I get this when I try to install vim via yum on my f21 candidate cloud image:
Package perl-Term-ANSIColor-4.03-2.fc21.noarch.rpm is not signed
Is this on anyones radar already?
Dusty
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedo
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 07:37:13AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 7:29 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> > I get this when I try to install vim via yum on my f21 candidate cloud
> > image:
> >
> > Package perl-Term-ANSIColor-4.03-2.fc21.noarch.rpm is no
I know I have probably been hiding under a Rock but can anyone help me
understand Fedora's stance on circular dependencies within RPMs?
At least in the past I think circular dependencies have been kept to a minimum
as it can cause issues with rpm sorting: i.e. for two rpms A,B with a circular
de
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 10:11:25PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 22.08.2014 um 21:53 schrieb Dusty Mabe:
> > I know I have probably been hiding under a Rock but can anyone help me
> > understand Fedora's stance on circular dependencies within RPMs?
> >
>
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 02:29:31PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 08/22/2014 02:23 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> >The scenario I am concerned with here is:
> >
> >if
> > * A requires B
> > * B requires C
> > * C requires A
> >
> >This basically
Hi All,
Per discussion in the #fedora-cloud meeting last Friday I would like to
start a thread about the names of the Docker and Atomic deliverables for F21.
I know of at least a few cases where there has been confusion regarding
what deliverable has been the subject of a conversation on IRC as
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 09:29:12AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 7, 2014, at 11:22 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> >
> > In a nutshell, it would be great if we added "Container" to references we
> > make to the container image (in conversation and docs).
>
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 09:28:20AM -0400, Adam Young wrote:
> On 09/07/2014 11:22 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> >Hi All,
> >
> >Per discussion in the #fedora-cloud meeting last Friday I would like to
> >start a thread about the names of the Docker and Atomic deliverables f
Hey all,
We have a bug that affects booting cloud images (see [1]). There are
denials that don't allow cloud-init to install packages. I'm not
exactly where a fix needs to be applied but I
osmet-pack: Mount RHCOS LUKS rootfs
Dusty Mabe (20):
6df34a21 mantle: bump google.golang.org/api library to latest
a11197f2 mantle/ore: glcoud: add --create-image option to upload.go
02653cad cosalib/gcp: remove unused argument
91297ff2 mantle/ore: gcloud: fix error
test day. Join us in #fedora-coreos on Freenode to
test Fedora CoreOS based on Fedora 32! For more information, see
the
mailing list post.
Thanks for helping us make Fedora CoreOS awesome!
Dusty Mabe, for the Fedora CoreOS team
The license for rust-ipnetwork changed to "MIT or Apache-2.0" upstream [1].
This is reflected in the PR to distgit [2] to update to the latest version.
Dusty
[1]
https://github.com/achanda/ipnetwork/commit/fa128680b51fbcf9c37db99f011c91204c4a3b0d
[2] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-ipnet
will follow those steps
if this is well received.
Thanks,
Dusty Mabe
[1] https://github.com/theonewolf/TermRecord
[2] https://pypi.python.org/pypi/TermRecord
[3]
http://dustymabe.com/2014/05/19/termrecord-terminal-screencast-in-a-self-contained-html-file/
[4] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 12:53:31PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> You can try asciinema which is already packaged in Fedora:
>
> yum install asciinema
Hi,
Thanks for the suggestion. What I like about TermRecord is that
it produces a self-contatined html file as output and that it
doesn't req
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 09:25:51AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 12:39:55AM -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> > I would like to package this software for Fedora and possible
> > EPEL if others think it would be useful. I have reviewed the
> > Fedora pack
Hey all,
Just wondering if anyone has started to feel any pain from trying to
use ansible with F23 systems. As part of the Fedora Cloud working
group it would be nice to ship a system that could be targeted by
ansible out of the box. Unfortunately, since ansible uses python 2.X
vs python 3 it d
On 10/14/2015 09:40 AM, Pete Travis wrote:
On 10/14/2015 07:47 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 08:57:57PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
Beyond that, though, why not just have your ansible play ensure its own
deps are installed? If you're dealing with docker, make sure the
p
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 11:07:42AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015, at 10:21 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
> > Just wondering if anyone has started to feel any pain from trying to
> > use ansible with F23 systems. As part of the Fedora Cloud working
> > group
On 10/14/2015 12:42 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 11:07:42AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
Just wondering if anyone has started to feel any pain from trying to
use ansible with F23 systems. As part of the Fedora Cloud working
group it would be nice to ship a system that could
On 10/16/2015 12:21 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
As scheduled [1], Fedora 23 Final Test Compose 10 (TC10) and TC11 are
now available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing!
Hey Adam/Cloud list,
Does anyone know what happened between TC9 / TC10 / TC11 with regards to
On 10/16/2015 02:24 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 10/16/2015 11:40 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
On 10/16/2015 12:21 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
As scheduled [1], Fedora 23 Final Test Compose 10 (TC10) and TC11 are
now available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing!
Hey
Basically this means we can't build any images (rawhide/Fedora23/etc)
because the builder hosts have been moved to Fedora 23. The following BZ
has more info. Please discuss in the bug if you have comments about the
technicals. Please discuss here otherwise.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_b
On 11/19/2015 09:41 AM, Cole Robinson wrote:
On 11/19/2015 09:35 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
Basically this means we can't build any images (rawhide/Fedora23/etc) because
the builder hosts have been moved to Fedora 23. The following BZ has more
info. Please discuss in the bug if you have com
According to [1] predictable interface naming can be disabled with a
symlink to /dev/null or by providing net.ifnames=0 on the kernel command
line. It seems like symlinking to /dev/null isn't working any more.
Is symlinking to /dev/null supposed to still work? We are seeing this on
Atomic Clou
On 11/20/2015 05:10 AM, wheelz wrote:
You need to run dracut to rebuild initramfs, or you wait for the next kernel >
update.
Thanks wheelz. I'll have to look into that.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of
On 01/08/2016 01:09 PM, Daniel Farrell wrote:
> Hello Fedora devs,
>
> Who owns this account?
>
> https://atlas.hashicorp.com/fedora
>
> My initial hope was to get the F22 boxes[0] hosted there, in addition to
> the current F23 ones[1]. Digging into that on #fedora-devel, dgilmore told
> me th
In older Fedora (at least Fedora 22) I could easily mount my ihphone
in Nautilus. I could click on it in the left hand side of the File
Manager and it would mount.
I am having trouble getting this same behavior in Fedora 24. Can
someone verify this works or does not work for them? You should be
a
On 07/09/2016 12:04 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> In older Fedora (at least Fedora 22) I could easily mount my ihphone
>> in Nautilus. I could click on it in the left hand side of the File
>> Manager and it would mount.
>>
>> I am having trouble getting this same behavior in Fedora 24. Can
>> some
On 07/11/2016 07:33 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>>> On 07/09/2016 12:04 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> In older Fedora (at least Fedora 22) I could easily mount my ihphone
> in Nautilus. I could click on it in the left hand side of the File
> Manager an
On 07/12/2016 05:01 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>
>
> Huh, the phone should still be getting mounted, but as a camera, and just as
> a camera, and you can remove photos there without botching the phone's
> internal
> photo database.
>
> That definitely works here.
> --
Yeah All I see are "docu
On 07/13/2016 08:49 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>>
>>
>> On 07/12/2016 05:01 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Huh, the phone should still be getting mounted, but as a camera, and just
>>> as
>>> a camera, and you can remove photos there without botching the
kernel-4.6.4-301.fc24.x86_64
Once I select the latest kernel in grub it then pops up and says
Probing EDD (edd=off to disable)... OK
and then nothing else and stays there.
Anyone else having this problem? If i boot the original kernel from f24
(kernel-4.5.5-300.fc24.x86_64) then the system
On 07/22/2016 09:00 AM, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 08:40:16AM -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>>
>>
>> kernel-4.6.4-301.fc24.x86_64
>>
>>
>> Once I select the latest kernel in grub it then pops up and says
>>
>> Pr
I have the Lenovo T460s with the Intel Wireless AC 8260 chip in it.
According to the page at [1], that chip is supported by the
iwlwifi-8000 firmware. I don't see that package as an option in the
Fedora 24 repos [2]. The newest I see is the 7260. Googling around
hasn't led me to a solution. Anybody
On 07/22/2016 09:40 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>> I have the Lenovo T460s with the Intel Wireless AC 8260 chip in it.
>> According to the page at [1], that chip is supported by the
>> iwlwifi-8000 firmware. I don't see th
On 07/22/2016 10:22 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 07/22/2016 09:40 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>>>> I have the Lenovo T460s with the Intel Wire
I can't seem to get firefox-48.0-5.fc24.x86_64 to work with kerberos
single sign on in a private window. It works fine when using a
non-private window.
Any ideas on why this would have broken? Anyone else seeing this?
Dusty
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedor
Several times over the past month my t460s has just blank screens
when I come back to it after some time. I don't know if the thing
froze up completely or if it is just the display not working. I lock
my screens (laptop + 2 external monitors) and then leave for an hour
or so. When I come back no a
On 09/20/2016 05:08 PM, Keith Keith wrote:
>
> I ran in to a problem that involved an unresponsive screen a few months ago
> and also had a FIFO underrun. I think your problem is somewhere in the intel
> graphics stack. Here's the bug I had:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1339
On 09/20/2016 06:28 PM, Jonny Heggheim wrote:
> I have not run into this issue on my T460s, using the latest BIOS on
> Fedora 25. I can try to reproduce the error if you are able to give me
> a more detailed walk-through.
>
> Jonny Heggheim
Thanks Jonny,
Are you in IRC? I may try to find you t
On 09/20/2016 07:22 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> On Sep 20, 2016 7:31 AM, "Dusty Mabe" <mailto:du...@dustymabe.com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Several times over the past month my t460s has just blank screens
>> when I come back to it after some time. I don
On 09/21/2016 08:41 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
>
> On 09/20/2016 07:22 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Sep 20, 2016 7:31 AM, "Dusty Mabe" > <mailto:du...@dustymabe.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Several times over the past month my t4
On 09/21/2016 09:05 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
>
> On 09/21/2016 08:41 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 09/20/2016 07:22 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>>> On Sep 20, 2016 7:31 AM, "Dusty Mabe" >> <mailto:du...@dustymabe.com>> wrote:
I am trying to package [1] in fedora and there is a name conflict with an
old/retired
package [2] that no longer has an upstream. I have talked with the old
maintainer (cc'd)
and we would like to unretire the package and allow for the new project to
assume the name
in rpm.
I'm attempting to f
The package has been un-retired and I have started the process of putting the
new
kompose into place.
Thanks!
On 09/29/2016 03:48 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
> I am trying to package [1] in fedora and there is a name conflict with an
> old/retired
> package [2] that no longer has an
On 02/27/2017 09:41 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 17:25 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
>> Missing expected images:
>>
>> Atomic qcow2 x86_64
>
> There seems to be some sort of problem in pungi-make-ostree:
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1386/18091386/
On 03/09/2017 05:21 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-03-09 at 20:10 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
>> Missing expected images:
>>
>> Atomic qcow2 x86_64
>> Server dvd i386
>> Workstation live i386
>> Server boot i386
>> Atomic raw-xz x86_64
>> Workstation live x86_64
>
> Atomic im
On 02/17/2015 07:53 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
> Some time back there was discussion of being able to rollback yum updates via
> btrfs snapshotting. As I recall, it turned out that the default btrfs
> install
> was not setup correctly to make this feasible (I had briefly tested it on my
> machine
On 03/14/2017 04:29 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>
> I'm fuzzy about the issue faced with containers. Containers will usually
> have a separate /dev that is populated by the container mgmt engine (whether
> docker, libvirt, lxc or something else). That mgmt engine is responsible for
> setting p
On 03/14/2017 04:56 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
>
> On 03/14/2017 04:29 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> I guess if you volume/bind mount the device into the container you could
> see an issue,
> but most containers that deal with /dev/kvm are going to be run as root,
> anyways.
I was running w
On 03/14/2017 05:15 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
>
> On 03/14/2017 05:02 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>>
>> On 03/14/2017 04:56 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>>>
>>> On 03/14/2017 04:29 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>> I guess if you volume/bind mount th
On 03/15/2017 05:17 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>
> Sure, if udev maintainers are willing to ship the kvm rule by default,
> that's fine with me for reason you suggest. I simply don't think it'll
> have any effect on usage of /dev/kvm inside containers
>
Does that mean you assume my scenario
On 03/15/2017 11:49 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:32:35AM -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 03/15/2017 05:17 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>>
>>> Sure, if udev maintainers are willing to ship the kvm rule by default,
>>
On 03/19/2017 07:17 PM, Olzhas Rakhimov wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> My name is Olzhas Rakhimov. I am an open-source enthusiast
> (https://github.com/rakhimov).
> I'd like to package https://github.com/rakhimov/scram
> The review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433686
>
>
Adding in fedora-devel
On 04/05/2017 10:23 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
> I've identified that we have not been getting notifications from
> pagure for the past few days. I'm working with pingou to resolve this.
We were not getting pagure notifications to our cloud mailing list.
On 04/05/2017 11:06 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
> Adding in fedora-devel
>
> On 04/05/2017 10:23 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>>
>> I've identified that we have not been getting notifications from
>> pagure for the past few days. I'm working with pingou to resol
On 04/05/2017 12:17 PM, Kamil Dudka wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 05, 2017 11:38:35 Colin Walters wrote:
>>
>> libostree does that -
>> https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/blob/c937305c0e7f5609273e25753912c294b0
>> 40a6ac/src/libostree/ostree-fetcher-curl.c
>>
>> In the exploded archive case, I ge
On 04/12/2017 10:49 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:18:33AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Matthew Miller
>>> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:37:47PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chi
On 05/18/2017 11:42 AM, Thanos Apostolou wrote:
> Hi, my name is Thanos Apostolou and I am from Greece. I am studying
> Electrical and Computer Engineering in the National Technical University of
> Athens.
Hi Thanos, Big welcome to you!
>
>
>
> My linux experience, so far, is this:
>
> I
On 05/28/2017 12:39 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 04:00:32PM +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
>> Am 27.05.2017 um 15:13 schrieb Jens-Ulrik Petersen:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I think we need to retire git-annex from Fedora (the current
>>> version is very old and has security
On 05/29/2017 09:16 AM, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
> Okay thanks for all the offers of help!
>
> I will post more details tomorrow then.
>
I saw a link to a copr come through, but not much on how to get
git-annex fixed in Fedora proper. Any info for that?
Unfortunately /me knows nothing about
On 07/14/2017 05:04 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 14 July 2017 at 20:28, Andreas Tunek wrote:
>> Is this really more reliable than using dnf (for graphical packages
>> like Recepies and Builder)?
>
> It's hugely more reliable. You can't actually trust rpm to do anything
> atomically, and this
I have played with all of the settings in hyperkitty and I still am
failing to get the emails that I compose and send to a mailing list
also sent back to me.
The reason I want this is because of the "archived-at" email header.
Once I compose an email and get it sent to me from mailman it will
have
On 02/10/2016 01:05 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 12:39:51 -0500
> Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
>> I have played with all of the settings in hyperkitty and I still am
>> failing to get the emails that I compose and send to a mailing list
>> also sent back to
On 02/10/2016 02:38 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 14:03:48 -0500
> Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
>> Thanks Kevin. I'm playing around with settings now to see if I can get
>> it. I can file a bug if needed. Is this the right place:
>>
>> https:
On 02/10/2016 02:51 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 14:47:56 -0500
> Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
>> On 02/10/2016 02:38 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>> On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 14:03:48 -0500
>>> Dusty Mabe wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks Kevin
Is it normal to have fc24 packages get installed when I install a package on
F25?
This system started as an F25 cloud instance based on the cloud image.
$ rpm -qa | grep fc24 | wc -l
116
$ cat /etc/redhat-release
Fedora release 25 (Twenty Five)
- Dusty
___
On 11/07/2016 11:03 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 11/07/2016 08:52 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>> Is it normal to have fc24 packages get installed when I install a package on
>> F25?
>> This system started as an F25 cloud instance based on the cloud image.
>>
>> $ r
Hey all,
In my vagrant-sshfs rpm i call `gem spec` here [0]. In rawhide vs f25 I get
differing
outputs. Basically in rawhide I get a bunch of `.freeze` added to my strings
like:
s.authors = ["Dusty Mabe".freeze]
See the full diff at [1]. This is causing pain for me because I actu
On 11/26/2016 12:31 PM, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Dusty Mabe wrote on 11/27/2016 01:35 AM:
>>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> In my vagrant-sshfs rpm i call `gem spec` here [0]. In rawhide vs f25 I get
>> differing
>> outputs. Basically in rawhide I get a bunch of
The atomic working group has configured pagure to send notifications to the
cloud mailing list. These notifications come through as normal emails
but for some reason in hyperkitty the emails from pagure show up as
coming from Brian Exelbierd (bex). Anyone know why that is?
You can see that he has
On 01/18/2017 03:50 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 9:48 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 01/06/2017 03:29 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DockerOverlay2
>>
>> Can we get this onto the "offic
On 01/06/2017 03:29 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DockerOverlay2
Can we get this onto the "official looking" page for F26 changes [1]?
Do we also need to document in here the different configurations for the
different variants?
Atomic Host vs Server vs Wo
On 01/31/2017 10:35 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Jan Kurik wrote:
>> = Proposed Self Contained Change: Container Minimal Image =
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ContainerMinimalImage
>>
>> Change owner(s):
>> * D
On 01/31/2017 09:54 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 09:00:01AM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
>> = Proposed Self Contained Change: Container Minimal Image =
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ContainerMinimalImage
>>
>> Chang
On 10/2/19 5:25 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
>
> A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update:
>
> Version: 29.20191001.0
> Commit(x86_64):
> 15b8a10f8b587c2a037a592806dc04e9cdf6ab1c73c6e49fdaacab1b1174b9ab
> Commit(aarch64):
> 2b83282e976249b8e1910a7292379753b006
This content also exists at:
https://www.projectatomic.io/blog/2019/11/fedora-atomic-host-nearing-eol/
Last year we [introduced the plans for Fedora CoreOS] [1] including that
Fedora CoreOS would be the successor to Fedora Atomic Host and Container
Linux (from CoreOS Inc.). As part of that succe
On 11/25/19 11:41 AM, Normand wrote:
>
>
> On 11/21/19 11:33 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>> This content also exists at:
>> https://www.projectatomic.io/blog/2019/11/fedora-atomic-host-nearing-eol/
>>
>> Last year we [introduced the plans for Fedora CoreOS] [1] incl
On 8/9/19 8:56 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hey folks! I'm starting a new thread for this to trim the recipient
> list a bit and include devel@ and coreos@.
Hey Adam!
>
> The Story So Far: there is a Fedora release criterion which requires
> Fedora to boot on Xen:
>
> "The release must boot s
On 8/10/19 9:06 PM, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My time to work on Fedora cloud-related things has diminished in
> recent months, so I have not been able to give the cloud-init and
> python-boto packages the care they deserve. They are free to a good
> home.
>
Maybe larks (cc) would be
On 8/10/19 9:06 PM, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My time to work on Fedora cloud-related things has diminished in
> recent months, so I have not been able to give the cloud-init and
> python-boto packages the care they deserve. They are free to a good
> home.
>
Can you give cloud-init t
On 8/19/19 1:18 AM, Sinny Kumari wrote:
> From the build logs [1] [2] , it looks like disk got full which could be
> builder specific. We can dig in more if it happens again.
>
> [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=37134473
> [2]
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/t
On 8/19/19 6:59 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Monday, August 19, 2019 10:50:52 AM CEST Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> Can we *please* send out the FN+1 and FN+2 keys a month before branching,
>> to *all* releases of Fedora, so we can avoid this pointless scramble?
>
> What about to have F
On 8/21/19 5:46 AM, Normand wrote:
>
>
> On 8/20/19 7:56 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
>> We are releasing images from multiple architectures but please note
>> that x86_64 architecture is the only one that undergoes automated
>> testing at this time.
>
> Is there wiki pages that descri
On 8/22/19 12:58 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 8/21/19 9:27 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 8/19/19 6:59 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
>>> On Monday, August 19, 2019 10:50:52 AM CEST Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
>>> wrote:
>>>> Can we *please* send
On 8/23/19 6:35 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> Hi, Adam.
>
> On Wednesday, 21 August 2019 at 15:41, Adam Samalik wrote:
> [...]
>> == Toolbox ==
>>
>> The 'showme' tool [3] for visualising and inspecting RPM dependencies
>> now supports weak dependencies and a package list output.
>
On 8/22/19 12:46 AM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Feel free to help review these packages needed to update Hugo:
>
Thanks for the effort here Robert-André. I might be able to help
with a few of these since I use Hugo. Will let you know next week.
Dusty
___
On 8/23/19 12:21 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 8/23/19 4:12 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 8/22/19 12:58 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>> On 8/21/19 9:27 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 8/19/19 6:59 AM, Pavel Raiskup
On 8/24/19 6:27 AM, Feilong Wang wrote:
> Hi team,
>
Hi Feilong! I'm adding in Spyros who has worked with us in the past on Atomic
Host and Magnum.
> Could you please help me understand when will be the EOL date for Fedora
> Atomic 29? I understand generally it takes 13 months. But given Fed
On 9/10/19 10:18 PM, Feilong Wang wrote:
> Hi Dusty,
>
> Now Spyros and I are trying to ask for support in Ignition for multi part
> MIME, see https://github.com/coreos/ignition/issues/849 It would be nice if
> we can get your review and support. Thanks.
Any chance you could drop by #fedora-c
On 9/27/19 9:18 AM, Aoife Moloney wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
>
> I’d like to introduce myself first, my name is Aoife Moloney and I recently
> started with the Community Platform Engineering (CPE) team. My role within
> this team is going to be a hybrid role of a Product Owner / Project Manager.
On 1/20/20 7:57 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
> I've been thinking about ways to solve this for a while, and I'm coming
> to the conclusion that the best plan is probably to just ship pre-built
> initramfs images. I can think of three main reasons to want to use
> system-specific images:
For
It was orphaned recently. Anybody care to pick it up? :)
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tmuxinator
Dusty
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Cond
On 2/7/20 9:30 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Good Morning Everyone,
>
> I while back I wrote a small service named simple-koji-ci, which reacts to
> every pull-request opened on dist-git and fires a (scratch) build of the
> package
> with the proposed changes merged, and report the outcome as
The current maintainer of fuse-sshfs is looking for a co-maintainer for it
in epel8. It's currently not in EPEL 8 so if you go from RHEL or CentOS 7->8
you'll lose it. I have users of vagrant-sshfs who would like to have it there.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758884#c4
Anybody int
we get you added as a co-maintainer we'll then need
to add a epel8 branch and build against it.
Thanks so much!
Dusty
On 3/8/20 12:33 PM, Vascom wrote:
> You can add me as comaintainer.
> FAS name: vascom
>
> вс, 8 мар. 2020 г., 19:32 Dusty Mabe <mailto:du...@dustymabe.com>>
On 3/17/20 2:01 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hey Adam,
>
> 3) CoreOS - CoreOS is just a *whole* other thing. It is not built like
> the rest of Fedora at all. It's not built as Pungi composes, whatever
> compose process it does have doesn't run alongside our other compose
> processes or output
On 3/18/20 8:04 AM, Kamil Dudka wrote:
> logrotate is a utility designed to simplify the administration of log files
> on
> a system which generates a lot of log files. It used to be triggered by
> cron.
> The cron hook was unconditionally installed with logrotate but it took effect
> only
Seems like Apple converted their phones over to using a new file format
to store pictures. I was copying some pictures from a phone and noticed
my linux box couldn't read them and they had an interesting extension .heic.
Looks like there is a new image format in town and we need the libheif and
l
On 11/30/18 5:20 AM, Leigh Scott wrote:
> Reviewers welcome.
>
> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5089
> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5090
Thanks Leigh. I see those have already made progress in code review. +1000
Is there a definitive reason why those are neces
1 - 100 of 323 matches
Mail list logo
