ether to separate the 'lazy
> idiots' from the active reporters. Q. E. D. ;)
Or perhaps the lazy maintainers?
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded, Fedora 64 and 3
.i686
xulrunner-1.9.2.3-1.fc13.i686
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded, Fedora 64 & 32 bit
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 26/04/10 09:01, Luming Yu wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
>> On 24/04/10 11:13, Luming Yu wrote:
>>> Hi there,
>>>
>>> I came across a really weird problem with flash player on playing
>>> these video on http://
two files over,
> edit menu.lst, and I'm done.
>
> I don't seem to find this installation method documented, just wondering
> if it's gone for good, or this is just my problem.
>
>
>
Cant you do:
fpo boot?
http://boot.fedoraproject.org/faq
--
Regards,
Frank M
1 - 100 of 366 matches
Mail list logo
